was offering us…We were always lying to him and he was always lying tous.”It is illegal for the government to entrap people who have noinclination to engage in criminal activity. And in this case, the courtspermitted the government to ignore prohibitions against entrapment and toliterally buy the convictions it wanted. The government is supposed to stopcrime, not create it, yet as part of its preemptive prosecution program itregularly employs Muslim criminals like Maqsood to entrap innocentMuslims in activities it can claim are criminal.References:Graham Rayman, “FBI Agent on Synagogue Case Has Questionable Record,”Village Voice blogs, May 21, 2009,http://blogs.villagevoice.com/runninscared/2009/05/index.php?page=11Graham Rayman, “Were the Newburgh 4 Really Out to Blow Up Synagogues?A Defendant Finally Speaks Out.”, Village Voice, March 2, 2011,http://www.villagevoice.com/2011-03-02/news/were-the-newburgh-4-really-out-toblow-up-synagogues/Gordon Corera, “Have U.S. anti-terror tactics strayed into entrapment?”, BBC,September 2011, http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/programmes/newsnight/9584637.stmPaul Harris, “Fake terror plots, paid informants: the tactics of FBI ‘entrapment’questioned,” The Guardian, November 16, 2011,http://www.theguardian.com/world/2011/nov/16/fbi-entrapment-fake-terror-plotsPaul Harris, “Newburgh Four: poor, black, and jailed under FBI ‘entrapment’tactics,” The Guardian, December 12, 2011,http://www.theguardian.com/world/2011/dec/12/newburgh-four-fbi-entrapment-terrorNiazi, Ahmadulla. In 2007, Niazi reported to the FBI the suspiciousbehavior of a new Muslim convert, Craig Monteilh, at his mosque inIrvine, California. Monteilh was talking about jihad and trying to get othersat the mosque to join in planning for terrorist attacks. The FBI said thatthey would investigate the matter, and the mosque obtained a courtinjunction to keep Monteilh away from the mosque.B-32
Later, FBI officials contacted Niazi and asked him to become a paidinformant for the FBI. When he refused, the FBI agents allegedlythreatened him by saying that they would make his life “a living hell.” InFebruary 2009 the FBI arrested Niazi and charged him with perjury, fraud,and false statements on his immigration papers. He was released on$500,000 bail.After several years of negotiations and claims that the charges werebrought in retaliation for Niazi’s refusal to become an informant, all thecharges against him were dropped in 2011. The FBI has since identifiedMonteilh as a “government informant.” On February 11, 2011, theAmerican Civil Liberties Union sued the government for its actions intrying to entrap Muslims at the mosque based on their religion.References:Salvador Hernandez, “FBI tactics against Muslims questioned,” Orange CountyRegister, October 7, 2010, http://articles.ocregister.com/2010-10-07/crime/24640008_1_fbi-agents-fbi-s-handling-ahmadullah-sais-niaziJerry Markon, “Lawsuit alleges FBI violated Muslims’ freedom of religion,”Washington Post, February 23, 2011, http://www.washingtonpost.com/wpdyn/content/article/2011/02/22/AR2011022206987.htmlPaul Harris, “The ex-FBI informant with a change of heart: ‘There is no realhunt. It’s fixed,’” The Guardian, March 20, 2012,http://www.theguardian.com/world/2012/mar/20/fbi-informantIbrahim Hirsi, “CAIR charges that FBI agents intimidated a Minneapolis manwho refused to become an informant,” Twin Cities Daily Planet, February 5, 2013,http://www.tcdailyplanet.net/news/2013/02/05/fbi-agents-allegedly-intimidateminneapolis-man-after-refusing-become-informantPadilla, José. On May 8, 2002, Padilla, a U.S. citizen, was arrested whenhe tried to enter the U.S. The government claimed (without charging him)that he was working with Al-Qaeda and was planning to make and detonatea “dirty bomb” inside the U.S. Padilla was held on a material witnesswarrant until June 9, 2002, when, instead of charging him with a crime,President George Bush announced that Padilla would be held in solitaryB-33
- Page 3 and 4:
INVENTING TERRORISTSThe Lawfare of
- Page 5 and 6:
About the Authors, Preparers, and S
- Page 7:
AppendicesA: Tactics Used in Prosec
- Page 14 and 15:
an immigration form, which is techn
- Page 16 and 17:
list, but which are found in the Pr
- Page 18 and 19:
Muslims or other targeted groups is
- Page 20 and 21:
were ideologically “predisposed
- Page 22 and 23:
Vildirim Beyozit Tumer. He was a Tu
- Page 24 and 25:
with bombs at the Boston Marathon,
- Page 26 and 27:
Material support:Preemptive prosecu
- Page 28 and 29:
Management Units or in solitary con
- Page 30 and 31:
Even worse, in some cases the gover
- Page 32 and 33:
social hospitality intended to help
- Page 34 and 35:
communities in places like Bosnia a
- Page 36 and 37:
and shame him or her into doing som
- Page 38 and 39:
in Bosnia that were under attack. B
- Page 40 and 41:
the government indicted him for mat
- Page 42 and 43:
1. After 9/11, the FBI began a hunt
- Page 45 and 46:
have no way of knowing whether the
- Page 47 and 48:
opportunity for an individual to su
- Page 49 and 50:
surveillance. To date, however, ver
- Page 51 and 52:
considered terrorism. And the enhan
- Page 53 and 54:
Post-conviction, terrorism defendan
- Page 55 and 56:
U.S. was fighting on the same side.
