Divisadero Street Neighborhood Marketplace Initiative - Office of ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Lower Divisadero Corridor: BAC SurveyAppendix A-3: District 5 reports 82% of respondents feel safe or very safewalking along during the day in their neighborhood.Appendix A-3: District 5 reports 50% of respondents feel safe or very safewalking alone during the night in their neighborhood.Chapter 4: Streets and Sidewalks (Page 4-1) Steady grades for street and sidewalk cleanliness from 2005.Forty-nine (49%) percent of respondents consider the cleanliness of theirneighborhood streets as good or excellentAppendix A-9: District 5 reports 37% of respondents consider the cleanlinessof their neighborhood sidewalks as good or excellent.Appendix A-10: District 5 reports 44% of respondents consider the cleanlinessof their neighborhood streets as good or excellent.Appendix A-11: District 5 reports 35% of respondents consider the pavementconditions of their neighborhood streets as good or excellent.Forty-five (45%) of San Franciscans think that the cleanliness of theirneighborhood sidewalks are in good or excellent condition. The average ratings in Districts 1,2,3,4,5,7 and 8 are significantly lower in 2007than in 2004 and 2005. There is a dramatic drop in District 2 and 7.Chapter 10: Demographic Information (Page 10-2 and 10-4) What was your household's total income before taxes in 2004?Item Units Value$100,000 % 32 How many people live in your household/Any children under 18?Item Units ValueOne % 33Two % 37Three % 15Four % 10Five or more % 6Children under 18 % 20Chapter 9: Technology and San Franciscans (Page 9-1 to 9-10)Page 7 of 25Eighty-two (82%) of the population uses a computer at home and 80% of thoseuse it to access the InternetAppendix A-22: District 5 reports 86% of respondents reach the Internet fromhome.
Lower Divisadero Corridor: BAC SurveyPercent of Internet in the Home versus IncomeItem (2006 Income) Units Appox. Value$100,000 % 992 Results and Analysis..2.1 Business TypesThere were a total of five questions in this section. Three had to do with types ofbusinesses desired, one dealt with walking versus driving to businesses and the lastone dealt with the Harding Theater property. The Harding Theater question was postedbecause it has been in limbo for quite a while and it is a major store front on the LDC.Three questions were posed to respondents to determine the types of businesses thatthey want on the LDC. Two of the questions were selection from a list while the otherwas to list your top three businesses. The exact wording of the questions follows:Question 1: How often do you travel outside of the Lower Divisadero to go to thesebusinesses (greater than a mile away)?Question 2: Please rank the following types of businesses you would like to see onLower DivisaderoQuestion 3: Please list your top 3 businesses that you would like to see in theLower Divisadero. You can indicate a specific business by name, or bycategory/type.The methodology to determine the actual business wants of the respondents was todetermine the commonality between the three questions. It was felt that the businessesthat people travel outside their neighborhood for are more valuable then ones that theymight potentially want. The top three list was to narrow down the list more and tocorrelate to the other two lists. In addition to a wants, we also wanted to determine whatthe respondent's don't want by including selection items that we deemed unpleasant tothe respondent'sThe results of the comparisons is presented below:Page 8 of 25
Page 5:
Table of Contents7 Overview9 Planni
Page 8 and 9:
During early 2006, three community
Page 10 and 11:
Vision StatementA key result of the
Page 12 and 13:
Summary ChallengesThe community ide
Page 14 and 15:
Small Business Support AndNeighborh
Page 17 and 18:
Land Use And DevelopmentSpace is at
Page 19 and 20:
Land Use and Development Action Pri
Page 21 and 22:
• More garbage receptacles• Bet
Page 23 and 24:
Participants suggested that the Cit
Page 25 and 26:
Safety And CleanlinessIssues and Ne
Page 27 and 28:
Results Since June 2006Since summer
Page 29 and 30:
3. Neighborhood Promotion and Commu
Page 31 and 32:
The abridged responses are below, a
Page 33 and 34:
• The program proved so successfu
Page 35 and 36:
Next StepsImplementing the Action P
Page 37 and 38:
Divisadero Street Neighborhood Mark
Page 39 and 40:
GAVIN NEWSOMMAYORDISTRICT 5 SUPERVI
Page 41 and 42:
LOWER DIVISADERO COMMERCIAL CORRIDO
Page 43 and 44:
LOWER DIVISADERO COMMUNITY PLANNING
Page 45 and 46:
LOWER DIVISADERO COMMUNITY PLANNING
Page 47 and 48: DIVISADERO MERCHANT SURVEYBusiness
Page 49 and 50: Bay Area LISC Commercial Corridor P
Page 51 and 52: NeighborhoodDesign Page 2 of 16
Page 53 and 54: NeighborhoodDesign Page 4 of 16•
Page 55 and 56: • • • • • • • • •
Page 57 and 58: • • • • • • • • •
Page 65 and 66: • • • NeighborhoodDesign Page
Page 67 and 68: Table of ContentsOverview of Divisa
Page 69 and 70: Western AdditionAnza VistaNorth Pan
Page 71 and 72: PAGEPIERCEOAKALAMO SQUAREFELLHAYESS
Page 73 and 74: vvvvvvvvvvvALAMO SQUAREPAGEPIERCEOA
Page 75 and 76: TURK1179 1182 12011218 123712151153
Page 77 and 78: MPMPMPMP MPStreet Trees (Matured)Ga
Page 79 and 80: MP MPGROVEMPMPTotalAuto 1Bar / Club
Page 81 and 82: Street Trees (Matured)Garbage Recep
Page 83 and 84: 11KL12M13NOP14Q15E10HDFG0 400 800 F
Page 85 and 86: Policy IssuesPedestrian SafetyThe p
Page 87: Appendix
Page 91 and 92: AsianNeighborhoodDesignCommunity Pl
Page 93 and 94: Lower Divisadero Corridor : BAC Sur
Page 95: Lower Divisadero Corridor: BAC Surv
Page 100 and 101: Lower Divisadero Corridor: BAC Surv
Page 112 and 113: Page 21 of 25Lower Divisadero Corri
Page 114 and 115: Page 23 of 25Lower Divisadero Corri
Page 116: Lower Divisadero Corridor: BAC Surv
show all

Divisadero Street Neighborhood Marketplace Initiative - Office of ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?