Background Check Report

Recommendations

Info

TABLE OF CONTENTSI. Executive Summary..........................................................................................................1II.III.Criminal Background Checks Facts 101 – Types, Scope, Reliability..........................8A. Who checks and how does it work?.................................................................11B. Biometric checks.............................................................................................15C. Comparison & Best Practices (Name vs. Biometrics) – How do they measureup?...................................................................................................................19For-Hire Ground Transportation Regulation – Driver Criminal BackgroundChecks..............................................................................................................................21A. Overview.........................................................................................................21B. Jurisdictional Analysis....................................................................................251. New York, New York............................................................................25i. Legal or regulatory licensing standardii. Background check processiii. Transportation Network Companies2. Houston, Texas......................................................................................27i. Legal or regulatory licensing standardii. Background check processiii. Transportation Network Companies3. State of California.................................................................................31i. Legal or regulatory licensing standardii. Background check processiii. Transportation Network Companies4. Chicago, Illinois....................................................................................35i. Legal or regulatory licensing standardii. Background check processiii. Transportation Network Companies5. State of Colorado...................................................................................41i. Legal or regulatory licensing standardii. Background check processiii. Transportation Network Companies6. Washington, District of Columbia.........................................................45i. Legal or regulatory licensing standardii. Background check processiii. Transportation Network Companies7. Seattle, Washington...............................................................................51i. Legal or regulatory licensing standardii. Background check processiii. Transportation Network Companies8. Boston, Massachusetts..........................................................................54i. Legal or regulatory licensing standardii. Background check processiii. Transportation Network Companies{11081861:2} i
9. Miami-Dade County, Florida................................................................57i. Legal or regulatory licensing standardii. Background check processiii. Transportation Network CompaniesIV.Criminal Background Check Litigation and Legal Issues..........................................61A. California District Attorneys’ Lawsuit............................................................61B. Civil Rights Lawsuits by Drivers....................................................................63C. Equal Protection Constitutional Litigation and Concerns...............................68V. Conclusions & Best Practices.........................................................................................70A. The TNC Model has already Failed the Public Safety Test............................70B. Biometric Checks are the Safer and More Accurate Standard........................73C. Government Administration and Vetting is Necessary...................................76D. Broad - Not Narrow - Licensing Review Standards are Needed.....................77E. Equal Standards are Required – TNCs, Taxis and Limousines all should havethe Same Type of Check..................................................................................78Appendix A: Reference Guide for Background ChecksAppendix B: Flow Chart of Biometric Check ProcessAppendix C: Table of Incidents with TNC Drivers Who Did Not Undergo BiometricChecks with Prior Criminal, Driving, or Licensing HistoriesAppendix D: Summary Table of the Report Findings and Fact/Fiction ComparisonAppendix E: Table with NYC Taxi & Limousine Commission RequirementsAppendix F: Sample NYC TLC Notice of Fitness Interview Determinations LetterAppendix G: Press Release of the Massachusetts Chapter of NOW regarding Uber’sBackground Check ProcessAppendix H: San Francisco and Los Angeles DAs’ Press Release Concerning a Settlementwith Lyft and a Lawsuit against Uber regarding Background ChecksAppendix I: Congressional Request to Uber, Lyft, and Sidecar to Implement BiometricChecksAppendix J: Biographies of the Authors and Panelists{11081861:2} ii
Page 1: ONESTANDARDFOR ALLCRIMINAL BACKGROU
Page 7 and 8: The study was presented and peer-re
Page 9 and 10: licensure. Further, equal standards
Page 11 and 12: (10) “One standard for all driver
Page 13 and 14: II.Criminal Background Checks Facts
Page 15 and 16: must be requested from that locatio
Page 17 and 18: • Government employees;• Educat
Page 19 and 20: The live scan operator checks the a
Page 21 and 22: Fingerprint biometrics have been us
Page 23 and 24: Figure 3: Sample fingerprint imageT
Page 25 and 26: million individual background check
Page 27 and 28: eason of a finding of lack of "good
Page 29 and 30: “(i) driving a TLC licensed vehic
Page 31 and 32: Services (“DCJS”). 36 New York
Page 33 and 34: • Whether the applicant has ever
Page 35 and 36: immediately preceding the applicati
Page 37 and 38: . Background check process (CPUC)An
Page 39 and 40: along with personal descriptor info
Page 41 and 42: must meet the requirements set out
Page 43 and 44: while under the influence of alcoho
Page 45 and 46: • Have successfully completed a t
Page 47 and 48: infirmity of mind and body which mi
Page 49 and 50: for the State called the Computeriz
Page 51 and 52: • An inspection verification form
Page 53 and 54: who are engaged in a business profe
Page 55 and 56:
o Leaving after colliding under sec
Page 57 and 58:
obtain a current copy of the applic
Page 59 and 60:
8. Boston, Massachusettsa. Legal or
Page 61 and 62:
c. Transportation Network Companies
Page 63 and 64:
• Have taken a one day course whi
Page 65 and 66:
enforcement authority, the CPD does
Page 67 and 68:
striking a passenger. The Uber driv
Page 69 and 70:
of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 2
Page 71 and 72:
it is therefore a regulated entity
Page 73 and 74:
C. Equal Protection Constitutional
Page 75 and 76:
V. CONCLUSION & BEST PRACTICESA. Th
Page 77 and 78:
arrested), that the city of Houston
Page 79 and 80:
If the fingerprints are related to
Page 81 and 82:
C. Government Administration and Ve
Page 83 and 84:
for background checks is so importa
Page 85 and 86:
COMPARISON OF FHV AND TNC BACKGROUN
Page 87 and 88:
{11081861:2} 82
Page 89 and 90:
JURISDICTION DATE INCIDENTChicago,
Page 91 and 92:
PurposeReviewerson the Blue Ribbon
Page 93 and 94:
APPENDIX ETable with NYC Taxi & Lim
Page 95 and 96:
APPENDIX FSample NYC TLC Notice of
Page 97 and 98:
APPENDIX GPress Release of the Mass
Page 99 and 100:
APPENDIX HSan Francisco and Los Ang
Page 101 and 102:
{11081861:2} 96
Page 103 and 104:
{11081861:2} 98
Page 105 and 106:
Appendix JBiographies of the Author
Page 107 and 108:
• Accessible Taxi Dispatch System
Page 109 and 110:
Pasqualino “Pat” Russo, Esq.Adj
Page 111 and 112:
Senator Michael A. L. BalboniPresid
Page 113 and 114:
In 2004, He was appointed by then-f
Page 115 and 116:
Lawrence Kobilinsky{11081861:2} 110
Page 117 and 118:
Frances received her Bachelor of Ar
show all

Background Check Report

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?