A Socially Assistive Robot Exercise Coach for the Elderly

Fasola & Matarić. A SAR Exercise Coach for the ElderlyFurthermore, it is important that the tasks not only be healthcare-driven, but that theyalso be successful in achieving the desired therapeutic behavior; in the case of our SARexercise coach, this means the interaction must elicit consistent physical exercise amongthe users (measurable through objective quantitative metrics), a result that was achievedin our user study with older adults as detailed in Section 5.3.1.2 Discussion of Design PrinciplesOur five SAR design principles were developed in an attempt to capture and address thekey components necessary for successful SAR-based therapy. Each of the designprinciples was developed based on findings from research in psychology, specifically inthe areas of intrinsic motivation and trust, and from research in HCI and HRI, specificallyregarding the effects of relational agent behaviors on user engagement. Although someprevious work has addressed the design of social agents for obtaining long-termengagement and trust, most has focused on agent guidance in task scenarios in which theagent does not monitor or instruct the activity itself (e.g., Bickmore & Picard, 2005; Kidd& Breazeal, 2008).We have presented a set of five clear and general SAR design principles that can beapplied to a variety of different SAR-based therapeutic domains, including those whereinthe SAR agent provides real-time instruction, activity monitoring, active guidance andfeedback, task participation, and continuity behaviors spanning multiple sessions ofinteraction. In the following sections we provide examples of how to incorporate thesedesign principles into practice with a SAR agent, as we elaborate on the implementationdetails of our SAR exercise system developed to engage older adults in physical exercise.In Sections 4 and 5 we discuss a user study conducted with older adults to evaluateour SAR approach, design, and algorithms in motivating task engagement andperformance. It is important to note, however, that the focus of the study was not onvalidating each of the five design principles independently. Prior work by our group andothers has already demonstrated the positive effect of many aspects of the above designprinciples individually. For example, previous studies conducted by our lab have shownthe positive influence on intrinsic motivation and user engagement of online taskmodification to achieve optimal challenge (Fasola & Matarić, 2010a), praise andrelational discourse, adjustable user autonomy, and fluidity of interaction (Fasola &Matarić, 2012). Instead, the focus of the conducted user study was on the evaluation ofour SAR exercise system and design principles as a whole, in addition to investigatingthe role of physical embodiment and its effect on user intrinsic motivation and userattitudes towards the system.3.2 Interaction ScenarioOur robot exercise system consists of a socially assistive robot whose purpose is tomonitor, instruct, evaluate, and encourage users to perform simple physical exercise.During the exercise sessions, the robot asks the user to perform seated arm gestureexercises. This type of seated exercise, called “chair exercise” or “chair aerobics,” iscommonly practiced in senior living facilities. Chair exercises are highly regarded fortheir accessibility to those with low mobility, for their safety, and for their healthbenefits, such as improved flexibility, muscle strength, ability to perform everyday tasks,and even memory recall (Baum et al., 2003; Dawe & Moore-Orr, 1995; McMurdo &Rennie, 1993; Thomas & Hageman, 2003).8