12.07.2015 Views

Integrated Transceivers for Optical Wireless Communications

Integrated Transceivers for Optical Wireless Communications

Integrated Transceivers for Optical Wireless Communications

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

182 IEEE JOURNAL OF SELECTED TOPICS IN QUANTUM ELECTRONICS, VOL. 11, NO. 1, JANUARY/FEBRUARY 2005Fig. 17.Eye diagram <strong>for</strong> hybrid integrated link.22 dB, which should be sufficient to allow correct operationwith large variations in link length as well as coverage at aparticular distance. Further variation might be accommodatedby controlling the transmitter power levels using received signalstrength in<strong>for</strong>mation from the distant transceiver.In order to test the individual components in combination, theCMOS electronics was integrated with the optoelectronics usingwirebonding techniques, within a large IC package. Simple opticswas used at transmitter and receiver, and transmitter andreceiver aligned over a short distance. Fig. 17 shows an eye diagramfrom a hybrid demonstration, showing data link operationat 100 Mb/s.The link uses entirely custom components, and these resultsare the first from such a system. These are excellent results,given the added inductance and shielding problems with theseintegration techniques. We, there<strong>for</strong>e, expect the integrateddemonstrator to show much improved per<strong>for</strong>mance.The link demonstration uses external circuitry to provide thecontrol signals to the driver and receiver circuits, and in this preliminarywork these are set manually. A more advanced systemwould incorporate channel power control, signal strength detection,and other link management functions within the transceiverintegrated circuit. These were beyond the scope of this initialdemonstration, but the use of a commodity CMOS process offersthe possibility of such a high level of integration.IX. CONCLUSIONResults from this work show that high-per<strong>for</strong>mance componentswhich are optimized <strong>for</strong> free-space optical communicationscan be realized using well-developed processes and thatthese when integrated should provide transceivers with goodoverall per<strong>for</strong>mance. The receivers are the fastest reported <strong>for</strong>such high-input capacitance and show per<strong>for</strong>mance much beyondthat of nonoptimized commercially available components.Similarly, the detectors show lower capacitance than those availablecommercially, and modeling suggests further substantialgains are possible.They also show that there are significant challenges <strong>for</strong> opticalwireless, perhaps the major one being scalability. As a firstestimate, assuming that each transceiver has a 90 field of view(FOV) in all directions and each cell has a 4.5 FOV, approximately200 channels would be required. This is largely due todetector capacitance and the need to limit this by fabricatingsmall detectors. At present, the receiver circuits that we havedesigned are not scalable, in that the transimpedance amplifiershave a slightly larger area than the detectors, especially when includingspace <strong>for</strong> the flip-chip bonding pads. The developmentof detectors with lower capacitance per unit area and the use ofa finer feature size CMOS process should allow the fabricationof channel electronics beneath the optoelectronic emitter or detectorfootprint and an increase in the FOV covered with eachchannel. While these represent significant technical challenges,the basic approach that we have taken should allow scaling to thelarge number of channels that an indoor transceiver will require.This work has demonstrated gigabit-per-second operation ofa high-input capacitance receiver, which is far in excess of thatavailable using current wireless LAN standards. As the additional“cost” of an optical channel is small, data rates can beincreased at the cost of detector size, and preliminary simulationsshow that with the further optimization of receivers anddetector structures this approach should be scalable to gigabitper-secondchannel capacities with large numbers of detectors.ACKNOWLEDGMENTThe authors would like to thank G. Hill, C. Roberts,J. Roberts, and C. Button <strong>for</strong> growing and processing theoptoelectronic devices.REFERENCES[1] A. M. Street, P. N. Stavrinou, D. C. Obrien, and D. J. Edwards, “Indooroptical wireless systems—A review,” Opt. Quantum Electron., vol. 29,pp. 349–378, 1997.[2] J. B. Carruthers and J. M. Kahn, “Angle diversity <strong>for</strong> nondirected wirelessinfrared communication,” IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 48, no. 6, pp.960–969, Jun. 2000.[3] J. M. Kahn, R. You, P. Djahani, A. G. Weisbin, B. K. Teik, and A. Tang,“Imaging diversity receivers <strong>for</strong> high-speed infrared wireless communication,”IEEE Commun. Mag., vol. 36, no. 12, pp. 88–94, Dec. 1998.[4] P. Djahani and J. M. Kahn, “Analysis of infrared wireless links employingmultibeam transmitters and imaging diversity receivers,” IEEETrans. Commun., vol. 48, no. 12, pp. 2077–2088, Dec. 2000.[5] D. Wisely and I. Neild, “A 100 Mbit/s tracked optical wireless telepoint,”in Proc. IEEE Int. Symp. Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio <strong>Communications</strong>’97, vol. 3, pp. 964–968.[6] D. O’Brien, G. Faulkner, and F. P. Parand, “A cellular tracked opticalwireless link,” IEE Proc.—J, Optoelectron., vol. 150, pp. 490–496, 2003.[7] D. C. O’Brien, A. M. Street, K. Samaras, D. J. Edwards, G. Faulkner, G.Patry, P. N. Stavrinou, K. H. Tang, C. C. Teo, and M. Whitehead, “Smartpixels <strong>for</strong> optical wireless applications,” in Spatial Light Modulators,ser. OSA Trends in Optics and Photonics. Washington, DC: Opt. Soc.Amer., 1997, vol. 14, pp. 265–271.[8] F. Mederer, M. Grabherr, F. Eberhard, I. Ecker, R. Jager, J. Joos, C. Jung,M. Kicherer, R. King, P. Schnitzer, H. Unold, D. Wiedenmann, and K.J. Ebeling, “High per<strong>for</strong>mance selectively oxidized VCSELs and arrays<strong>for</strong> parallel high-speed optical interconnects,” in Proc. Electronic Componentsand Technology Conf. 2000, 2000, pp. 1242–1251.[9] E. F. Schubert, N. E. J. Hunt, R. J. Malik, M. Micovic, and D. L. Miller,“Temperature and modulation characteristics of resonant-cavity lightemittingdiodes,” J. Lightw. Technol., vol. 14, no. 7, pp. 1721–1729, Jul.1996.[10] R. F. Oulton, J. W. Gray, P. N. Stavrinou, and G. Parry, “Insight intoplanar microcavity emission as a function of numerical aperture,” Opt.Commun., vol. 195, pp. 327–338, 2001.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!