January 18, 2010 - District of Mission

1MDISTRICTissioOFON THE FRASERRegular Council AgendaJanuary 18, 2010 - 6:30 p.m.Council Chambers8645 Stave Lake Street, Mission, BC1. PROCLAMATIONS(a) Proclamations for Africa Awareness Month andBlack History Month(i)January 2010 as "Africa Awareness Month"(ii) February 2010 as "Black History Month"Page 4(b) February 8, 2010 as "Jack Poole Day" Page 92. DELEGATIONS AND PRESENTATIONS(a) Shelley Hempstead on behalf of St. Paul's Presbyterian Church Page 10Re: Widening of Cedar Street between Cherry and Tunbridge(b) Mission Downtown Business Association Page 11Re: Application L09-002 — Mission Snipers Pool Hall Ltd.3. ADOPTION OF INFORMATIONAL ITEMS(a) Social Development Report (Review of 2009) Page 12(b) 2009 Report — Leak Detection Program Page 22(q) Transit and Overflow Parking for West Coast Express Users during Page 28Olympics(d) Inspection Services Department Report — 4 th Quarter 2009 Page 33(e) Major Development Project Update — January 6, 2010 Page 37(f) Minutes of the Mission Community Heritage Commission Meeting Page 46held on November 4, 2009(g) Minutes of the Mission Community Heritage Commission Meeting Page 48held on December 2, 2009(h) Ferndale Institution Population Profile — January 2010 Page 50(i) Mission Institution Report — December 2009 Page 514. RESOLUTION TO RESOLVE INTO COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE5. PLANNING

2Regular Council AgendaJanuary 18, 2010(a) Summary of Public Information Meeting — Mission Snipers Pool Hall Page 58Ltd. at 33212 — 1 st Avenue/33211 North Railway Avenue — LiquorPrimary License Application(b) Proposed Text Amendment to Land Use Application Procedures and Page 130Fees Bylaw(c) Extension for Rezoning File R06-035 Robert Ciccozzi Architecture Page 131Inc. — Parr Avenue6. PARKS, RECREATION AND CULTURE(a) Cemetery Columbarium Capital Project Page 1337. ENGINEERING AND PUBLIC WORKS(a) Earth Hour 2010 Page 134(b) LAN.54 Resolution Request — Silvermere Lake/Silvermere Island Page 1358. ADMINISTRATION AND FINANCE(a) Lease Renewal — New Horizons Lawn Bowling Society Page 141(b) Visit from Oyama Delegation — 2010 Page 142(c) Administrative Support for Economic Development Officer Page 143(d) Enhanced 911 Emergency Telephone Service Area Merger Bylaw Page 145No. 0981, 2009 Fire Dispatch Service Area Bylaw No. 0982, 2009(e) Amendments to Officers Bylaw 3986-2007 Page 171(f) Kennel Bylaw 2788-1994 Page 1749. PUBLIC SAFETY AND HEALTH(a) Minutes of the Downtown Coalition Meeting held on Page 175December 8, 200910. RESOLUTION TO RISE AND REPORT11. ADOPTION OF COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE REPORT12. BYLAWSMOTION: That the readings of all bylaws included in the Bylaws section of theJanuary 18, 2010 regular council agenda be approved as listed.(a)(b)District of Mission Traffic Regulation Amending Bylaw 5106- Adoption2009-1698(11) — a bylaw to amend Section 8 for consistencywith the zoning bylawDistrict of Mission Council Procedures Amending Bylaw 5108- Adoption2009-3694(10) — a bylaw to clarify the procedure for adoptingbylaws

3Regular Council AgendaJanuary 18, 2010(c)District of Mission User Fees and Charges Amending Bylaw5110-2009-4029(1) — a bylaw to add an administrative user feeAdoption(d) District of Mission Officers Amending Bylaw 5112-2010-3986(10) — a .bylaw to reflect the recent restructuring of theengineering departmentFirst, Second andThird Readings(e)District of Mission Land Use Application Procedures and FeesAmending Bylaw 5113-2010-3612(5) — a bylaw to delete theverbal development inquiry feeFirst, Second andThird Readings(f) District of Mission Kennel Amending Bylaw 5114-2010-2788(5)— a bylaw to clarify section 3 to include the lot sizeFirst, Second andThird Readings13. MINUTES(a) Regular Council Meeting — January 4, 2010 Page 17914. OTHER BUSINESS15. CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER'S REPORT16. MAYOR'S REPORT17. COUNCILLOR'S REPORTS ON COMMITTEES, BOARDS, AND ACTIVITIES18. QUESTION PERIOD19. ADJOURNMENT

yMissionON THE FRASERCorporate AdministrationINFORMATION Memorandum4File Category: ADM.PUB.VAGFile Folder: ProclamationsTo: Chief Administrative OfficerFrom: Director of Corporate AdministrationDate: January 14, 2010Subject: Proclamations for Africa Awareness Month and Black History MonthThe January 18, 2010 regular council agenda includes a proclamation related to"Africa Awareness MOnth" and another related to "Black History Month".At its regular meeting held on January 4, 2009 council proclaimed January .as"Africa Awareness Month" at the request of the University of British Columbia(UBC). In doing so, council requested a number of revisions to the proclamation.The UBC letter and proclamation included references to Black History Month. Itappears that these references may have created some confusion about therelationship between Africa Awareness Month and Black History Month. In realitythey are quite separate topics.As a result, it is staff's suggestion that both proclamations be adopted by council,as submitted by UBC and the Centre of Integration for African Immigrants.\ 2010 \ 0118 January \proclamations.docPage 1 of 1

UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA AFRICA. AWARENESS INITIATIVE111C-6138 STUDENT UNION BOULEVARD • VANCOUVER, BC V6T 1Z1PHONE: 778.320.7273 • www.africaawareness.ca5December 17 th, 2009Mayor and councilors,District of Mission,Box 20,Mission, BC V2V 4L9DISTRICT OF MIS aI NDate Ack'dDateDldCP/1011Date ScannedFile Folder N _ c .0 LArrATIcypiDate,ae;n9 /1Z0File CategoryADN.PUB. 2010To: ■ ltthayor tir0 ou011ori • MayorF113 ■ DH ■ Exempt • COVi,l :Other n (--- "For: OReport to COW antormagon El Reply for Mayors Sig7,3 Recuested By CV Din Response to Council Follow tic;Dear Mayor James Atebe and Council,Re: Proclamation for Africa Awareness Week in JanuaryEvery year Canadians are invited to take part in the festivities and events that honourthe legacy of black Canadians, past and present, during Black History Month.This is a time to celebrate the many achievements and contributions of blackCanadians who, throughout history, have done so much to make Canada the culturallydiverse, compassionate and prosperous nation we know today. It is also anoppOrtunity for the majority of Canadians to learn about the experiences of blackCanadians in our society, and the vital role this community has played throughout ourshared history.We here at the University of British Columbia Africa Awareness. Initiative have been atthe forefront of creating awareness of the African experience to students and faculty atthe university and in the Greater Vancouver area. Accordingly, since 2002 we haverecognized January as. Africa Awareness Month by having a week of events on ourcampus. The UBC Africa Awareness Initiative thus respectfully requests yourproclamation of January 2010 as Africa Awareness Month in the District of Mission.We would be grateful to receive notification of approval of this proclamation. To thisend, we have enclosed a draft 'Proclamation' for your reference.If we may provide any additional information, please contact the undersigned at yourconvenience by cell-phone at 778-329-7273 or by email atvpfinance@africaawareness.ca .Sincerely,Felix Riaga OderaVP-FINANCEUBC Africa Awareness Initiative111C-6138 Student Union BoulevardUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouver, BC V6T 1Z1

6ProclamationTo: Mayor James Atebe, District of MissionJanuary 2010WHEREAS: The University of British Columbia Africa Awareness Initiative is a student-runorganization whose mission statement is:"INVOLVING AFRICA IN THE CREATION OF GLOBAL CITIZENS"AND WHEREAS: The UBC Africa Awareness Initiative provides a forum for BritishColumbians to learn about the experiences of black Canadians in our society, and the vital rolethis community has played throughout our shared history;AND WHEREAS: Black History Month celebrates the involvement of black people and theirachievements, during which fellow Canadians have an opportunity to learn more of the blackpeople's experiences;AND WHEREAS: We applaud and commend the citizens of British Columbia, the faculty andstudents of the University of British Columbia for their dedication and commitment to thecourses of Africa Awareness Initiative, and wish them continued success;I, THEREFORE: proclaim that the month of January be observed as "Africa Awareness Month"in the District of Mission. I further urge all citizens and establishments to give the UBC AfricaAwareness Initiative the greatest possible support.Let's make the world a better place for all of us!

CENTRE D'INTEGRATION POUR CENTRE OF INTEGRATION FOR 7IMMIGRANTS AFRICATNSC LAXAFRICAN IMMIGRANTS#811 Carnarvon St, New Westminster, BC, Canada 173M 1E9 - Tel.: 604 759 0240 Fax: 604 759 9202www.ciia-ciai.comDecember 14, 2009His WorshipDISTRICT OF MISSIONDate9Ack'd/12/211 .Distd Date Scanned Fi e Categ ry1' (11File Folder Name f‘Mayor James Atebe tfOckin crtions 2610District of Mission8645 Stave Lake StreetBox 20, Mission, BCV2V 4L9Dear Mayor Atebe:To: aNtayor 1yppylersliMayorRB DH Exempt 0 COWOtherFor: OReport to COW 0 Inforrnaton ❑ Reply for Mayor's SigD Requested By Cllr Oln Response to Council Foupw Up— Email: paulliriciia-cialcomThe Centre of Integration for African Immigrants (CIA!) is hosting our 6th annual BlackHistory Month celebrations. We are requesting municipalities across the LowerMainland to officially declare February 2010 as Black History Month. (Please seeenclosed sample Proclamations.)In December 1995, the Parliament of Canada officially recognized February as BlackHistory Month. This came as a result of a motion introduced by Jean Augustine,P.C., M.P., the first African Canadian woman elected to Parliament.Since then, Black History Month has been celebrated in communities all acrossCanada. In BC this month-long celebration coincides with the winter Olympics, tohighlight the contributions made by Blacks in sports, and also the historical growth ofCanada. The Lower Mainland is home to over 80,000 Blacks and this numbercontinues to increase annually. We are hoping that through this municipaldeclaration, people within your community will seek ways to celebrate Black HistoryMonthOn behalf of the Black community, we thank you for your participation in recognizingthis important cultural and historical occasion.

8Office of the MayorCITY OFBRITISH COLUMBIAproclamationWHEREAS, British Columbia is a culturally diverse Provincecomprised of many people and communities; andWHEREAS,WHEREAS,people of African descent have been a part of BritishColumbia since 1858, and have contributed to thecultural, economic, political and social developmentof the Province; andpeople in the Province of British Columbia recognizethe contributions of people of African heritage andwish to celebrate in commemoration of Black HistoryMonth;NOW THEREFORE, I,., as MAYOR of the City of, DO HEREBY PROCLAIM the month of February, 2005, as,"BLACK HISTORY MONTH"in the City of_NameMAYOR

9lsslonMDISTRICTisslonOFON THE FRASERCorporate AdministrationMemorandumFile Category:File Folder:ADM.PUB.EVE.2010 Olympic GamesTO: Chief Administrative OfficerFROM: Deputy Director of Corporate AdministrationDATE: January 8, 2010SUBJECT: FEBRUARY 8, 2010 — JACK POOLE DAYRECOMMENDATION:That Council proclaim February 8, 2010 as Jack Poole Day in the District of Mission.BACKGROUND:On February 8, 2010 the 2010 Olympic Winter Games Torch will be travelling through theDistrict of Mission and preparations are currently underway to celebrate this event.Council wishes to honor long time Mission resident Jack Poole who as part of his legacy workeddiligently to bring the 2010 Olympics to British Columbia. To honor his dedication and hardwork, Council wishes to proclaim February 8, 2010 as Jack Poole day.Kelly RidleygAclerk\confidentiaRkelly\2010treports to counciRjack poole day proclamation.docPAGE 1 OF 1

PPPIONIMPIPMP IIIIIPP1.611411DISTRICT OF MISSION71,DEC 7 .2 7nir1 0REQUEST TO APPEAR AS A DELEGATIONDate: Pee-- 2i /ogTo: Dennis Clark, Director of Corporate AdministrationI hereby request permission to appear as a delegation before District of MissionMayor and Council with reference to the following topic:f° IP elk PG./ f C4-K14-14 14,-/v6PA/0_ cs ekes's v .ec-gt 41 C4-k,i-e4k1 „ 6 sc-t -(s- 7e40e -14-7c A-0 /A/6( -I 7."-, 4n.s. it 7/4-e. 1-79c.,,IMvi ,vi;,r 18 A4-4/ Gvell:7' Ahi-j CZY•Ce-C 5 iae) 64,1C ert c.eI understand that the deadline for submission of the request is 4:30 p.m. on the Monday preceding thedate of the meeting and that once my appearance has been confirmed, I will be allotted a maximum of 10minutes to make my presentation.Name: A/4-1444

1 1DISTRICT OF MISSIONREQUEST TO APPEAR AS A DELEGATIONDate: Jan/04/10To: Dennis Clark, Director of Corporate AdministrationI hereby request permission to appear as a delegation before District of Mission Mayor andCouncil with reference to the following topic:Mission DBA regarding Liquor Application L09-00s Mission Snipers Pool Hall Ltd33211 N. Railway AveI understand that the deadline for submission of the request is 4:30 p.m. on the Monday preceding thedate of the meeting and that once my appearance has been confirmed, I will be allotted a maximum of 10minutes to make my presentation.Name: Mission DBAAddress: 7311 James St PO Box 3461City:Mission BCPostal Code:V2V 4J3 Telephone: 604-814-2022Signature:G:clerk/forms/request to appear as a delegation.docDelegation Confirmed to Appear on:Date Confirmed:Time:Confirmed by:

12misisTsRicon.,ON THE FRASERCorporate AdministrationMemorandumFile Category:File Folder:ADM.COM.COMSocial Development CommissionTo: Chief Administrative OfficerFrom: Manager of Social DevelopmentDate: January 12, 2010Subject: Social, Development Report (Review of 2009)Section 1 - Social Development program updatesSection 2 - Program Goals for 2010Section 3 - Social Development Working Group UpdatesSection 4 - ReviewSection 1: Social Development program updatesI began my position as Social Development Manager January 26, 2009 with my last Progress Report toCouncil on June 3, 2009. This report will outline activities of the Social Development Commission andrelated working groups from June 2009 to the present as well as clarify the ways in which the SocialDevelopment Commission is transitioning and my goals and vision to advance the program forward in2010.Beginning in 2010, I will provide Council with quarterly reports on the Social Development program.This will provide consistent communication and enable Council to keep updated with the program.New membershipTwelve members were initially appointed to the Social Development Commission in 2006. Six of thesemembers have either stepped down or been replaced due to their lack of availability to adequatelyparticipate at the Commission level. These six members have been replaced along with two new youthrepresentatives. Additional members of the Mission community have demonstrated interest in joining theSocial Development Commission, thus expanding our membership is a future topic of debate.Membership will be reviewed annually and diversifying membership will remain top priority when-inviting new members-to-join-the-Commission.World Youth in MissionCanada World Youth is an educational youth exchange program that will be in Mission December 2009 -March 2010. For the participants, the family, the community, and the team are their school. Theinteractions and experiences they have in their host community provides for a tremendous amount ofPage 1 of 11

16District of Mission Website — Social Development site upgradeOne of my personal program goals for 2010 is the updating and redesign of the social developmentwebpage on the District site. Currently, there is a link to the plan without any updated information. As .apart of celebrating the accomplishments and progress of the plan, I intend to showcase each workinggroup, their successes and current projects. Webpage development will focus on making SocialDevelopment more accessible to the public, including pictures of events, participant testimonials and theposting of meeting dates, times and locations. Suggestions for future development of the site couldincorporate online surveys to gather feedback from the communityAdditionally, it has been brought to my attention by MFAN (Mission Food Access Network) thatcommunity food sustainability, nutrition and food security are not mentioned anywhere in the SocialDevelopment Plan and should be incorporated into the ideals of health and wellness. Thus, revisions willmost likely include the previously non included area of food security and sustainability. Over time, Iintend to incorporate into the plan an overarching theme of sustainability of which it currently does notpossess.Faith and CommunityFaith communities and religious-based organizations are major resources for building community, andaddressing social and systemic issues.In 2010 I will be asking faith leaders in our community to share how their religious organizations discussissues and decide on actions in relation to the well-being of the community. It is apparent that we need toincrease the dialogue between different religious groups, agencies and organizations. As all faiths differ, itis important to learn both multicultural sensitivity and appropriate steps to take , when wishing to engagewith the faith community. In a meeting with St. Andrew's Church in November, I learned that manychurches are only communicating with and receiving updates from a small number of communityorganizations. Thus in 2010, I will be arranging meetings with church leaders to discuss the networking ofcommunity events and how best to coordinate congregational participation. Additionally, as a growingsegment of congregation members are aging, this approach would target two populations, faith groups andseniors.Community CanoeIn partnership with Parks Recreation and Culture, I am drafting a contract for the community canoe to beavailable for rental this upcoming spring/summer 2010.Bookings will occur through the same format as the public stage and under the coordination ofrecreational staff.Community SchoolsAligwatliTr,c—Diaiii's Vision 2020'. -Adaptive—Sclakifs Enabling Student Success -Report, amomentum is building to re-establish the community schools working group. Community education is anopportunity for local citizens and community schools, agencies and institutions to become active partnersin addressing education and community concerns.The Association for Community Education in British Columbia states that the community educationPage 5 of 11

17process brings community members together to identify and link community needs and resources in amanner that helps people to raise the quality of life in their communities. Overall, it is an educationalphilosophy which embraces the. belief that education is a lifelong process. Community schools in B.C. areelementary or secondary schools with a special emphasis on the belief held by residents and staff in thevalue of community involvement and integration.A community school takes one of the largest and most under utilized public facilities, the public school,and increases the investment by keeping it open during evenings, weekends, and during the summer forcommunity activities. It is in this way that community development is promoted. I expect the report backevent to clarify direction for this group as well as determine group membership. I was informed throughdiscussions with Abbotsford Community Schools that there are families in Mission whose children areenrolled in Abbotsford community schools simply because Mission does not currently offer this approach.Thus, this working group is interested in dialogue around utilizing the community schools approach tostrengthen neighborhood connections.Leq'a:mel First Nations ConferenceA conference focusing on Residential School trauma and renewing relationships will be held at Leq'a:melFirst Nations community hall January 19-21 st 2010. I intend to go to this conference representing both theDistrict of Mission as well as the Social Development Program. It is through these opportunities that Ibelieve we can begin to make the connections and gain the trust of partnerships with First Nationscommunities.Section 3: Social Development Working Group UpdatesThe term sub-committees has been replaced with the term working groups to better reflect the nature ofthese groupS.OutreachThe purpose of this committee is to improve access to programs and services by relocating existingservices and developing new services based on neighborhood needs.The Outreach working group welcomed a new Chair in November 2009. Jacquelyn Jeanne is a communitymember passionately involved in community development. In addition to welcoming our new chair, thegroup along with the literacy bus sub-committee is celebrating the mobility of the literacy bus andwelcomes new driver George Anthony who will begin his position in the New Year. George is a long timeMission resident and currently works as a spare driver for Mission Public Schools.With renovations complete, the literacy bus (a standard full size renovated school bus) will provide mobile__outreach services within rural areas in Mission and offer multiple resources. Additionally, a book lendingand informational resource program will be offered out of the bus. Transportation continues to be a barrierto much of the rural population in Mission, resulting in many children and youth being unable toparticipate in recreational, library, sport or after school planning. The literacy bus will assist in thechallenge of transportation by bringing integral resources to vulnerable families in these rural Missionareas.Page 6 of 11

18Additionally, the Early Development Instrument Scores (EDI scores) for Mission shows a vulnerabilityindex for children age 5 higher than the provincial average in most categories. Thus, the Literacy bus is acommunity development initiative to implement positive change. A needs assessment will be undertakenwith bus participants to determine specific areas of community intervention in January and February 2010.40 Developmental AssetsThe purpose of this working group is to initiate the implementation of the Search Institute's 40Developmental Assets throughout the community. Additionally, this working group is involved in anyissues relatedto youth. Currently Constable Sharon Siluch Chairs this working group with a youth cochairMs. Samantha Reeves.This working group celebrated the launch of youth website Moltspace www.moltspace.ca in September2009. This website developed from feedback from youth regarding a lack of resources aimed at youth.Thus, the creation of moltspace developed as a website created for youth by youth. As with the electronicresource bureau website, the launch is the start of a project this group hopes to see flourish in the years tocome. High school students will be able to access information about Post-Secondary scholarships,community events and volunteer resources among others.Currently, this working group has partnered with Fraser House Society to assist in the coordination ofChallenge Day for Mission youth. The Challenge Day mission is to provide youth and their communitieswith experiential programs that demonstrate the possibility of love and connection through the celebrationof diversity, truth and full expression. Since 1987, Challenge Day has served more than 1 million youth in400 cities, 45 U.S. States and five provinces in Canada.This 6.5 hour program is designed for 100 students per session. The program aims to create and buildconnection and empathy and serve as the foundation that ignites a movement in compassion and positivechange. Fraser House is committed to seeing this workshop come to Mission, thus the 40 assets workinggroup is currently strategizing a fundraising plan in partnership with Fraser House and the community.40 Developmental Assets Follow UpThe 40 Developmental Assets Group is engaged in dialogue around implementing the assets survey resultswithin the community. One goal for 2010 in relation to the Literacy bus is to coordinate bus visits to lowincome housing complexes. One Housing complex "Mission Heights" has come to the attention of the 40Developmental Assets working group for assistance. The youth living in this complex are considered highrisk and most families in the complex are low income single parents. I have had meetings with both the onand off site managers for this complex around utilizing the literacy bus for mobile outreach. This issomething Lplanio developlurtherin 20111Asset building in a community is an ongoing process. True asset building begins before birth equippingnew parents with integral skills and continues until young people become independent adults. In thiscontext, Mission has already begun to work towards implementing the assets in our community throughthe development of partnerships towards a common goal. As you strengthen relationships within andPage 7 of 11

19between these spheres of influence across the community, you work towards building a web ofinterconnected efforts that support one another. Sustainable success results from interconnectingcommunity members in all settings where adults and youth intersect.The 40 Developmental assets working group is creating a positive vision which can energize a communityfor the long term. The vision for Mission focuses on encouraging organizations and institutions tointegrate asset building into their own mission and commitments. Asset building is a long-term vision, nota quick fix; however it is important to celebrate successes along the way to renew energy and refocuscommitment. One elementary school in Surrey making a shift to a more community oriented school istaking the assets and incorporating them into the curriculum. Perhaps this is a model we can adopt infuture years.Town SquaresThe purpose of this sub-committee is to identify and facilitate the creation of town squares throughoutMission. The goal is to establish public meeting spaces and places and enable citizens to meet, socializeand feel like part of their community.The town squares working group broke ground on the rain garden project in October 2009 at the corner of7th Avenue and Grand street. The goal of the Rain Garden is to add bio-diversity to the neighborhoodthrough an interactive demonstration of rain-water management as a self-sustaining environmental pilotproject. It will be an innovative educational 'green' experience, and an accessible social interactive space.Over $25,000 was raised for this project through donations, materials and volunteer time. This group hasworked diligently to make this project a reality.HousingThe purpose of the Housing Committee is to advocate and establish for a wide variety of housing optionsthroughout Mission to meet the needs of its residents.The housing working group is actively involved in consultation workshops with Planning through SharonFletcher and Dayle Reti. The diversity and housing experience of this working group has been greatlyinformative and beneficial to this process. The group is actively engaged in establishing guidingprinciples, definitions and vision statements to contribute to the development of practical solutions for anaffordable housing strategy.Currently, this group is measuring and assessing housing need in the community. This is timely with thedevelopment of an FVRD needs assessment which will be helpful in providing us with some backgroundstatistics and information.Our neighboring communities in the FVRD are also in varying stages of developing affordable housingplans for their communities. I coordinated a FVRD Social Planners Meeting which was held on September23, 2009 to discuss the current needs assessment for the Fraser Valley. This event was followed uprecently and expanded upon in a Regional workshop held December 11, 2009 entitled "A progress reporton municipal responses to the need for affordable housing and a look at some new strategies that getPage 8 of 11

20results". Michael Geller, Architect and Developer led an afternoon workshop entitled "10 Ways toAffordable Housing: proven and promising municipal and architectural practices". This was a verysuccessful workshop that succeeded in building momentum and partnerships for the Fraser Valley.OutreachThe purpose of this committee is to improve access to programs and services by relocating existingservices and developing new services based on neighborhood needs.The Outreach working group welcomed a new Chair in November 2009. Jacquelyn Jeanne is a communitymember passionately invoNed in community development. In addition to welcoming our new chair, thegroup along with the literacy bus sub-committee is celebrating the mobility of the literacy bus andwelcomes new driver George Anthony who will begin his position in the New Year. George is a long timeMission resident and currently works as a spare driver for Mission Public Schools,With renovations complete, the literacy bus (a standard full size renovated school bus) will provide mobileoutreach services within rural areas in Mission and offer multiple resources. Additionally, a book lendingand informational resource program will be offered out of the bus. Transportation continues to be a barrierto much of the rural population in Mission, resulting in many children and youth being unable toparticipate in recreational, library, sport or after school planning. The literacy bus will 'assist in thechallenge of transportation by bringing integral resources to vulnerable families in these rural Missionareas.Additionally, the Early Development Instrument Scores (EDI scores) for Mission shows a vulnerabilityindex for children age 5 higher than the provincial average in most categories. Thus, the Literacy bus is acommunity development initiative to implementing positive change for some of these families in ruralMission. A needs assessment will, be undertaken with bus participants to determine specific areas ofcommunity intervention in January and February 2010.Central Resource BureauThe Central Resource Bureau has completed its goal of developing the www.infomission.ca websitewhich enjoyed a public launching event November 17, 2009 at the Public Library. Margaret Hardy whowas initially contracted with the District to see this project through to the launch phase has completed herfinal report and contract responsibilities. Although the website is stable for the next two years withDistrict financial support, emphasis within the newly formed interagency alliance group will focus on thefuture sustainability for the website. Additionally, an active inquiry into the future direction anddevelopment for the website will continue among partners.SPrtionIllieviewInitial planning sessions for the Social Development Plan established 11 priority areas. Learning's fromthis process have concluded that 11 priority areas under a staff of one individual and five active workinggroups exceed what can be realistically accomplished. This finding will be discussed at the report backevent. In community development work, I believe it is not a question of quantity but rather one of quality.Page 9 of 11

21Thus, revisions to the plan in 2010 will incorporate outcomes of the 2010 Report Back Event and usethese outcomes as guiding principles. Community development work is not a static process but rather aconstantly adapting and flexible process to the community as it transitions and grows.Additionally, a consistent finding and frustration among working groups is the lack of facilitation skillsfor individual working groups. As these groups consist of citizens, few people possess the managementskills required for effectively mobilizing a group of people towards a common goal. One future strategycould be to provide annual basic facilitator's training for the Chairs of working groups with theexpectation of a one year commitment to Chair a working group. This presents a situation benefiting bothparties as facilitation training adds to a resume and the group benefits from effective leadership andtherefore increased capacity.As part of my position with the District, I have been evaluating how the Social Development Program canbest serve the community. In the past 11 months my work can be categorized into four main hubs:1. Community engagement and relationship building (includingeducation and awareness)2. WOrking group facilitation (both under the SDC and communitybased)3. Social Development Commission facilitation and coordination4. Liaison to Planning for relevant community projects and issuesThe social factors within a community do not work in isolation but rather affect all aspects of community.With the original Social Development Plan as a framework, I see my role as entering in phase 2 toimplement the plan to the best of current capacity and to uncover what is realistic, practical andachievable, thus evaluating this on an annual basis.As with all communities, Mission faces many challenges; however, I am energized in the belief thatthrough Council's forward thinking approach and directive for a social development plan, we are on apositive path to embracing change and maximizing our potential as a community.Thank you,Kirsten HargreavesManager of Social DevelopmentPage 10 of 11

lsslonMDISTRICT OFON THE FRASEREngineering and Public WorksMemorandum22File Category:File Folder:INF.WAT.DISWater Management Leak DetectionTo: Chief Administrative OfficerFrom: Superintendent of UtilitiesDate: December 21, 2009Subject: 2009 Report — Leak Detection ProgramSummaryThe following summarizes the progress to the 2009 year end for the Leak Detection Program plus theinclusion of the previous 2008 year:1. Original budget $105,096 which included a $10,000 Provincial Government Infrastructure Grant.With $47,483 being expended in 2009 plus $49,900 in 2008; for a total of $97,383 over the firsttwo years of the program.2. The type of leak detection equipment purchased is acoustic, which is a modern computer-basedinstrument that has a simple field setup and works by measuring leak signals (sound or vibration)at two points that bracket a suspected leak. The position of the leak is then determinedautomatically based on the time shift between the leak signals. Prior to excavation the location isconfirm by use of a powerful ground microphone. All excavations have found a leak; no dry holedug.3. Leak detection survey work was carried out on 43 Km of water main in 2009 plus 9 Km in 2008 fora total of 52 Km in over the first two year. The District of Mission has approximately 170kilometers of water main; therefore approximately 30% has now been surveyed.4. The survey work in 2009 found 7 leaks compared with 6 in 2008; all have been repaired. The totalannual estimated water saving is 35,740 cubic meters in 2009 with a further 13,140 cubic metersin 2008 for a total of 48,880 cubic meters. A copy of the summary of located leaks for 2009 is alsoattached.A copy of the 2008 report is also attached for reference.BackgroundThe Drought Management and Water Conservation Study completed in February 2006 for theAbbotsford/Mission Water & Sewer Commission, states "the given statistics suggest that leakage/UFW(UFW - unaccounted for water loss) is much higher in Mission than in Abbotsford, likely over 25%". Aspart of the reports many recommendations, number 48 states:"Similarly, water losses cannot be directly calculated. The given statistics, however, suggests that leakageand losses are much higher in Mission than in Abbotsford, likely over 25%. This could be quantified byfurther analysis, but an -implied conclusion is-that-accelerated -leak detection should be considered".It is noted that UFW is normally around 10 - 15 % in typical municipal water systems accounting for watermain flushing, fire flows and leakage. Based on the concerns raised in the report the District of Missionchose to undertake a leak detection program and sought grant assistance from the ProvincialGovernment, which was approved in 2008.Page 1 of 2

232010The survey work will continue in 2010 and beyond under funding established in the water operationsaccount as the existing funding in the water capital program is almost exhausted; $75,000 has beenbudgeted for each of the next 5 years. Assuming continued good progress at completing the leak surveywork of the water system, it is reasonable to expect that we will be completed the initial survey by 2012 or2013. Once the survey of the entire system is completed it would be appropriate to start again where westarted in 2008. Leak detection programs recommend that a survey of a water main be completed atleast once every 5 years because leaks are continually developing.ProjectionsBased on the information collected in 2009 and 2008 (note a little less then one third of the system hasbeen surveyed) the following projections have been prepared:a. The total annual water saving appear now to be in the order of (48,880 cubic meters/30%)160,000 cubic meters or 0.5 mega liter per day.b. As a portion of our current average daily flow which is approximately 19 mega liters per day thatwould represent a 2.5% reduction.c. Based on a total system (combined Abbotsford and Mission) average daily flow of 80 mega litersper day the District of Mission portion of the overall operating cost could be reduced by 0.65%.CC Director of Engineering and Public WorksCC Director of FinanceFile g:pworks/greg/2009/Memo Leak Detection Status Report 2009 Year End.doc

