02.12.2012 Views

Chapter 1 - Universiteit Twente

Chapter 1 - Universiteit Twente

Chapter 1 - Universiteit Twente

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

General Introduction<br />

self-control in the past (and were thus depleted of their regulatory resources) to<br />

conserve their remaining self-control strength for this future task. These participants<br />

performed worse on an intervening measure of self-control than participants who were<br />

either not depleted, or not expecting future self-control. Moreover, when performance<br />

on this future task was actually measured, participants who were initially depleted but<br />

conserved resources performed as well as non-depleted participants. In contrast, initially<br />

depleted participants not expecting to exert self-control in the future performed worse<br />

than participants in the other conditions.<br />

In sum, we should state that self-control performance under depletion conditions is<br />

amenable to short-term modulation as a function of motivation, and the motivation<br />

to engage in self-regulation is therefore an important component of self-control as<br />

well (Baumeister & Vohs, 2007). A state of self-regulatory resource depletion and the<br />

expectation of future self-control demands may cause people to become more selective<br />

in exerting self-control. People are likely to be involved in a constant trade-off between<br />

multiple self-control demands, and motivation can compensate for a reduced ability<br />

to self-regulate. As Muraven and Slessareva (2003) already stated, this trade-off is not<br />

necessarily a conscious and deliberative process, but rather something individuals do<br />

continually with very little awareness, in contrast to the exertion of self-control itself,<br />

which is typically an act of conscious volition.<br />

An alternative perspective on the self-regulatory strength model has recently been<br />

put forward by Dewitte, Bruyneel, and Geyskens (2009). Starting from an alternative<br />

cognitive control model, they claim that the strength-model only holds when the<br />

control processes that have been recruited to deal with the demands of a first selfregulatory<br />

task differ from the control processes needed for a second task. Depletion<br />

effects thus should only occur when the control processes required for two consecutive<br />

tasks differ, since in between people will have to adapt to the temporary misfit between<br />

their cognitive system and the demands of the task at hand. Indeed, Dewitte et al. (2009)<br />

23

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!