13.07.2015 Views

July 6, 2009 - District of Mission

July 6, 2009 - District of Mission

July 6, 2009 - District of Mission

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

34i) The Guidelines for Legislated Landslide Assessments for Proposed ResidentialDevelopment in British Columbia, May 2008.At the time <strong>of</strong> the tragic landslide in North Vancouver there were no Provincially establishedguidelines for the content <strong>of</strong> geotechnical reports. As a result <strong>of</strong> this event, and others in thelower mainland, as well as the <strong>of</strong>ten flawed and inconsistent geotechnical reports that werebeing submitted province wide, the Association <strong>of</strong> Pr<strong>of</strong>essional Engineers and Geoscientistconsidered it necessary to establish guidelines, providing clear criteria for Engineers, theirclients and approving jurisdictions when considering development in areas subject to landslidehazards. Thus, in 2006 the Association approved "the Guidelines" and revised them in May2008 to include seismic stability.Content requirements for reportsThe Association <strong>of</strong> Pr<strong>of</strong>essional Engineers and Geoscientists Guidelines requires that anylandslide assessment reports submitted to the Approving Jurisdiction, by the QualifiedPr<strong>of</strong>essional meet "the Guidelines" and include the submission <strong>of</strong> Appendix D-LandslideAssessment Assurance Statement (from "the Guidelines"). The purpose <strong>of</strong> Appendix "D" is toensure the Engineer has prepared the report in accordance with "the Guidelines". Appendix"D" is not required for geotechnical reports that do not involve a landslide hazard component,such as Fraser River Flooding Hazard.Purpose <strong>of</strong> "the Guidelines"The purpose <strong>of</strong> "the Guidelines", (Appendix 5) is two fold:• Provide guidelines <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>essional practice for a Pr<strong>of</strong>essional Engineer andPr<strong>of</strong>essional Geoscientist who carry out a landslide analysis for a proposedresidential development.• Provide guidance to the pr<strong>of</strong>essional as to how to relate the results <strong>of</strong> the analysis toa level <strong>of</strong> landslide safety for residential development when required by provinciallegislation (i.e. Community Charter, Local Government Act, and Land Title Act.)"The Guidelines" provide an industry standard for all landslide assessment reports in BritishColumbia. The intent is not to advise the Qualified Pr<strong>of</strong>essional on how to a conduct a landslideassessment; only to outline the factors that must be considered for a comprehensive landslideassessment report. These guidelines basically serve as a "Terms <strong>of</strong> Reference" for the qualifiedpr<strong>of</strong>essional.ii) Hazard Acceptability Thresholds for Development Approvals by LocalGovernmentThe Hazard Acceptability Thresholds, paper was prepared by Dr. Peter Cave, former Director <strong>of</strong>Planning at the Fraser-Cheam Regional <strong>District</strong>, (now Fraser Valley Regional <strong>District</strong>). Thepaper provides an overview <strong>of</strong> different types <strong>of</strong> geological hazards, and the damage that thesehazards can inflict on properties. The document establishes acceptable levels <strong>of</strong> safety fordevelopment, depending on the type <strong>of</strong> development. For example, a property with a probability<strong>of</strong> a landslide hazard <strong>of</strong> 1:200 may be allowed to rebuild or repair an aging structure; however,further subdivision would not be permitted (see Appendix 6, p. 15, Fig. 7 and p. 11, Fig. 2).The reasoning for the adoption <strong>of</strong> levels <strong>of</strong> safety for the <strong>District</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Mission</strong> is that theEngineering Association <strong>of</strong> BC maintains that Qualified Pr<strong>of</strong>essionals should not write landslideassessment reports stating development is "safe for the use intended" if the local governmentPAGE 4 OF 73

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!