SUMMARY OF LOCATED LEAKS USING DETECTION SYSTEM 24WorkOrder Job # Date Street AddressMain orServicePipeTypeFlow(liter/min)Est.Ann.Loss(Cubic Meters)7559 8 20-Feb Stave Lake 7469 Service Copper 1 525.6Method of Repairprivate Leak Repaired byHomeowner7559 9 3-Apr Raven 31958 Service Plastic 2 1,051.2 Replaced Service7559 10 15-May Brant 32508 Service Plastic 2 1,051.2 Replaced Service7559 11 24-Jul 7th 32477 Service Copper 3 1,576.8Private Leak DisconnectedService off Peterson7559 12 2-Sep McRae 32670 Service Copper 40 21,024.0 Replaced Service7559 13 29-Sep Edge 7829 Service 0.0 Private Leak in Backyard7559 14 9-Oct McRae 32694 Service PE+Copv 20 10,512.0 Replaced Service at Main0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Grand Total Year to Date for 2009 35,740.8I I IUnderlined flows are estimates because service replaced without excavatino -at the road.G:\PWORKS\UTILITY\Leak Detection Summary.xis-2009 WO# 7558

lsslonMDISTRICT OFON THE FRASERDirector of Engineering and Public WorksMemorandum25File Category:File Folder:INF.WAT.DISWater Management Leak DetectionTo: Chief Administrative 'officerFrom: Superintendent of UtilitiesDate: March 4, 2009Subject: 2008 Report — Leak Detection ProgramSummaryThe following summarizes the progress to the 2008 year end for the Leak Detection Program and willprovide the basis for our Provincial Infrastructure Grant claim:1. Original budget $105,096 which included a $10,000 Provincial Government Infrastructure Grant.With $49,900.16 being expended in 2008; $32,332.68 on leak detection equipment and training(copies of the invoices are attached) with the balance $17,567.48 as expenses to locate andrepair leaks plus administration.2. The type of leak detection equipment purchased is acoustic, which is a modern computer-basedinstrument that has a simple field setup and works by measuring leak signals (sound or vibratiOn)at two points that bracket a suspected leak. The position of the leak is then determinedautomatically based on the time shift between the leak signals. Prior to excavation the location isconfirm by use of a powerful ground microphone. All excavations have found a leak; no dry holedug.3. Leak detection survey work was carried out on 8.43 kilometers of water main. The District ofMission has approximately 170 kilometers of water main; therefore approximately 5% wassurveyed.4. The survey work in 2008 found 6 leaks, 4 with in the road allowance and 2 on private property; allhave been repaired. Copies of each of the 6 job orders are attached. The total annual estimatedwater saving is 13,140 cubic meters. A copy of the summary of located leaks for 2008 is alsoattached.BackgroundThe Drought Management and Water Conservation Study completed in February 2006 for theAbbotsford/Mission Water & Sewer Commission, states "the given statistics suggest that leakage/UFW(UFW - unaccounted for water loss) is much higher in Mission than in Abbotsford, likely over 25%". Aspart of the reports many recommendations, number 48 states:"Similarly, water losses cannot be directly calculated. The given statistics, however, suggests that leakageand-losses are much higher in Mission than in Abbotsford, -likely -over 25%. This could be quantified byfurther analysis, but an implied conclusion is that accelerated leak detection should be considered".It is noted that UFW is normally around 10 - 15 % in typical municipal water systems accounting for watermain flushing, fire flows and leakage. Based on the concerns raised in the report the District of Missionchose to undertake a leak detection program and sought grant assistance from the ProvincialGovernment, which was approved in 2008.Page 1 of 2

262009The survey work is continuing and as of the beginning of March another 4,000 meters has beencompleted with 1 leak found and repaired; estimated annual savings of 525 cubic meters. Significantlymore of the system will be surveyed in 2009 because of the demand on staff, to service newdevelopments, has reduced significantly.ProjectionsBased on the information collected in 2008 (note only 5% of the system has been surveyed) the followingprojections have been prepared:a. The total costs to complete the survey repairs to water services will be in the order of($17,567.4815%) $350,000; therefore approximately $300,000 needs to be budget in the next fewyears.b. The total annual water saving could be in the order of (13,140 cubic meters/5%) 262,000 cubicmeters or 1 mega liter per day.c. As a portion of our current average daily flow which is approximately 19 mega liters per day thatwould represent a 5% reduction.d. Based on a total system (combined Abbotsford and Mission) average daily flow of 80 mega litersper day the District of Mission portion of the overall operating cost could be reduced by 1.25%.Greg W. GilesCC Director of Engineering and Public WorksCC Director of FinanceFile g:pworks/greg/2009/Memo Leak Detection Status Report 2008 Year End.doc

SUMMARY OF LOCATED LEAKS USING DETECTION SYSTEM 27WorkOrder Job # Date Street AddressMain orServicePipeTypeFlow(liter/min)Est.Ann.Loss(Cubic Meters)7559 2 6-Jun 2nd Ave 32901 Service Copper 1.5 788.4 Replaced Service7559 3 6-Jun 2nd Ave 32907 Service Copper 7.5 3,942.0 Replaced ServiceMethod of Repair7559 4 13-Jun 4th Ave 32890 Main 150 AC 2 1,051.2 Installed Repair Clamps7559 5 19-Sep 5th Ave 33164 Service Copper 3 1,576.87559 6 3-Oct 5th Ave 33170 Service Copper 4 2,102.47559 7 3-Oct 6th Ave 33187 Service Copper 7 3,679.2Replaced Servicejeak was underpavement flows only estimated.Private Leak Repaired byHomeownerPrivate Leak Repaired byHomeownerGrand Total Year to Date for 2008 13,140.0 As of the end of 200811i I. IUnderlined flows are estimates because service re laced without excavatin•at the road.GAPWORKS\UTILITY\Leak Detection Summary.xls-2008 WO# 7558

MissionON THE ERASEREngineering and Public WorksMemorandum28To: Chief Administrative OfficerFrom: Director of Engineering and Public WorksDate: January 14, 2010Subject: Transit & Overflow parking for WCE Users during OlympicsDuring the upcoming Olympics vehicle access at and around venues will be limited and peopleare being encouraged, through free transit passes for Olympic Ticket holders and volunteers, touse transit and the West Coast Express (WCE). As the Olympics are nearing there is someconcern about limited parking for people using the WCE in Mission to get to events. MetroVancouver staff has been coordinating with municipalities that have WCE stations to see whereadditional parking could be accommodated.This is to confirm that the gravel lot south of the West Coast Express parking lot betweenMershon St and Durieu St will be made available as overflow parking during the Olympics thisFebruary and March. The lot is currently barricaded at both ends to stop semi-trailers fromparking there and tracking mud out onto the road. Staff will be grading the area in the next fewweeks to improve drainage and provide decent parking for vehicles on a temporary basis.In the event more parking is needed the area north of Liquidation World could also be madeavailable. This will be monitored during the events. Some minor signage will also be needed todirect people to the parking areas.The alternative to this would be to let people find roadside parking on there own. This couldwork but could also prove a problem for local businesses in the downtown and industrial area.The cost for signage and grading is relatively minor so it was felt prudent to complete this usinggeneral maintenance funds in order to avoid reacting to problems later.TransitThe attached e-mail memo has been sent out to the Transit Committee for approval. If approvedthere will also be free transit for Olympic Event ticket holders and volunteers on the local transitsystem.Rick BornhofFILE: [CLICK HERE TO TYPE EFS FILE CATEGORY] PAGE 1 OF 1[Click here to type EFS File Folder Name]

HI 1111111111111111111111'WESTCOASTEXPRESS STATIONNORTH RAILWAY AVEC.P.R.EX. WESTCOASTEXPRESS PARKINGPRIMARY OVERFLOVVPARKING FOR OLYMPICS

30Lesley White-RaymondFrom: Sunita Sharma [ssharma@abbotsford.ca ]Sent: Monday, January 11, 2010 10:07 AMTo: lharris@abbotsford.ca; Moe Gill; sgibson@abbotsford.ca ; Mike Scudder; Terry Gidda; DannyPlecas [External]; James AtebeCc: Rick Bomhof; Carl Johannsen; Brown, Chris; Johann VanschaikSubject: MATC: Do we want to offer Free Transit for Olympic Event Ticket Holders andVolunteers?Attachments: image001.jpgImportance: HighPlease see email below.Sunita SharmaEngineering ClerkTel: 604-864-5514 Fax: 604-853-221941110......kr 1,0 32315 South Fraser Woy.40' Abbotsford, BC V2T 1W?ABBOTSF ORDwww.abbotsford.caFrom: Rick BomhofSent: Friday, January 08, 2010 4:52 PMTo: Kim TvergyakSubject: Do we want to offer Free Transit for Olympic Event Ticket Holders and Volunteers?Importance: HighKim, please send this out to the voting MATC members and cc to me, Carl, Johann and Chris.Dear Mission Abbotsford Transit Committee Members:Translink & BC Transit is offering free transit services for Olympic event ticket holders and volunteers in MetroVancouver and Squamish Whistler and Pemberton area. This includes the Westcoast Express service. Translink has askedif we will be doing the same.As the next MATC meeting is not until Jan 28th and Olympics starting on Feb 12th the committee chair Mayor JamesAtebe asked that this be sent out by e-mail to the MATC committee members for early approval prior to the Jan 28thmeeting. Early approval is requested so it can be adequately advertised and promoted if approved.It is recommended that transit on the Mission Abbotsford Transit system be provided free during the Olympics andParalympics period (Feb 12 - 28, 2010 and March 12 - 21, 2010) to Olympic/Paralympic event ticket holders and VANOCvolunteers for the following reasons:• It is an excellent good will gesture to the public• It provides a good opportunity to promote transit to people that may not otherwise have used transit (couldinfluence them to consider it in the future)• As confirmed by BC Transit it will have minimal cost impact since the non-transit users who have Olympictickets or volunteers would not have used transit were it not for the Olympics; and for transit users it is likelythat a good percentage of those buy monthly passes which they would continue to need for the month ofFebruary and March for their regular day to day activities outside the Olympics.• It's a once in a lifetime event in this area.It is also recommended that staff prepare a press release to inform the public and advertise the service in the respectiveCity Pages and websites.1

31Please respond by e-mail by Wednesday, January 13, 2010 if you are in favor or not of these recommendations.Rick Bonnhof, P.EngDirector of Engineering & Public WorksPh 604-820-3739Fx 604-826-13632

MDISTRICT OF*ON THE FRASERInspection ServicesMemorandum33To: Chief Administrative OfficerFrom: Manager of Inspection ServicesDate: January 11, 2010Subject: Inspection Services Department Report — 4 th Quarter 20091. BUILDING PERMITSPlease refer to the attached statistical reports.2. BUSINESS LICENCES2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Resident 531 534 600 634 647 645Home Occupations 537 543 525 578 667 652Non-Resident 486 464 431 506 611 588Total Licences 1554 1541 1556 1718 1925 1885Total Revenue $271,042 $272,633 $216,358 $242,124 $268,639 $273,2633. BYLAW ENFORCEMENTCategory(Written Complaints)TotalFromPreviousYear1stQtr2ndQtr3rd Qtr 4th Qtr Total OpenFilesUntidy Premise 90 10 51 32 25 118 18Unauthorized Suites 1 1 0 2 0Dumping/Littering 2 1 . 2 2 5 1Zoning Bylaw 13 2 4 3 1 10 2Second Dwelling 3 1 2 0 3 1Noise Bylaw 57 4 7 32 10 53 0Traffic Bylaw 108 27 34 37 29 127 5Business Licence 4 1 2 3 0 6 0Building Bylaw 54 3 15 15 1 34 2Miscellaneous 77 7 4 . 9 2 22 2Total 408 56 118 136 70 380 314. MTI TICKETSA total of 447 tickets were issued.Beverly EndersbyG:\inspect\chris\chadmin.docFILE: ADM.REP.INS PAGE 1 OF 1Year End Building

_DISTRICT or MISSION BUILDING,I4EPOHTCOMPARISON OF TOTAL PEITIWT-S rot; MONTH OF OCTOBER 2005 - 2009MONTH OF OCTOBER 2005 2006 2007 2008 2008/VALUE 2009 2009NALUEResidential Units 7 7 17 2 $223,426.00 13 $2,405,901.00Duplex Units 0 0 0 0 $0.00 0 $0.00Multi-Family Units 0 25 0 0 $0.00 0 $0.00Mobile 0 0 0 0 $0.00 0 $0.00TOTAL RESIDENTIAL UNITS 7 32 17 2 $223,426.00 13 $2,405,901.00Res. Additions & Alterations 5 2 3 1 $9,360.00 3 $142,837.00Institutional 0 0 0 0 $0.00 1 $60,000.00Commercial 3 1 2 1 $40,000.00 3 $25,000.00Industrial 1 2 2 0 $0.00 1 $200,000.00Miscellaneous 1 2 10 10 $368,660.00 9 $172,570.00Demolitions 1 2 2 1 2,TOTAL PERMITS FOR MONTH 18 41 36 15 $641,446.00 32 $3,006,308.00'COMPARISON OF TOTAL PERMITS FOR YEAR TO DATE 2005 - 2009YEAR TO DATE 2005 2006 2007 2008 2008/VALUE 2009 2009/VALUEResidential Dwellings 162 150 197 115 $22,938,979.00 83 $16,376,596.00Duplex Units 0 3 0 1 $211,200.00 0 $0.00Multi-Family Units 183 26 138 0 $0.00 0 $0.00Mobile 1 1 1 4 $172,536.00 0 $0.00TOTAL RESIDENTIAL TO DATE 346 180 336 120 $23,322,715.00 83 $16,376,596.00Res. Additions & Alterations 50 37 42 25 $918,567.00 27 $758,057.00Institutional 6 4 1 3 $7,642,711.00 2 $522,000.00Commercial 17 14 12 10 $6,510,601.00 12 $577,000.00Industrial 3 2 2 6 $1,427,500.00 13 $2,661,000.00.Miscellaneous 37 65 61 122 $3,471,735.00 104 $2,597,561.00Demolitions 12 12 23 28 12•TOTAL YEAR TO DATE PERMITS 471 314 477 314 $43,293,829.00 253 $23,492,214.00Completions to date 230 114 126 141 89

DISTAICT OF ttniSSIoN Etitt_biltiG REPOR iCOMPÄRiS9N COP tOTAL PEttfortg Poil MONTH OP NOV iViBk,F1 2005-2009MONTH OF NOVEMBER 2005 2006 2007 2008 2008NALUE 2009 2009NALUEResidential Units 5 4 6 2 $535,771.00 7 $1,260,937.00Duplex Units 0 0 0 0 $0.00 0 $0.00Multi-Family Units 0 0 26 0 $0.00 0 $0.00Mobile 0 0 0 0 $0.00 0 $0.00TOTAL RESIDENTIAL UNITS 5 4 32 2 $535,771.00 7 $1,260,937.00Res. Additions & Alterations 1 3 2 1 $34,372.00 3 $129,275.00Institutional 0 0 0 0 $0.00 1 $27,820.00Commercial 4 1 2 2 $51,000.00 1 $1,000.00Industrial 0 0 0 1 $1,250,000.00 0 $0.00Miscellaneous 8 2 6 5 $87,364.00 15 $470,871.00Demolitions 1 0 2 1 1TOTAL PERMITS FOR MONTH 19 10 44 12 $1,958,507.00 28 $1,889,903.00cOM ArtigtiN OFT r i NUTS on YEA 0; T 200$ 2,409YEAR TO DATE 2005 2006 2007 2008 2008/VALUE 2009 2009NALUEResidential Dwellings 167 154 203 117 $23,474,750.00 90 $17,637,533.00Duplex Units 0 3 0 1 $211,200.00 0 $0.00Multi-Family Units 183 26 164 0 $0.00 0 $0.00Mobile 1 1 1 4 $172,536.00 0 $0.00TOTAL RESIDENTIAL TO DATE 351 184 368 122 $23,858,486.00 90 $17,637,533.00Res. Additions & Alterations 51 40 44 26 $952,939.00 30 $887,332.00Institutional 6 4 1 3 $7,642,711.00 3 $549,820.00Commercial 21 15 14 12 $6,561,601.00 13 $578,000.00Industrial 3 2 2 7 $2,677,500.00 13 $2,661,000.00Miscellaneous 45 67 67 127 $3,559,099.00 119 $3,068,432.00Demolitions 13 12 25 29 13TOTAL YEAR TO DATE PERMITS 490 324 521 326 $45,252,336.00 281 $25,382,117.00Completions to Date 259 130 142 152 108

DISTRICT OF. MIS ION BUILDING REPORTCOMPARISON OF TOTAL PERMITS FOR MONTH OF DECEMBER 2005 - 2009MONTH OF DECEMBER 2005 2006 2007 2008 2008NALUE 2009 2009NALUEResidential Units 5 4 10 1 $345,986.00 6 $1,025,574.00Duplex Units 0 0 0 0 $0.00 0 $0.00Multi-Family Units 0 0 0 0 $0.00 0 $0.00Mobile 0 0 0 0 $0.00 0 $0.00TOTAL RESIDENTIAL UNITS 5 4 10 1 $345,986.00 6 $1,025,574.00Res. Additions & Alteratioris 2 1 4 1 $25,944.00 3 $29,962.00Institutional 0 0 0 0 $0.00 0 $0.00Commercial 1 0 0 1 $50,000.00 1 $16,000.00Industrial 0 0 3 2 $16,000.00 0 $0.00Miscellaneous 1 1 9 5 $313,656.00 8 $182,363.00Demolitions 0 0 0 3 3TOTAL PERMITS FOR MONTH 9 6 26 13 $751,586.00 21 $1,253,899.00COMPARISON OF TOTAL PERMITS FOR YEAR TO DATE 2005 - 2009YEAR TO DATE 2005 2006 2007 2008 2008NALUE 2009 2009NALUEResidential Dwellings 172 158 213 118 $23,820,736.00 96 $18,663,107.00Duplex Units 0 3 0 1 $211,200.00 0 . $0.00Multi-Family Units 183 26 164 0 $0.00 0 $0.00Mobile 1 1 1 4 $172,536.00 0 $0.00TOTAL RESIDENTIAL TO DATE 356 188 378 123 $24,204,472.00 96 $18,663,107.00Res. Additions & Alterations 53 41 48 27 $978,883.00 33 $917,294.00Institutional 6 4 1 3 $7,642,711.00 3 $549,820.00Commercial 22 15 14 13 $6,611,601.00 14 $594,000.00Industrial 3 2 5 9 $2,693,500.00 13 $2,661,000.00Miscellaneous 46 68 76 132 $3,872,755.00 127 $3,250,795.00Demolitions 13 12 25 32 16TOTAL YEAR TO DATE PERMITS 499 330 547 339 $46,003,922.00 302 $26,636,016.00Completions to Date 279 131 137 168 124

MDISTRICT OFSSON THE FRASER ,FPPlanning DepartmentMemorandum37FILE: ADM.REP.COMDevelopment ProjectsTo: Chief Administrative OfficerFrom: Pl8nning TechnicianDate: January 18, 2010Subject: Major Development Project Update — January 6, 2010Attached is the Major Development Project Update dated January 6, 2010. The informationcontained in the update includes commercial, industrial, institutional and residentialdevelopment in the District of Mission.Additional details regarding any of these development applications may be obtained from thePlanning Department.Donna-Lee L kesG:\COMDEV\DONNA-LEE\COW Reports \2010 Reports \Major Development Project Update Cover Memo January 6, 2010.docPAGE 1 OF 1

DISTRICT OF MISSIONUpdateJanuary 6, 2010

Major Development Project Update - January 6, 2010TYPE OFDEVELOPMENTFILE NUMBER &APPLICANT'S NAMECIVIC ADDRESSOR LOCATIONDENSITY OFDEVELOPMENTPROJECT FEATURES& CHARACTERISTICSSTATUS OFDEVELOPMENT1. Commercial DP09-003 7871 Stave LakeUrban Design Group StreetArchitectsApprox. 40,000 squarefoot commercialneighbourhood shoppingdevelopment whichincludes an additional10,000 square feet ofoffice space.Acrylic stucco, wood andcultured stone materialsare proposed withcanopies and awningsover storefronts.Pedestrian friendly withoutside sitting areas.A report to Council isforthcoming.2. Commercial DP07-001 32471 LougheedMission WesternHighwayDevelopmentsLtd./Harvey WeissApprox. 35,000 squarefoot commercialdevelopment with officespace.Prominent 'gateway'commercial project.Approved (with conditions) onDecember 10, 2007.3. Commercial DP06-006 7057 Mershon StreetJo-Anne Chadwick3 commercial units onthe first floor above theunder building parkinglayer and 5 residentialunits above thecommercial floor.Wood, shingles and rockmaterials are proposedand articulate thestructure with largewindows, decks anddormer windows in a waythat capitalizes on theview of the Fraser River.Application is on hold pendingwaterfront planning.4. Commercial DP05-002 & R05-005 33420 & 33430Jerry DhillonDewdney Trunk Road(ie. northeast corner ofCade Barr St. &Dewdney Trunk Rd.)2,085 square footconvenience store andgas pumps. Also 782square feet of othercommercial space.Convenience store, gaspumps and commercialspace with a residence(1,607 square feet) abovethe store.Third reading grantedSeptember 6, 2005. Developerhas been granted a fourth 1-year extension to finalizeoutstanding rezoningrequirements.5. Commercial DPO4-012 33888 Dewdney TrunkAli ShameiRoad (ie. northeastcorner of Stave LakeSt. & Dewdney TrunkRd.)Approx. 1,409 squarefoot convenience storewith residence above,and gas pumps.Convenience store andgas pumps with aresidence (1,127 squarefeet) above the store.Development Permit approvedApril 7, 2008. The site iscurrently for sale.6. Industrial DP08-007 7266 River PlaceKrahn Engineering0.783 acre site 1,367.4 square metre(14,719 sq. ft.) multitenantbuilding.Development Permit approvedJune 1, 2009. Construction ofthe new DFO office is 50%complete.

TYPE OF FILE NUMBER & CIVIC ADDRESS DENSITY OF PROJECT FEATURES STATUS OFDEVELOPMENT APPLICANT'S NAME OR LOCATION DEVELOPMENT & CHARACTERISTICS DEVELOPMENT7. Industrial DP08-003 31510 Gill Avenue & 1.41 acre &Silvercreek Investments Lot 8 Gill Avenue (to1.49 acresLtd.be consolidated)3 tilt-up concretebuildings with a totalfootprint of 4,582.85square metres (49,331sq. ft.) & an additional845 square metres (9,100sq. ft.) of office space ona 2nd mezzanine floor.Development Permit approvedSeptember 29, 2008. A buildingpermit has been issued for thefirst building which is 75%complete.8. Industrial D08-001 31413 Gill Avenue 1.94 acre siteTeck Construction9. Industrial R07-022 10100 Shaw Street Approx. 43 acresDistrict of Mission (Shaw Pit)10. Industrial DP07-004 7252 River Place 0.765 acre siteKrahn Engineering Ltd.11. Industrial DP07-002 33433 Railway Approx. 103,500 squarePJ Lovick Architect Ltd. Avenue foot mini-storagewarehouse building.3,492.85 square metre(37,598 sq. ft.) multitenantbuilding (approx.2,885.2m 2 of industrialspace & 607.66m 2 ofoffice space).Rezone the Shaw Pit toallow the District ofMission to extract andprocess gravel from theproperty.Approx. 15,727 squarefoot multi-tenant building.Two phases ofdevelopment. Includesindividual storage unitsand office space for theoperation of the facility.Development Permit approvedJune 23, 2008. A buildingpermit has been applied for butcannot be issued untiladditional required informationis submitted.Bylaw adopted October 6,2008. A request for proposals(RFP) was issued andsubmissions are beingevaluated.Development Permit approvedFebruary 25, 2008. Shellconstruction is complete andtenant improvements areunderway.Construction is complete andmini-storage is open.12. Industrial DP06-009 7261 River Place 1.8 acre siteKeystone ArchitectureTwo multi-tenantwarehouses; Building #1— approx. 22,956 sq. ft.and Building #2 — approx.14,839 sq. ft.Development Permit approvedAugust 28, 2006. Constructionis complete.

TYPE OF FILE NUMBER & CIVIC ADDRESS DENSITY OFDEVELOPMENT APPLICANT'S NAME OR LOCATION DEVELOPMENTPROJECT FEATURES& CHARACTERISTICSSTATUS OFDEVELOPMENT13.Institutional R08-005 & DP08-002 33043 2"d Avenue 0.14 acre siteIda Castro15-bed specialized carefacility.Third reading was grantedSeptember 8, 2009. Applicantis working to completeoutstanding rezoningrequirements.14. InstitutionalR08-018Mission CommunityServices32646 Logan AvenueExisting 10,000 squarefoot, two-storey building.Homeless andemergency shelter; a foodbank; general counsellingand life skills training.Rezoning adopted October 14,2008. The homeless andemergency shelter is operating.15. InstitutionalR08-027Barry GowlingArchitect33038 Dewdney TrunkRoad4.76 acre siteApproximate 1497.1square metre (16,116 sq.ft.) Church of Jesus Christof Latter-Day Saints.Council deferred 1 st readingpending further discussion withthe applicant regarding thefinancial impact of the proposal.16. Multi-unitResidentialDP06-012Josef Wine!7332 Grand Street2 residential units &2,000 sq. ft. ofcommercial space.Mixed commercial/residential developmentwith underground parking.Development Permit approvedAugust 27, 2007. Constructionis underway.17. Multi-unitResidentialR09-014/DP09-002/S09-008Tim Ellison7273 Hurd Street2 duplexes & a singlefamilyhome containinga secondary suite.Heritage-style duplexesto complement theexisting heritage-stylehome.A report to Council isforthcoming.18. Multi-unitResidentialR08-029Slade Dyer/Points WestArchitecture7251 Cedar ValleyConnector2.28 acre site84-unit multi-familyapartment.The applicant met with staff inDecember 2009 to reconsideroptions for the site. An updatedapplication is expected soon.19. Multi-unitResidentialR08-010 & DP08-006Perspective InvestmentsLtd.7260 & 7290 MapleStreet, 32848 & 328521 sl Avenue, 32851,32853 & 32859 ViewAvenue154 units with 1,017.3square metres (10,950square feet) ofcommercial space.Three apartmentbuildings includingamenity space andcommercial space on theground floor of buildingsA & C.A report to Council isforthcoming.20. Multi-unitResidentialR07-003/DP07-03/DV07-002Points West Architecture32501 Fraser Crescent 26 townhouse units Five wood-framed Construction is complete andbuildings including an units are for sale.amenity building. Situatedadjacent to the CedarValley Connector.

TYPE OFDEVELOPMENTFILE NUMBER &APPLICANT'S NAMECIVIC ADDRESSOR LOCATIONDENSITY OFDEVELOPMENTPROJECT FEATURES& CHARACTERISTICSSTATUS OFDEVELOPMENT21. Mixed UseDevelopmentR08-016 & R08-017Jorden Cook Assoc.Portion of SilverdaleNeighbourhood Onearea owned byGenstar & Madison365 acres with densityclustered around avillage and densitiesdetermined by thetopography of thehillside.Country-estate lots,single-family lots,townhouse, apartments,commercial andinstitutional land uses.Bylaws adopted March 2, 2009.Off-site service planning isunderway.22. ComprehensiveDevelopmentR06-023 & S08-001Lyle Holman8977 Edwards StreetWest & 8980 EdwardsStreet East109 bare land strata lots(plus one 17.9 acre ALRfarm land parcel).Proposed suburbanresidential clusterdevelopment with overallaverage density ofapprox. 1 dwelling per0.88 acres. Lots range insize from 10,961 sq. ft. to25,523 sq. ft.Second and Third readingswere granted on July 12, 2007.The applicant has been granteda second 1-year extension tocomplete the outstandingrezoning requirements.23. , ComprehensiveDevelopmentR97-019 & DPO4-011 32331 7th Avenue(DPM06-005 & DPM07-002)Patrick Cotter Architect138 unit congregateapartment facility forseniors.Market sales. Semiindependentapartmentresidential units thatcontain kitchenettes witha common dining roomand social/recreationalrooms.Development Permit approvedFebruary 7, 2005. Constructionis complete.24. ComprehensiveDevelopmentR08-007/S08-009/DP08-005Worthy Construction7655 Peterson Street& 32477 7th Avenue15 compact single-family Intensive single—familylots infill residentialdevelopment. Theproposed lots range insize from 280 squaremetres (3,000 sq. ft.) forlots with lane access and372 square metres (4,000sq. ft.) for lots with directstreet access.Third reading was grantedDecember 8, 2008. Council hasgranted the applicant a 1-yearextension to completeoutstanding rezoning andsubdivision requirements.25. Single FamilyResidentialR09-017/DP09-005/S09-013Gary Toor &KC McPherson32600 TunbridgeAvenue23 compactsingle-family lotsCompact single-familyresidential lots (min.4,004 sq. ft.).A report to Council isforthcoming.

TYPE OFDEVELOPMENTFILE NUMBER &APPLICANT'S NAMECIVIC ADDRESSOR LOCATIONDENSITY OFDEVELOPMENTPROJECT FEATURES& CHARACTERISTICSSTATUS OFDEVELOPMENT26. Single Family R08-022 & S08-019 33764, 33782 & 33790 15 lots Urban residential lotsResidential Darren Hall Dewdney Trunk Road (min. 5,005 sq. ft.).27. Single Family S08-014 32691 Best Avenue 11 lots Urban residential lotsResidential Peter Haffner (min. 6,006 sq. ft.).28. Single Family R07-032/S07-029/ 8556 Alexandra Street 14 lots Urban residential lotsResidential DV07-016 & 32578 Egglestone (min. 5,005 sq. ft.)S&S TitanAvenueDevelopment Group29. Single Family R07-024 & S07-021 32663 & 32673 14 lots Urban residential lotsResidential 555891 BC Ltd Inc. Tunbridge Avenue (min. 5,005 sq. ft.)No. BCO555891(Roger Gill)30. Comprehensive R07-021 & S07-019 34059, 34081, 34097 94 units combined 68 single-family lots, 7Development Paul Regnier Dewdney Trunk Road; of free-hold and duplex lots (14 units) and34051, 34058, 34069,34085, 34072, 34088,strata ownership a townhouse complex (12units).34112 York Avenue;8738 Stave LakeStreet31. Single Family R08-031 /S08-025 8414, 8434, 8478 26 lots Urban residential lotsResidential Carson Noftle Stave Lake Street & (min. 5,005 sq. ft.)33940 Cherry Avenue32. Single Family R07-017/D P07-06/ 32603, 32621, 32643 33 lots Compact single familyResidential DV07-010/S07-015 Egglestone Avenue residential lots (min.Gary Toor4,004.3 sq. ft.).33. Single Family R06-038/DP06-015/ 33000, 33090, 33126 65 lots Compact single familyResidential S06-036 & 33144 Tunbridge residential lots (min.Gary Toor Avenue 4,004.3 sq. ft.). GaudinCreek realignmentcontinuation.Third reading granted January5, 2009. Applicant is working tocomplete outstanding rezoningand subdivision requirements.Applicant is working tocomplete outstandingsubdivision requirements.Subdivision has beencompleted and houses areunder construction.Third reading grantedDecember 22, 2008. Applicantis working to completeoutstanding rezoning andsubdivision requirements.The applicant needs to submitdevelopment permit drawings,landscape plans and servicingplans. Once this informationhas been reviewed, a report willbe forwarded to Council.A report to Council isforthcoming.Subdivision has beencompleted and houses areunder construction.Rezoning adopted November17, 2008. Subdivision hasbeen completed and housesare under construction.

TYPE OFDEVELOPMENTFILE.NUMBER &APPLICANT'S NAMECIVIC ADDRESSOR LOCATIONDENSITY OFDEVELOPMENTPROJECT FEATURES& CHARACTERISTICSSTATUS OFDEVELOPMENT34. Single Family R07-009 & S07-009 8589, 8571 & 8526 37 lotsResidential Gary Toor & G. Dhaliwal Nottman Street; 8488,8510, 8464 & 8547Judith Street35. Single Family R06-026 & S06-024 32705 & 32689 10 lotsResidential Brian Sharp - Tunbridge Avenue36. Single Family R06-025 & S06-023 8521, 8539 & 8569 17 lotsResidential Jason Tiegen Alexandra Street37. Single Family R06-018 & S06-019 8289 Manson Street 11 bare landResidential Cartwright Development strata lotsCorp.38. Single Family R06-035 & DP06-014 34048, 34054 & 34142 297 townhouse units &Residential Robert Ciccozzi Parr Avenue one 36-unit apartmentArchitecture Inc.39. Single Family SO4-041 & R04-040 8511 & 8531 Cedar 11 lots &Residential KC McPherson Street 25 unit townhouseUrban residential lots(min. 5,005 sq. ft.)Urban residential lots(min. 5,005 sq. ft.)Urban residential lots(min. 5,005 sq. ft.)Urban residential lots(min. 7,201.3 sq. ft.).Multi-family development8 urban residential lots(min. 6,006 sq. ft.)3 compact single familylots (min. 4,004 sq. ft.)25 townhouse units.Applicant has been requestedto submit additional information.A report to Council isforthcoming.Subdivision has beencompleted and houses areunder construction.Subdivision has beencompleted and houses areunder construction.Rezoning adopted December15, 2008. Subdivision isnearing completion.Third reading granted March 3,2008. Applicant has beengranted a 1-year extension tocomplete the outstandingrezoning requirements.Construction is complete.40. Single Family R02-033 & DV09-006 29221 Lougheed Approximately 130 lotsResidential Jorden Cook Associates(for GenstarDevelopment Corp.)Highway & the 2.4acre portion ofproperty located to theimmediate north of9309 Hayward Streetand adjacent on theeast to SilvermereLake (total of approx.366 acres)A comprehensiveclustered residentialdevelopment with most ofthe lots on the island withadditional lots on thepeninsula in the northeastcorner and two sites longHayward Street.1 st reading granted March 3,2003. The applicant hassubmitted developmentvariance permit application tovary Section 208 of the ZoningBylaw to use the detailedassessment provided for underthe Riparian Areas Regulation(RAR) to define streamsideprotection and enhancementareas (SPEA) for the proposeddevelopment on SilvermereIsland and Silvermere Lake.