- Page 57 and 58:
trap has been pending for years and
- Page 59 and 60:
http://www.stopfbi.net/2012/6/5/vic
- Page 61 and 62:
50 See Graham Rayman, “Were the N
- Page 63:
62 For example, Viktor Bout, a Russ
- Page 67 and 68:
Appendix A - Tactics used in prosec
- Page 69 and 70:
Appendix A - Tactics used in prosec
- Page 71 and 72:
Appendix A - Tactics used in prosec
- Page 73 and 74:
Appendix A - Tactics used in prosec
- Page 75 and 76:
Appendix A - Tactics used in prosec
- Page 77 and 78:
Appendix A - Tactics used in prosec
- Page 79 and 80: Appendix A - Tactics used in prosec
- Page 81 and 82: Appendix A - Tactics used in prosec
- Page 83 and 84: Appendix A - Tactics used in prosec
- Page 85 and 86: Appendix A - Tactics used in prosec
- Page 87 and 88: Appendix A - Tactics used in prosec
- Page 89 and 90: Appendix A - Tactics used in prosec
- Page 91 and 92: Appendix A - Tactics used in prosec
- Page 93 and 94: Appendix A - Tactics used in prosec
- Page 95: Appendix A - Tactics used in prosec
- Page 99 and 100: APPENDIX BPREEMPTIVE PROSECUTION CA
- Page 101 and 102: 1. had not engaged in any violent a
- Page 103 and 104: theatrical sort of way of trying to
- Page 105 and 106: conversation, presumably because th
- Page 107 and 108: and was released in February 2011.
- Page 109 and 110: circumstances,” nationality, and
- Page 111 and 112: appropriate care, treatment, and me
- Page 113 and 114: manipulation to try to create an in
- Page 115 and 116: Hashmi was extradited to the U.S. i
- Page 117 and 118: Muslim charity in the U.S. In 2007,
- Page 119 and 120: cooperate with the FBI. The FBI eve
- Page 121 and 122: easy to prosecute terrorists, even
- Page 123 and 124: about the phone call from Maldonado
- Page 125 and 126: attorney, Montes accepted this prop
- Page 127 and 128: Steve Duin, “Jihad at Pioneer Cou
- Page 129: After the defendants were arrested,
- Page 133 and 134: district judge in California, but i
- Page 135 and 136: Atlanta Penitentiary in August 2006
- Page 137 and 138: Rafiq Sabir, a physician, to provid
- Page 139 and 140: monitored all of her communications
- Page 141 and 142: arrested both men. The attacker was
- Page 143 and 144: they were building an Islamic utopi
- Page 145 and 146: Ziyad Yaghi, Omar Hassan, Hysen She
- Page 147 and 148: more about Boyd than they were sayi
- Page 149: APPENDIX CBibliography
- Page 152 and 153: Becker, Andrew, G.W. Schulz, and Da
- Page 154 and 155: Eberhardt, Sally, and Jeanne Theoha
- Page 156 and 157: -----. “The FBI’s anticipatory
- Page 158 and 159: _____. “NSA phone record collecti
- Page 160 and 161: Silver, Charlotte. “Stateless in
- Page 162 and 163: Associated Press. “5 years later,
- Page 164 and 165: Hanners, David. “Terrorist traine
- Page 166 and 167: McFadden, David. “3 From NY Terro
- Page 168 and 169: United States v. Viktor Bout. “Or
- Page 170 and 171: [Aref-Hossain case] “Muslim Solid
- Page 172 and 173: Accompanied by Appendix B: Chronolo
- Page 174 and 175: Offices of the Inspectors General (