12.07.2015 Views

Nam Theun 2 Trip Report and Project Update - BankTrack

Nam Theun 2 Trip Report and Project Update - BankTrack

Nam Theun 2 Trip Report and Project Update - BankTrack

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

International Rivers NetworkBiomass Clearance <strong>and</strong> Water Quality■ Failure to clear biomass from the reservoir area will resultin water quality problems <strong>and</strong> fish kills in the reservoir<strong>and</strong> downstream. The Concession Agreement requires thata biomass survey be conducted <strong>and</strong> used to propose meansfor “maximising removal of biomass in high biomass areasof the Nakai Reservoir. The priority shall be to clear thevegetation in areas which will be permanently flooded”(Schedule 4, Part 2, Section 3a). The ConcessionAgreement also requires that “... water in the DownstreamChannel must at least be suitable for irrigation purposes”(Schedule 4, Part 2, Section 9.1f ).Recommendations:■ NTPC <strong>and</strong> the GoL should commit toclear biomass from at least all permanentlyflooded areas of the NT2reservoir.■ NTPC <strong>and</strong> the GoL should implement anindependently reviewed clearance plan<strong>and</strong> impoundment strategy to minimizedownstream water quality problems inthe first years of NT2 operations.■ Despite these commitments, approved by the World Bank,the ADB <strong>and</strong> NT2’s other funders, neither the GoL norNTPC have plans to remove or ensure the maximum removal of biomass from the reservoir. NTPC is onlynow conducting a study on water quality optimization during reservoir impoundment <strong>and</strong> says that “biomassclearance may be part of the answer.”<strong>Project</strong> (Construction) L<strong>and</strong>s Compensation■ Compensation payments to <strong>Project</strong> L<strong>and</strong>s villagers havebeen unequal <strong>and</strong> insufficient, failing to compensate forthe full production value of l<strong>and</strong>, fisheries losses <strong>and</strong> waterquality problems caused by project construction. Many villagersdo not underst<strong>and</strong> what they are entitled to, whythey have received what they have, <strong>and</strong> if they will bereceiving more in the future. Compensation paymentsstarted a year after villagers’ l<strong>and</strong> was taken <strong>and</strong> impactswere first felt, in violation of the Concession Agreement<strong>and</strong> World Bank policy.■ Resettlement Action Plans for <strong>Project</strong> L<strong>and</strong>s have notbeen disclosed, nearly two years after villagers lost l<strong>and</strong><strong>and</strong> assets, in violation of World Bank <strong>and</strong> ADB policies.Recommendations:■ The Independent Monitoring Agencyfor the Resettlement ManagementUnit (RMU) should urgently undertakea comprehensive review of <strong>Project</strong>L<strong>and</strong>s compensation <strong>and</strong> mitigationmeasures <strong>and</strong> publicly disclose itsfindings.■ NTPC <strong>and</strong> the GoL should: 1) urgentlyfind comparable replacement l<strong>and</strong> for<strong>Project</strong> L<strong>and</strong>s villagers, <strong>and</strong> 2) detailthe livelihood restoration options thatwill replace irrigation for significantlyaffected <strong>Project</strong> L<strong>and</strong>s villagers.5

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!