TYPE OF FILE NUMBER & CIVIC ADDRESS DENSITY OF PROJECT FEATURES STATUS OFDEVELOPMENT APPLICANTS NAME OR LOCATION DEVELOPMENT & CHARACTERISTICS DEVELOPMENT41. Suburban R08-019 & S08-018 Lot 7 Silverdale 22 lots Minimum 0.88 acre lots.Residential Daren Alary Avenue (68.71 acres)Third reading granted March 2,2009. Applicant is working tocomplete outstanding rezoningand subdivision requirements.42. Suburban SO4-038 & R04-031 8973 Manzer StreetResidential Mission Contractors26 lots 2 fee simple .88 acre lots. Rezoning adopted June 5,24 bare land strata lots 2006. Applicant is working to(min. 0.67 acre size). complete subdivisionrequirements.43. Rural Residential R03-024 & S03-037Elaine Cheung30932 Dewdney TrunkRoad26 lots Twenty-five 1.98 acresize lots and one 18 acreremainder parcel.Public Hearing held March 26,2007. Staff will be providingadditional information toCouncil prior to considerationof Third reading.G:\COMDEV\DONNA-LEE\COW Reports \2010 Reports \Major Development Project Update January 6, 2010.doc

46DiShit of MiSS1.011 MinutesThe Minutes for the Mission Community Heritage Commission (MCHC) meeting held in the MissionMunicipal Hall, Conference Room on November 4, 2009 commencing at 6:30 p.m.Present:Absent:Janis Schultz, ChairJim HindsKim KokoszkaShirley MitchellJenn Murray, Clerical SupportVal Billesberger, GuestBarbara Met, GuestSieglinde StiedaSheryl McKameyMike Scudder, Council Liaison1. MINUTESThe meeting was called to order at 6:30 p.m.(a) The minutes of the Mission Community Heritage Commission held on October 7, 2009.Moved by Jim Hinds and seconded by Shirley Mitchell that the minutes be approved.CARRIED2. BUSINESS ARISING FROM THE MINUTES(a) Terms of Reference — Members reviewed the recently adopted Mission Community HeritageCommission Terms of Reference.ACTION: Janis Schultz will seek to have a date correction made to the Terms of Reference, asdiscussed, and to seek further information on the 'consensus approach.'(b) Heritage Register Media Presentation — Members reviewed circulated notes and discusseddetails pertaining to the project criteria.ACTION: Jenn Murray will liaise with potential contractors and the Commission in theacquisition of project estimates.(c) Laptop Purchase —ACTION: Jenn Murray will liaise with Debbie Sanderson to finalize the purchase of a laptop.(d) Work Plan and Budget 2010 — Members discussed and made recommendations to the draftWork Plan and Budget prepared by Shirley Mitchell.ACTION: Shirley Mitchell will redraft the Work Plan and Budget with the discussed changes andforward it to Janis Schultz who will submit it to Marcy Bond.(e) Recognition and Incentives Task Group — Val Billesberger presented a colour draft of theHeritage Awards brochure for Commission members to review.FILE: Minutes Page 1 of 2Mission Community Heritage Commission

47Mission Community Heritage Commission MeetingNovember 4, 2009ACTION: Commission members will prepare to discuss potential nominations for theRecognition and Incentives Awards program at the next Commission meeting.3. OTHER BUSINESS(a) 2nd Annual Community Heritage Commission Networking Conference: November 28, 2009Moved by Shirley Mitchell and seconded by Kim Kokoszka to register for the Conference and tospend up to eighty dollars for registration costs.CARRIEDACTION: Shirley Mitchell will arrange the expenditure for registering to attend the Conference.4. ADJOURNMENTThe meeting adjourned at 8:10 p.m.FILE: Minutes Page 2 of 2Mission Community Heritage Commission

48Dishict of Mission MinutesThe Minutes for the Mission Community Heritage Commission (MCHC) meeting held in the MissionMunicipal Hall, Council Chambers on December 2, 2009 commencing at 6:30 p.m.Present:Absent:Janis Schultz, ChairJim HindsShirley MitchellMike Scudder, Council LiaisonJenn Murray, Clerical SupportBarbara Metz, GuestKim KokoszkaSieglinde StiedaSheryl McKamey1. MINUTESThe meeting was called to order at 6:35 p.m.(a) The minutes of the Mission Community Heritage Commission held on November 4, 2009.Moved by Jim Hinds and seconded by Shirley Mitchell that the minutes be approved.CARRIED2. BUSINESS ARISING FROM THE MINUTES(a) Terms of Reference — Members reviewed the revisions recommended to the recently adoptedMission Community Heritage Commission Terms of Reference.ACTION: Janis Schultz will contact Marcy Bond to ensure all members have the properlyrevised Terms of Reference.(b) Heritage Register Media Presentation — Members discussed revision to the Request forProposals document.ACTION: Jenn Murray will make the changes as discussed and contact Marcy Bond andSharon Fletcher for feedback.(c) Laptop Purchase — Jenn Murray presented the newly purchased laptop and accessories to theCommission.(d) Maple Ridge Heritage Commission Conference — Members discussed their attendance at theconference. Shirley Mitchell submitted a claim for expense reimbursement related to conferenceadmission costs.ACTION: Jenn Murray will submit the expense from to Marcy Bond.3. TASK GROUPS(a) Recognition and Incentives — Shirley Mitchell reported that Val Billesberger is currently workingon preparation of the colour brochure and that it should be ready by Monday December 7. AfterCommission members have reviewed and approved it, they will be printed for possibleFILE: Minutes Page 1 of 2Mission Community Heritage Commission

49Mission Community Heritage Commission MeetingDecember 2, 2009distribution by the end of January 2010. Members will review and approve the brochure viaemail.Moved by Jim Hinds and seconded by Shirley Mitchell to set the closing date for HeritageAwards nominations for January 31, 2010.CARRIEDThe Heritage Award winner selection will take place in February 2010.4. OTHER BUSINESSHeritage Register — Members discussed the future development of the Heritage Register andthe need for criteria planning.ACTION: Jenn Murray will locate the reference in previous minutes to the formation of aHeritage Register task groupACTION: Janis Schultz will forward details to Jim Hinds5. ADJOURNMENTThe meeting adjourned at 7:45 p.m.FILE: Minutes Page 2 of 2Mission Community Heritage Commission

50Ferndale Institution Population ProfileJanuary 2010Population Total as of January 4, 2010 123Number of Aboriginal Offenders 15Number of Other Ethnicities 25Number of Caucasian 83Age Groups

01/11/2010 14:06 6048264319 MMSI WARDEN PAGE 02/08 . 51DISTRICT OF MISSION REPORTDECEMBER, 2009Enclosures:16 District of Mission Public Safety Committee Report• Definitions• Major Offence Profile• Institutional Programming and Community Involvementi/case mgt/privatefeern-clk/District of Mission Report Enclosures

CORRECTIONAL SERVICE OF CANADAMISSION INSTITUTIONDISTRICT OF MISSION PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE REPORT2009STATISTICAL INFORMATION UP TO AND INCLUDING THE LAST DAY OF EACH MONTHTafFILITR7;Inside Institutional Count 272 274 276 275 276 276Iris274 279 273 272":,c(112271 273Number of Inmates at Outside Court 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0Number of Inmates at Outside Hospital 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 1 0 0Number of Inmates on Bail 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0Humber of Inmates U.A.L. (1 since 1973) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1Number of Inmates on Temporary Absence 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ()Total Number of inmates at Mission 273 275 278 279 277 277 279 281 274 274 272 274123 123 126 127 129 131 130 130 129 127Transfer Out to Maximum Security 3Transfer Out to Medium Security 1 2 0 2 1 2 1 0 0 5 1 2Transfer Out to Minimum Security 6 6 2 0 2 5 3 1 1 1Transfer Out to Other (Provincial, etc.) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Transfer In from Maximum Security 1 2 1 4 3 4 3 2 7 1 1 2Transfer In from Medium Security 4 5 5 4 3 6 8 1 6 2 5Transfer In from Minimum Security 2 0 0 1 1 3 2 3 1 2 1Transfer in from Other (Provincial, etc) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Transfer In from Multi-level Security 8 58172338125Transfer in from RRAC526 21322543Admitted by Suspension 7 2 3 6 8 6 7 4Revocation 2 1 3 4 5 1 3 4 5 47111Day ParoleFull Parole 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0Statutory Release 11 9 5 13 4 9 10 8 12 9 7 12Warrant Expiry 2 2 2 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 3Death 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Bail 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0U.A.L. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Court Ordered Release 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0:TT T. =1-:,_____---;-. I. • .7--7Z- 0Number of individual Escorted Temporary Absences' for the month.Number of inmates on an Unescorted Temporary Absence during the month. 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 I 1 0 0Number participating in the PerimeterWork Clearance Program for the month. 3 3 1 2 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 1Number of inmates participating in the Work Release Program for the month. 0 ,, 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 0 0 0'Figaro dam nal Include IMeJlos. amprory Absenzas

01/11/2010 14:06 6048264319 MMSI WARDEN PAGE 04/0853DEFINITIONSBAILBail is an option for the courts or police to consider, in some cases, where an offender may be able to be released onconditions, rather than being detained in custody prior to court appearance. Bail is also known as Judicial Interim Release.TEMPORARY ABSENCES AND DAY PAROLETemporary Absences (TM) and Day Paroles allow the temporary release of offenders from institutions in order to accessprograms and services available in the community. All provinceseerritories operate TA programs, and TM may be grantedfor personal development, medical, compassionate, employment, administrative, parental or family-related reasons. Inmost cases, TA's are utilized for pre-parole preparation and planning,TA's are either escorted (ETAs) or unescorted (UTAs). Typically, ETAs are not longer than eight hours and UTAs mayrun from 8 hours to 60 days. The type of offence and sentence length determines whether the Correctional Service ofCanada or the National Parole Board has authority to issue TAs. In simplistic form, the National Parole Board determinesall TM for offenders serving Life sentences and for other violent offences that resulted in serious harm to the victims, TheWarden, as the head of the releasing institution, retains complete responsibility for the final clearance of offenders beingreleased on TM and provides a written recommendation to the N.P.B. when they possess the legal authority.As a general rule, all offenders are eligible for E.T.A.s the moment they commence their federal sentences. In practicehowever, very few offenders will receive authorization for TAs early within their sentence, with the exception of TAs formedical and compassionate purposes. As a general rule, medical and compassionate TM are escorted by what isdetermined as a security escort (two officers who possess and utilize restraint equipment). However, for other types ofETAs, the offender is usually escorted by one officer only. Variations in the level of security exist and is determined byassessing the level of risk the offender poses to the public.In terms of offender's eligibility for UTAs, this is determined by legal calculations of eligibility and varies from one offender toanother depending on their sentence length. In the case of offenders serving a Life sentence, UTA eligibility is calculatedas three years before their full parole efigibility date.Federal offenders may qualify to participate in work release programs outside of the correctional institution for a specifiedperiod of time These type of releases could see a single offender going out to work as well as groups of offenders.However, they are usually escorted by at least one officer. In addition, UTAs may be granted to allow offenders toparticipate in personal development programs or community service projects. UTAs are generally granted for a maximumperiod of 15 days, although if the UTA is for participation in a personal development program, it may be extended to 60days, renewable.Day Parole is a flexible form of release that provides an opportunity for correctional officials to employ gradual release,preparing the inmate for release on full parole and allowing the inmate the opportunity to. participate in community-basedprograms and become readjusted to life outside the institution.Federal offenders, with the exception of those inmates in preventive detention or serving indeterminate sentences, areeligible for day parole six months prior to their parole eligibility date or after having served six months of their sentence.whichever is longer. The majority of the inmates on day parole reside in community-based facilities operated by theprovincial and federal corrections services or by private agencies on contract with the Correctional Service.FULL PAROLEFull Parole is a program of conditional release that allows inmates to serve a portion of their sentence in the communityunder supervision. Inmates are generally eligible for full parole after serving one-third of their sentence or seven years,whichever is shorter. Under the Corrections and Conditional Release Act enacted in 1992, however, sentencing judgeshave the authority to set the parole eligibility for offenders convicted of violent and serious drug offences at one-half ratherthan one-third of the sentence. In such cases, the period until parole eligibility cannot exceed ten years. Federal inmatesserving Life sentences are eligible for parole consideration after seven years in confinement, dated from the day theoffender was arrested and taken into custody. The exception to this are situations in which an offender is serving a Lifesentence with a mandatory minimum sentence. For example, a First Degree Murder conviction carries a mandatory 25years confinement before parole eligibility.STATUTORY RELEASEStatutory Release has its origins in an amendment to the Parole Act in 1970, which created a mechanism to provideassistance and control during the offenders readjustment to life in the community for inmates who had been denied parole,In contrast to parole, statutory release involves the release of offenders from the institution after serving two-thirds of theirsentence, with the remaining one-third being served under supervision of the National Parole Board in the community.Inmates released under statutory release are supervised by parole officers and must abide by mandatory and any additionalconditions set by the NPB that are deemed necessary to successfully manage the offender's risk in the community. Aviolation of the conditions can result in suspension and revocation and return to the institution where the offender may haveto serve the remainder of his sentence.Inmates can be Detained by the NPB and thus not released on statutory release. However, it has been determined in lawthat offenders have the right to be released after serving two thirds of their sentences and thus, to detain an offender, theremust be significant grounds to establish that the offender would constitute a grievous threat to the community, or anymember thereof, if released, Following completion of their sentence, (Warrant Expiry Date), these Inmates are releasedinto the community without any _ supervision or assistance. However, recent changes in the Garret:bons and _ConditionalRelease Act have made provisions to allow for the supervision of some offenders beyond their Warrant Expiry dates,However, the changes in this law are not retroactive to offenders currently serving sentences and will likely involve a verysmall group of offenders determined to be extremely dangerous.

01/11/2010 14:06 6048264319 MMSI WARDEN PAGE 05/08 54Major Offence ProfileOffenders profile at the specified site and proportion for each major offenceMISSION INSTITUTIONTRAFFIC IN NARCOTIC 1 0.37%OBSTRUCT PUBLIC/PEACE OFFICER 1 0,37%OBSTRUCT PUBLIC/PEACE OFFICER 3 1.12%UNLAWFULLY AT LARGE 1 0.37%FAIL TO ATTEND COURT - UNDER/RECOG 1 0.37%RAPE 3 1.12%ESCAPE LAWFUL CUSTODY 1 0.37%FAIL TO ATTEND COURT - UNDER/RECOG 1 0.37%FAIL TO COMPLY W/COND OF UNDER/RECOG 1 0.37%FAIL TO COMPLY W/COND OF UNDER/RECOG 3 1.12%SEX INTER W/FEMALE U/14 1 0.37%SEXUAL EXPLOITATION -TOUCH 2 0.74%NON CAPITAL MURDER 2 0.74%FIRST DEGREE MURDER 6 2.23%SECOND DEGREE MURDER 6 2.23%MANSLAUGHTER 1 0.37%ATTEMPT MURDER 1 0.37%FIRST DEGREE MURDER 23 8.55G/0SECOND DEGREE MURDER 53 19.70%MANSLAUGHTER 2 0.74%ATTEMPT MURDER 1 0.37%ADMINISTER NOXIOUS THING - ENDANGER 1 0.37%SEXUAL ASSAULT WITH WEAPON 1 0.37%OVERCOME RESISTANCE - ADM DRUGS 1 0.37%KIDNAP - HOLD FOR RANSOM 1 0.37%DANGEROUS OPERATION OF MOTOR VEHICLE 1 0.37%IMPAIRED DRIVING - CBH 1 0.37%OPERATE MV WHILE DISQUALIFIED 1 0.37%UTTER THREAT TO CAUSE DEATH/HARM 1 0.37%ASSAULT - USE OF FORCE 2 0.74%Correctional Service of CanadaPROTECTED 13Date and time extracted: 2010/01/04 1:48:14PM EST Page 1 of 3

01/11/2010 14:06 6048264319 MMSI WARDEN PAGE 86/0855ASSAULT - USE OF FORCE2 0.74%ASSAULT WITH A WEAPON1 0.37%ASSAULT CAUSING BODILY HARM1 0.37%AGGRAVATED ASSAULT 7 2.60%ASSAULT PEACE OFFICER 2 0.74%SEXUAL ASSAULT 6 2.23%SEXUAL ASSAULT WITH WEAPON 1 0,37%SEXUAL ASSAULT CAUSING BODILY HARM . 3 1.12%AGGRAVATED SEXUAL ASSAULT 2 0.74%KIDNAP - UNLAWFULLY CONFINE 1 0.37%FORCIBLE CONFINEMENT 4 1.49%ROBBERY ' 1 0.37%THEFT OVER 1 0.37%THEFT UNDER 1 0.37%THEFT UNDER 4 1.49%ARMED ROBBERY 1 0.37%BREAK ENTER W/INTENT 7 2.60%BREAK ENTER AND COMMIT 11 4.09%DISGUISE WITH INTENT 1 0.37%POSS PROP OBT BY CRIME-OVER 5 1.86%POSS PROPERTY OBTAINED BY CRIME - UNDER 1 0.37%FRAUD OVER 1 0,37%MISCHIEF IN RELATION TO OTHER PROP 1 0.37%ARSON - DAMAGE TO PROPERTY 1 0.37%ATTEMPT IND OFF - PEN=LIFE/DEATH 1 0.37°AATTEMPT IND OFFENCE 1 0.37%ATTEMPT SUM CONV OFF 1 0.37%CONSPIRE TO COMMIT MURDER 4 1,49%PROVINCIAL STATUTES 1 037%OFFENCE UNDER MOTOR VEHICLE ACT - B.C. 2 0.74%CAUSE DEATH BY GRIM NEGL - ALL OTHERS 1 0.37%MANSLAUGHTER - ALL OTHERS 13 4.83%ATI MURDER - USE FIREARM 2 0.74%ATT MURDER - ALL OTHERS 1 0.37%CBH WANT TO WOUND - AIR GUN OR PISTOL . 1 0.37%SEXUAL ASSAULT W/WEAPON - ALL OTHERS 2 0.74%SEXUAL ASSAULT CBH - ALL OTHERS 2 0.74%AGG. SEXUAL ASSAULT - ALL OTHERS 2 0.74%Date and time extracted: 2010/01/04 1:48;14PM EST Page 1 of 3

01/11/2010 14:06 6048264319 MMSI WARDEN PAGE 07/0856KIDNAP - UNLAWFULLY CONFINE - FIREARM 1 0.37%KIDNAP - UNLAWFULLY CONFINE - ALL OTHERS 2 0.74%KIDNAP - HOLD FOR RANSOM - ALL OTHERS 2 0.74%ROBBERY - USE FIREARM 2 0.74%ROBBERY - ALL OTHERS 24 8.92%FAIL TO COMPLY W/ PROBATION ORDER 3 1.12%POSS. SCHEDULE 1 SUBSTANCE 1 0.37%POSS. SCHEDULE I SUBSTANCE 1 0.37%POSS SCHEDULE II SUBSTANCE 1 0.37%POSS SCHEDULE II SUBSTANCE 1 0.37%MSS SCHEDULE I/II SUBST FOR PURP TRAFF 3 1.12%UNLAWFULLY IN DWELLING HOUSE 1 0.37%B E & COMMIT - NOT DWELLING HOUSE 1 0.37%PERSONATION W/INT TO GAIN ADVANTAGE 1 0.37%ASSAULT WITH A WEAPON 1 0.37%Total Number of Offenders; 269Date and time extracted: 2010/01/04 1:48:14PM EST Page 1 of 3

01/11/2010 14:06 6048264319 MMSI WARDEN PAGE 08/08 57The offenders enjoyed two socials (Open House with Aboriginal Focus and theFamily Visiting Event) during the month. Santa attended the family visiting eventto distribute presents to children of the offenders who were at the event. Inaddition, the offender population received delivery of their Christmas parcels.The offenders were also given Christmas treats that were supplied by the LifersGroup and the IMC supplied the offenders with prizes for their Christmastournaments.

MDISTRICT OFON THE FRASERMemo58FILE: PRO.DEV.DEVL09-002To: Chief Administrative OfficerFrom: Deputy Director of PlanningDate: January 18, 2010Subject: Summary of Public Information Meeting — Mission Snipers Pool Hall Ltd. at33212 1 st Avenue/33211 N. Railway Avenue — Liquor Primary LicenseApplicationRecommendationThat Council directs Planning Staff to submit the following resolution to the Ministry of PublicSafety and Solicitor General, Liquor Control and Licensing Branch (LCLB):Background"Be it resolved that:1. Council recommends the issuance of the license for the followingreasons:a. The proximity of the establishment to other social and/orrecreational facilities and businesses would help create a vibrantdowntown.2. Council's comments on the prescribed considerations are as follows:a. The potential for noise if the application is approved is minimal;b. The impact on the community if the application is approved isseen as positive; andc. The amendment would not result in the establishment beingoperated in a manner contrary to its primary purpose.3. Council instructed Staff to hold a public information meeting. The localresidents were informed about the public information meeting via mail.Council has reviewed all submissions both positive and negative innature."The Mission Snipers Pool Hall is proposing to construct a 35.7 square meter (384 square foot)seating lounge within the existing Pool Hall located at 33212 1s t Avenue/33211 N. RailwayAvenue (Map 1). The facility previously had a liquor license under the prior ownership, but thelicense was not renewed. The proposed liquor license would allow the sale of alcohol to 29persons in a detached area (Plan 1).In accordance with the District of Mission's Liquor Licensing Procedures Policy LIC.15, referralshave been made to the District -of Mission's Economic Development Department- and the localRCMP and a public information meeting was held at 6:30 p.m. Wednesday, December 9, 2009at Municipal HallComments from the RCMP Fire Department, Inspection Services and the Manager of EconomicDevelopment are attached as Appendix B.PAGE 1 OF 8

59The public information meeting sign-in and comment sheets are attached as Appendix A.Additional correspondence, by way of letters, emails and petitions, expressing both support forand against the application have been received from the public and are attached as AppendixC.Petition FOR from users: 191Petition FOR from business: 23Letters FOR: 4Petition AGAINST: 110Letters AGAINST: 36Summary of MeetingPresent at the meeting were the owners of the Mission Snipers Pool Hall (Cesar Morales andMirna Guevara), and the planner (Ryan Anderson). Additionally, approximately 7 to 10 membersof the community attended the meeting, not all of whom signed in on the available sign-in sheet.There were several concerns raised by the community members in attendance. Those concernscan be summarized as follows:• Alcohol may bring the wrong type of person to the area;• The owners cannot control persons after they have left the facility after consumingalcohol;• Alcohol does not promote the downtown in a positive way;• There is an increased probability of drinking and driving in the area;• Children attend facilities in the immediate vicinity of the pool hall; and• General concerns about loitering and the potential for aggressive behaviour.The following responses were provided by the owners/applicants and attending communitymembers who supported the application:• If necessary, the owners/applicants would be willing to hire a security company tomonitor the loitering and any negative outcomes associated with the consumption ofalcohol;• Smoking is not dependent on the consumption of alcohol;• Loitering as a result of smoking can in part be addressed by the security the applicantis willing to hire;• A liquor license would contribute to a business which will potentially otherwise have toclose down; and• Comments regarding the nature of the clientele are stereotypes.Planning AnalysisThe subject property is zoned Core Commercial Downtown One Zone (CCD1) and has anOfficial Community Plan (OCP) designation of Core Commercial. The CCD1 zone specificallyhas a Permitted Use of "Pool and Billiard Hall".FILE: PRO.DEV.LIQ PAGE 2 OF 8L09-002

60Section 4.1 of the OCP deals specifically with "Developing the Community Core" by creating a"Strong Downtown", and points out the following:• The downtown is very pedestrian oriented;• The downtown's physical environment is generally in need of upgrading;• There has been a high vacancy rate in the downtown core; and• Downtown revitalization is a key component of Mission's overall economic developmentefforts.The OCP also references a 2001 Mission Downtown Retail Market Study. The study identifiedthat there should be a focus on "creating a merchandising mix that provides either a unique orcomplimentary shopping experience".From a planning perspective, downtown areas need vitality to be healthy. This vitality must beachieved not only during regular business hours (9:00am - 5:00pm), but must extend into theevening. By having businesses in this area willing to open their doors for longer hours, morepeople will be drawn to the area creating a more vibrant, alive precinct. This activity, in turn,generates more "eyes on the street" and ultimately a safer environment. Dark, empty streetswhere businesses are closed generate more fear for those that do venture into the area.Additionally, many of the concerns residents raised regarding the issuance of a liquor licenceare issues that are not connected to the Mission Snipers Poll Hall directly. Issues such asdrinking and driving, prostitution, unsavoury people and smoking are all greater social issuesdealt with at different levels. Restaurants are permitted to serve alcohol, don't allow smokinginside, yet we don't oppose their applications.For the above rationale, and because other staff generally had no concerns, and the ownerspetitioned 23 local businesses for their support, and the owners willingness to work with theirneighbours to address concerns, the Planning Department is recommending that Councilendorse the application.ProcessFor applications of this nature the LCLB requires a resolution from the local governmentcommenting on the application. Two options are available to the local government in responseto this application and forms part of Staff's recommendation:1. Provide "No comment" — a resolution indicating this decision must be provided to thebranch; or2. Provide a complete resolution to the branch, as recommended.Barclay Pitkethly, MCIPDeputy Director of PlanningG:\COMDEV\RYAN\Development Files\Snioers Pool Hall\Reports\Summary of Public Meeting (Snipers Pool Hall).docFILE: PRO.DEV.LIQ PAGE 3 OF 8L09-002

iVI IR IA A R.T.i.E112_1 roystirjEll t.,;!,ccAtobbVii'spl :11r,wsti " mitt I4147t FA it rixtr1,,...! fl. ME!: L.,Iltrt :Fro f -' lart t 'LS Fri i I 5'r . ti-fir ! Sktft , Atin i " .1 ; 1121FA : .,_:virIT ;trct I I xt7tr , WITArrfiiii : " 1' ri 1 g Ifail' RCITS _I ktrtt ' 17-11UMW 0,,,.4 1:awl -.PUTSLTucc7 •ottira•kittt.ctak gmit 1,;E!-1 -", ,odo2 bet kCD0 0:>Lup0ccn_a; 9_J

62Plan 1ST912 hi,theraab..ts : tor!, B.C. V2T 4B7FILE: PRO.DEV.LIQ PAGE 5 OF 8L09-002

63Appendix A — Public MeetingFILE: PRO.DEV.LIQ PAGE 6 OF 8L09-002

ODo jp P304_ F/.7-41_4_gr27.5-/i ii/z; . 2002SIGN-IN SHEET - (please print clearly)NAMEADDRESS64,:-.,r\ , I 1, ()JAG r, c,t-, NR\A 3303 ( 1 5-\--/..,, ,...,,..,,..,- ..4•,--:\i},9,,\Ve .. , :a 6)0(1-Le--„...- • 1 ..1 :. , , , ,,I,4 ,I. f,, Iv ,'' 24-7 eL.., 4:'• a .',/45? &',-fi)csA\LA 11-t.t. A iv_-c..,,—&0\)e,a ,,,,, \,,,s- 0,...„_,, 2-2) 30 -7 \ \ -\tcv.,-) 4Ak.,:) A_ e rve,)3)5:C '', u, ' OM €.?;' .714-, 2 '-' 7 /'3 tAstil Rex/pros-cc\ ,.,>tv.44,/,.AiL...

‘..01.1 1VIIIVI Gill 1 a7I IL I65APPLICATION: L09-002 (Mission Snipers Pool Hall. Ltd) — 33211 Glasgow AvenuePROPOSAL: For a liquor-primary license 35.7 square meter (384 square foot) seating and loungearea at the pool hall.COMMENTS:1. Generally, my opinion of the proposal is as follows:❑- I do not support the proposalI support the proposal❑- Undecided❑- Other (please specify)2. What issues concern you about the proposal?3. What aspects of the proposal do you like?ono fv\ac'e__ ?to Op cL.)ov,\c\ be_C'\!\P— C300\ \\"\ch,A.co pf\rv\,4. Other comments you would like to make regarding this proposal.Ce_RA 4W, h 5\r\p \\Arka.. o\NQiE;‘,0\ pc?tkc--\rv\ ThIcr f \ 0,.c 4\vec.- L.; f- 5'\/\5,..)?Ctp(A.7 \S r Ac?-5S„,Name: itf\ 0 r\ e.1\r\e,\J\Address: _Phone:Email:DZIAz.r\.‘07s ( (osk•-1GAcomdev\corresplComment Sheets.doc

%Or No/ Ill lima • II • %fa, • •Mom Ina •66APPLICATION: L09-002 (Mission Snipers Pool Hall Ltd) — 33211 Glasgow AvenuePROPOSAL: For a liquor-primary license 35.7 square meter (384 square foot) seating and loungearea at the pool hall.COMMENTS:1. Generally, my opinion of the proposal is as follows:I do not support the proposal- I support the proposal- UndecidedEN re /4CI- Other (please specify)2. What issues concern you about the proposal?e... Pnec\- 04'(l'A\(1u.° r ' " (1e-'fiLeL6N,:k ck COAto,t4- Wt-A Ai DO SC:› 1/4t.R. " I t O \[)/ 0, V e‘ r\r\ a cA-.Ab.e. OU„Ir\ e() he o CB-11 wuki-) 1`.J3. What aspects of the proposal do you like?nni1e/4 .. Other comments you would like to make regarding this proposal.rr r bv.brn eielloiknOtAS eF\--‘ YA- kdoa-40(k) n area_ ce,v40,11‘7,0,..4-1.'on ;4-1e..E,5e5) m YDC 4f-\6\t1SeiVe5 4c. our\ el a. CsLe e..1 *6,A- +Ile1,AsiName: F,,,n• ,Address:Phone:Email:C 4-10A. e 'CiteciS u or es4-ckkskiner,-.)\ r\-\prc4k,\Q. " OW1dOLOnttik.)(1 7G:\corndev\corresp\Comment Sheets.doc

67Appendix B — Staff CommentsRCMP, Fire Department, Inspection Services and EDOComments from RCMP:Verbal comments were received from the local RCMP Branch on December 18, 2009. The commentswere provided by Constable Russell. Constable Russell indicated that a background check had been runon the owners and the establishment. His comments follow:• No issues with the establishment;• No issues with the owners;• Background check elicited nothing negative;• No real red flags; and• A liquor license may change the dynamic of the area, but that has yet to be determined.Comments from EDO:To: Planning, c/o Ryan Anderson .From: Manager of Economic DevelopmentDate: December 15, 2009Subject: Liquor Licence Application L09-002 (Mission Snipers Pool Hall Ltd.) 33212 l st AvenueThe economic development office is in support of this new liquor-primary licence for the Mission Snipers Pool Hall.The economic development office believes that Mission Snipers Pool Hall Ltd. is an asset to the downtown businessdistrict and that supporting responsible business owners is imperative to assuring economic development continuesin the area.Stacey Crawford, MAEconomic Development OfficerDistrict of Mission34033 Lougheed Hwy., Mission, BC V2V 5X8Tel: 604.820.3789 Fax: 604.820.6738 T Free: 1.866.814.1222scrawford@mission.cawww.mission.cawww.tvvitter.com/InvestMissionFollow us on Twitter for the latest Economic Development news in Mission!FILE: PRO.DEV.LIQ PAGE 7 OF 8L09-002

issioDPSTR1CT OE.ON THE FRASER.Planning DepartmentMemorandum68FILE: PRO,DEV.L10L09-002To: Larry Watkinson, Assistant Fire ChiefFrom: Ryan Anderson, PlannerDate: October 21, 2009Subject: Liquor Licence Application L09-002 (Mission Snipers Pool Hall Ltd.) 33212l st AvenueThe purpose of this application is for a new liquor-primary license for the Mission Snipers PoolHall. The Pool Hall is an entertainment facility that has an occupant load of 29 seats. The hoursof operation will be from 12:00 pm to 1:00 am daily.Please provide your comments at your earliest convenience to the attention of Ryan Anderson,G:n.COMD VAYAN`Developmeni Fiies:Snipers Pool Hall‘Referrats\ Referral to FIRE RESCUE SVC.loc0j,"?'Vx)PAGE 1 OF 1

`J0,1.- -0( GI I P'eC-TOCe yOtek_kc?"_17569From: Mike RohdeSent: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 1:22 PMTo: Ryan AndersonSubject: Sniper's pool Hall 33212 1st Ave.No concerns.

