324 PART THREE Long-Term Investment DecisionsTABLE 8.1MotiveExpansionReplacementor renewalOther purposesKey Motives for Making Capital ExpendituresDescriptionThe most common motive for a capital expenditure is to expand the level of operations—usually throughacquisition of fixed assets. A growing firm often needs to acquire new fixed assets rapidly, as in thepurchase of property and plant facilities.As a firm’s growth slows and it reaches maturity, most capital expenditures will be made to increaseefficiency by replacing or renewing obsolete or worn-out assets. Renewal may involve rebuilding, overhauling,or retrofitting an existing fixed asset. Each time a machine requires a major repair, the outlay forthe repair should be compared to the outlay to replace the machine and the benefits of replacement.Some capital expenditures do not result in the acquisition or transformation of tangible fixed assets. Instead,they involve a long-term commitment of funds in expectation of a future return. These expendituresinclude outlays for advertising campaigns, research and development, management consulting, and newproducts.2. Review and analysis. Formal review and analysis is performed to assess theappropriateness of proposals and evaluate their economic viability. Once theanalysis is complete, a summary report is submitted to decision makers.3. Decision making. Firms typically delegate capital expenditure decision makingon the basis of dollar limits. Generally, the board of directors must authorizeexpenditures beyond a certain amount. Often plant managers are givenauthority to make decisions necessary to keep the production line moving.4. Implementation. Following approval, expenditures are made and projectsimplemented. Expenditures for a large project often occur in phases.5. Follow-up. Results are monitored, and actual costs and benefits are comparedwith those that were expected. Action may be required if actual outcomesdiffer from projected ones.Each step in the process is important. Review and analysis and decision making(Steps 2 and 3) consume the majority of time and effort, however. Follow-up(Step 5) is an important but often ignored step aimed at allowing the firm toimprove the accuracy of its cash flow estimates continuously. Because of theirfundamental importance, this and the following chapters give primary considerationto review and analysis and to decision making.Personal Finance ExampleIndividuals can approach the acquisition of major assets much as do corporations.Using the five-step process:1. A personal financial plan or a special situation initiates the proposed assetpurchase. For example, your personal financial plan specifies a new car purchasein 2010.2. Review and analyze the proposed asset purchase to isolate attractive alternativesin terms of features and costs. For the car purchase, you would shop forcars with the desired features and costs that are consistent with the budgetedamount.3. Compare the features and costs of the alternative assets and choose the preferredalternative. That is, you would decide which car you are going to buy.4. Make the purchase. This would involve arranging financing/payment for thecar, possibly negotiating a trade-in price, closing the transaction, and takingdelivery of the new car.2008935971Principles of Managerial Finance, Brief Fifth Edition, by Lawrence J. Gitman. Copyright © 2009 by Lawrence J. Gitman. Published by Prentice Hall.
CHAPTER 8 Capital Budgeting Cash Flows 3255. Compare the actual asset performance to its expected performance. Youwould assess how well the new car meets your expectations. If the actual performancefails to meet expectations, you might consider new alternatives(e.g., trade in the car).Basic TerminologyBefore we develop the concepts, techniques, and practices related to the capitalbudgeting process, we need to explain some basic terminology. In addition, wewill present some key assumptions that are used to simplify the discussion in theremainder of this chapter and in <strong>Chapter</strong> 9.2008935971independent projectsProjects whose cash flows areunrelated or independent ofone another; the acceptanceof one does not eliminatethe others from furtherconsideration.mutually exclusive projectsProjects that compete withone another, so that theacceptance of one eliminatesfrom further considerationall other projects that servea similar function.unlimited fundsThe financial situation inwhich a firm is able to acceptall independent projects thatprovide an acceptable return.capital rationingThe financial situation inwhich a firm has only a fixednumber of dollars availablefor capital expenditures, andnumerous projects competefor these dollars.accept–reject approachThe evaluation of capitalexpenditure proposals todetermine whether theymeet the firm’s minimumacceptance criterion.ranking approachThe ranking of capitalexpenditure projects on thebasis of some predeterminedmeasure, such as the rateof return.Independent versus Mutually Exclusive ProjectsThe two most common types of projects are (1) independent projects and (2)mutually exclusive projects. Independent projects are those whose cash flows areunrelated or independent of one another; the acceptance of one does not eliminatethe others from further consideration. Mutually exclusive projects are those thathave the same function and therefore compete with one another. The acceptanceof one eliminates from further consideration all other projects that serve a similarfunction. For example, a firm in need of increased production capacity couldobtain it by (1) expanding its plant, (2) acquiring another company, or (3) contractingwith another company for production. Clearly, accepting any one optioneliminates the need for either of the others.Unlimited Funds versus Capital RationingThe availability of funds for capital expenditures affects the firm’s decisions. If afirm has unlimited funds for investment, making capital budgeting decisions isquite simple: All independent projects that will provide an acceptable return canbe accepted. Typically, though, firms operate under capital rationing instead. Thismeans that they have only a fixed number of dollars available for capital expendituresand that numerous projects will compete for these dollars. Procedures fordealing with capital rationing are presented in <strong>Chapter</strong> 9. The discussions thatfollow here and in the following chapter assume unlimited funds.Accept–Reject versus Ranking ApproachesTwo basic approaches to capital budgeting decisions are available. The accept–reject approach involves evaluating capital expenditure proposals to determinewhether they meet the firm’s minimum acceptance criterion. This approach canbe used when the firm has unlimited funds, as a preliminary step when evaluatingmutually exclusive projects, or in a situation in which capital must be rationed. Inthese cases, only acceptable projects should be considered.The second method, the ranking approach, involves ranking projects on thebasis of some predetermined measure, such as the rate of return. The project withthe highest return is ranked first, and the project with the lowest return is rankedlast. Only acceptable projects should be ranked. Ranking is useful in selecting the“best” of a group of mutually exclusive projects and in evaluating projects with aview to capital rationing.Principles of Managerial Finance, Brief Fifth Edition, by Lawrence J. Gitman. Copyright © 2009 by Lawrence J. Gitman. Published by Prentice Hall.