12.07.2015 Views

2013 Conference Proceedings - University of Nevada, Las Vegas

2013 Conference Proceedings - University of Nevada, Las Vegas

2013 Conference Proceedings - University of Nevada, Las Vegas

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Mathematics Teacher Candidates’ Understanding <strong>of</strong> FunctionStacy Reeder<strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> Oklahomareeder@ou.eduRachel BatesRedlands Community Collegerachel.m.bates-1@ou.eduFunctions play in integral and important role throughout mathematics. Many studies havefocused on college student understanding <strong>of</strong> function and have found them to be lacking. Fewstudies however, have focused on teacher candidates’ understanding <strong>of</strong> function. Given thatmiddle school and high school mathematics teachers help students develop what we hope will bea deep and flexible understanding <strong>of</strong> function it is important that their own understanding <strong>of</strong>function be rich and well-developed. This study examined one group <strong>of</strong> mathematics teachercandidates’ understanding <strong>of</strong> function. The results indicate that their understanding was limited.The idea <strong>of</strong> a function, or at the very least, the anticipation <strong>of</strong> the idea <strong>of</strong> function can bedated back as far 2000 B.C.E. and is evidenced in the work <strong>of</strong> the Babylonians and ancientGreeks with one-to-one correspondence for counting and their extensive use <strong>of</strong> tables. However,the notion <strong>of</strong> function, as we know it, did not arrive on the mathematics landscape until the early1300’s and had its beginnings as a way <strong>of</strong> designating the correspondences between geometricalentities. Over time the notion <strong>of</strong> function continued to develop and become associated with thestudy <strong>of</strong> analytical expressions, thus securing a central place in mathematics (Burnett-Bradshaw,2007).The work <strong>of</strong> Oreseme (1323 – 1382) included “general ideas about independent anddependent variable quantities seem to be present” (Ponte, 1992, p. 4). Some two hundred yearslater Descarte (1596 – 1650) indicated a dependence between variable quantities in his work withequations in two variables marking the emergence <strong>of</strong> the notion <strong>of</strong> functions as an individualizedmathematical entity. Furthering the idea <strong>of</strong> function was Newton (1642 – 1727) whodemonstrated how functions could be developed in infinite power series. While Leibnitz was thefirst to use the term “function” in 1673, the study <strong>of</strong> function as a clearly individualized conceptdid not arise for a few more decades at the end <strong>of</strong> the 17 th century. Finally, as a result <strong>of</strong> “thedevelopment <strong>of</strong> the study <strong>of</strong> curves by algebraic methods, a term to represent quantities that weredependent on one variable by means <strong>of</strong> an analytical expression was increasingly necessary”(Ponte, 1992, p.4), the term “function” was adopted. This was decided somewhere between1694 and 1698 in an exchange between Leibnitz (1646 – 1716) and Bernoulli (1667 – 1748).<strong>Proceedings</strong> <strong>of</strong> the 40 th Annual Meeting <strong>of</strong> the Research Council on Mathematics Learning <strong>2013</strong> 24

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!