70Appendix C — Public SubmissionsFILE: PRO.DEV.LIQ PAGE 8 OF 8L09-002 •

71Mission Snipers Pool Hall33212 1" AvenueMission, BC604-820-211210,(4,1)Re: Primary Liquor License ApplicationTo: Mayor James Atebe and Councils of the District of MissionMy husband, Cesar Morales, and I, Mirna Guevara, have put together this letter in order toshow you our reasons for wanting to acquire a liquor license for our downtown pool hall. We aretwo very hard working and honest individuals who came to Canada over twenty years ago and havebeen working hard to try and make a good life for ourselves and our four children since that time.We are currently in the process of applying for a primary liquor licence for our pool hallwith hopes that this will help to generate more business for us. We worked extremely hard and spenta great deal of money on renovating the building to make our business look the way that it looksnow in order to try and attract an honest and decent clientele. Unfortunately, we have not beengetting enough customers coming in and therefore we are not generating enough revenue to coverour expenses. Our business is family owned and operated and we do our very best to ensure that weare maintaining a safe and enjoyable environment for everyone to enjoy.We can promise you that the businesses which are located around ours 'will not haveanything to worry about if we do get our liquor license because we would be hiring securitypersonnel to take care of the place, and we would also be monitoring the amount of alcohol thatpeople are consuming. We can guarantee that our employees who are serving alcohol will have thenecessary experience to do so as well as having attained their Serving it Right certificates. It will bebusiness policy that anyone who tries to come in to the building already intoxicated will not beserved anymore alcohol and will be asked to leave. We also realize that our responsibility does notend when our customers leave the building and we would ensure that people who have beendrinking inside of our establishment have a safe way to get home afterwards. Our reputation is veryimportant to us as we would like to continue to run a safe and successful business.Furthermore, I would also like to mention that this establishment has functioned as alicensed pool hall in the past and businesses who are currently opposed to us acquiring our liquorlicense did not even realize that the previous pool hall was licensed to serve alcohol. This issignificant because it demonstrates that it is possible to successfully run an establishment whichserves alcohol at this location without causing disturbances to the surrounding businesses. Themajority of businesses in downtown Mission are only open during the day and during that time wetypically are not very busy, as the majority of our clientele does not come in until later on in theevening.If you look at the area of our building which we have proposed as the designated drinkingarea, you will notice that this section is quite small in comparison to the size of our entire building.This area would be protected by a railing and only people over the legal drinking age would bepermitted to enter this area and no alcohol would be permitted in the actual playing area.We would like to have the opportunity to keep our business open to the community, but ifwe do not get the approval for the liquor licence we may have to shut down our doors to the overtwo-hundred pool players that come in to enjoy a game of pool in our building. Not only are weserving pool lovers from the Mission area, many of these players come in from Abbotsford, MapleRidge, and Coquitlam because the places that are available in these other locations are not as nice as

72ours. We believe that our business is beneficial to the community as it is the only one of its kind intown and it gives citizens another option for things to do for entertainment in town. The people whohave come in to play pool in our building have been very happy with their experience there and haveshown us great support. We thank you for your consideration in this matter and look forward tohearing from you. Please feel free to contact either one of us if you have any questions or concernsregarding this matter.Sincerely,Mima Guevara Cesar Morales

73From: Karley Seabrook [mailto:Sent: Wednesday, December 09, 2009 2:30 PMTo: Ryan AndersonSubject: support for liquor licenseHello,My 3 year old daughter attends dance classes at Fraser Valley Academy of Dance and Iunderstand that Sniper's Pool Hall has applied for a liquor licence. I imagine most of theresponse from FVAD has been against such a licence. As a citizen of the community of Mission,I however, have a different response. The downtown core of Mission has unrealized potential tobe a chosen destination for shopping, entertainment and culture. The negative response fromsome of the businesses downtown is, in my opinion, a reaction of fear based thinking; fear ofchange and fear of what could happen if Sniper's is granted such a licence. What I wonder is,where is the support and encouragement between business owners? Where is the optimisticvision of what downtown Mission has the potential to become? With this unsupportive aridnegative response between business owners, how will Mission city grow to serve the communityin more prosperous and exciting ways?I am not typically a person who involves themselves in politics but I had quite a reaction whenMs. Carney was encouraging the patrons of FVAD to sign a petition voting against this licence.There was an assumption implied that I shouldn't want to support the owner's of Sniper's, thatmy daughter and other children of FVAD would be harmed in some way if this license were togo through, all of which I think is ridiculous.What I am most passionate about here and supportive of is the development of the downtowncore, business owners supporting one another and optimistic (rather than fear based) thinkingThank you for reading and considering my outlook,Sincerely,Karley Seabrook

74From: Ian MacLachlan [mailto:Sent: Wednesday, December 09, 2009 3:03 PMTo: Ryan AndersonSubject: Mission Snipers Pool Hall - Letter in Support of Application for Liquor LicenseMr. Anderson,I am writing to you in reference to, and in support of, the Liquor License Application made on behalf ofMission Sniper's Pool Hall. I am a resident and taxpayer in the District of Mission, and a regular visitor tothe downtown core. My daughter is a student at the Fraser Valley Academy of Dance and as such I havethe opportunity to visit the neighborhood affected by the application at least once a week.I believe that Mission would benefit from additional business in the Downtown core, and do _not believethat a licensed Pool Hall is in any way inappropriate in spite of it's location across the street from theFraser Valley Academy of Dance. If the application is complete and the applicants are in compliance withthe liquor licensing laws of the Province, the District and the City, I believe the license should besupported. Any other position would be prejudicial towards the owners or patrons of the establishment.Would this be an issue if the license application were for a fine dining establishment, an English style pubor a cultural club? The Fraser Valley Academy of Dance is itself housed in a former Mason's Lodge,which has no doubt at one time or another held a liquor license.I look forward to a favorable outcome in this matter, and to the part that the Mission Sniper's Pool Halland other neighborhood businesses, including the Fraser Valley Academy of Dance, may play in therevitalization of our beloved town center.IanIan MacLachlan, MD.Executive Vice President &Chief Scientific OfficerTekmira Pharmaceuticals Corp.100-8900 dlenlvon ParkwayBurnaby, BCCanada V5J 5J8Tel: 604-419-3205Fax: 604-419-3201www .tekmirapharm.corn

75Doug LandrevilleMission, B.C.,PhoneDecember 21, 2009Mr. Ryan Anderson (Planner)The District of Mission,8645 Stave Lake Street,P.O. Box 20,Mission, B.C.,V2V 4L9•OF MiS-VON Date R,-'d05 I?.Date /;clod Date Distd Date Scanned CateJFile Folder Nam: —Re: Liquor Licence Application for Mission Snipers Pool. Hall.„ .To: Mayor El, Councillors 9 Mayors DOH DExempt D COWPor: C3Report to COW M inform-_t of U Reply for Mayors SIg!O, Requested By CM: kssponse to Council FoilowDear Mr. AndersonMy name is Doug Landreville and I am writing to you in order toexpress my support, for the Mission City Council to grant a liquor licence toMission Snipers Pool Hall.For the last 2 1/2 months I have been running a pool tournament everySaturday afternoon at the pool hall. In my dealings with Cesar Morales andhis wife Mirna Guevara, I have found them to be hard working and veryresponsible people. I am sure that they would obey all of the laws that gowith having a liquor licence and not abuse the privilege.The last time there was a pool hall in Mission was about four yearsago and it was owned by a gentleman named Phil. For three years I played ina nine ball league at this pool hall and it did have a liquor licence. In thistime I saw lots of people playing pool and enjoying an occasional beer. Inever did see anyone who was drunk. People who want to drink heavily willgo to pubs and bars, not the pool hall to indulge. The clientele that will go toa pool hall will be there to play pool first and may enjoy a beer or two at thesame time.Seeing as there has not been a pool hall in Mission for the last fouryears, the pool players in town could only go to the pubs in order to playpool. These people are now, used to having a beer while they are playing agame of pool. I have spoken to several people who will not come to thetournaments on Saturday because the pool hall does not have a liquorlicence.

76Cesar and Mirna have made a very large investment to bring a poolhail back to Mission. They spent a lot of money on renovating the buildingand they bought brand new Gold Crown tables for the hall. These tables arein the top three tables available for quality and are very expensive tables.With this investment out of their pocket, I am sure that Cesar and Mirna arenot going to allow anyone to drink too much and do damage to the buildingor their tables. They are going to want to protect their investment.Cesar is trying to work with the community. He has madearrangements with the principals of the high schools and some classes areeven coming down the pool hall. To me this sounds like someone who wantsto be a good member of the community and run his business in a beneficialway for everybody. I do not think he is going to take a chance on ruining hisbusiness by abusing the privilege of having a liquor licence.In summary, I am hoping that you will grant a liquor licence to Cesar.This will give him equal footing in competing with other locations that offerpool tables to their customers.Just for the record, I would like you to know, that due to a couple ofhealth issues, I do not drink alcohol.C.C. Mayor James AtebeCouncilor Terry GiddaCouncillor Paul HornCouncillor Danny PlecasCouncilor Mike ScudderCouncillor Jenny StevensCouncillor Heather StewartCesar Morales — Mission Snipers Pool HallDoug Landreville

77ppbc FiD-f\ DIOnMission Snipers Pool Hall is in the process ofApplying for a liquor Licence.If you support us with this idea, we would likeTo have your name and phone number.OS1 e,learener)SSS7,e,c_511CAlleda _Snotiet)t 41. V (1',."(20 /1.7d;2,551 Spy SkyoithiticeYL 9o55ic Sulu c- Lu )cc.(—v4-116 (oin 1,'_---71:Al.4:7- 6 , 7. e Ai /c- L, 4 --.-- v-C6L1- 44_1_,.6 fli-5/4qx-,/-4--,04*.16 46q. iAp\t5.4.1.2‘ekiv\i- - -7-(7 3. 7 1:3_s_ is,;--- t-mts({ ,_ , A ,:::::-.. ...■•■•■•••■_---------41'a \q±1 ■K? • V-1, C‘p,...1y t. I ..--3.--71 0 L.—out . e_,ec 4. ,:.),ymv.2$4, .'-.:(1. 7 _..._,c;) Lk Qt'Lici..QS 1-a.Z...-41°4=3• Ac.,-,:tC,L,100 ■--(0.-A'r"\")\ - C\ \JC2.k.\\. , i i \§,)6k. cc cirr- — C "— 'f-r.,(7(4 .' r-.2t. ':-1,aebin rn:n co,lc - - ,36-..wikualz, 6(41); es - i 1 — la Tv /‘/I -1._ - C,Pi--1 2 2_Thank you for your support.Qt--ototZ---

78‘:-- NioNm °of- c.,, os r sMission Snipers Pool Hall is in the process ofApplying for a liquor Licence.If you support us with this idea , we would like leVrToil eve your me and phone number./CA t-v-i-C./ A f)LC/go,A1Algr7,_ A / (V-7)6 'VThank you for your support

)--'79Mission Snipers Pool Hall is in the process ofApplying for a liquor Licence.If you support us with this idea, we would likeTo ave your name and phone number.H- (601?-0.0 Le,l,rosp._--- K609'.6(}0e)r.4,04ty) f I 0. l c bcro iri• /)-15,7

80Mission Snipers Pool Hall is in the process of•Applying for a liquor Licence,If you support us with this idea, we would likeTo have your name and phone number.4AI tAate- Gk(T:-/ 12.,rri &LC- L,S01.-Yo/f72,2/7:6-11Cy-f)cct 11V irisiNtemc, LA,54.1,731/414-.7/Thank you for your support.

81Mission Snipers Pool Hal! is in the process ofApplying for a liquor Licence,If you stImpitus with this idea, we would likeTo hay your name and phone number.-71 74;i/4) "--/q7AThank you foryour support.

82Mission Snipers Pool Hall is in the process ofApplying for a liquor Licence.if you support us with this idea, we would likeTo have your name and phone number.__Ayer.4ov)ii 1: eel/r_' CIL(-ve-t,„ -.-(76\-, 60t-(r1L; , ( niLDO-H .guitc.„ ,iOS ,1 6S ca ,m1v:tThank you for your support./ 4.(61

83Mission Snipers Pool Hall is in the process ofApplying for a liquor Licence.If you support us with this idea, we would likeTo have your name and phone number.1C,,q 0'1 44 (1 45,( 5. 1 3 ,i)A Pa.S0/1OC4i ofrA,47.'(0z2(7(/01,-/Ge-iLLrg 6Thank you for your su-'pport.

84Mission Snipers Pool Hall is in the process ofApplying for a liquor Licence.If you support us with this idea, we would likeTo have your name and phone number../) P -1 ,,c7.0 0 L 14,(1(,) cc-77P;)Li77E1Thank you for your support.67°4

5i;85Mission Snipers Pool Hall is in the process ofApplying for a liquor Licence.If you support us with this idea, we would likeTo have ysur nine and phone numberCoo 4„-Y.7)t/Lfqo0/-a/nr/9Z1 JCA(37,19e-ar2 /1(2,.1? e_i?/1141-A4'-i-N ,A 4?-\-Thank you for your support

86Mission Snipers Pool Hall is in the process ofApplying for a liquor Licence.If you support us with this idea, we would likeTo have your name and phone number.Eenee t;c,(S(At PG

Ryan Anderson87From: FVAD Office [info@fvad.ca]Sent: Monday, January 04, 2010 10:54 AMTo: Ryan AndersonSubject: Petition against Snipers Liquor LicenseAttachments: FVAD Snipers Petition.pdfHello Ryan,I neglected to attach our petition when I sent the letter for Council review in December. There aren't as manysignatures as we could have, due to the time-frame leading up to the holidays. Given more time, we do havemore people who have expressed concerns and would likely wish to sign. Should we continue the petitionsigning, or is today the deadline for everything relating to the license?In any case, could you please forward our petition to Council?Thanks very much.Happy New Year!Kind regards,CarolyneMrs. Carolyne CarneySchool AdministratorFraser Valley Academy of Dance33219 1st Avenue, Mission BC V2V 1G7T: (604) 826-0097F: (866) 304-fvad (toll-free)E: info@fvad.caW: www.fvad.ca"A centre of excellence for dance"Entrepreneurial Excellence Award Winner 2009Find us on Facebook: www.facebook.com/pages/Mission-BC/Fraser-Vallev-Academv-of-Dance/781442369091

88We, the undersigned, strongly object to the requested application for a liquor license for the Mission Snipers Pool Hall at 33212 Avenue,Mission. As customers, employees, owners and residents of the downtown area, we know that the presence of another licensed lounge wouldbe at the detriment of the business and residential core of Mission. The area is struggling to be revitalized, and is slowly moving away from theproblems associated with alcohol and drugs that have had a regular presence around us, especially in the evening.In particular, the license location is_ directly 'across the street from a children's dance school, where over 300. students and their familiesccngrvgRit@ over many hours eve_ y evening ana weekend., BONin the immediate- vicinity of a OliKIrerf.S Phl?0! makes this license rExliAot' completely unsuitable and directly at odds with the safe, family environment essential tar our children.All signitortes below we 18 years of age or older.VFull NamePostalcode1' i'PrithlY,..IV: n'slitatstY Vg-li 1C- '4- 1.1 LS S t 6N.12' Vitir-tr\_) C__Pttti VaV t 6-1- Vi, i.SL er•-.1City[Customer /Resident /Business Owner /Employee]of downtown Mission1340.42r s 11.,`s&St fveSS Cuus.eit3 . "17,,,, 11„...) pit -740,3 4 21 Ci. r1 a A dzeiesTsA:o/Z.b fralko Cc IN 15g linX4' limn /06 Pi•aiiq ‘it/ 7 t3 vvki c5/,),.3 faisi,833 ooAir-k....s. (-7 1 ar 't 0'1 5 6, fi 3 fiilo a 4 Fin C.1 ir, 4-7-n-4,6. 04 6,- V.4.5 f.5- /M44-4.."et (A:‘,7.-,,,,c--,7.• 4 L. if ' Sr ' ( V . L.3 ' 1 on h.," .8► 0.-MI.MM IMPAIM=SWIOMMI a A _9 ' IHNM' MIIMErr id t'"A 5 16 II a tafignin • AZU Mitilliffll .. ,r,ir•a-,..-- -la. NIUMII ili11,∎ If Uti:i , KC) j 6._ V ? V f L.trn,:sS itr.) CaDIDk.te o12. cx\e-., 0 , y. .L\ .\CIA_!.13 INDWIll . •• &PM MI • lot!14, yormammagim 1' .- 0 TOALL IVIWAN15. ea,--10-4,-4( Lb.,v#E /45 /44 /.5 .5./0 '4/ eas76 .--)-4.16. i i rC\C-U./htri k1.3& 5 Act 'h , ,. -C,c-N-6 ,17. . • , e. -I-/o/ r 0 I/ ) 1/1- g.S-- /77/.55 1 a rl t. SI ,-A-G'+18. F.--e. A-.4._› ,,/,.7 V ---3-"i .11-d ∎■ -.....S. 1 o....1 Cr A C h>"•eles,:-" . • ..,.-19. i ra 4, k;c;A:i}‘,.,-.1 V-( '-, ..I.H'i 145'ic3-1 •'r- , - \rn iN ' 5 10 ) n ,a-s:h.i.-- t/ -i f i i-• C" ]1,1 iy5 ie.-■• ..21. rA v,r. V15 1,12 t‘if,".A.,,; it/22. C L44 1,2 S' 278 Abh..-4-_ifi c'. . LA/t-1324. iiEJA:n/ 4/1//1/1,16 ■42 s 4-0 ge(617;coep 4ts 7- 0),•..( El725. (4) "I" Utz. 0 c, Sc l\"1/ 1" 4 vjv -?ks Af,,,i,,q,. GA OrN__26. f )4:\i,c,A,,,,,ILA. V' -V(01 Nk(5(-i en CLuz4-tscv•P"--27. (.1/ fridfr/77// irs2. V 410- Mi .c.,c 1 r) ti (1.0-S h2/17LC28. ✓,P 7v 4 `7. 5 )4 V fA2 9;2 lir I S 4) .` (,),-i eiriu.1.129. ' l4A i+- L -hi , ‘-1 VI) '1i.-1 t="1 65Cio AC cc-- , -2 7 1/1.-130. 64‘,..4 .5t-e • , 1 11 _. .111 1 ..3132. MMIINIIEIIII33. & , ILK t,...kid l./ 1 EINIMIIMMEMII34. nffillignalMIMMI111=1131111 ;Gas i&.. ALSignatureA

89pETrnoN AGAINST the APPLICATION (1,09-00s) for a LIQUOR LICENSE atMISSION SNIPERS POOL HALL at 33212 1ST AVENUE.Full NamePostalcodeCity[Customer / Resident /atiSiFIESS Owner /Employee]of downtown Mission35 ' A461451, (44(PPn MS i \ k frkvsci ON) Ct tcArDra-ke r36c_n-e 35-z.T.laNQi , nil a - 1._ i•t4t tr.\ -,-.6-reNe (38 IMUMPISIMENNELVEMie k 13 i 507.0 ( ,t, taill ild-* I- , •:- ,... ..fte_tc41 rinffintISW MCBEE= I In Tai 1 a g IP MITA I I I 11142 .-MMIIIIMMMII 1i lt, " 111/1P"IMI-.-.4.-2/ .,I43. C-1,A21.4-■ 3- -C. 6 g ii ii. t-tria. IMIIMION44 IIMPRIMEMMIAMIMI MOSNICININMEWANIIMMINIMILMINIMPSWW3111112.018111/WWWINMILMUIREMA ' _ _ 'MINIIIIBRIMISMINIIIMILIMMIll(' ■ , C.":"WC.WAIIMAllit . a L, r AIL .50' IMISIVENZWIERMIIIMINAIWOM A._ _.51- r.IMETIO .......11MIIENEMIE52 ,.L.A.L.1 m -m — ---.-- 11VINIMMAINMPMNEWAr A53. groMINICMIN tj,9 t,s • BrywasgMERIP17/# 2,4111154 riz 1,i2 t9t/ ow, I/ ,C1-,/ - 7(5 i ;',-,,- ie,, , r.-.1in't i 1..ed25eqyL yoLkt viv 7ec frissfo") 0,0S+TOrrek-56. 1—e e.-, -.1_ '..nxi Lev -v-■„.. L.,Th. e_.,..., ---re.,-,-57. 1 i I A , _ AA I' VI l 1)(I/ r) MI' t.0Aro id . . 4 /0/61 'aihef 04. P cfr \O 5 crli-i- Abian's V) C,-(017/6-- t12_6 2 4e14,e0. ra . A Nr23c-lic ..) i\ fvel kris? (.'_63. LUC4etr,iir 1-l-eir-1 '474 L.* v 'c' rrik 5',.G iv C...,_5400-42_,,64 --..)- 41 .1 L I. , \-. -1 -5- CSbbo-46%cl (-s y (Ad-" C. a 0(114 (4 Ui /M IZ It-A-15'5'6(1 "4 m66 10 ICA e i311,-6 -k--2- v IX ov, N_Ape g,16 ':,.,'67 AlICIft114, Fat 'di- V-(soAl 1-i455;,1-- c:,a4)A.,-.68 Al/CM XVC. 441(A4t‘d V? %-iii, 0145 5 ,,,,..; C lb c,.,-..69 Pfrir) 4 k- --2/041.7L/V.2V 6/4 401 It)/ C,

90PETITION AGAINST the APPLICATION (L09-00s) for a LIQUOR LICENSE atMISSION SNIPERS POOL HALL at 33212 1 ST AVENUE.iFull Name Postal City[Customer /Resident/Rosiness OwnerSignatureIcodeEmployee]of downtown Mission -77' ... VI C. Li . .: 4 C i V34, 3 -Pri3 ,A .:".•112,■ it'0 " t-1.e). „z.,11111EIPAMI -1-L..‹2 .. ,79 grAMORMINIIIMMZEMMENTRarn . ... 4._IIIMINALMIIIIIUMMEIIM INia. I. %IN' 4.4: ...:81 felltiMAIIIIENICIIIIIIFMMI -.82. Igil V T I,. . del")\rafip-elI I k tiln 1.1 O. f L PPMit ..., t,a85f -,A-sru vier-36.87. 11101MITIMM, -_MRMIMMIEM Tel.- ',....., -4.-88. 5 v.) A, `)C.Lt. ( \1C'4 6;3'1 vv\ xss 1 0 0 (` t.Ot•'.'--789. \rt: ./g(D`- ‘'‘40 01 I 47,0 ,i(bc-kv-, c 0 sTIon,-V___,-90. -7- ) InSW2\ T -1,-*1 V6 M /Goo _7, ?;C.,Ci./e- C u757brn Fje,91. E., „,,,,..., .4,./4,y,,,,- likv l>c. Cc 'IA, ry-)t...,i-,.--\ C 1,,L47)0A...0C91 ?ix- t„,-_,,,7 /,,K )x;',. -.7`-/ ,-_-;,1/:. 1/2 , j F q ;27, • 5 ' c)),, Ce..)57 ,--)-1-‘,---2,93- /L i! c/fik iTc._ fc!..6-N,-7 V„z v Cr/ 9' ./-1 /,1.1/ D!../ (,1,,./ -,41)fri . (2.-94.44,,,:iirtet_ R-e.--VE--e._ vz kr-+ 4:4 .■-•/1-.95 ' ))11 i kl16) IAAKI sYtr \17)•\I L4PC -7-r N\Ac4-5`4,,-N, 00 c\--L c 796. 9,C_4•(,)s'• ,. r, 7- (( -43 S ‘721) .eZ..,-/ k.1 [Z rd n) Res.d c,-, -1-97. -,--.. I • •_00. .... un irmt Y-98' erStlialle lVeliM' Iri eTEMMIIMilil irr99' 1111MMAIIIIMPRIffelli. .i ...,(7)'•C :Ade100. rMILIMATERWEggillEMINEi101 ' C...e.t. N\krk■•••o- 015 -1 V-1. k\5116ig'Cu. tl. c" -V,•-‹ r. r102. ' t4116,. 1/1 x Z65 41eNty. ,-,-(,,) cv 7 ,i, -,-103, iLkt-t"t .--Fki yL,f- o S(L-VaDritti- C USTOka_104. eii\,1:01i.e 41qtr* V 7C 416 -or4 r t;1--0(),Q1105. ,2,,,,,, vi L6,... vqx- 7_13 !4 ill,,,-A-s.r:,,- c Lk 0-dNiNg.-{ -• 106. 1 ' mil A Lit? 1C ■17 \) ))22,--1 M\33 ‘(--A k 0 u':3 • --- 1 1 t107. t.'-,.-_.ru 47-i-rrs, -? , LIA$ 5' 0.4 ?- N.41.54, ,,,... C -:--,"1"■01 ‘ k;.---4.108. AN Ga.A 1:.4.:7Y\Al .., -1:‘,•;11 2-- t-m `YS. c-ov7 C,.... :JAN: --109. fa ,7t), , , -7 S L'-•'- VZ V(f./.-IL5 n' f 'St f:, }110. t,,I\ .•\e'',3L.t\ilk/3 V,:t \..11 • 1% • CI W)t-kt-4-III.112.113.114.115,1 16.117.118,rIIJ

91From: Juli Abramyk [mailto:exiSent: Monday, December 21, 2009 1:45 PMTo: Ryan AndersonSubject: Snipers Pool Halli]Dear Mr Anderson,I believe it is time to start improving downtown Mission into the quaint little shopping area thatit has potential for. I myself would utilize the area more frequently but I am uncomfortable withthe rough crowd that hangs around and I do not like my children observing/hearing how theychoose to live their lives.I believe by giving a liquor licence to Snipers pool hall will only attractfurther seedy characters into the downtown area. My daughter attends FVAD Thursday evenings,I do not feel it correct to have a 'drinking" pool hall across the way.Sincerely,Juli AbramykMission, BC

92From: Linda Alex [mailto:li,Sent: Monday, December 21, 2009 9:10 PMTo: Ryan AndersonSubject: re: liquor liscenceNrearT)Czg,This is regarding Snipers on main street applying for a liquor license one word sums it up"WRONG"....some one has to get some balls (sorry for the language ) for a change we knowthere should not be a liquor license in the middle of Mission's main street.,...down the road froma dance studio where children and families come and go and also across the street from a dancestudio I can see riff raff still wondering the main street of mission in the early evenings eventhough the police and others are trying to clean it up this is just asking for trouble there areenough places here where people can do their drinking....so the owners want to increase theirprofits....I can forsee drunken ,disorderly people increasing, loitering of undesirablesincreasing.... women of the night increasing....violence increasing , accidents increasing, andother negative behaviors ....As far as i am concerned the answer should have been a direct NOright from the beginning and never gotten this far on Mission's councils agenda Linda

93From: Nicolette [mailto:Sent: Monday, December 21, 2009 6:18 PMTo: Ryan AndersonSubject: RE: Liquor Licence for SnipersEhritreatHi Ryan,I'm a parent who has many concerns regarding the safety of children going to theFraser Valley Academy of Dance. My daughter goes to this ballet school and Ithink it would be inappropriate for the children to witness the loitering,drunkenness, as well as the increased risk of drunk driving directly outside achildren's school. I would like to vote NO to the liquor license application.Nicolette Bridger

94From: Jason Burrows [mato*Sent: Saturday, November 28, 2009 4:55 PMTo: Ryan AndersonSubject: Liquor License 1st Ave, MissionEr)Mr. Anderson,It has come to my attention that a liquor license is being proposed, or considered for the south side of the33200 block of downtown Mission. I am opposed to this proposal or consideration for the followingreasons:-I have been employed in Law Enforcement for the last 12 years, and have noticed, in my professionaland private experience, that smoking bans within licensed premises (and many other businesses) havemoved smokers onto public streets. An addition of a liquor license to a business in the 33200 block of 1stAve, would likely cause additional people under the influence of alcohol to frequent the sidewalks nearthis business. I also cannot imagine the applicant of the liquor license has a patio large enough at itssouth side (overlooking West Railway) that could accommodate current smoking regulations (i.e. not with30 feet of doors etc).-There is a currently a Dance Academy on the north side of the 33200 block of 1st Ave, that attractshundreds of children into healthy hobbies, activities and social events at various hours of the day, andevening. Many parents in the community gladly spend hard earned money enrolling their children into thisdance school at young ages (as young as three) in hopes that their children stay committed to healthyactivities and continue attending into their young adulthood years. Furthermore, the parents dropping theirchildren off, and spending time and money downtown could .greatly be discouraged.-I have recently noticed a decline in undesirable people hanging around in Downtown Mission, and I haverecently found myself shopping, buying coffee, and purchasing a variety of goods in the area. I currentlyhave no reservations about walking around downtown during dark winter evening hours, after dinner withmy four year old daughter. I can guarantee I would not do the same activity between Grand St and CedarSt, which by coincidence is the home of a licensed establishment, and beer and wine store.For your consideration,Jason Burrows

95From: Shelley Canning [mailto:sSent: Tuesday, December 22, 2U09 11:27 AMTo: Ryan AndersonSubject: Snipers liquor licenseHi Ryan,We understand you are presenting to Mission Council regarding the recent appication for a liquor licenseby Sniper's pool hall.We are Abbotsford residents with 2 daughters dancing across the street at FVAD (Fraser Valley Academyof Dance). We strongly oppose having this business obtain a liquor license. We began attending FVAD inSept 2009 and were shocked at number of individuals loitering around that area of town and disturbed atbeing approached for drugs by some of these individuals. We decided that we would walk our daughtersright up to the door of the dance studio rather than let them walk along the street. Neither our daughtersnor ourselves felt comfortable about having them walk along this street.The owners of the dance studio were well aware of the concerns held by families regarding safety on thestreet. To that end they have hired security for the entrance of the dance studio. We have also beenpleased to see other security patrols along the street in this area. These interventions serve to make usfeel much safer and more comfortable having our children attending this dance studio in Mission.Again, we strongly oppose this liquor license application.Sincerely,Shelley Canning & Rene St-Martin

96From: Tina McGee [mailto:Sent: Monday, December 21, 2009 2:18 PMTo: Ryan AndersonSubject: Sniper's Liquor LicenceDear Mr Anderson,EtcfellAhgnI am writing in regards to the possibility of Sniper's Pool Hall obtaining a liquor license. Iwill keep it short, but I am completely opposed to such an idea. I have been a teacher atthe Fraser Valley Academy of Dance now for nine years, and needless to say, I have seenmany of the students grow from small children into resposible young adults. I teach allages, some as young as four, and they are all in the dance studio not only to learn how todance, but also important tools in order to be a respectable and contributing member of ourcommunity. How unfortunate to create such a safe and creative environment, only for themto walk outside onto 1st Ave, which has greatly improved since I first worked here, to theunforseen circumstances that an establishment providing liquor will no doubtly give.I have two small children of my own, and only want Mission to continue to improve into aclean, safe, family orientated community. I do not want to come out of my work, feelingunsafe, and surely do not want the three hundred students that I teach to feel that way aswell. I want to be proud when I say I reside and work in Mission!Thank you for your time,Tina Cattermole, instructor for Fraser Valley Academy of Dance.

