12.07.2015 Views

Review of services for people living with HIV in New Zealand

Review of services for people living with HIV in New Zealand

Review of services for people living with HIV in New Zealand

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Inquiry9. How is impact,effectiveness and valueassessed, and what havethose assessments<strong>in</strong>dicated to date?Criteria employedFrequency and modes<strong>of</strong> assessmentsEvidence <strong>of</strong> data <strong>for</strong>policyResponseHow is impact, effectiveness and value assessed, and what have those assessments<strong>in</strong>dicated to date?Assess<strong>in</strong>g the impact, evaluat<strong>in</strong>g our effectiveness and valu<strong>in</strong>g our <strong>services</strong> are asignificant, complex and multi layered range <strong>of</strong> activities. It is an area <strong>of</strong> constantfocus and improvement.A major impediment to effective evaluation is the cost <strong>of</strong> external, expert,<strong>in</strong>dependent contractors not be<strong>in</strong>g budgeted/funded specifically by the MoH.Another major impediment is the be<strong>in</strong>g very little benchmark data (i.e., no sexualbehaviour survey <strong>of</strong> all <strong>New</strong> <strong>Zealand</strong>ers s<strong>in</strong>ce early 1990s, no fund<strong>in</strong>g <strong>for</strong> next <strong>HIV</strong>prevalence study, only pilot fund<strong>in</strong>g <strong>for</strong> a small sexual behaviour survey <strong>of</strong> Africanpopulations).Criteria employedGAPSS and GOSS behavioural surveillance on sexual behaviour <strong>of</strong> MSM and attitudesto <strong>HIV</strong> <strong>with</strong> components survey<strong>in</strong>g attitudes towards and recognition <strong>of</strong> NZAF<strong>in</strong>terventions, e.g., ma<strong>in</strong>tenance <strong>of</strong> numbers report<strong>in</strong>g constant condom usebetween 2002–2008.Early stages <strong>of</strong> cost/benefit analysis as data on tests and treatment costs becomeavailable.Independent external research when able to purchase – i.e., Shore centre ‘Men Talk’on non condom users. Included survey on attitudes towards NZAF’s effectiveness.Client surveys, non‐client surveys.Close analysis <strong>of</strong> the <strong>New</strong> <strong>Zealand</strong> epidemiology where feasible and funded.Dr Saxton’s PhD thesis <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g GAPSS and GOSS data.External f<strong>in</strong>ancial audit annually.Charitable registration.M<strong>in</strong>istry response to NZAF report<strong>in</strong>g aga<strong>in</strong>st our M<strong>in</strong>istry <strong>of</strong> Health contract. External MoH audits 2006 and 2010.Whilst <strong>in</strong>dicative only:– <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> client use <strong>of</strong> <strong>services</strong> especially <strong>HIV</strong> test<strong>in</strong>g– <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> cl<strong>in</strong>ician referrals– <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> volunteers, members and supporter database– <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> visitors <strong>of</strong> new website– <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> ‘members’ <strong>for</strong> social network<strong>in</strong>g sites – GiO, Bro on L<strong>in</strong>e, facebookand beebo– <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> fundrais<strong>in</strong>g– <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> qualifications and appropriate skills sets <strong>of</strong> candidates <strong>for</strong> vacancies– <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> suitable candidates <strong>for</strong> election to Trust Board.Frequency and modes <strong>of</strong> assessments GAPSS and GOSS data 2002, 2004, 2006 and 2008.Ongo<strong>in</strong>g analysis <strong>of</strong> research and published literature.<strong>HIV</strong> Futures 2000 and <strong>HIV</strong> Futures2 <strong>in</strong> 2005/06 – no fund<strong>in</strong>g <strong>for</strong> future surveys.<strong>HIV</strong> Prevalence study <strong>of</strong> sexual cl<strong>in</strong>ic attendees 2006 – no fund<strong>in</strong>g <strong>for</strong> future surveys.External behaviour surveillance.Evidence <strong>of</strong> data <strong>for</strong> policyGAPSS & GOSS Data 2002, 2004, 2006 and 2008 – <strong>in</strong><strong>for</strong>m<strong>in</strong>g and direct<strong>in</strong>g <strong>HIV</strong>prevention campaigns (Bullfighter 2007, Fuck buddies 2003, <strong>HIV</strong> prevention Plan2009–2014). Brief<strong>in</strong>g papers provided by Research and Analysis Unit direct NZAF policy position –e.g., blood donor deferral policy.Use <strong>of</strong> <strong>New</strong> <strong>Zealand</strong> and <strong>in</strong>ternational literature and research studies accessedthrough NZAF library to <strong>in</strong><strong>for</strong>m policy – i.e., Public Health Bill submission.REVIEW OF SERVICES FOR PLHA 61

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!