977ron-Lf- phebe cneunc a]• Sent: Monday, December 21, 2009 11:02 PMTo: Ryan AndersonCc: FVAD OfficeSubject: Objection to a liquor license in Mission downtownHi.I have grave concern about the possibility of issuing a liquor license to Snipers which is inDowntown Mission, extremely close to the dance school where my kids and a lot other kidsattend Monday to Saturday and sometmes Sunday. Being a parent, I am extremely cautiouswith takin ., m hiois in and out of the l"VAD dance school everytime expecially when it's dark. Ihave seen prostitules. homeless people, hikers hanging around in the neighbourhood. Thanks tothe school hiring a security guard and it has helped to improve the situation: If alcohol isavaiiane in the neighbourhood, I can guarantee that the old problems will be back and it couldget worse than before. I work in the field of Mental Health and Addictions and I have workedwith people who are homeless and poor. Trust me, though they have a very tight budget, theywill have or even find money for alcohol if it is easily accessible. Also nobody would be "toobusy" to drink if this is what they like.I'm not saying that we are depriving the Snipers' right to determine how they do business but thisis just not an apporbriate area to have the liquor so readily available. It is too risky to have ourkids exposed to all the potential problems. The downtown Mission can become East sideVancouver if we are not careful and not responsible. I think it is very sad that the owner ofSniper chooses to ignore his social responsibility while he only cares about making a profit fromthe community. However, the Council, with a wider perspective, should make a decisionconsidering the benefits of the community as a whole instead of only looking after the profits ofa business man. I do hope Snipers owner's request for a liquor license be turned down. Thankyou.PhebeOne of the FVAD Parents

98From: Lisa DonateIli [mailto:l i]Sent: Monday, December 21, 2009 6:27 PMTo: Ryan AndersonSubject: RE: Sniper's Liquor Licensekillere4Good evening Ryan,send you this email as a concerned citizen of Mission and customer of 1st Avenue. I have beeninformed that you are the person to write to in regards to the possible liquor license at Sniper's. I believethat if this application is accepted, it would be a detrimental to the community as a whole. 1st avenue hasbeen well known for unsavoury behaviour which have seemed to decrease lately. I believe that this wouldincrease with Sniper's serving alcohol. There are alot of children in the area in well establishedbusinesses fie. Martial arts, ballet school, ect) and I would like to think that their safely would be first andforemost in tne Council's decision.Please do not accept this application.Sincerely,Lisa Donatelli

99From Michelle Elliott [mailto:rrSent: Monday, December 21, 2009 1:51 PMTo: Ryan AndersonSubject: Snipers liquor licence applicationDear Ryan,I would like to express my concerns over the recent application for Snipers billiards loungefor a liquor licence. My young daughter attends the Fraser Valley Academy of Dance justacross the street, and I believe it would be very detrimental to the surroundingneighbourhood to have customers drinking nearby.Please add my voice to the list of those opposing this application.Thank you,Michelle ElliottMission resident

100From: Lynne Fedora [mailto:lSent: Monday, December 21, 2009 1:47 PMTo: Ryan AndersonSubject: pool hallHi...I would like to send my support for the Fraser Dance Academy andsay that granting a liquor license to the pool hall is NOT a goodidea as the area attracts enough "questionable" visitors already. Ialready feel unsafe walking in the area and do not need to think thata drunken customer from the pool hall could stumble into the danceacademy where my daughter is taking lessons.Thanks,Lynne Fedora

101From: bformosa [maiIto:Sent: Sunday, January 03, 2010 1:10 PMTo: Ryan AndersonCc: FVAD OfficeSubject: Liquor Licence - Snipers Pool HallHappy New Year Mr. AndersonMy family and I moved to Mission five years ago from Coquitlam. We wanted to move to asmaller town and buy a bigger piece of property, which we have done and completely enjoy.When we moved to Mission it was always my thought that First Avenue could be such a characterstreet if it was cleaned up. As it stands now my family and I avoid it at all costs. Unfortunately,our dance studio is now located on First Avenue and every time we attend it we are subject to themisgivings of that street. We are constantly harassed by panhandlers, drunk or drugged personsas well as groups of "undesirables" sleeping or sitting randomly. I was somewhat shocked anddismayed that Council is considering a liquor licence to the pool hall. To have alcohol availablewithin that short distance of a danCe studio seems like we are asking for huge trouble. I'm notconfident we have the policing to monitor the situation. The security currently in place does notreplace law enforcement as they have no authority to effectively deal with any of the problems onFirst avenue.I would like to see Mission take positive steps to make this the beautiful town it is capable ofbecoming and avoid situations that take us backwards.Yours truly,Brenda Formosa

102From: A FrendoSent: Saturday, November 28, 2009 2:36 PMTo: Ryan AndersonSubject: Sniper's Pool Hall Liquor Licenseemeeffi)Hello Mr. Anderson,I am writing to you in regards to the application of a liquor license for the Mission Sniper's Pool Hall. Myhusband and I moved to Mission from Burnaby with our family about 2 years ago. One of the mainreasons we chose Mission as a place to buy our home and raise our family is because of our perceivedcare that Mission has taken to be family friendly and progressive in planning for the future.The revitalization of the downtown core is a major concern for any customer to the downtown businesses.The choice of businesses that make up this revitalization project must be carefully considered if Missionwants to continue to attract families that will come and spend time and money locally rather than goingelsewhere.I am aware that the pool hall in the downtown core has applied for a liquor license. I am concerned thatthe granting of the license would effect the entire downtown core in a negative way, especially given thecare that Mission has taken to ensure the safety of citizens who frequent the family oriented businesses,including the retail stores and the dance schools. I do not see the necessity of another establishmentthat serves alcohol in such a small downtown core, especially given the size and location of the pool hall.We are strongly opposed to the granting of a liquor license to the pool hall, and would hope that yourcouncil will see the damage that the granting of the application could have on the future of the downtownof Mission.Thank you.Sincerely yours,Angela Frendo

103Hello Ryan,Please find attached our comments regarding the Snipers Pool Hall liquor-primary licenceapplication.I hope that I am sending this in time to be included in your report to Council.Kind regards,CarolyneMrs. Carolyne CarneySchool AdministratorFraser Valley Academy of Dance33219 1st Avenue, Mission BC V2V 1G7T: (604) 826-0097F: (866) 304-fvad (toll-free)E: info@fvad.c aW: www.fvad.ca

104December 22, 2009Re: Mission Snipers Pool Hall Liquor-Primary Licence ApplicationDear Mr. Mayor and Council Members,We write to you as owners of the Fraser Valley Academy of Dance, a children's dance school of over 300students mainly aged from 3 to 16 years old, located at 33219 1 st Avenue in Missi6n. We are directly acrossthe street from the Mission Snipers Pool Hall. We understand that the owners of Snipers have applied for aliquor-primary licence for 28 seats between 12 noon and 1:00 a.m. daily.We attended the December 9, 2009, Public Information Session at the Mission Municipal Hall in order topresent our concerns with this licence request, and to learn more about the details of the application from theowners. We hoped to learn that the owners would have some answers in regards to the obvious communityconcerns with this licence application. We also believed that they would be aware of the problems of thedowntown core, the struggle to revitalize the area, and the existence of childrens' schools surrounding theirestablishment. Unfortunately, this was not the case.As new residents of Mission, we were ourselves naïve to the problems on .1 st Avenue when we moved toMission and purchased the Fraser Valley Academy of Dance in July 2008. However, we became completelyaware of the situation within one week of being at the school daily. Our response was to immediately hire asecurity guard, to discuss the problems with the RCMP, to talk to the Downtown Business Association, and tomeet with the Community Police Liaisons. Understanding the importance of community involvement, we alsojoined the Arts Council, the Chamber of Commerce, and later the new Business and Professional Women'sMission Chapter.As a result of hard work and community involvement during our first year, we raised enrollment by 35%. This,along with our visions of further growth in the community, resulted in us receiving the EntrepreneurialExcellence Award for 2009 from the Mission Chamber of Commerce. We did this against the odds in arecession and in spite of the difficulties on 1 st Avenue in the evening.In order to ensure the safety of our children and their families attending the school, we pay $10,000 per yearto have a security guard outside our building for 4 hours every evening, Monday to Friday, either 4:30-8:30 or5:00-9:00. Every evening, we receive a security report. Between September 2008, and June 2009, therewere 188 incidents reported, 82 of those between September and December 2008. The majority of incidentsinvolved prostitutes (106 sightings visible from our school). Between September 2009 and December 2009,there were only 4 incidents. This is a vast improvement and is shown in the chart below.Fraser Valley Academy of Dance and Theatre Arts Ltd.33219 .1" Avenue, Mission BC V2V1G7Tel (604) 826-oo97 Fax (866) 304-fvad info@fvad.ca www•ivad.ca

105Comparison 08/09 to 09/10100 -Incidents 2008-095:Incidents 2009-10o c` . c,0› .c.,0) .c-;(- s(:-. c., ,§-\ . ,a* \`°c e,t> cz; eti, 0,

106As there is no place to smoke inside the Snipers Pool Hall, everyone who frequents the establishment mustgo onto the surrounding streets to smoke. With an entrance at front and back, this means that the smokersare either near the Martial Arts school and boxing club, or opposite the dance school. Neither location ishelpful for the children, nor is an increase in smokers on the street helpful for downtown. Studies show thatpeople who drink tend to smoke, and heavy drinkers tend to be heavy smokers. With a liquor-primarylicence, there will be a substantial increase in the number of people smoking, and therefore the number ofpeople exposed to the toxic second-hand smoke, on and around 1 st Avenue.With a liquor-primary licence from 12 noon to 1 am, people can be drinking alcohol without food for 3.5 to 9hours at the time young children come to the dance school across the road from the Snipers Pool Hall. Forpeople drinking without causing problems, there is little incentive for any establishment to stop serving them.When customers do reach the point of having drunk too much, and are asked to leave, they will now be indirect contact with our children and their families. If they are displeased about being told to leave the poolhall, they will now be drunk and angry. This is never a situation into which children should be placed. Andyet it is being requested nonetheless.Many of the people leaving the pool hall will get behind the wheel of a motor vehicle. No matter how muchcampaigning occurs, people still drink and drive. Many people don't think 2 or 3 drinks makes them too drunkto drive. It can never be acceptable to place those people in their cars directly next to the hundreds ofchildren and their families who frequent the dance school, the martial arts school and the boxing club. Noone should ever take such a risk with children's lives, let alone adults' lives.The liquor-primary licence on 1 st Avenue may be necessary for the pool hall owners to make a profit. But thatprofit comes with a price tag of increased loitering, second-hand smoke, drunken behaviour, drunk drivingand potential for aggression. It seems impossible for anyone to consider introducing such risk factors into ourchildren's lives, let alone into a community area where people are working together so effectively to make thestreets safe for everyone.There is room for a family-friendly, non-alcoholic pool hall on 1 st Avenue at the centre of the downtown core.There cannot be room for a liquor-primary licence. Please support the work already done by the Council andthe community, and reject the Mission Snipers Pool Hall liquor application. Please continue to make sure ourchildren are safe.Yours sincerely,John Carney Carolyne CarneyOwner OwnerFraser Valley Academy of Dance and Theatre Arts Ltd.332.19 Avenue, Mission BC VaViG7Tel (604) 8z6-oo97 Fax (866) 3o4-fvad info@fvad.ca www.fvad.ca

107From: peter and tamara [maltSent: Tuesday. December 22, .zuU9 9:22 PMTo: Ryan AndersonSubject. Liouor License app Snipersam writing to share my concerns of a Liquor being sold at Snipers. My daughter dances right across thestreet, we are so pleased with the dance studio and feel that it has added much to the Down Town area.It is a very busy dance studio, with many children corning and going. I often head to The Cottage andFields while my daughter dances, the cross walk is right by Snipers. I think I would be hesitate to headacross the street to shop with a Liquor License there ( not sure if drunk people would be heading out thedoor) I think that we want to make the Down Town area more appealing, and Family Friendly. Not addingto the problems with more Liquor available to people. We already have one end of Town a little lessFamily Friendly and nov,, it would be spread to the other end. I don't think Liquor should be sold in an areawhere there are so many children around. We all so use the Scotia Bank and I think we would have tolook at dealing with a different bank too, It just wouldn't feel safe to be going to take out money with aLiquor selling facility so close by.Tamara Gray

From: peter and tamara [mailto4Sent: Sunday, January 03, 2010 9:10 AMTo: Ryan AndersonSubject: SnipersI definitely oppose Snipers pool hall of being able to serve alcohol at any timeC===:)gukgrewe108Peter Gray

109From: Frank Gundermann [mailto:Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2009 10:32 PMTo: Ryan AndersonSubject: Mission Snipers Pool Hall - Liquor License ApplicationI DO NOT support the Mission Snipers Pool Hall liquor license.My young daughter attends the Fraser Valley Academy of Dance (FVAD), across from the SnipersPool Hall. The FVAD has wisely provided a security presence at the school, and since then, the areahas felt much safer. If the image of downtown Mission is to improve any, please don't attract thepeople to the downtown core which this type of establishment would attract. I am sure youunderstand the types of drinkers who I am referring.This downtown establishment is a place where many "drinkers" will likely be close to home, and sowill not place themseleves on a limit to the number of drinks the consume. We fear that theseyoung attractive dancers may be physically or verbally harassed, or at the very least intimidated bythe presence of such people at the Snipers Pool Hall.Please carefully consider how this decision will impact the image and quality of our downtownbusinesses.Frank Gundermann

110From: Jennifer Harris [mailto:_Sent: Monday, December 21, 2009 1:53 PMTo: Ryan AndersonSubject: Snipers liquor license applicationDear Mr. Ryan Anderson,I'm writing to express my deep concern over Sniper's pool hall application for a liquor license.I think this would be a huge step backwards for Mission to approve such a license. The DowntownBusiness Association and Council have worked hard to improve conditions and safety in thedowntown core over recent years and adding a drinking establishment would erode the good thathas been done.Moreover, I have young children who attend the Fraser Valley Academy of Dance on First Ave. andthe Canadian Martial Arts Academy just below on Railway. The last thing we want to have to dealwith are intoxicated people coming out of the pool hall or loitering in the area. I am also concernedabout an increase in drunk driving in an area so concentrated with children. You wouldn't locate adrinking establishment across from an elementary or high school, so it astounds me that you wouldeven consider allowing one next to TWO kinds of specialty SCHOOLS!Please, do not allow this application to move forward.Sincerely,Jennifer HarrisMission, BC

111From: tara-lea hehn [mailto:tSent: Tuesday, December 22, 2009 9:52 AMTo: Ryan AndersonSubject:I am absolutely opposed to them having a liquor license. I have been a client of FFAC for 2 years andhave always felt uneasy with being down town in that area in the evenings. A liquor license would justmake matters worse.Tara-Lea

112From: Ljanzeashavv.ca [mailto:iSent: Thursday, December 10, 2009 10:50 AMTo: Heather St .wart l:External:1; Jenn y:Stevens [External]; Paul Horn [External];terrydiddasnawcable.com ; James AtebeCc: Ryan AndersonSubject: Plissin Sripers loci Hall liquor license applictionDear Mr. Mayor, and Council Members,tt Lifr in Bedford Falls - er, I mean Mission. Pottersville would be aI attended the 7:.!d is information session on Wednesday evening to support theDowntown Business Association in their attempts to make the main shopping district ofMission a safe and enjoyable place to work and shop. To this date, they have done awonderful job.It is with dismay that I found out about the owners of the Mission Snipers Pool Hallapplying for a 28 seat liquor license. With no marketing research, the owners believethat adding liquor will increase their business. Adding a liquor license to this part ofMission, will only increase vandalism, loitering, drunk-driving, etc. Mission already hasthe Bellevue to contend with, and adding another establishment that allows drinking atthe other end of Mission will just increase disorderly conduct on our lovely main street.The hard work and dedication that the DBA has strived for to clean up this area, couldgo down the gutter within months of a liquor license being granted.With proper marketing, and no li quor license, the Snipers Pool Hall could be a vibrant,non-alcoholic facility open to the many youth groups, high school students, parents andfamilies. It could be rented out for pool tournaments, teen birthday parties, or specialoccasions (weddings, bachelor parties, stagettes - with a temporary one night liquorlicense). They could offer lessons on playing pool, bring in pool champions to showtheir skills, they could have theme nights, etc. There are a multitude of options theowners could entertain to make their business viable with no liquor license. Withproper marketing, and working with the Downtown Business Association, the ownersof Sniper's Pool Hall could have a unique, thriving, profitable business without theaddition of alcohol.Mr. Mayor, and Council: it is up to you to decide what kind of "Wonderful Life" thehard-working citizens of Mission deserve in their community - Bedford Falls orPottersville?Thank you,Shelley Janze

113From: connie krahn-manning [mailto:Sent: Monday, December 21, 2009 4:46 PMTo: Ryan AndersonSubject:Ec:zz, h4grey;,iMr. Anderson.I am very unhappy to hear that you think a liquor license would solve your problems. I would like to seeyou agree to your family and your children come down and try to enjoy going to the dance school, or astore open late, or Tim's for their favorite snack, when you are allowing drinking and all that it per tails,right in the area that they would want to walk. I am disappointed in the fact that you aren't eveninterested in listening to other ideas from the community. Bottom line is that you have your mind madeup, you are being stubborn, you refuse to listen to others, since you think you have the best idea.You realize, that if you get your way, you just may be spending more money on law suits, than you aremaking money selling liquor. I am very disappointed in you Mr. Anderson. A quick suggestion, whydon't you ask your kids their opinion? Make sure you tell them , that kids their ages are walking by thisestablishment. Make sure you tell them that Tim's is right there . Are you willing to park your car in frontof your establishment Mr Anderson, if there is liquor for sale, and are you willing to leave your car there?An unhappy parent,Connie Krahn

114From John Lemond [mailto:Sent: Tuesday, December 22, 2009 9:23 AMTo: Ryan AndersonSubject: Snipers Liquor LicenseMr. Anderson,I am writing this email to you in hopes that you do not recommend Snipers to acquire a liquor license.Mission's downtown core is starting to improve with the focus that has been put forward. By grantingSnipers a liquor license I feel that this would not be inline with the plan of improving the downtown core.This would be a step backwards, it would have a negative impact in this area.The location of Snipers is in close proximity to two other business that have young children being droppedoff to attend lessons. This would not be a responsible decision by council to approve this request. Itdoes not take much thought to see the risks will be added to these other already thriving businesses byhaving a bar next door.I understand that the owner of Snipers is attempting to increase business with a liquor licence. It appearsfrom what I have read, that alternative ideas to improve business have been presented to the owner withlittle or no interest by the owner. It sounds like the owner is looking for a quick and simple fix to hisproblem without any consideration to the impact that it may have on others. The downtown core requiresbusinesses that match the cites needs and goals, that support and contribute to the community in apositive manner. Businesses that cannot sustain themselves within this criteria will fail. They should notbe propped up with liquor licensees.I have seen the downtown core in the past and I applaud the hard work that has been done to improve it.By granting a liquor licence to Snipers I feel that this is not congruent with the goals of the downtownimprovement plan and would be undoing the hard work that took so long to achieve.A proud and concerned Mission residentJohn Lemond

115From: Captivating Designs [mailto:Sent: Monday, December 21, 2009 3:19 PMTo: Ryan AndersonSubject: Fwd: Snipers Liquor License ApplicationDear Ryan,I am writing in response to the Snipers Liquor License Application.My 3.5 year old daughter attends dance across the street, as do many other little girls that I know.I do not find it appropriate to be having people drinking across the street where no doubt it willattract some sort of mishaps. I don't think that the chance should be taken when our little girlsare there throughout the late afternoon and evenings. Not only do these children go in and out ofthe dance school, but often parking is bad and there are times when parking across the street isnecessary.My 6 year old son attends martial arts classes in behind Snipers. Often we are forced to park onthe side street right beside Snipers, and I am not at all confident with parking in that area alonewith 3 young children if there is any sort of public drunkeness, which would no doubt be the caseat some point.Mission has worked hard to clean up 1st Avenue, I have seen the changes first hand and ampleased with the results to date. Let's not take a step backwards here.A major concern of mine would be the loitering around outside that will go hand in hand with theserving of alcohol. The smokers have to go somewhere, and I find it inappropriate to have themon 1st avenue, particularly when I may have to pass by the establishment with 3 young children,a 1 year old with asthmatic tendencies, a 3 year old with asthma, and a 6 year old. Whatprotection will be offered to them as I have to walk down the street past a bunch of smokers? It isdisgusting, and no child should have the breath that in. I challenge you to have a look at thenumber of children in that area in the late afternoon/evenings. This is not really a suitable placeto have a bunch of poitering, smoking, and public drunkeness. Perhaps if Snipers wishes tochange the nature of their business to include the serving of alcohol, they should be searching fora mroe suitable location to expand their business.Thank You,Lisa Lindal

116From: Aaron and Maja Malks [mailto:Sent: Monday, December 21, 2009 5:37 PMTo: Ryan AndersonSubject: Snipers Liquor LicenseDear Mr. Anderson,As longtime Mission residents and regular patrons of many of our downtown businesses, we are veryconcerned that council is considering granting a liquor license to the Snipers Pool Hall.Our fourteen year old daughter has been attending classes and practices at the Fraser Valley Academyof Dance seven days a week.She as well as other young girls often walk to local restaurants (Akasaka, Tim Horton's, etc.) during theirdinner breaks. They are being dropped off and waiting for pick up throughout the day and evening. It isinevitable that intoxicated individuals will be interacting with these young ladies with the proximity of theproposed licensed pool hall. This is not an acceptable mix. There are more appropriate venues foranother drinking establishment in our town that would not be so close to where our children are using thedowntown core area. As well, we appreciate being able to shop and enjoy other services in Mission'sdowntown.We urge you to support the efforts of many small business owners to create a safe, family orientedatmosphere in downtown Mission by refusing to grant a liquor license for the Snipers Pool Hall.Thank you for considering our concerns.Sincerely,Maja and Aaron Malkswiission, BC

117From: Amy Neufeld [mailto:Sent: Sunday, November 29, 2009 12:51 PMTo: Ryan AndersonSubject: Mission Snipers Pool Hall,EDNovember 29, 2009Kevin NeufeldMission BCDear Mr AndersonI recently became aware of an application for a liquor license submitted by the MissionSnipers Pool Hall.After all efforts made by the Downtown Business Association and others to make downtownMission attractive to shoppers, I beleive that granting this application would be anenormous step backwards for Mission. The downtown Mission businesses are already findingit difficult to survive economically. Downtown Mission has a large number of marginalizedand addicted people who spend their days and nights wandering Main Street, and anotherdrinking establishment will only make the situation worse. If this application is approved itwould not surprise me at all to see more Mission businesses abandon Main Street, leaving itto deteriorate rapidly.Consider also the Fraser Valley Academy of Dance located directly across the street fromthe pool hall. There are over three hundred children attending classes at the academy.They come from all over the Fraser Valley, and it is inappropriate for a drinkingestablishment to be located in such close proximity to children. The academy already finds itnecessary to have a security guard posted outside of its front door.Mission has The Bellevue Hotel at one end of town, and does not need anotherestablishment at the other end of town. I do not think the merchants of Downtown Missionor their customers will appreciate the clientelle from bars at either end of town wanderingfrom one establishment to the other in increasing states of intoxication. Shoppers will go toThe Mission Junction or Abbotsford more than they already do in order to avoid this familyunfriendly environment. This outcome is inevitable if this application is approved.I hope that Mission will be able to attract more quality businesses to Main St, but I believethat allowing more drinking establishments will make that impossible.SincerelyKevin Neufeld

118Ryan AndersonFrom: Daniella PettySent: Sunday, December 27, 2009 8:10 AMTo: Ryan AndersonSubject: re the snipers liquor license.Just a note to say that you have enough drunks running around in the city at night...all youneed is another establishment at which they can get more alcohol and run around your streetslater at night! my child goes to the dance school across the street and I already make sureto come out of the car to get her safely to the car. Just last month I phoned the policebecause of a man stumbling around drunk. He even fell into the window of the sushi store downthe way from the dance school. I live in Abbotsford but drive to mission for the danceschool. I am really noticing a steady decline in the people on the streets over the pastcouple of years. You need to take care of your community! Daniella P.1

119From: Darrell & Jas [mailto:pSent: Friday, November 27, 2009 7:47 PMTo: Ryan AndersonSubject:EitrzighDear Mr Anderson,As a returning resident to the city of Mission, I have been so impressed with the care and planning thathave gone into creating a safe and supportive community here in Mission over the last 10 years. When Iwas growing up here, I was unsure I would ever return as an adult to raise my own family. Now, as amother, teacher and citizen, I am more and more proud of the work that is happening to showcase ourstrengths and our clear acknowledgement of areas that are of concern.After so many years, hours and efforts of our community to make First Avenue an economic hub andcentral part of our city, I am very concerned about a licensed pool hall in the area. To be completelycandid, we aren't ready. I don't believe we have the infrastructure, the resources, or the desire to handlesome of the potential problems this could reintroduce to an already instable part of our city. No matterhow diligent the owners are, I feel that it would be damaging to the work that has been done by ourcitizens, and RCMP. As an Auxiliary, my husband has had first hand experience working with some of theunique environments within the downtown core. We feel that -having another licensed liquor establishmentin the area, at this time, would be detrimental to the feel of 'progress' and the perception of 'public safety'that draws other communities to ours. Not only would this be negative for our economy, but also for ouralready thinly stretched resources.Please consider our opinions in the making of this decision.Thank you,Jas and Darrell Piche

120From: Catherine Potocky [mailto:1Sent: Tuesday, December 22, 2009 3:13 PMTo: Ryan AndersonSubject: Snipers Liquor license requestDear Mr Anderson,EameRein)(=z)0Please find attached letter, expressing some of my concerns regarding the Sniper's liquorlicense request.Kind Regards,C. Potocky

121Re: Sniper's request for liquor-primary licenseTo Whom It May Concern:As an employee of FVAD (Fraser Valley Academy of Dance), located on 1st Avenue in Mission, Iwould like to express some of my concerns regarding the above mentioned request.Due to the large number of children who attend the dance school and the continuous turnoverof children between the hours of 3pm and 9.30pm on a daily basis, my main concern is thesafety of these children. With the possibility of a liquor license being granted in the buildingdirectly opposite the dance school, my concern is for the increased number of drunken peopleon 1 st Avenue. Drunken behaviour, whether it be drunken people loitering on the streets,drunken people driving on the streets or simply drunk people being in the vicinity of a danceschool, is worrying for parents, business owners and above all, the children.In my opinion, it would be a huge shame to risk the possibility of 1 st Avenue going back to it'sold ways before the security patrol started there. It would be terrible to see the return of anunsavoury, criminal, and unsafe 1 st Avenue when effort has gone in to improving the area.In order to protect the people on 1 st Avenue and make it a safe environment for everyone inthe area, I am opposed to the request for a liquor-primary license at Snipers, 1 st Avenue,Mission.Yours Faithfully,Mrs C Potocky

122From: Patricia Raymond-Adair / Bruce Adair [mailto:rSent: Monday, December 21, 2009 2:05 PMTo: Ryan AndersonCc: Patricia Raymond-Adair / Bruce AdairSubject: concern about Snipers liquor licensegood day,i am responding to your decision regarding the application for alcohol on site at the business across thestreet from my daughters dance class.I do not support this initiative. There are an abundancy of liquor outlets and establishments for a cityof this size and having another one located on the main street of mission across from a childrens dancestudio is not healthy - it is not ethical and it is not an area that the city should consider adding too.if you wish to discuss with me further you can reach me by return email or my cellregards,patricia raymond-adair

123From: LARRY REIST [mailtoSent: Tuesday, December 22, 2009 1:20 PMTo: Ryan AndersonSubject: Sniper's Liquor License applicationHello,I am a parent of a child who dances at Fraser Valley Academy of Dance, which is located acrossthe street from Snipers. I am very concerned about having a drinking establishment in that closeproximity to where my child takes lessons. If Snipers is granted a liquor license, I am concernedthat we will see and hear drunk people loitering around the streets, not to mention drinking anddriving while my child is in the area. I am concerned for our safety of walking to our cars anddriving around that downtown area if there is a drinking establishment so close. There arealready problems downtown, we do not need to add to it which I believe granting the liquorlicense will do.We need to enhance downtown with family oriented, safe establishments and not encouragealcohol drinking and potential rowdy, loitering behaviour.Please consider my concerns.Sincerely,Lisa ReistCustomer of Fraser Valley Dance Academy and various other downtown businesses.

124From: Bruce Schmor imaiitoSent: Monday, December 21, 2009 3:03 PMTo: Ryan AndersonSubject: snipers poo! iidour application1:14, 11eYeaHello MI.Anderson.My name is Bruce Schmor. Having been a resident of Mission for over 40 years I feel like Iknow the community well. I have watched ourdowntown area deteriorate to the point where I would be uncomfortable walking there by myselfor with my children at certain times of the day.Changes such as an increased security presence and an influx of caring business owners hashelped to improve the situation. If the liquor license for the pool hall is approved I am concernedthat these improvements will be negated by the potential for public drunkenness, drunk driving,and the other destructive forces that alcohol creates. Mission does not need another drinkingestablishment downtown. The downtown business owners are working hard to clean up theimage of our core please don't halt this progress by approving this licence. Businesses such asthe Fraser Valley Dance Academy which is 'adding so much to our community well inevitably beforced to leave as clients and their own sensibilities tell them they can no longer have theirbusiness downtown.Sincerely,Bruce Schmor

125From Ivetta Susimaki [mailto:1 _Sent: Sunday, January 03, 2010 12:05 AMTo: Ryan AndersonSubject: safe children on 1st AveD.Hi,I oppose a liquor license for Sniper's. I am a father of 4 daughters who attendFVAD.I feel it would be inappropriate to have liquor sold between the 2 schools thathundreds of children attend.Safety first,Kari Susimaki

From: Brown/Ward [mailto:Sent: Tuesday, December 22, 2009 4:50 PMTo: Ryan AndersonSubject: application for liquor licence,/,49PzQuo126Hello Mr. Anderson, I frequent the establishment on a weekly basis and have introduced my son who is11 to the playing of pool and it is a great game for it teaches about strategy and good judgment whywould we want to impair those faculties with liquor. It was and remains the reason I still frequent theestablishment.Sincerely,Brad Ward

127From:[mailtcSharon WiebeSent: Monday, December 21, 2009 4:53 PMTo: Ryan AndersonSubject: Snipers Pool Halla] On Behalf OfDear Mr AndersonIt is my understanding that Snipers Pool Hall has applied for a liquor license, despite the fact thatthey are located directly across from hundreds of children participating at Fraser ValleyAcademy of Dance's programs and despite the children and youth participating at their ownplace of business. Given that I have managed a youth drop in center (pool tables, concession,foosball and a general hang out spot) in Abbotsford for several years I feel that I may be able toshed some light on this issue.Having worked with young people for over 15 years, and being familiar with many of the youngpeople ages 18 -30 who frequent the area I am concerned about the temptations presented forthese vulnerable young adults. A great deal of the youth downtown are at risk of alcoholism dueto pre-existing circumstances or are currently struggling with alcoholism. While they enjoyplaying pool and hanging out with their friends at places like Snipers, this enjoyment may leadthem to habit forming addictions - thus making the pool hall an unsafe place for them. Why putthese temptations into a previously safe, family environment?I understand also that those representing Snipers indicated that the homeless in our communitydo not have enough money to buy alcohol. I am sure that those in attendance addressed thisissue, but in case it was missed - clearly this is a misinformed comment. Aicholism and drugaddictions are prevalent amongst the homeless, which is often why they are homeless. Theyspend all they get on their addictions. This fact cannot be brushed over and is a significantplayer in this discussion.When an individual causes problems in a business such as Snipers, generally they are sentoutside where they tend to cause problems as well - only now they are angry. My concern is thatwhen these certain individuals are "kicked out" of Snipers and the first person they see whenthey are sent out is a young lady from the school, what will their reaction be? This is completelyunpredictable and not something I wish to even consider and none of us should be put in thatposition.Lastly, having spent many years with youth who struggle with addictions, and having seen thefruit of this, I am gravely concerned about the threat presented to students attending FraserValley Academy of Dance. Drunkenness creates a whole new personality and causes people todo things they may not have imagined themselves doing, had they been sober. I have seen thisacted out in all kinds of behaviour all the way from rude comments and vandalism to death by adrunk driver.Given my extensive experience with children, young adults and with addictions, in myprofessional opinion I strongly recommend that Snipers reconsider their application for a liquorlicense unless they relocate to a more appropriate area, or show a great deal of proactive

128response to the problems they will most certainly bring to the area. Please make the area safe formy six year old daughter and the many others who attend the school.Sincerely,Sharon WiebeSharon WiebeYFC/Youth Unlimited

129From::Sharon WiebeSent: Saturday, November 28, 2009 1To: Ryan AndersonSubject: ii0t.10.T license1:47 AMfRyan,understand that the pool halt across the street from Fraser Valley Academy of Dance indowntown Mission has applied for a liquor license.I an). seriously concerned about the creation of a drinking establishment across the streetsilt; the dance school. •• While there have been great improvements in the downtown area since the patrolling,security guards were introduced, this would be a great leap backwards in providing a safe andsuitable environment for the many students and families who attend the school each evening andweekend.• There are many suitable locations to introduce a licensed pool hall. Directly across thestreet froth more than 300 children cannot be one of them.Please do what you can to help make Mission a safe place for kids.Sincerely,Sharon WiebeSharon WiebeYFC/Youth Unlimited

MDISTRICT OFON THE FRASERPlanning DepartmentMemorandum130FILE: ADM.BYLPROLand Use Application Procedures and Fees BylawTo: Chief Administrative OfficerFrom: PlannerDate: January 18, 2010Subject: Proposed Text Amendment to Land Use Application Procedures and FeesBylawRecommendation1. That the Director of Corporate Administration prepare a bylaw to amend District of Mission LandUse Application Procedures and Fees Bylaw 3612-2003 to:a) Delete "Development Inquiry Fee (verbal comments provided following developmentmeeting)" in its entirety from Schedule "A".2. That staff be directed to delete "Development Inquiry Fee (verbal comments provided by staff)"from page 27 in LAN. 41 - Guide to Land Development.Background and issuesThe District of Mission Planning Department currently conducts 'development inquiry meetings' todiscuss very preliminary development scenarios with developers. The applicant is provided initialcomment from various development related departments and is informed of all necessaryrequirements to make full application. The development inquiry meetings are often attended byEngineering, Inspection Services and Planning staff for a period of 30 minutes for each inquiry. Inaddition to the staff time spent at the meeting, planning staff have been providing written commentson the development proposal to the applicants once the meeting has concluded.The developer has always had an option to receive written comments but rarely requested thewritten comments option. As staff now provides written comments for all development inquiries, onlythe written comments option should remain.Planning AnalysisPlanning staff have found that many preliminary development inquiries can be dealt with free ofcharge at the planning counter. In respect to costs, development inquiry meetings occupy significantamounts of staff time to attend and to write a follow-up letter. In order to obtain an improved costrecovery structureto overall planning department duties, the verbal inquiry fee should be deletedfrom the cost structure and only the development inquiry fee (written comments provided by staff)should remain. This would allow for cursory comment to be provided free of charge at the planningcounter while improved cost recovery for the written comments development inquiry meeting tocontinue.SummaryThe proposed deletion of the development inquiry fee (verbal comments) will allow for many inquiresto be dealt free of charge at the planning counter and will realize improved cost recovery structure tothe development inquiry (written comments) meetings.Erik WilhelmGACOMDEV\ERIK\Developrnent Planning Staff Reports\Development Iquiry Fee Verbal Deletion.docPAGE 1 OF 1

issionm' DISTRICT OFON THE FRASERMemo131FILE: PRO.DEV.ZONR06-035To: Chief Administrative OfficerFrom: Senior PlannerDate: January 18, 2010Subject: Extension for Rezoning File R06-035 Robert Ciccozzi Architecture Inc. —Parr AvenueRecommendationThat Council grant a twelve month extension to Rezoning Application R06-035. (Robert CiccozziArchitecture Inc.) for the properties located at 34048, 34054 and 34142 Parr Avenue to enablethe applicant to complete the outstanding rezoning requirements.BackgroundThis rezoning application was considered by Council, in conjunction with a Development Permit,for a significant townhouse and apartment development comprising 297 townhouse units andone 36-unit apartMent building located on Parr Avenue (Map 1).The proposal was considered at Public Hearing on September 10, 2007 and was subsequentlygiven 2 nd and 3 rd readings on January 21, 2008. Applicants are given 12 months from 3 rdreading to complete outstanding zoning requirements. Files are closed after this period unlessapproval is forthcoming from an outside agency or the applicant has applied for and paid for anextension request. An extension was granted in 2009, however, due to market conditions andother factors, the project was not completed during that time.The applicant recently applied and paid for an extension and plans to complete the outstandingrezoning requireMents this year.G:COMDEV/Dayle/ExtensionMernoR06-035Ciccozzi(Parr Ave)PAGE 1 OF 1

132R06-035DP06-014IIIMMAVE.MAP1431017AIMassissMRR AVE331101131142341111130054350120IOWAt*.331100331105 331130SUBJECTPROPERTIESFILE: PRO.DEV.ZON/PRO.DEV.DEV PAGE 2 OF 2R06-035/DP06-014

133cpfission,o,MDISTRICT OFParks,Recreation & CultureMemorandumON THE FRASERTo: Chief Administrative OfficerFrom: Director of Parks, Recreation & CultureDate: January 18, 2010Subject: Cemetery Columbarium Capital ProjectRecommendationThat Council provide early approval to initiate the purchase of a columbarium for the Cemetery asoutlined in the 2010 General Capital Program. The project has a budget of $24,000 and will be fundedthrough the General Capital Reserve.BackgroundThe 2010 General Capital Program includes the purchase and installation of an additional columbariumat the Cemetery, to be funded through the General Capital Reserve with a budget of $24,000. Allcolumbarium spaces currently at the Cemetery have been sold. Thus, staff have been turning awaycustomers, many of whom are holding on to ashes until we have spaces available.Although the financial plan has yet to be approved for 2010, staff are requesting this early approval inorder to reduce the time customers will be waiting, and to reduce the potential for lost customers.Ray HermanFILE: [CLICK HERE TO TYPE EFS FILE CATEGORY] Page 1 of 1[Click here to type EFS File Folder Name]

134MDISTRICT OFission'PrON THE FRASEREngineering and Public WorksMemorandumFile Category:File Folder:INF.ENV.VAGInitiatives - 3 rd PartyTo: Chief Administrative OfficerFrom: Manager of Environmental ServicesDate: January 11, 2010Subject: Earth Hour 2010Recommendation1. That the Manager of Environmental Services be authorized to register the District with the EarthHour program to promote energy conservation;2. That staff turns off all unnecessary lights, appliances, computers etc. for an hour starting at8:30PM on March 27, 2010;3. That staff advertises the Earth Hour program using the website, City Page and coupons.BackgroundEarth Hour (www.earthhour.org/) is a climate change awareness initiative that started in Australia in2007. The program asks registrants to turn off all unnecessary lights and appliances for one hourstarting at 8:30PM local time on March 27, 2010. Last year, 4,000 cities in 88 countries participated.Canada, as in previous years, had the largest participation rate of all participating countries. Theprogram is becoming one of the year's most important events for increasing people's awareness ofclimate change and measures that individuals can take to reduce their climate change footprint. Theprogram is spearheaded by World Wildlife Fund and is supported in Canada by BC Hydro and majormetropolitan cities.Should the program be supported again this year, staff will advertise on the District's website, the CityPage and by handing out coupons at the library, leisure centre and city hall. Greater attempts will bemade to engage local businesses and the schools this year.Michael YounieManager of Environmental ServicesPage 1 of 1

issionMDISTRICT OFON THE FRASEREngineering and Public WorksMemorandum135File Category: PUB.PLA.DEVFile Folder: R02-033To: Chief Administrative OfficerFrom: Manager of Environmental ServicesDate: January 10, 2010Subject: LAN.54 Resolution Request — Silvermere Lake / Silvermere IslandRecommendationThat the detailed assessment as per the Riparian Areas Regulation, in conjunction with Section 108 ofthe District's Zoning Bylaw, be used to define streamside protection and enhancement areas for rezoningapplication R02-033 at Silvermere Island and Silvermere Lake.BackgroundJorden Cook Associates, acting on behalf of Genstar Development Corporation, have submitted arequest (attached) to use the detailed assessment provided for under the Riparian Areas Regulation(RAR) to define streamside protection and enhancement areas (SPEA) for the proposed development onSilvermere Island and Silvermere Lake.The proposed development first came to Council in February of 2003 and First Reading was granted.Council resolved to have the developer hold a public open house for Mission residents to review andcomment upon the land development, environmental, engineering and design aspects of the proposal.The open house was meant to occur after the outstanding issues had been resolved so that the planexhibited at the open house would be representative. It was also resolved that further consideration ofthe bylaws would be deferred pending resolution of external agency and municipal requirements.The proponent decided to hold a public open house on March 25, 2003 prior to resolution of alloutstanding issues. No additional open houses were held and no further progress on bylawestablishment has been made. Various amounts of work have been completed by the applicant in thepast 6 years including various environmental and engineering studies, discussions with stakeholders etc.LAN.54 states that Council can resolve to vary from Section 108 of the District's Zoning Bylaw(Streamside Protection and Enhancement Areas) when exceptional circumstances exist. Section 108would require that 30 m from the high water mark of Silvermere Lake is retained as a SPEA and wouldbe unavailable for development. LAN.54 states that a SPEA could be defined using the detailedassessment gs per the Riparian Areas Regulation which would stjll be consistent with provincial andfederal regulatory requirements. In this case, it is likely that the majority of SPEAs would be 15 m fromhigh water mark although some areas may still require approximately 30 m.The applicant's agent is presenting a case that exceptional circumstances do exist in terms of competingenvironmental objectives and uniqueness of the site. Several potential environmental attributes of thePage 1 of 6

136site could be realized through private investment if the project is eventually supported. These includeimproved access by juvenile salmonids into and out of Silvermere Lake, improved riparian vegetation,painted turtle habitat protection and improved long term stewardship of the lake. Many of these wouldrequire long term monitoring and maintenance to be realized. The applicant also raises the point that thelong term existence of the lake is dependent on well maintained and engineered causeways that will notcollapse during flood events and the engineering of these causeways is dependent on the projectproceeding.There are significant environmental impacts associated with the project in terms of access via acauseway, construction of houses and roads on the island and related water quality impacts fromrainwater and sewage disposal. Portions of the development such as access along the causeways willlikely result in harmful alteration, disruption or destruction of fish habitat and will require the proponent toobtain authorization from Fisheries and Oceans Canada. These authorizations will also trigger aCanadian Environmental Assessment Act screening which will require impacts to terrestrial as well asaquatic resources to be assessed and mitigated. Additional regulatory requirements will need to be metfor rainwater management and sewage disposal.As noted by the applicant's agent, support for the use of the detailed RAR assessment does notconstitute Council support for the rezoning application. The use of the detailed RAR will determine theminimum SPEA required under federal and provincial legislation. Although Council could allow the use ofthe detailed RAR assessment to exclusively set SPEAs, Council could also have the developer submit adevelopment plan that combines the Section 108 (Zoning Bylaw) SPEAs with those from the detailedRAR assessment with the goal of balancing the need for developable land with the requirement to protectenvironmental attributes. The resulting SPEA, outside of areas where HADDs are required, could thusrange in width from likely 15 m to 30 m or greater but given the constraints on the site, will likely be closerto 15 m. Once the SPEA is established, the use and layout of the development can be finalized allowingthe normal OCP amendment and rezoning referral and review processes by the public and regulatoryagencies to continue.Mike YounieManager of Environmental ServicesF:\ENGINEER\MYOUNIE\Memos\R02-033 RAR Variance.docPage 2 of 6

137Jordan CookDistrict of Mission8745 Stave Lake StreetMission 3C2009-Dec-21Attention: Michael YOU nie, Manager of Environmental ServicesRE: LAN.54 Resolution Request - Silvermere ReservoirPursuant to District of Mission Policy SPEA Variance Process (LAN.54), we requestthat Mission Council recognize the exceptional circumstances related to SilvermereIsland and reservoir and support the use of a detailed RAR process in the Silvermererezoning application (R02-033). The variance request is made on the basis that thereare exceptiona! circumstances which will result in a net community benefit, inparticular envi:onmental benefits for Mission.Mission staff have visited the site. Pottinger Gaherty Environmental Consultantshave conducted environmental studies related to the site.The site is unique in that it is a man-made reservoir, originally constructed over 50years ago, which requires active investment by the landowners to store the waterinside the reservoir, and active management to reduce the occurrence of invasiveplant and fish species. Management of the plant life in the reservoir is also beneficialfor safe use of the water surface.LAN.54 provides examples where a variance process for the application ofStreamside Protection Enhancement Areas (SPEA) would apply. Consistent withLAN.54 bullet item 6, there are competing environmental objectives which supportthe application of a detailed RAR methodology for land uses adjacent to thereservoir. Some of these competing environmental objectives include:• improving access through and within the reservoir for salmonids• providing permanent protection for painted turtle habitat• avoiding a future where, left unmanaged, the reservoir will become moreprone to proliferation of bass as the reservoir fills in with vegetation, getsshallower and warmer• removing habitat supporting the invasive bass species• reducing the current reliance on hand-transfer of salmonids across thecauseway.• improving the management for the preferred species such as the paintedturtle, as well as for compatible recreational uses of the reservoirFurther to the environmental objectives above, without active investment in themaintenance and management of the causeways and reservoir, there is a serious riskof degradation of the current environmental assets of the site and the physicalintegrity of the causeways. Private investment in the site, activated by a rezoningprocess, would encourage appropriate maintenance and rehabilitation of theMARKET-BASED LAND USE AND SITE PLANNLNG, BUILT ON LONG-TERM ENVIROMENTAL AND SOCIAL VALUESPage 3 of 6

138Michael Younie, Manager of Environmental ServicesDistrict of Mission2009-Dec-21Page 2reservoir dykes, and thereby encourage protection of the existing environmentalassets, as well as support environmental enhancement in the areas noted above. Ourclients seek assurance from Council that a comprehensive environmentalmanagement approach, including setbacks appropriate to the unique circumstancesof a privately owned reservoir, are supported by Council, as one parameter guidingdevelopment of the adjacent lands.The Landowners have been active supporters of salmonid enhancement for overfifteen years in partnership with a local non-profit group. This has included base lineresearch and support for hand-transfer of salmonid juveniles through the reservoirbarriers. During their stewardship of these lands, the landowners active support forbuilding nests has resulted in the first documented return of the Purple Martin tonesting on the north side of the Fraser River.A resolution of support by Council for a detailed RAR assessment approach for thisapplication would enable the following community objectives to be achieved:• New outlet and new fish ladder to improve fish access from the Stave River tothe reservoirEnhance existing riparian vegetation by planting native plants• Manage recreational use of the reservoir through a strata or trust entity, andthereby encourage long-term stewardship by an active and interestedcommunity• Replant native plants for much more diverse and productive habitat• Permanent protection of the northeast bay of the reservoir for painted turtlehabitat, likely through a covenant and physical barriers to boating adjacent tothe turtle habitat.• Enhance habitat for amphibians and small mammals• Remove invasive terrestrial vegetation (blackberry)• Support a Purple Martin stewardship initiative in the Stave RiverStrict application of Mission's Sec. 108 setbacks would preclude access to the Islandoutside of a SPEA area, and would severely constrain developable areas on theremaining site. As a consequence, the c.omnumity_benefits outlined above would notbe realized. It is important to note that this is restricted to an -acceptablemethodology for determination of riparian setbacks on the site --- this is not adevelopment application. It is one step that will enable a development application tobe made. The development application, including any HADDs (Harmful Alteration,Disruption or Destruction) associated with the proposed development will be appliedfor separately and subject to full agency review.Page 4 of 6

139Michael Younie, Manager of Environmental ServicesDistrict of Mission2009-Dec-2IPage 3We ask Mission Council to resolve to support use of the detailed RAR assessmentapproach for SPEA setbacks per LAN.54 for the Silvermere rezoning site as it:Meets the requirements of legislation and policy supported by the senior levelsof government and the Union of British Columbia . Municipalities,WILL provide a wide array of sustainable community benefits as outlined above,andMeets the requirements of exceptional circumstances for consideration ofCouncil Policy LAN.54.We fully understand that support for use of the detailed RAR approach under LAN.54does not constitute Council support for the rezoning application, and recognize thatany impacts on environmental resources will be the subject of review by seniorgovernment agencies, including review of proposed mitigation measures related toany potential HADDs. The detailed RAR approach for setback determination simplyenables a complete application to be made, which will be reviewed comprehensivelyby staff, Council and the public through the normal rezoning referral process. Thecomprehensive review will include environmental, economic and socialconsiderations.Yours truly,Jorden Cook AssociatesRichard Cook MCP MCIP ITEPrincipalAttachments:1. Context PlanDVP-DOM-J206303-2009-Dec-21.DOCPage 5 of 6

140B.C. HYDROPr. N.I. 1/4 SEC. 3. TP 15NorthCauseway/110;11.CrirPurpleMartinNestingBoxesD.L. 437, GP. ISouth!CausewaySilvermere Rezoning App. R02-033Context PlanEGENDSite AreaHigh Water MarkContour .Page 6 of 6

141r DISTRICT OFNil 1 S 10 to,ON THE FRASERCorporate AdministrationMemorandumFile Category: PRO.LEA.VAG.File Folder: Hurd Street - 7580TO: Chief Administrative OfficerFROM: Deputy Director of Corporate AdministrationDATE: January 8, 2010SUBJECT: LEASE RENEWAL — NEW HORIZONS LAWN BOWLING SOCIETYRECOMMENDATION:That the current Lease Agreement between the District of Mission and New HorizonsLawn Bowling Society for municipal property located at Lot 300, Section 20, Township17, Plan 50882, New Westminster District — civic address 7560 Hurd Street be renewedfor a further term of five years under the same terms and conditions as the currentlease.BACKGROUND:The Municipality has received a request from the New Horizons Lawn Bowling Societyto renew the current lease agreement for property located at 7560 Hurd Street, for afurther term of five years. The property has been leased for a lawn bowling facility since1988. The current agreement includes a lease fee of $1.00 per year.Kelly Ridleye(ditiOcierldconfidential \ kelly \ leases and licencesthurd street 7560 rtc requesting renewal of 5 year agreement.docPAGE 1 OF 1

142MDISTRICT OFON THE FRASERCorporate AdministrationMemorandumFile Category:File Folder:ADM.COM .SEL.Oyama Sister City Select CommitteeTO: Chief Administrative OfficerFROM: Deputy Director of Corporate AdministrationDATE: January 11, 2010SUBJECT: Visit from Oyama Delegation - 2010RECOMMENDATION:That a letter be sent to the Town of Oyama and the Oyama International Friendship Associationfrom the Mayor requesting that they postpone their trip to Mission until 2011; andThat council approve budgeting an additional $5,000.00 for the 2011 Oyama delegation visit fora total budget of $8,000.00 from 2011 Council contingency.BACKGROUND:The sister city program was set up in 1996 and part of the program was that every two yearseither a Mission delegation would visit Oyama or a delegation from Oyama would visit Mission.As some of Council may be aware, 2010 is the year that a delegation from Oyama is slated tovisit Mission.In 2006 a delegation of 26 people visited Mission from Oyama and stayed from June 22 to June26. Because of the 2008 municipal election, the trip to Oyama that was to be held in October2008 was postponed a year. In 2009, a delegation of 26 people from Mission visited Oyamaand stayed from October 15 to October 22. Because of the short time period since our visit toOyama, staff are suggesting that the Town of Oyama and the Oyama International FriendshipAssociation be asked to visit Mission in 2011 instead of 2010.In 2006 Council authorized an increase in the Oyama budget of $5,000 to cover the costsassociated with the delegates visit for a total budget of $8,000. Due to a number of donationsfrom various businesses and organizations the cost for the visit was $7,109.82. In order for the2011 visit to take place, additional funds of $5,000.00 will need to be budgeted to cover costsfor a total of $8,000.00.g:\clerk\ cOnfidentiakelly12010 \reports to council\delegation from oyama 2010 budget.docPAGE 1 OF 1

143MiDON THE§STSIOnOFFRASERCorporate AdministrationMemorandumFile Category:File Folder:PRO.LEA.VAGLougheed Highway — EDO OfficeTO: Chief. Administrative OfficerFROM: Deputy Director of Corporate AdministrationDATE: January 13, 2010SUBJECT: Administrative Support for Economic Development OfficerRECOMMENDATION:That Council authorize the Mayor and Deputy Director of Corporate Administration to sign theattached three year agreement between the District of Mission and the Mission RegionalChamber of Commerce to provide administration support to the economic development officerat 20 hours per week at a fee of $21.00 per hour effective January 1, 2010 and reviewed in2011 and 2012.BACKGROUND:In 2007 the district entered into a three year contract with the Mission Regional Chamber ofCommerce for secretarial support for the economic development officer.Initially, Council authorized 20 hours of Administrative support at $20.00 per hour for a threeyear period. This was changed to $21.00 the following year. This rate has not changed for2010 year, but will be reviewed annually. The economic development officer has reviewed thisagreement and has requested an additional section be added related to the delivery of theservice.Ke q y Ridley /e(j°L1(x7Attachmentg:Nclerk \confidentiaRkellA2010 \reports to council \ administrative support agreement for edo 2010.docPAGE 1 OF 1

Mission RegionalChamber of CommerceThe Voice of Business in Mission144Agreement for Administrative Supportof theDistrict of Mission Economic Development OfficeThe Mission Regional Chamber of Commerce agrees to provide administrative support to theMission Economic Development Office for a period of 3' years, with the wages and hours to bereviewed annually.Administrative support would include 20 hours per week of designated administrative supportincluding equipment usage at a rate of $21.00 per hour. Tracking of administrative supportwill be compiled by the Chamber and reviewed monthly with the Economic DevelopmentOfficer to ensure adequate support levels are being met.Any concerns with the delivery of the service will be dealt with via discussion between theaforementioned parties until resolution to the concern has been mutually agreed upon.Billing for support will take place on the first Friday of each month for the month previous withpayment terms of net 7.THE MISSION REGIONAL CHAMBER OF DISTRICT OF MISSIONCOMMERCEBy its authorized signatories: By its authorized signatories:Michelle Favero, Manager Kelly Ridley, Deputy Director CorporateAdministrationDated:Dated:SIGNED AND DELIVERED SIGNED AND DELIVEREDIn the presence of: In the presence of:Dated:Dated:.(as to both signatures) tas to toth signatures)Visitor Info Centre34033 Lougheed Highway, Mission, B.C. V2V 5X8Phone: (604) 826-6914 Fax: (604) 826-5916www.missionchamber.bc.ca manager@missionchambenbc.ca

M issionDISTRICT OFON THE FRASER prCorporate AdministrationMemorandum145File Category:File Folder:GOV.REG.FVRD9-1-1 Service 'TO: Chief Administrative OfficerFROM: Deputy Director of Corporate AdministrationDATE: January 14, 2010SUBJECT: Enhanced 9-1-1 Emergency Telephone Service Area Merger Bylaw No. 0981, 2009Fire Dispatch Service Area Bylaw No. 0982, 2009RECOMMENDATION:That Council for the District of Mission give consent to the Fraser Valley Regional District to establish aregional E-9-1-1 emergency telephone service area by endorsing Fraser Valley Regional District RegionalEnhanced 9-1-1 Emergency Telephone Service Area Merger Bylaw No. 0981, 2009; andThat Council for the District of Mission give consent to the Fraser Valley Regional District to establish aregional fire dispatch service by endorsing Fraser Valley Regional District Regional Dispatch Service AreaEstablishment Bylaw No. 0982, 2009.BACKGROUND:Attached is a report provided to the Fraser Valley Regional District (FVRD) chair and members of theexecutive committee dated August 22, 2009 recommending that the Central Fraser Valley, Dewdney-Alouette, and Fraser Cheam E-9-1-1 Service areas be amalgamated into two service areas, as follows:A Fraser Valley Regional District E-9-1-1 Service Area;Fraser Valley Regional District Regional Fire Dispatch Service area; andThat the two E-9-1-1 Primary Safety Answering positions (PSAP) be maintained under the currentlocations (Chilliwack RCMP and Abbotsford Police Department).This report was generated from the FVRD board asking staff to review the basis for having three separateE-9-1-1 service areas. As noted in the report part of the review was to ensure that there was no reductionin service and that the services already being offered were not jeopardized.The FVRD has asked that council endorse these two bylaws./ex- joce.4.7.(1Kelly RidleyAttachmentgAclarktconfidentialtkelly12010treports to counciltestablishment of fvrd bylaws 0981 and 0982.docPAGE 1 OF 1

146SincerelyFRASER VALLEY REGIONAL DISTRICT45950 Cheam Avenue, Chilliwack, British Columbia V2P 1N6Phone: 604-702-5000 Toll Free: 1-800-528-0061 (BC only) Fax: 604-792-9684website: www.tml,bc,ca e-mail: info@fivrd.bc.caNovember 23, 2009 File: 3920-20-Bylaw No. 0981Frank Pizzuto, CAO, City of AbbotsfordPeter Monteith, CAO, City of ChilliwackGlen Robertson, CAO, District of MissionKarla Lanktree, Acting CAO, District of HopeWallace Mah, CAO, District of KentLarry Burk, CAO, Village of Harrison Hot SpringsDear Sir/Madam,Re: Request for Statutory Consent for Proposed Fraser Valley Regional. District RegionalEnhanced 9-1-1 Emergency Telephone Service Area Merger Bylaw No. 0981, 2009The Board of Directors of the FVRD has resolved to create a regional E-9-1-1 emergencytelephone service area by merging three existing services. In accordance with the relevantprovisions of the Local Government Act, this will be achieved by way of an establishing bylaw.The. "Fraser Valley Regional District Regional Enhanced 9-1-1 Emergency Telephone ServiceArea Merger Bylaw No. 0981, 2009" was given 3 readings by the FVRD board of Directors onNovember 24, 2009 and a copy is enclosed for your reference. The next steps in the process are:• To seek the necessary statutory consents from the participants in the service inaccordance with S. 801.4 of the Local Government Act;• Approval of Bylaw 0981, 2009 by the Inspector of Municipalities; and• Adoption of Bylaw 0981, 2009 by the FVRD Board.In view of the foregoing, we are requesting that your respective Councils give consent, by way offormal resolution, to the establishment of a regional E-9-1-1 emergency telephone service area.Your prompt attention to this matter would be greatly appreciated. If you have any questions orconcerns regarding the bylaw, please do not hesitate to contact Suzanne Gresham toll free at 1-800-528-0061, or direct at (604)-702-5032.Suzanne GreshamDirector of Corporate AdministrationCc: Gerald H Kingston, Chief Administrative Officer, FVRD191098-1

147FRASER VALLEY REGIONAL DISTRICTBYLAW NO. 0981, 2009A Bylaw to consolidate and merge theCentral Fraser Valley Regional District Enhanced 9-1-1 Emergency Telephone Extended ServiceArea, the Regional District of Fraser-Cheam Enhanced 9-1-1 Emergency Telephone ExtendedService Area and the Dewdney Alouette Regional District Enhanced E-9-1-1 EmergencyTelephone Extended Service Area into one Local Service Area.WHEREAS the Fraser Valley Regional District was incorporated by Letters Patent effectiveDecember 12, 1995;AND WHEREAS Article 11.1 of the Letters Patent incorporating the Fraser Valley RegionalDistrict provides that all services of the former Central Fraser Valley Regional District, DewdneyAlouette Regional District, and the Regional District of Fraser-Cheam in force and effect at thetime of dissolution, whether established by legislation, regulation, order in council, letters patent,supplementary letters patent or bylaw pursuant to the Local Government Act R.S.B.C. Ch. 3231996 (the "Act") are services of the Fraser Valley Regional District, except as to those servicesdescribed in Section 11,4 of the Letters Patent;AND WHEREAS the Central Fraser Valley Regional District Enhanced 9-1-1 EmergencyTelephone Extended Service Area was established by Bylaw No. 470-1991 to include all landwithin the District of Abbotsford, the District of Matsqui and Electoral Area A of the CentralFraser Valley Regional District, read, City of Abbotsford and portions of Electoral Area G of theFraser Valley Regional District;AND WHEREAS the Regional District of Fraser-Cheam Enhanced 9-1-1 Emergency TelephoneExtended Service Area was established by Bylaw No. 0940, 1990 to include all land within theDistrict of Chilliwack, the District of Kent, the Town of Hope, the Village of Harrison HotSprings, and Electoral Areas A, B, C, D, E and F of the Regional District of Fraser-Cheam, read,the City of Chilliwack, the District of Kent, the District of Hope, the Village of Harrison HotSprings, and Electoral Areas A, B, D, E, and portions of Electoral Area C of the Fraser ValleyRegional District;AND WHEREAS the Dewdney Alouette Regional District Enhanced 9-1-1 EmergencyTelephone Extended Service Area was established by Bylaw 547-1991, to include all land withinthe District of Mission and Electoral Areas B,C, D and E of the Dewdney Alouette RegionalDistrict, read District of Mission, Electoral Area G, and portions of Electoral Areas C and F ofthe Fraser Valley Regional District;

FVRD Bylaw 0981, 2009 Pake 2148AND WHEREAS Section 802 of the Act, provides that the Board may, by Bylaw, provide forchanges to the boundaries of a Service Area, including merging two or more service areas;AND WHEREAS the Board of Directors of the Fraser Valley Regional District wishes to mergethe Central Fraser Valley Regional District Enhanced 9-1-1 Emergency Telephone ExtendedService Area, the Regional District of Fraser-Cheam Enhanced 9-1-1 Emergency TelephoneExtended Service Area and the Dewdney Alouette Regional District Enhanced E-9-1-1Emergency Telephone Extended Service Area for the purpose of establishing a separate ServiceArea to provide enhanced 9-1-1 emergency telephone services for the Fraser Valley RegionalDistrict;AND WHEREAS consent on behalf of electoral participating area electors in Electoral Areas A,B, C, D, E, F and G of the Fraser Valley Regional District has been obtained in accordance withSection 801.5(1)(b) of the Act;AND WHEREAS consent on behalf of municipal participating areas of the Fraser ValleyRegional District has been obtained in accordance with Section 801.4 of the Act;NOW THEREFORE in open meeting assembled, the Board of Directors of the Fraser ValleyRegional District enacts as follows:1. CITATIONThis Bylaw may be officially cited for all purposes as the "Fraser Valley Regional DistrictRegional Enhanced 9-1-1 Emergency Telephone Service Area Merger Bylaw No. 0981,2009".2. ENACTMENTa) The Regional District hereby merges the Central Fraser Valley Regional DistrictEnhanced 9-1-1 Emergency Telephone Extended Service Area, the Regional District ofFraser-Cheam Enhanced 9-1-1 Emergency Telephone Extended Service Area and theDewdney Alouette Regional District Enhanced E-9-1-1 Emergency Telephone ExtendedService Area for the purpose of establishing a separate Service Area to provide enhanced9-1-1 emergency telephone services for the Fraser Valley Regional District ;b) The boundaries of the former Central Fraser Valley Regional District Enhanced 9-1-1Emergency Telephone Extended Service Area, the Regional District of Fraser-CheamEnhanced 9-1-1 Emergency Telephone Extended Service Area and the Dewdney AlouetteRegional District Enhanced E-9-1-1 Emergency Telephone Extended Service Area arehereby consolidated and merged into a separate Service Area, hereinafter referred to asthe "Fraser Valley Regional District Regional Enhanced 9-1-1 Emergency TelephoneService Area" for financial and budgetary purposes;191079-1

"'D Bylaw 0981, 2009 Pare 3149c) The Regional District Board is hereby empowered and authorized to undertake and carryout, or cause to be undertaken or caused to be carried out, provision of an enhanced 9-1-1emergency telephone service, in accordance with plans approved by the Board ofDirectors, to do all things necessary in connection therewith and without limiting thegenerality of the foregoing to:(i) acquire all such licenses, titles, rights or authorities as may be required or desirablefor, or in connection with, the provisions of the enhanced 9-1-1 emergency telephoneservice;(ii) to enter into contracts with such authorities and companies as may be necessary orappropriate to implement and maintain the enhanced 9-1-1 emergency telephone service .d) The boundaries of the Fraser Valley Regional District Enhanced 9-1-1 EmergencyTelephone Service Area shall be the boundaries of the Fraser Valley Regional District.e) The participants of the Fraser Valley Regional District Enhanced 9-1-1 EmergencyTelephone Service Area shall be Electoral Areas A, B, C, D, E, F, and G of the FraserValley Regional District, and the City of Abbotsford, City of Chilliwack, District ofMission, District of Kent, District of Hope, and the Village of Harrison Hot Springs.f) In accordance with Section 803 (1) of the Act, the annual costs of the service may berecovered by:(i) the requisition of money under section 805 and 806 to be collectedby a property value tax levied and collected under section 805.1and 806.1; and/or(b) the imposition of fees and other charges that may be set by separatebylaw for the purpose of recovering these costs;3. REPEALa) Central Fraser Valley Regional District Enhanced 9-1-1 Emergency Telephone ExtendedService Establishment Bylaw No. 470, 1991 and any and all amendments attached theretoare hereby repealed.b) Regional District of Fraser-Cheam Enhanced 9-1-1 Emergency Telephone ServiceEstablishment Bylaw No. 940, 1990 and any and all amendments attached thereto arehereby repealed.c) Dewdney-Alouette Regional District Enhanced 9-1-1 Emergency Telephone ExtendedService Establishment Bylaw no 547-1991 and any and all amendments attached theretoare hereby repealed.

FVRD Bylaw 0981, 2009 Page 41504. READINGS AND ADOPTIONREAD A FIRST TIME THIS 24th day of November, 2009READ A SECOND TIME THIS 24th day of November, 2009READ A THIRD TIME THIS 24th day of November, 2009APPROVED BY THE INSPECTOR OFMUNICIPALITIES THISADOPTED THISChair/Vice-Chair Chief Administrative Officer/Deputy5. CERTIFICATIONSI hereby certify the foregoing to be a true and correct copy of "Fraser Valley Regional District Regional Enhanced9-1-1 Emergency Telephone Service Area Merger Bylaw No. 0981, 2009" as read a third time by the Fraser ValleyRegional District Board on the 24 th day of November, 2009.Dated at Chilliwack, BC on the 25 th day of November, 2009Chief Administrative Officer/Deputy191079-1

151107503.1290.111112104eS1.1.12.1111177M1FVR DFRASER VALLEY REGIONAL DISTRICT45950 Cheam Avenue, Chilliviack, British Columbia V2P 1N6Phone: 604-702-5000 Toll Free: 1-800-528-0061 (BC only) Fax: 604-792-9684 'website: www.fvrd.bc.ca e-mail: info@fvrd.bc.caNovember 23, 2009 File: 3920-20-Bylaw No. 0982.Frank Pizzuto, CAO, City of AbbotsfordPeter Monteith, CAO, City of ChithwackGlen Robertson, CAO, District of MissionKarla Lanktree, Acting CAO, District of HopeWallace Mali, CAO, District of KentLarry Burk, CAO, Village of Harrison Hot SpringsDear Sir/Madam,Re: Request for Statutory Consent for Proposed Fraser Valley Regional District RegionalFire Dispatch Service Area Establishment Bylaw No. 0982, 2009The Board of Directors of the FVRD has resolved to create a regional fire dispatch service area. Inaccordance with the relevant provisions of the Local Government Act, this will be achieved by wayof an establishing bylaw.The "Fraser Valley Regional District Regional Fire Dispatch Service. Area Establishment BylawNo. 0982, 2009" was given 3 readings by the FVRD board of Directors on November 24, 2009and a copy is enclosed for your reference. The next steps in the process are:Sincetely,• To seek the necessary statutory consents from the participants in the service inaccordance with S. 801.4 of the Local Government Act;• Approval of Bylaw 0982, 2009 by the Inspector of Municipalities; and• Adoption of Bylaw 0982, 2009 by the FVRD Board.In view of the foregoing, we are requesting that your respective Councils give consent, by way offormal resolution, to the establishment of a regional fire dispatch service.Your prompt attention to this matter would be greatly appreciated. If you have any questions orconcerns regarding the bylaw, please do not hesitate to contact Suzanne Gresham toll free at 1-800-528-0061, or direct at (604)-702-5032.Suzanne GreshamDirector of Corporate AdministrationCc: Gerald H Kingston, Chief Administrative Officer, FVRD

152FRASER VALLEY REGION DISTRICTBYLAW NO. 0982, 2009A Bylaw to Establish a Service Area for Fire Dispatch Services within the FraserValley Regional DistrictWHEREAS pursuant to Section 796 of the Local Government Act, R.S.B.C. Chapter323 (the "Act"), a Regional District may, by bylaw, operate any service that the RegionalBoard considers necessary or desirable for all or part of the Regional District;AND WHEREAS the Fraser Valley Regional District Board, deems it desirable tooperate and establish a service for Fire Dispatch in all of the Fraser Valley RegionalDistrict;AND WHEREAS consent on behalf of electoral participating area electors in ElectoralAreas A, B, C, D, E, F and G of the Fraser Valley Regional District has been obtained inaccordance with Section 801.5(1)(b) of the Act;AND WHEREAS consent on behalf of municipal participating areas of the Fraser ValleyRegional District has been obtained in accordance with Section 801.4 of the Act;NOW THEREFORE, Fraser Valley Region District Board in open meeting assembledenacts as follows:1. OFFICIAL CITATIONThis bylaw may be officially cited as the "Fraser Valley Regional DistrictRegional Fire Dispatch Service Area Establishment Bylaw No. 0982, 2009".2. TERMSa) The Fraser Valley Region District hereby establishes the "Regional FireDispatch Service Area".b) The participating area and boundaries for the "Regional Fire Dispatch ServiceArea" includes all of the Fraser Valley Regional District.c) In accordance with Section 803 of the Act, the annual costs for the serviceestablished by this -bylaw shall be recovered by -one or more of-the following:i) The requisition of money to be collected by a property value tax leviedand collected in accordance with Division 4.3 [Requisition and TaxCollection] of the Act; and/or;

FVRD Bylaw 0982, 2009 Page 2153ii) Parcel taxes imposed in accordance with Division 4.3 [Requisition andTax Collection) of the Act; and/oriii) The imposition of fees and other charges pursuant to section 363 of theAct that may be fixed by separate bylaw for the purpose of recovering thesecosts.3. READINGS AND ADOPTIONREAD A FIRST TIME this 24th day of November, 2009READ A SECOND TIME this 24th day of November, 2009READ A THIRD TIME this 24th day of November, 2009APPROVED BY THE INSPECTOROF MUNICIPALITIES thisADOPTED BY THE BOARD thisChair/Vice-ChairChief Administrative Officer/ Deputy4. CERTIFICATIONSI hereby certify the foregoing to be a true and correct copy of "Fraser Valley Regional District RegionalFire Dispatch Service Area Establishment Bylaw No. 0982, 2009".as read a third time on the 24 th day ofNovember, 2009.Dated at Chilliwack, BC this 25 th day of November, 2009.Chief-Administrative Officer/Deputy191080-1

154Fraser Valley Regional District45950 Cheam Avenue, Chilliwack, BC V2P 1 N6Phone: 1-800-528-0061 or (604) 702-5000Fax: (604) 792-9684MEMOFtANDUMTo: The Chair and Members of the Executive CommitteeFrom: Doug Joinson — Manager of Communications and Information ServicesGeorge M. Murray, CGA, Director of FinanceDate: 2009 AUG 22Subject E911 System ReviewFile No.: 7150-50STAFF RECOMMENDATION:THAT the Executive Committee recommend to the Board of Directors that the Central FraserValley, Dewdney-Alouette, and Fraser-Cheam E91 1 Service Areas be amalgamated into twoservice areas, as follows;A Fraser Valley Regional District E91 1 Service Area, andA Fraser Valley Regional District Regional Fire Dispatch Service Area.AND FURTHER THAT the two E91 1 Primary Safety Answering Positions (PSAP) be maintainedunder the current locations (Chilliwack RCMP and Abbotsford Police Department)AND FURTHER THAT staff be directed to prepare all necessary documents, including thenecessary Bylaws, to impose a Call Answer Levy throughout the entire. Regional District,SUMMARY OF THE ISSUE:At the March 5 th, 2009 Committee of the Whole (Budget) Meeting, the Board requested that staffreview the basis for having three separate E911 Service areas. The challenge in proposing anychange(s) to a life safety" service is to ensure that there is no reduction in service and that we don'tjeopardize the services being offered.Staff has investigated this issue and are prepared to report back and provide recommendations onthis issue.C, ;EV ) I ;von Sep 18thveguon do

Page 2155•BACKGROUND:A background paper was prepared to provide the Committee and the Board with a generaloverview of the history and configuration of the current E911 system. This paper should be readand understood prior to reading the remainder of this report.DISCUSSION:As part of this review, staff looked at a significant number of options to providing E911, Firedispatch and/or a combination of both services.Six (6) options where developed and explored fully;1. Combine the service areas into one and keep the status quo for PSAP and SSAPconfigurations and include fire dispatch in the new FVRD E911 Service Area.2. Restructure the current configurations retaining the PSAP at APD and re-locating thePSAP from the RCMP to FV Fire Dispatch3, Consolidate the PSAP into one location in combination with FV Fire Dispatch4. Contract the PSAP function to EComrn and contract the fire dispatch function to the SurreyFire Department5. Contract the PSAP function to EComm and retain the fire dispatch function at the FV FireDispatch6. Contract the PSAP function to the Abbotsford Police DepartmentAs part of the review process, a quote for E911 call distribution was requested from ECommVancouver and a quote for Fire Dispatch was requested from Surrey Fire Dispatch. Both agenciessupplied quotations.The quotation provided by EComm Vancouver for E911 call distribution was highly competitive.However, it would result in considerable loss functionality in areas such as availability ofoperational police personnel to oversee and supervise operations, loss of immediate response toabandoned E911 calls, and loss of local geographic diversification of the communication centresfor disaster recovery.The quotation provided by Surrey Fire for fire dispatch replaces the personnel costs only. Costsrelating to radio network operations and maintenance remain the responsibility of the FVRD. Astart up cost would be required for construction -and configurations to integrate computer-aideddispatch, records management, and connectivity to the FVRD radio network into their systems.There will also be unknown recurring costs relating to connectivity to the radio network and othercommunication expenses.The results of the review of options are summarized in the ables that folioG NE911 repon - Sep lath version doe

156E91 1 Configurations Options and Comparison MatrixOption 1 Option 2 Option 3 Option 4 Option 5PSAP's at APD, 2 PSAP's - 1 at APD & 1 PSAP Combined with 1 PSAP at EComm & 1 PSAP at EComm & 1RCMP & SSAP at 1 at FVRD FireFVRD Fire 1 Fire SSAP at Surrey SSAP at FVRD FireFire DispatchFire DispatchTwo Services areas:E91 1 & Fire Dispatch• 5 F.T.E. at RCMP• 5 F.T.E at APD• 6 F.T.E at FV Fire- (comprised of 5 F.T.& 4 P.T. positions)• Contract APD• II F.T.E. at FV Fire(9 F.T. & 4 P.T.;nci. Super)• 12 F.T.E. at FV Fire(9 F.T. & 4 P.T. inclSuper)• No dispatch staff• Contract ECommfor E91 1 CallAnswer andDistribution• 8 F.T.E at FV Fire(5 F.T & 4 RT. inclSuper)Total: 16 F.T.E. Total: 11 F.T.E. Total: 12 F.T.E. Total: 0Total: 8 F.T.EPros: Pros: Pros: Pros: Pros:• "Hot" Back-up ofDispatch Centres• Load balancing ofcall volumesduring peak times• No changes infundingarrangements withbetween FVRDand APD• Local service andsupport for SAR,EmergencyPrograms, localVFD, UtilitiesEmergencies• Local support forFire ComputerAided Dispatchand F.D.Administrationand Records• "Hot" Back-up ofDispatch Centres• Load balancing ofcall volumes duringpeak times• No changes infundingarrangementsbetween FVRD andAPD• Local service andsupport for SAR,EmergencyPrograms, localVFD, UtilitiesEmergencies• Local support forFire ComputerAided Dispatch andF.D. Administrationand RecordsManagement. No externalcontracts required• No staff costs• No staffmanagement,training, labourrelations•• E91 I calldistribution costsbased on actual callvolumes• "Hot Back-up"within ECommstructure• Secondary back-upat FV Fire Dispatch• Technologyadvancement costsincluded(SMS/TTD, Vo1P,Wireless, languageline)• Public awarenessmaterials and mediacampaignsG 1 report Sep I5Iivtiiondoc

Page 4157,mentsoftware1 service area for] ]service area forFire Dispatchice attendanceat. abandonedE911 callsOperationalmember of thepolice agency ,supervisingoperationsSoftwareLoss of immediateresponse toariandonecl E91 1calisCons:Increase of 4 staff atFV FireInconsistentresponse toabandoned callsCons:• No "Hot" Back-upor redundancy ofDispatch Centres(single point offailure)• Loss of immediateresponse toabandoned £911calls• No load balancingof call volumesduring peak times• Loss of immediateresponse toabandoned £911callsCons:• Loss of hnmediateresponse toabandoned £911calls• Loss of admin andops support to .EAand small municipalfire depts (1-1R,TRNG, .)• Unknown actualoperational costs• Loss ofcommunicationsupport to EmergProgram, utilities,and other FVRDfunctionsNo "Hot" Back-upor redundancy ofDispatch Centres• No load balancingof call volumesduring peak times• No local service andoperational supportfor SAR,Cons:• Partial loss of jobsin regionLoss of immediateresponse toabandoned £911calls0 1E911 repan Sep 111* mama doc

Page 5158EmergencyPrograms, localVFD, UtilitiesEmergencies• No local support forFire ComputerAided Dispatch andF.D. Administrationand RecordsManagementSoftware• Loss of jobs inregion• Will still have tofund and maintainradio networksystems• Will still have tofluid telephoneoperating costrelating to areaoperations• Possible conflictwith union over"contracting out"G Vri9 I repom • Sev lifth waft dm

159RECOMMENDATION:Staff are recommending the following changes to the E911 and Fire dispatch model for the 2010year and beyond.2010 FVRD E911 Service Area PSAP Configuration:The FVRD E911 Service Area will change the staffing and funding method to make it equalbetween the two PSAP contractors whose call volumes, and populations served, are almost equal.The funding will be more reflective of performance requirements than staffing levels.Figure 2 Grade of Service Calculatorcc-Modeler liteCallsCalls per hour 13-0—Average Talk Time: 115 secsWrap-up Tine: Fr secs Total Call Duration:45 secsService Levelr Average Delay: 17-- secsJLr Auto GeoGraphs0" 97 percent answered withinCalculate Agents Requiredlikkarber al Agents alpetatprz:TA. Tine Fla* Vra.77Queue StatisticsAnswered without Queueing 34%,Ave Calls in Queue: 0 Max Tine in Queue: 50 secsTrunks Required: 2cc-ModelerLitefromKoorroaLeornStaffing a call centre with 2 operators 24 X 7, 365 days per year requires 10 Full Time Equivalenthours (FTE) based on a 40 hour week.If the E911 PSAP was a "Stand alone" call answer point, and, as shown in the "Grade of ServiceCalculator" Figure 2 above, a total of 2 call takers are required at all times. This equates to 10person years to provide service 24 X 7, 365 days per year, providing for holidays, time off andother entitlements, Five full time equivalents offunding in -the amount of $542,77&00 will beprovided to the RCMP Communication Centre in Chilliwack, and five full time equivalent of fundingin the amount of $542,775.00 will be allotted to the Abbotsford Police Department.'EO I 1 rem" Sep I Sib version doc

The FVRD 2 PSAP configuration provides fault tolerance', load balancing 2, and "Hot Back-up" inthe event at system failure at either location, an evacuation requirement, or a sudden majorincident when additional answer capabilities are required instantaneously. The two centres aregeographically separated, yet within range for radio and cellular communications. This makeseach police communication centre able to communicate to the other's operational units fordispatch of a police incident.Page 7160Co-locating E911 Primary Answering in established emergency communication centres within theFVRD ensures that their operations remain viable, help insure their longevity, and address theneeds of the communities for public safety communications reliability. Placement of the PrimaryAnswering in a police communications centre also enables approximately 70% of E911 calls to beanswered within the agency they are intended. On average, Police account for 70% of E9111 callvolumes, Ambulance 25%, and Fire 5%.The police departments have another significant role within the E911 function. There areapproximately 7000 abandoned or dropped E911 calls annually per PSAP area. If E911 operatorsare unable to determine the nature of the call, operational police personnel attend at the locationindicated in the automatic location information (ALI) and verify the nature of the call.Figure 3 — E911 Service Area Configuration:E911 Landline & Cellular CallsESZ 1792 S6 , 466 Ines)ESZ 5500 (3 629 WM)ESZ 5500 (63919 tines)Cellular 777FY Fe aipathSecnnaary Sarety_AnswenngPosnscr: SSAP)1 Fault-tolerance or graceful degradation is the property that enables a system to continue operating properlyin the event of the failure of (or one or more faults within) some of its components.2 Load balancing is a technique to distribute workload evenly. Using multiple components with load balancing,instead of a single component, may increase reliability through redundancy.,.E91 report • Sep lab version doc

Page 8161In the newly established E911 Service Area, the 2010 E91 1 call distribution budget will be$1,191,550.00, $1,007,713.00 funded by E911 Call Answer Levy (CAL), $183,837.00 via propertytax requistions.In the newly established E911 Regional Fire Dispatch Service Area, the 2010 budget will be$658,500.00 funded by property tax. Creation of this service area does not require any new oradditional capital or operating costs.Requirements:• Create Services By-law for E911 and CAL• Create Services By-Law for Fire Dispatch• Re-negotiate RCMP contract• Enter into contract with Abbotsford• Reduction of Supervisor time to 30%Figure 4E91 1: $1,199,550.00CAL: $1,007,713.00Diff: $ 191,837.00CAL SOBS+ SO 07 BO T2• ESZ 5500 ABBY — 124,121• ESZ 5500 ABBY Telephone Lines: 63,919• ESZ 279215800 FC Population — 132.910• ESZ 2792/5600 FC Telephone Lines: 65275• Total FVRD Population: 257,031 •• Total FVRD Telephone: 129,194• PSAP staff for population

SUBSTANTIATION OF THE RECOMMENDATION:Page 9162The new model being recommended by staff is meant to achieve efficiency, equity and financialstability throughout the Region by,1) Providing a new source of revenue for funding the E911 system, thata) Collects a Call answer levy (CAL) from all users in the region.i) Currently, the 911 system does not receive funding from(1) First Nations lands(2) Federal/Provincial properties like Prisons, Court houses, Post Offices, etc.(3) Non taxable properties (e.g. churches, schools, colleges. Etc.)(4) Etc.b) Hopefully in the future, cell phones will be charged the CAL and thereby further expand theavailability of funding2) Provides equity between the Chilliwack RCMP and Abbotsford Police Department PSAP functionsby funding them at the same financial (versus based on 6 fte positions) level.3) Ensures that the E911 system has both back-up and redundancy built into the system (unlikeEComm) or Surrey Fire Dispatch.4) Provides the City of Abbotsford with equity by ensuring that the the FVRD taxes" (requisitions) forFire dispatch service, versus "contracts° with the City thereby requiring the City to raise the taxrevenues directly.COMMENT BY DEPARTMENT HEAD / DIRECTOR OF FINANCE:Reviewed and supportedCOMMENT BY ADMINISTRATOR:Reviewed and supportedG91 1 repan • Sep I veruon de

163Fraser Valley Regional District45950 Cheam Avenue, Chilliwack, BC V2P 1N6.Phone; 1-800-520-0061 or (604) 702-5000 .Fax: (604) 792-9684BACKGROUND PAPEREmergency 911 & Fire Dispatch SystemOverview of the System:The present Fraser Valley E911 Systems consists of a combination of 3 service areas, the formerRegional Districts of Fraser-Cheam, Dewdney-Aiouette, and Central Fraser Valley E911 ServiceAreas. Not all the Service Areas provide the same service. Central Fraser Valley E911 ServiceArea does not include Fire Dispatch (SSAP) service. The City of Abbotsford contracts the FVRDfor fire dispatch service in the amount of $195,000.00 per year. The DARD Service Areaagreement bills the District of Mission $74,000,00 for Fire Dispatch Service. Fire Dispatch isincluded in the Fraser-Cheam Service Area. The current operational configurations for Egli callanswer and distribution are efficient, reliable, and have a built-in configuration for "highavailabilityl"and fault tolerance, and should not be jeopardized. The challenge is to retain currentefficiencies and benefits.Definition of E91 1:911 - The three digit dialing sequence used for calls for emergency assistance from police, fire,and ambulance services.Enhanced 9-1-1 or E9-1-1 service is a North American telecommunications based system thatautomatically associates a physical address with the calling party's telephone number, and routesthe call to the most appropriate Public Safety Answering Point (PSAP) for that address. Thecallers address and information is displayed to the PSAP call taker immediately upon call arrival.This provides emergency responders with the location of the emergency without the person callingfor help having to provide it. This is often useful in times of fires, break-ins, kidnapping, and otherevents where communicating one's location is difficult or impossible.Calls to 911 are routed to a public safety access 'point (PSAP). Enhanced 911 (E911) providescaller location information to the PSAP, Once the nature of the emergency is established, the callsare then re-routed (down-streamed) to one of the four SSAP's established for police (Abbotsfordor Chilliwack), fire and ambulance,E911 can be categorized as centralized answer (PSAP) with distributed response (SSAP).1 High availability is a system design protocol and associated implementation that ensures a certain absolutedegree of operational continuity during a given measurement period.G V:91 BgrAsground Paper doe

Page 2164History:in 1992, the Fraser-Cheam E911 system began operations in what were the Regional District ofFraser-Cheam boundaries. The service area and funding by-laws included the provision of E911emergency telephone call distribution regional fire dispatch.In 1994, the Dewdney-Alo.uette Regional District contracted the Fraser-Cheam Regional Districtfor the provision of E911 emergency telephone call distribution and fire dispatch services. The firedispatch service included the dispatch of the North Fraser Volunteer Fire Department, a regionaldistrict function, and fire dispatch service for the District of Mission. The District of Missioncontracted DARD to provide fire dispatch service for their municipal fire halls.In 1994, Central Fraser Valley Regional District E911 began operations within their boundaries.The E911 Service Area and bylaws included only E911 emergency telephone call distribution. Itdid not include funding of a centralized fire dispatch. The fire dispatch was being performed by theAbbotsford Police and that arrangement was left intact.In 1 .996, the amalgamation of the three Regional Districts occurred. The FVRD maintainedcontinuity of operations of existing E911 Service areas.In 2002 the City of Abbotsford Fire Rescue Service contracted the Fraser Valley Regional Districtto provide centralized fire dispatch for a three yearterm ending December 31 st, 2004. Thisagreement has been renewed for a five year term effective January 1, 2005, in the amount of.$195,000,00.System Operation:The FVRD E911 Emergency Telephone Access System currently consists of the following:• Fraser-Cheam Service Area with primary answering location located in conjunction withthe RCMP Upper Fraser Valley Regional Communication Centre, and a fire dispatchcentre ih Chilliwack, serving the former Fraser-Cheam.• DARD Service Area contracts to the Fraser-Cheam Service Area for E911 and FireDispatch. The DARD service area in-turn bills the District of Mission for fire dispatch.Central Fraser Valley Service area with a primary answering location located in conjunctionwith the Abbotsford Police Communications Centre.• A Secondary Safety Answering Position (SSAP) for BC Ambulance call located inVancouver, funded by the Province.All E91 1 telephone calls are automatically routed to the appropriate primary answering centre,either in Abbotsford or Chilliwack. The caller is asked if they require Police, Fire, or Ambulance. Ifthe call is a Police emergency, the call then becomes a police call and is dispatched at that the •point of original receipt. If the emergency is for Fire, the call is downstreamed to the RegionalDistrict Fire Dispatch Centre; andlf the emergency is Medical, the call is downstreamed to the BCAmbulance Centre. Once the E911 call answerer determines the nature of the call and "downstreams2" the call to either Police, Fire, or Ambulance, and ensures the caller is connected, theE911 service responsibility ends. The call becomes the property and responsibility of the downstream agency and the E911 operator drops out.2 °down stream" — the process of transferring the E911 call from the initial answering point to Police, Fire, orAmbulance during which there is constant contact with the caller.G■491 tiackgrand Paper doe

Page 3165The C911 Service Areas call volume is 100,000 calls annually. The call volumes are almost evenlysplit between the Abbotsford and Chilliwack call centres. in 2008, the Abbotsford Service Area had44,776 calls, and the Fraser-Cheam Service Area had 50,202 calls. The call volumes haveremained fairly constant since record keeping became available in 2000. E91 1 calls are answeredat either the RCMP or APD Communication Centres depending on origin. See figure 1 below thatidentifies the Emergency Service Zones (ESZ) and routing of E911 calls to the Public SafetyAnswering Positions (PSAP).Figure 1 — FVRD E911 Emergency Service Zones (ESZ):E91 I Call Answer and Quality of Services Standards:.The accepted E911 standard in the Province of British Columba and Alberta is 95% of all calls areanswered within 5 seconds. This is also the calling answering performance standard as defined inthe National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) Standard 1221.Calculations for E911 Call Answer position requirements, based on actual call volumes, andmeeting a standard (NFPA 1221) call answering criteria of 95% of all calls answered within 5seconds, indicate that there are 2 operators required during all hours of the day.G ',E911 Background Paper dcc

Page 4166.. '7.orrent '2009 1 - Staffing & Finance:The C, V ; DARE), :7- reser-Cheam E911 Service Areas presently fund:12 fuli time equivalent E911 call answerer / dispatcher positions,6 positions at the Abbotsford Police Communication Centre, andc 6 in the RCMP Communication Centre.Total cost: $1,145,000.00.In the present three (3) E911 Service Areas, the FVRD provides 12 full time equivalent (FTE)positions including administrative costs. Of these position, 6 are located at the RCMP inChilliwack and 6 at the Abbotsford Police Department. The agreements for each location are notequal in terms of overall fundingThe RCMP contract calls fOr 6 FTE © $108,555.00 per person = $651,330.00 per year. TheRCMP serves approximately 50 percent of the region noted by the blue area in figure 1.The Abbotsford Police Agreement provides the Abbotsford Police with a $400,000 paymentfor staffing, capital costs and Operations & Maintenance relating to the Abbotsford (PSAP)E911. In addition to the fee noted above, the FVRD directly pays for an admin support fee, acontribution toward travel and administration fees for a total of $466,189.18 per year. TheAbbotsford Police serve the other half of the region (primarily the City of Abbotsford), which isthe green area of the map in figure 1.The other portion of the E911 service is the provision of Fire Dispatch services. Fire dispatchservices are provided for the entire region by FVRD staff. The staffing of the Fire. Dispatch systemcurrently has one Manager, four (4) Full time dispatchers and a complement of part time (currently5) to provide sick/vacation relief as well as a "cover shift". The cover shift is a part time shiftrunning from 15:00 — 19:00, hours which is the Fire dispatch's busiest period. The cover shift wasinitiated in 2001 at the request d the City of Abbotsford's Fire/Rescue Department.Under the current configuration, the method of funding the E911 and Fire Dispatch services is asfollows,The Fraser Cheam area pays for both E911 and Fire Dispatch by way of FVRD property taxrequisition,The DARD service areasThe CFVRD pays for E911 by way of FVRD property tax requisition, while Fire Dispatch isdelivered by way of a contract with the City of Abbotsford. The 2009 contract was in theamount of 195,000. This contract is up for renewal in 2009.Under the Fraser-Cheam, D.A.R.D., and C.F.V. 3 service areas the total cost in 2009 is$2,207,400.00. For additional information, attached please find copies of the 2009 Financial Planfor all three service areas.

RASER VALLEY REGIONAL DISTRICT■udget Departmental by Category167-ern Category: 201 To Category: 203ccount Code: 77-7-77?-777? To: 77-7-???-????c.count CodeAccount Description2007 2008 2008 2009 2010Actual values Final Budget Actual values Final Budget FinancialValues Values Plan2011FinanciPlanGeneral Operating FundRevenueE-911 (CFVRD)0-1-201-1200 Grants in Place of Taxes - E911 CFV 6,592 2,500 7,243 2,500 2,500 2,500-1-201-1579 EA Tax Requisition - E911 CFV 2,063 2,154 2,154 0 00-1-201-1830 Municipal Tax Requisition E911 CFV 418,737 438,616 438,616 443,400 481,950 500,590-1-201-1910 Transfer from Reserve - E911 CFV 8,383 31,000 29,767 32,000 32,800 33,600-1-201-1911 Prior Year Surplus - E911 CFV 17,709 9,050 9,057 20,850 0 ■Total Revenue 453,484 483,320 486,837 498,750 517,250 536,690-2-201-1100 Supervision 8,000 8,200 8,200 8,500 8,750 9,0D0-2-201-2116 Travel/Conferences/Seminars - E911 CF1 6,939 6,000 6421 6,000 6,150 6,300-2-201-2131 Telephone - E911 CFVRD 18,652 15,000 12,965 15,000 15,375 15,80'0-2-201-2211 Newspaper Advertising - Egli CFVRD 0 5,000 0 1,000 1,025 1,05 :0-2-201-2475 Other Equip Maintenance - E911 CFVRD 4,549 10,000 8,727 10,000 10,250 10,500-2-201-4000 Admin Support - E911 CFVRD 6,000 6,120 6,120 6,250 6.500 7,000-2-201-6176 Capital (Equip) - E911 CFVRD 8,384 31,000 29,767 32,000 32,800 33,600-2-201-7410 Transfer to Reserve - E91 1 CFVRD 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,400 20,800-2-201-7540 OperaUng Grant 371,904 382,000 373,776 400,000 416,000 432,64Total Expenditure 444,428 483,320 465,976 498,750 517,250 536,69E-911 (CFVRD) Surplus/(Deficit) 9,056 0 20,861 0 0

RASER VALLEY REGIONAL DISTRICTludget Departmental by Category168rom Category: 201 To Category: 203ccount Code: ??-?-???-777? To : ??-?-777-7???ccount Code Account DescriptionkFVRD2007 2008 2008 2009 2010 2011Actual values Final Budget Actual values Final Budget Financial FlnanciValues Values Plan PlanGeneral Operating FundRevenueE-911 (DARD)0-1-202-12000-1-202-13750-1-202-15790-1-202-18300-1-202-1911Grants in Place of Taxes - E911 DARDE911 Svcs to First Nations - DARDEA Tax Requisition - E911 DARDMunicipal Tax Requisition - E911 DARDPrior Year Surplus - E911 DARD7,94673016,775163,23012,7731,00077518,123171,6526,9003,86571418,123171,6526,9041,00077519,427184,0985,8001,00077520,488194,11201,00177:21,04199,33,iTotal Revenue 201,454 198,450 201,258 211,100 216,375 222,1510-2-202-1100 Supervision 1,600 4,100 4,100 7,000 7,200 7,4010-2-202-2392 Consultants/Contract Svces - E911 Dard 174,250 179,500 179,500 190,000 194,750 200,0010-2-202-2399 Other Business Services - E911 Dard 9,000 9,000 7,000 9,000 9,225 9,4510-2-202-4000 Admin. Support - E911 Dard 4,700 4,850 4,850 5,100 5,200 5,3010-2-202-7410 Transfer to Reserve - Epil Dard 5,000 1,000 0 0 0 1Total Expenditure 194,550 198,450 195,450 211,100 216,375 222,151E-911 (DARD) Surplus/(Defidt) 6,904 0 5,808 0 0

LASER VALLEY REGIONAL DISTRICTudget Departmental by Category169em Category: 201 To Category: 203:count Code: ??-7-7/7-???? To : ??-?.???-????:count Code Account Description2007 2008 2008 2009 2010 .2011Actual values Final Budget Actual values Final Budget Financial FinanciValues Values Plan PlanGeneral Operating FundRevenueE-911 (RDFC)3- 1-203-1200 Grants in Place of Taxes - 6911 RDFC 20,505 20,000 19,059 20.000 20,000 20,00(3-1-203-1375 SVCES PROVIDED TO FIRST NATIONS 0 0 3,751 1,750 1,800 1,85(3-1-203-1579 EA Tax Requisition - E911 RDFC 96,930 105,369 105,369 110,771 118,420 122,0913-1-203-1590 Miscellaneous Revenue - E911 RDFC 2,079 2,000 2,601 2,000 2,000 2,00(3-1-203-1600 Cndtril Tmsfr from Local Gov't - 6911 259,625 265,600 264,926 268,500 273,500 278,00(3-1-203-1E130 Mun Tax Requisition - E911 RDFC 782,150 879,901 879,901 912,254 975A80 1,005,6813- 1-243-1900 Other Transfers - 6911 RDFC 1133,450 188,900 188,900 194,500 199,625 209,3213-1-203-1910 Transfer from Reserve - 6911 RDFC 46,664 75,000 75,000 75,000 78,800 80,70(3-1-203-1911 Prior-Year Surplus - E911 RDFC 31,098 0 0 0 0 (3-1-203-1914 Appropriated Surplus - E911 RDFC 0 94,000 47,890 40,000 0 (3-1-203-1920 Recoveries from Other Services 9,600 12,300 13,179 40,500 40,950 41,40(Total Revenue 1,432,101 1,643,070 1,600,576 1,665,275 1,710,575 1,761.0513-2-203-1110 Salaries Full time Regular - RDFC 911 464,285 483,200 485,672 488,300 505,400 523,1013-2-203-1120 Overtime-RDFC 911 13,824 20,000 21,378 22,000 22,500 23,00(3-2-203-1405 Benefits - Cont to Sick Leave - 6911 RDF 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,075 3.150 373;13-2-203-1410 Benefits - Superannuation - E911 RDFC31,331 35,000 30,581 35,000 36,0003-2-203-1430 Benefits - Canada Pension - E911 RDFC 16,541 18,250 17,399 20,000 20,500 21,0013-2-203-1440 Benefits - Employment Ins - E911 RDFC. 8,674 10,000 8,777 10,000 10,250 10,50(3-2-203-1450 Benefits - Extended Health Ins - E911 RD 5,003 5,000 5,148 6,000 6,150 6,3013-2-203-1460 Benefits - BC Medical Plan - 6911 RDFC 5,383 5,500 5,450 6,000 6,150 6,3013-2-203-1470 Benefits - Group Ins - E911 RDFC 2,851 3,000 2,841 3,100 3,200 3,3013-2-203-1480 Benefits - Workers' Comp - E911 RDFC 3,779 4,200 3,906 4,800 4,900 5,0013-2-203-1490 Benefits - Dental Plan - E911 RDFC 4,505 4,500 4,741 5,000 5,100 5,2013-2-203-2110 Travel - 6911 RDFC 2,673 5,000 2,702 5,000 5,125 5,25(3-2-203-21313-2-203-2219Telephone - 6911 RDFCOther Advertising/Education - 6911 RDFC68,2212465,0002,00064,600065,0002,00066,6252,050 682,3 1(1)3113-2-203-2340 Training & Education - 6911 RDFC 3,091 5,000 3,975 6,000 6,150 6,30(3-2-203-2392 Consultants/Contract Svces - 6911 RDFC 585,521 603,000 616,751 625,000 643,700 663,00(3-2-203-2395 Memberships - 6911 RDFC 752 1,000 1,232 1,000 1,025 1,05(3-2-203-2440 Broadcasting/Booster Station Malnt. 35,849 45,000 34,662 46,000 47,150 48,50(3-2.203-24753-2-203-2479Other Equip Maint. - 6911 RDFCComputer Maint. - E911 RDFC28,24128,48025,00020,00019,21114,64325,00020,00025,62520,50026,25(21,00(3-2-203-4000 Admin Support - 6911 RDFC 70,000 71,750 71,750 75,400 77,3013-2-203-4025 Mapping Support - 6911 RDFC 34,000 35,000 35,000 376003,5500 36,700 37,60(

&ASER VALLEY REGIONAL DISTRICTudget Departmental by Categoryorn Category; 201 To Category: 203:count Code: 77-7-777-777? To : ??-?..???-????LFVRD170:count CodeAccount Description2007 2008 2008 2009Actual values Final Budget Actual values Final BudgetValues Values2010FinandalPlan2011FinanciPlan3-2-203-4050 Software Support 0 0 0 25,000 25,000 25,0013-2-203-5300 - Supplies - E911 RDFC 4,082 4,000 1,069 4,000 4,100 4,2013-2-203-6179 Capital (Comp Equip) - all RDFC 46,664 75,000 74,858 85,000 87,125 89,3013-2-203-7410 Transfer to Re‘erve - E911 RDFC 40,000 20,000 0 40,000 41,000 42,001D-2-203-9110 Deficit from Prior Year - E911 RDFC 0 74,670 74,674 3,450 0 1Total Expenditure 1,506,774 1,643,070 1,604,020 , 1,665,275 1,710,575 1,761,051E-911 (RDFC) Surplusi(Deficit) -74,673 0 -3,444 0 0

171MDISTRICT OFON THE FRASERCorporate AdministrationMemorandumTo: Chief Administrative OfficerFrom: Legislative AssistantDate: January 11, 2010Subject: Amendments to Officers Bylaw 3986-2007RecommendationThat District of Mission Officers Bylaw 3986-2007 be amended as follows:(a)by deleting the title "Superintendent of Roads and Drainage" from Section 1(17) and replacing itwith the title "Operations Manager";(b)(c)(d)(e)(f)(g)(h)(i)(j)by deleting the job description of the "Superintendent of Roads and Drainage" from Schedule "A" inits entirety;by deleting the title "Superintendent of Utilities" from Section 1(18) and replacing it with the title"Assistant Operations Manager";by deleting the job description of the "Superintendent of Utilities" from Schedule "A" in its entirety;by inserting the job descriptions for the new positions of "Operations Manager" and "AssistantOperations Manager" in Schedule "A";by deleting the title "Manager of Engineering Design Services" from Section 1(33) and replacing itwith the title "Design Engineer";by deleting the title "Manager of.Engineering Design Services" from the applicable job description inSchedule "A" and replacing it with the title "Design Engineer";by deleting. the words "including the annual complete an annual audit of parks and recreationpolicies and procedures, and forward any recommended changes to the Director of CorporateAdministration" from Schedule "A", Director of Forest Management, section (i);by deleting the words "Tree Farm" from Schedule "A", Manager of Forestry, sections (b), (f), (g) and(i), and replacing them with the words "Mission Tree Farm Licence 26"; andby adding the words "assume the duties and responsibilities of the Director of .Forest Managementin his/her absence" as a new section (j) to Schedule "A", Manager of Forestry.BackgroundThe recommended changes to the Officers Bylaw are housekeeping amendments to keep pace with therecent restructuring of the engineering department, and to clean up a few discrepancies in a couple ofother job descriptions. Complete job descriptions for the Operations Manager and Assistant OperationsManager are attached to this report.Page 1 of 1

172OPHRATIONS MANAGERTnere shall be appointed an Operations Manager who shall, under the direction:A the Director of Engineering and Public Works:(a) provide leadership and plan and direct the activities of the public worksdepartment;(b) in consultation with the Manager of Human Resources, recruit, hire,discipline, lay off, suspend and terminate staff as required, within knownguidelines and following appropriate consultative practices;(c) monitor and assess work performed to ensure that it meets a high standardof quality, efficiency and customer service, and is performed in compliancewith Worksafe regulations and appropriate risk management practices;(d) provide verbal and/or written performance feedback and performanceassessments of supervised staff, and provide mentoring, advice andguidance to supervised staff on matters related to performance concerns;(e) prepare the annual budget for the department and on approval ensure thatexpenditures are in accordance with budgetary policy;(f)devise, implement and adjust 3 year rolling strategic operations and capitalplans for the public works department to ensure that the department isfocused on highest priorities;(g) initiate, plan and direct the preparation of a variety of reports relative topublic works operations and capital works;(h) attend meetings of the Council, Engineering and Public Works Committee,other committees, and public meetings when necessary;(i) assess the utilization of crews and equipment to ensure the most effectiveuse of resources;(i) ensure that fleet equipment is properly maintained and repaired through apreventive maintenance program, including that all statutory and regulatoryrequirements are met;(k) ensure the acquisition and replacement of fleet equipment is completed inaccordance with the fleet replacement plan;(I) supervise and direct Public Works administrative support staff;(m) at the direction of the Director of Engineering and Public Works, act for theMunicipality on matters relating to his/her department in hiring personnel,union negotiations, and employee grievances, submit confidential reports inaccordance therewith as required and give evidence on behalf of theMunicipality at hearings relating to labour relations;(n) assume the duties and responsibilities of the Assistant Operations Managerin his/her absence; and(o) perform such other duties as required by statute, municipal bylaw,resolution or as may be delegated by the Director of Engineering andPublic Works.

173ASSISTANT OPERATIONS MANAGERThere shah': be appointed an Assistant Operations Manager who shall, underdirection of the Operations Manager:ka) provide leadership and plan and direct the activities of the public worksdepartment;in consultation with the Manager of Human Resources, recruit, hire,discipline, suspend, lay off and terminate staff as required, within knownguidelines and following appropriate consultative practices;monitor and assess work performed to ensure that it meets a high standardof quality, efficiency and customer service, and is performed in compliancewith Worksafe regulations and appropriate risk management practices;(d) provide verbal and/or written performance feedback and performanceassessments of supervised staff, and provide mentoring, advice andguidance to supervised staff on matters related to performance concerns;ke) assist the Operations Manager to implement a staff personal developmentprogram;assist in the preparation of the annual budget for the department and onapproval ensure that expenditures are in accordance with budgetary policy;(g) assist the Operations Manager to devise and implement 3 year rollingstrategic operations and capital plans;(h) prepare work schedules to complete budgeted work;(i) initiate, plan and direct the preparation of reports relative to public worksoperations and capital works;a) as required attend meetings of the Council, Engineering and Public WorksCommittee, other committees, and public meetings;(k) ensure work crews and equipment are assigned in the most efficientmanner to contribute to the effective management of the division;(I) ensure an ongoing review of usage, performance and suitability of existingequipment through communication with the foremen and crew and fleetsupervisor,(m) at the direction of the Operations Manager, act for the Municipality onmatters relating to his/her department in hiring personnel, unionnegotiations, and employee grievances, submit confidential reports inaccordance therewith as required and give evidence on behalf of theMunicipality at hearings relating to labour relations;(n) assume the dutieS and responsibilities of the Operations Manager in his/herabsence; and(o) perform such other duties as required by statute, municipal bylaw,resolution or as may be delegated by the Director of Engineering andPublic Works.

174Inspection ServicesMemorandurnTo:Chief Administrative OfficerFrom: Manager of Inspection ServicesDate: January 8, 2010Subject: Kennel Bylaw 2788-1994RecommendationThat Kennel Bylaw 2788-1994 be amended by deleting Section 3 which reads:"A kennel shall be permitted on a parcel of land which allows for general agricultural use; excepta hobby kennel shall only be permitted on a parcel of land which allows for small scaleagricultural use."and replacing it with:"A kennel shall be permitted on a parcel of land which allows for general agricultural useprovided that the minimum lot size is 1.6 ha (4.0 ac); except a hobby kennel shall be permittedon a parcel of land which allows for general or small scale agricultural use provided that theminimum lot size is 0.36 ha (0.88 acres)."BackgroundOn December 14, 2009, an amendment was made to the Kennel Bylaw in order to reflectchanges made to Zoning Bylaw 5050-2009. The recommendation should have included the lotsize permitted for a general agriculture use as this is not directly stated within the Zoning Bylaw.GAInspectthylawenforce \kennel bylaw recommendationFILE: ADM.BYL.PRO PAGE 1 OF 1Kennel Regulation Bylaw Amendment

17514'V ki C I C.. 4fission.ON THE FRASERMinutesMinutes of the DOWNTOWN COALITION Meeting held at the Municipal Hall, 8645 Stave LakeStreet, Mission, British Columbia on Tuesday, December 8, 2009 commencing at 8:30 a.m.Present:Heather Stewart, Councillor, District of Mission (Chair)Calvin Adams, Tim HortonsPeter Bandi, Member at LargeTony LaPointe, Mission Community Services SocietyJim Wilson, alternate, Mission Downtown Area Residents AssociationKaren Bogle, Union Gospel MissionKirsten Hargreaves, Manager of Social DevelopmentMichelle Faveron, Mission Chamber of CommerceTina Mooney, Administrative ClerkAbsent:Greg Elford, Mission Ministerial AssociationJohn Fitzsimmons, Ministry of Children and Family DevelopmentVacant, Mission Mental HealthMary Flavelle, Mission Association Community LivingPam Willis, Women's Resource Society of the Fraser ValleySally Buchanan, OAP #28Shelley Clarkson, Downtown Business AssociationJeanette Dillabough, Triangle Community ResourcesAmanda Welti, Mission Friendship Centre1. MinutesMoved by Karen Bogle, seconded by Peter Bandi, andRECOMMENDED: That the minutes of the Downtown Coalition meeting held on October13, 2009 be approved.CARRIED2. BUSINESS ARISING FROM THE MINUTES(a) Excerpt from the Regular Council minutes of October 19, 2009The Committee received this as information.(b)Terms of Reference and Downtown Coalition Membership ListDiscussions ensued as to whether Triangle Community Resources and the Chamber ofCommerce were appointed to the committee by council and members from all appointedorganizations are encouraged to attend meetings.Moved by Tony LaPointe, seconded by Calvin Adams

Downtown Coalition Minutes — December 8, 2009 2176RECOMMENDED: That the Manager of the Mission Chamber of Commerce beappointed as a member of the Downtown Coalition.3. PRESENTATION(a) Community Education Program(Councillor Stewart)Councillor Stewart made a presentation on education in Mission. She noted that thecommunity should be involved as educational services are an attraction to potential newresidents and beneficial to our community. She stated that the community educationdevelopment task force group was appointed by council in 2008 and a subsequentreport was presented to council in 2009 summarizing their recommendations.She noted that Mission's education consists of elementary, secondary, post-secondaryeducation and continuing education but not community education. Mission presentlyfocuses on individual success but not on learning as a community. We have communityuse of public schools but do not utilize them as community schools.She stated that one of the major objectives identified in the District of Mission's 2006strategic plan was to expand post-secondary opportunities in Mission as many studentsgraduate in Mission but leave the community to pursue available opportunities.Mission School District was presented with the Vision 2020: Adaptive Schools EnablingStudent Success report and is encouraging input. She noted that Mission needs todevelop technical fields and work with the institutions to develop programs for thecommunity. The University of the Fraser Valley is also encouraging input until December14, 2009.Michelle Favero noted that if the community works in conjunction with universitypracticum students to get their assistance on projects it would benefit the communityboth educationally and financially and noted that the Chamber of Commerce recentlysuccess with this.Kirsten Hargreaves noted that she has recently met with. John Maclure ElementarySchool in Abbotsford who heads the community schools program in partnership withsurrounding Abbotsford community schools to discuss this program.Karen Bogle reported that Heritage Park Secondary School was having a student drivenChristmas dinner which encourages youth participation in the community. Shediscussed various programs offered for aboriginal students.Discussions ensued regarding Community Schools and the differences betweencommunity and public schools. A community school is a school that partners withcommunity agencies and provide unique and accessible opportunities to our community.The school arranges for transportation, hot lunches and extra curricular activities. If, forexample, students wanted to attend band classes, they would be offered at one schooland transportation would be provided so that this service is available to all studentswanted to participate.

Downtown Coalition Minutes — December 8, 2009 31774. OLD BUSINESS(a)(b)Discussion Item - Update from Red Card SubcommitteeTony LaPointe discussed the recent meeting with the red card programsubcommittee. He noted that when the program was initiated meals were notavailable to those in need every day but various community organizations haveexpanded their programs and meals are now available at different locationsseven days a week. The committee has discussed withdrawing meals from thered card program and having a separate list showing the locations where mealsare available every day that would be provided to those in need.Mission Community Services will obtain the various organizations'approvals to list their location, the day of the week the meals are availableand permission to distribute the list to community members. They will alsoreview the key services that should be included on the card, the list of sponsorsand telephone numbers.Discussions ensued about some of the programs that are assisting the homelessand it was noted that Mission Association for Community Living puts togetherhygiene packages and most of the donations for these packages come throughMission Community Services.Recommendation: That the meal allowance be withdrawn off the red cardprogram card and the price for the red card be increased from $2.00 to$3.00.RoundtablePeter Bandi stated that he is pleased that administrative support is now againoffered to committee.Jim Wilson appeared on behalf of the Mission Downtown Area ResidentsAssociation and he handed out their new brochure for the committee'sinformation (copy attached).Calvin Adams noted that following the Candlelight Parade the clean up went verywell and the community did their part to keep the area clean. He also noted thatwith the added security and increase in RCMP members the parade was asuccess without any significant incidents.Karen Bogel announced the Christmas Dinner at the Union Gospel on December11, 2009 and there are also various other dinners available throughout theholiday season in the community.Kirsten Hargreaves noted that the Social Development dinner is being held at theleisure centre and updates will be provided from the organizations on theirprojects.Tony LaPointe announced Mission Community Services week is scheduled forthe end of January, 2010 and discussed upcoming 2010 events that support theirorganization. He also noted that the extreme weather program has not beenutilized since opening recently and discussed the current systems in place tohelping homeless during the extreme cold conditions.Michelle Favero asked if the new Info Mission website that was recently launchedcould include which organizations are in need of volunteers and KirstenHargreaves will discuss this with the committee.

y.,lawn Coalition. 7— December 8, 2009 41787. NEXT MEETINGHeather: Stewart will be discussing the foot patrol with council at the next meetingas per previous committee discussions.Discussion ensued regarding the extreme weather program and noted thatMission is not a community that will force individuals into the extreme weatherprogram but would welcome receiving information from the RCMP on whetherthis change should be discussed in the future. The intake procedure forindividuals into the program was discussed as safety issues for those enteringthe program and those currently in the program must be Considered. The shelteris currently able to accommodate 20 individuals and the last count of thehomeless individuals in the community was approximately 100. The quality ofcare in Mission regarding doctors, transportation and emergency services isbeing reduced and this will have an impact on the community.Next meeting — February 9, 2010 at 8:30 a.m. in the Council Chambers.8. ADJOURNMENTMoved by Peter Bandi, seconded by Calvin Adams, andRECOMMENDED: That the meeting be adjournedCARRIEDThe meeting was adjourned at 10:00 a.m.

179MINUTES of the REGULAR MEETING of the COUNCIL of the DISTRICT OFMISSION held in the Council Chambers of the Municipal Hall, 8645 Stave LakeStreet, Mission, British Columbia, on January 4, 2010 commencing at 6:30 p.m.Council Members Present: Mayor James AtebeCouncillor Paul HornCouncillor Danny PlecasCouncillor Mike ScudderCouncillor Jenny StevensCouncillor Heather StewartCouncil Members Absent: Councillor Terry GiddaStaff Members Present:Glen Robertson, chief administrative officerDennis Clark, director of corporate administrationChristine Brough, administrative clerkJennifer Russell, legislative assistant1. PROCLAMATIONSRC 10/001JAN. 04/10January 2010 as "Africa Awareness Month"University of British Columbia Africa Awareness InitiativeMoved by Councillor Stevens, seconded by Scudder, andRESOLVED: That January, 2010 be proclaimed as "Africa Awareness Month" withinthe District of Mission; the District to assume no costs related thereto.CARRIED2. DELEGATIONS AND PRESENTATIONSRC 10/002JAN. 04/10Fraser Health AuthorityRe: Mission Memorial Hospital ServicesLATE ITEM — letter from Fraser Health Authority dated January 4, 2010Barbara Korabek and Arden Krystal, both vice presidents, clinical operations, fromFraser Health appeared before council to provide information regarding FraserHealth's decision on the best option for budget reductions at Mission MemorialHospital.Ms. Krystal referred to the letter from the Fraser Health Authority dated January 4,2010 and stated that due to unavoidable cost pressures, the best option is to closethe operating room, effective early in February 2010. She further stated:(a)(b)(c)(d)the operating room it currently open only two days a week;there were 500 low acuity procedures done-last-year;of those 500 surgical patients, most were not from the Mission area;all currently scheduled surgeries will be rescheduled prior to closure;(e) there will be no changes to the hours of operation of the emergencydepartment during the planning process;

180Regular Council Meeting Page 2 of 12January 4, 2010(f)(g)any changes to emergency room hours or services would occur as a result ofthe planning process;Fraser Health is committed to the relationship and the consultation processwith the District of Mission to guide decisions for healthcare services; and(h) the operating theatres will remain under the surgical program and have notbeen committed to other uses.In response to questions from council, Ms. Korabek stated that all current nursing"beds" at Mission Memorial Hospital will remain open.Council noted that although no service reductions would have been preferable,closing the operating room and leaving the emergency department open is areasonable option. Council expressed concern that the emergency department, oranother part of the hospital may be under threat of closure during next year. It wasfurther noted that council looks forward to continuing to work with Fraser Health in aconsultative decision process to improve services for a growing community.Mayor Atebe thanked Ms. Korabek and Ms. Krystal for the information.Moved by Councillor Stevens, seconded by Councillor Horn, andRESOLVED: That the letter from the Fraser Health Authority dated January 4, 2010be received.CARRIED3. ADOPTION OF INFORMATIONAL ITEMSRC1 0/003JAN. 04/10Moved by Councillor Scudder, seconded by Councillor Stewart, andRESOLVED: That the following items be received as information:(a)correspondence from Town Square working group regarding status of the raingarden project;(b) release of information from the closed council meeting held on December 15,2009;(c)THAT the last section of policy STR.25 Snow Plowing be amended by:1. Adding the heading "Exceptions" above the last paragraph that starts withthe words "Given ,that there are resource..."; and2. Adding the following words as article d) "Clearing of snow on Florence LakeRoad, except as may be required under Priority #1 Override."THAT council request BC Housing to advertise and undertake a public openhouse to be held at the Grand Street Lodge, AND THAT following the openhouse, a good neighbour agreement be prepared and registered at the LandTitle Office.annual report on free tipping of litter at the Mission landfill;(d) Mission Institution report — November 2009;

181Regular Council Meeting Page 3 of 12January 4, 2010(e)minutes of the Abbotsford/Mission Water & Sewer Commission meeting heldon November 12, 2009; and(f) minutes of the downtown revitalization task force meeting held on October 27,2009.CARRIEDRC 10/004JAN. 04/10Moved by Councillor Horn, seconded by Councillor Plecas, andRESOLVED: That the minutes of the downtown coalition meeting held onOctober 13, 2009 be referred to a closed meeting.CARRIED4. RESOLUTION TO RESOLVE INTO COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLERC 10/005JAN. 04/10Moved by Councillor Stevens, seconded by Councillor Stewart, andRESOLVED: That council now resolve itself into committee of the whole.CARRIED5. ENGINEERING AND PUBLIC WORKSCouncillor Horn assumed the Chair on behalf of Councillor Gidda.RC 10/006JAN. 04/10Minutes of the Downtown Revitalization Task Force Meeting held onNovember 17, 2009Moved by Mayor Atebe, andRECOMMENDED:1. That the downtown revitalization task force be dissolved;2. That staff prepare a report with an action plan for the items listed on the taskforce matrix for council's consideration; and3. That staff arrange for the task force members to be recognized at a futurecouncil meeting.CARRIEDMayor Atebe thanked the task force members and the volunteers for their hard workand commitment to the community.6. PLANNINGCouncillor Stewart assumed the Chair.RC10/007JAN. 04/10Rezoning Application R09-012 (District of Mission) — Proposed TextAmendments to Zoning Bylaw 5050-2009Moved by Councillor Scudder, and

182Regular Council Meeting Page 4 of 12January 4, 2010RECOMMENDED:1. That the director of corporate administration prepare a bylaw to amend zoningbylaw 5050-2009 to:a) Delete "Industry, Light" in its entirety from Section 102 Definitions andreplace with:Industry, Lightmeans a Use that involves manufacturing, production, processing,fabrication, assembly, treatment, repair, or packaging of finished products,predominantly from previously prepared or refined materials (or from rawmaterials that do not need refining) which is enclosed within a Building andis not offensive by reason of smoke; vibration, smell, toxic fumes, electricalor electronic interference and produces no significant noise which in anyway interferes with the use of any contiguous Lot.Includes:■ Light ManufacturingExcludes:• Salvage Industry,■ Heavy Industry, and■ Transportation Industryb) Delete "Fish Bearing Stream" in its entirety from Section 102 Definitionsand replace with:Fish Bearing Streammeans a Stream in which Fish are present or potentially present ifintroduced barriers are either removed or made passable for Fish.c) Delete "Non Fish Bearing Stream" in its entirety from Section 102Definitions and replace with:Non Fish Bearing Streammeans a Stream that is not inhabited by fish, and provides water, food andnutrients to a downstream Fish Bearing Stream or other body of water.d) Delete "Agriculture, Small Scale" in its entirety from Section 102 Definitionsand replace with:Agriculture, Small Scalemeans providing for the growing, rearing, and harvesting of agriculturalproducts and includes the preliminary grading of land for agriculturalproducts grown, harvested or reared on that land.And includes:■ "hobby kennel" as defined in the District of Mission Kennel Bylaw 2788-1994, andthe keeping of:■ bees■ cattle (limited to 1 animal per .36 ha (.88 ac) of Lot Area)

183Regular Council Meeting Page 5 of 12January 4, 2010■ horses (limited to 1 animal per .36 ha (.88 ac) Lot Area), and■ chicken hens (limited to 1 bird per 375 sq m of Lot Area), andExcludes:■ mushroom growing, andthe keeping of:■ swine,■ rabbits,■ mink,■ all other fowl, excluding chicken hens, and■ feed lots.Delete "Agriculture, Urban" in its entirety from Section 102 DefinitionsDelete Section 104 Part B. 2.a. in its entirety and replace with:"For pie-shaped or irregular shaped lots, frontage may be reduced belowthe minimum prescribed width by 50%, provided the minimum frontage ismet at the mid point of the depth of the lot or 20.0m back from the front lotline, whichever is less."g) Delete Section 108 Part C. 5. in its entirety and replace with:"Notwithstanding Section 108, Part C, in determining a StreamsideProtection and Enhancement Area, the Approving Officer may adjust theboundaries of a Streamside Protection and Enhancement Area incircumstances where the establishment of the Streamside Protection andEnhancement Area pursuant to the criteria in Section 108, Part C.3 isunfeasible, with the determination made under the following factors:a. biophysical conditions;b. existing parcel sizes;c. existing roads, trails, works or services;d. proposed roads, trails, works and services needed to provide access orservices to- otherwise developable -land or to connect to existing roads,trails, works or services;and where opportunities to maintain and enhance the total net area withinthe Streamside Protection and Enhancement Area can occur, as indicatedby the example shown in Figure 108.3 below."

184Regular Council Meeting Page 6 of 12January 4, 2010h) Delete Section 109 Part C. Paragraph 1 in its entirety and replace with:1. The minimum dimensions for a parking space and associatedmaneuvering aisle shall be as follows:Parking Angle Width of Length of Width of Aisle Traffic(in deg rees) Parking • ace Parking Space Direction90 2.6 m (8.5 ft) 5.5 m (18.0 ft) 7.0 m (23 ft) Two way90 2.6 m (8.5 ft) 5.5 m (18.0 ft) 6.5 m (21.3 ft) Two way -within Building90 Compact 2.5 m (8.2 ft) 5.0 m (16.4 ft) 6.5 m (21.3 ft) Two way60 2.6 m (8.5 ft) 5.5 m (18.0 ft) 6.5 m (21.3 ft) Two way60 Compact 2.6 m (8.5 ft) 5.0 m (16.4 ft) 6.5 m (21.3 ft) Two way45 2.6 m (8.5 ft) 5.5 m (18.0 ft) 6.5 m (21.3 ft) Two way45 Compact 2.7 m (8.9 ft) 5.0 m (16.4 ft) 6.5 m (21.3 ft) Two way180 (parallel) 2.6 m (8.5 ft) 6.7 m (22.0 ft) 6.5 m (21.3 ft) Two wayNOTE: Dimensions for handicapped parking spaces must be as set out in theBritish Columbia Building Code.i) Delete Section 111 Part A. Paragraph 1.a. in its entirety and replace with:1. Unless otherwise provided in this Bylaw, the following shall apply to allUrban zones:a. No fence shall be constructed on a Lot to a Height exceeding:i. 1.9m (6.2 ft), orii. 1.2m (4.0 ft) when it is located within a required Front Yard or SideYard on a flanking street.i)Add the following Paragraphs to Section 1005 Part B. Permitted Uses:3. The following Principal Uses and no other shall be permitted in the INARzone provided no Automotive uses exist on the lot:a. Food and Beverage limited to:i. Industrial Café.b. Industrial limited to:i.Light Industry,ii. Warehouse Uses, andiii. Transportation Industry.c. Service limited to:i. Appliance Repair,ii. Beverage Container Return Centre,iii. Call Centre,iv. Dog and Cat Daycare Kennel,

185Regular Council Meeting Page 7 of 12January 4, 2010v. Driving School,vi.Funeral Parlour and/or Memorial Service Facility,vii.General Service Use, andviii.Taxi Dispatch.4. The following Accessory Uses and no other shall be permitted in the .INAR zone provided no Automotive uses exist on the lot:a. Office limited to:i. Administrative Office Use - provided the Use is limited to a maximum of50% of Floor Area of the Principal Use.b. Retail limited to:i. Retail Store - provided the retailing of products are manufactured orwholesaled within the business premises, limited to a maximum of 30%of the Floor Area of the Principal Use or 450 sq m (4,843.8 sq ft),whichever is less.c. Storage limited to the following:i. Enclosed Storage, andii. Outdoor Storage - provided the Use is for finished products which aremanufactured on the Site. All Outdoor Storage operations shall:■ Not exceed 50% of the Floor Area of a Principal Use in size.■ Not include storage of material or goods likely to produce or give offdust or other particulate matter that may become wind-borne.■ Not exceed 2.0 m in height, from Finished Grade.■ Not be located within 3.0 m of a Lot line adjoining a Street.■ Be located only on that part of a Lot surfaced with dust-free material.■ Be bounded on all sides not adjacent to a Building or Structure by afence of at least 1.8 m (6.0 ft) in Height constructed and maintained ina manner to completely screen storage from view from public Streets,the fence shall be fronted by a Landscaped Area 1.5 m (4.9 ft) widecontaining a minimum of one tree, for every 9.0 linear m (29.5 ft) offence. Each tree shall have a minimum size of 6.0 cm (2.4 in) caliper."5. The following Conditions of Use apply to all permitted uses for a site:a. All Principal Uses shall be located completely within an enclosed Buildingexcept for:i. Outdoor Storage.k) Add the following to Section 1004 Part B. Permitted Uses, Paragraph 1:and,a. Industrial, limited to:i. Auction - Wholesaleii. Light Industryiii. Warehouse. Recreation limited to:i. Commercial Outdoor Recreation

186Regular Council Meeting Page 8 of 12January 4, 20102. That the tables referenced in Section 106 Part D. Use Categories be amendedas necessary;3. That the bylaw be considered for first and second readings at the regularcouncil meeting on January 4, 2010; and4. That following such readings, the bylaw be forwarded to a public hearing onJanuary 25, 2010.CARRIEDRC1 0/008JAN. 04/10Request for Extension — Rezoning Application R08-007 (Worthy) — 7613 and7655 Peterson Street, and 32477 — 7 th AvenueMoved by Mayor Atebe, andRECOMMENDED: That a 12-month extension be granted to rezoning applicationR08-007 (Worthy) for the properties located at 7613 and 7655 Peterson Street and32477 - 7th Avenue to enable the applicant to complete the outstanding rezoningrequirements.CARRIEDStaff were directed to ask the property owner to demolish the existing building assoon as possible.RC1 0/009JAN. 04/10Minor Amendment to Mission Community Heritage Commission RevisedTerms of ReferenceMoved by Councillor Horn, andRECOMMENDED:1. That the first sentence of part 3, section C, Budget and Expenditures of theMission Community Heritage Commission terms of reference be amended toread:"The Heritage Commission will submit an annual budget to Council inNovember, as part of a progress report that includes the past year'saccomplishments, the expectations and work plan for the upcoming calendaryear (January to December)."; and2. That the words "(see Examples of a Consensus Approach to Decision makingas Attachment 2)" be deleted from part 3, section B. Meeting Protocol.CARRIEDRC1 0/01 0JAN. 04/10Affordable Housing Workshops — Information to CouncilMoved by Councillor Horn, andRECOMMENDED:1. That the vision and guiding principles for affordable housing be endorsed; and

187Regular Council Meeting Page 9 of 12January 4, 20102. That staff request the housing sub-committee to:(a)(b)CARRIEDprovide a clear definition of "Affordable Housing",consider the inclusion of seniors' housing and accessibility issues forphysically handicapped people, and(c) invite Councillor Plecas to the next committee meeting.7. ADMINISTRATION AND FINANCECouncillor Stevens assumed the Chair.RC10/011JAN. 04/10Administration and Finance Committee Meeting RecommendationsMoved by Councillor Scudder, andRECOMMENDED: That the minutes of the administration and finance committeemeeting held on December 10, 2009 be adopted.CARRIEDRC10/012JAN. 04/10Administration and Finance Committee Meeting. Recommendations(Administrative Fees and Charges Bylaw 4029-2007)Moved by Councillor Horn, andRECOMMENDED:1. That the amendment to the administrative fees and charges bylaw 4029-2007to incorporate the new criminal record checks fee amendments be approved;2. That staff provide feedback from organizations regarding this fee increase tocouncil next year;3. That recommendation AF 09/35 of the minutes of the administration andfinance (budget) committee meeting held on December 17, 2009 be amendedto read:"That council support including in the public presentation document, theproposal of having the leisure centre closed during the Canada Day statutoryholiday."4. That the recommendations (AF 09/29 — AF 09/41) contained within the minutesof the administration and finance (budget) committee meeting held onDecember 17, 2009 be adopted as amended.CARRIEDRC10/013JAN. 04/10Proposed Write-off of Property Taxes, Utilities, Penalties and InterestMoved by Councillor Stewart, and

188Regular Council Meeting Page 10 of 12January 4, 2010RECOMMENDED: That consideration of the proposed write-off of property taxes,utilities, penalties and interest be deferred.CARRIEDRC10/014JAN. 04/10Grant Request — Mission Arts CouncilMoved by Councillor Horn, andRECOMMENDED: That consideration of the request from the Mission Arts Councilfor an exemption • from utility fees for 2010 be referred to the administration andfinance committee budget meeting on January 7, 2010.CARRIEDRC10/015JAN. 04/10Municipal. Grants in Aid Policy FIN.19Moved by Councillor Horn, andRECOMMENDED: That council policy FIN.19 Grants — Municipal Grants in Aid beamended as follows:(a)' by changing item 1 of the Applications section to read: "the adoptedconstitution of an unincorporated group, or, in the case of a body corporate, acopy of its incorporation documents setting forth its objectives and goals ONLYif applying for the first time OR if the constitution has been amended"; and(b) by adding item 9 to the Applications section as follows: "a current list ofBoard members and number of full and part time employees;"CARRIEDRC10/016JAN. 04/10City of BurnabyRe: Correspondence to the Solicitor General concerning the PoliceRecords Information Management Environment (PRIME)Moved by Councillor Horn, andRECOMMENDED:1. That the letter from the City of Burnaby dated November 23, 2009 regardingthe Police Records Information Management Environment (PRIME) costs bereceived as information; and2. That the PRIME costs be added as a separate line item in the budget forfurther discussion at the administration and finance committee budget meetingon January 7, 2010.CARRIED8. RESOLUTION TO RISE AND REPORTMayor Atebe resumed the Chair.

189Regular Council Meeting Page 11 of 12January 4, 2010RC10/017JAN. 04/10Moved by Councillor Stevens, seconded by Councillor Scudder, andRESOLVED: That the committee of the whole now rise and report.CARRIED9. ADOPTION OF COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE REPORTRC10/018JAN. 04/10Moved by Councillor Stevens, seconded by Councillor Plecas, andRESOLVED: That the recommendations of the committee of the whole, ascontained in items RC10/005 to RC10/017, be adopted.CARRIED10. BYLAWSRC10/019JAN. 04/10Moved by Councillor Stevens, seconded by Councillor Scudder, andRESOLVED: That the readings of all bylaws included in the Bylaws section of theJanuary 4, 2010 regular council agenda be approved as listed:(a)District of Mission Highway Closing and Undedication Adoption(Highway 11 Eastern Bypass) Bylaw 4094-2008(b) District of Mission Zoning Amending Bylaw 5105-2009- First and Second5050(2) (R09-012 — District of Mission) — a bylaw to add Readingsclarity and update the recently adopted Zoning Bylaw(c) District of Mission Council Procedures Amending Bylaw First, Second and5108-2009-3694(10) — a bylaw to clarify the procedure for Third Readingsadopting bylaws(d) District of Mission User Fees and Charges Amending Bylaw First, Second and5110-2009-4029(1) — a bylaw to add an administrative user Third ReadingsfeeCARRIED11. MINUTESRC10/020JAN. 04/10Moved by Councillor Scudder, seconded by Councillor Stevens, andRESOLVED: That the minutes of the regular meetings of councilDecember 7, 2009 and December 14, 2009 be adopted.CARRIEDheld on12. OTHER BUSINESSThere was no other business.

190Regular Council Meeting Page 12 of 12January 4, 201013. CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER'S REPORTThe chief administrative officer did not report.14. MAYOR'S REPORTThe mayor reported on various activities, meetings and events attended since thelast regular council meeting.15. COUNCILLOR'S REPORTS ON COMMITTEES, BOARDS AND ACTIVITIESCouncillors Plecas, Horn, Stewart, Scudder and Stevens reported on variousactivities, meetings and events attended since the last regular council meeting.16. QUESTION PERIODCouncil and staff responded to questions and comments from the following people:Jim Hinds, Mission, asked why the Mission Community Heritage Commission termsof reference stated that decisions for the commission will be made by consensus.Mayor Atebe responded that the example is based on regular council procedures,which is to try for consensus first, and if that does not work to go to a majority vote.Councillor Scudder clarified that as the commission is a committee of council, thesame consensus procedure is used as the model, with a majority vote used as aback-up.17. ADJOURNMENTMoved by Councillor Plecas, seconded by Councillor Scudder, andRESOLVED: That the meeting be adjourned.CARRIEDThe meeting was adjourned at 7:36 p.m.JAMES ATEBE, MAYOR DENNIS CLARK, DIRECTOR OFCORPORATE ADMINISTRATIONG:\clerk\minutes\rc100104.doc