Government<strong>and</strong> workforceEmeritus Professor Garry Phillips AMThe Government of Australia has beentracking the <strong>College</strong>s for many years,<strong>and</strong> first began publishing data providedby them, <strong>and</strong> obtained from othersources in 1996, when the first MedicalTraining Review Panel (MTRP) reportwas published 1 , along with the firstpublication by the <strong>Australian</strong> MedicalWorkforce Advisory Committee (AMWAC)on supply, requirements <strong>and</strong> projectionsof the Anaesthetic Workforce in Australiacogently revised in 2001 2 .Since 2005, when the ProductivityCommission’s Research Report onAustralia’s Health Workforce hit thestreets 3 , the Council of <strong>Australian</strong>Governments (COAG) agreed to eight of itsrecommendations, modified eleven, <strong>and</strong>did not support two. As a result, AMWACwas abolished, <strong>and</strong> there has been a hiatusin reliable medical workforce data untilsome was included in the National HealthWorkforce Taskforce (NHWT) report byKPMG in April, <strong>2009</strong> 4 .In a section entitled “EmergingStrategies”, a brief <strong>and</strong> variable qualitysummary is made of trends in the UK,Canada <strong>and</strong> the USA with regard to“physician assistants”, but it ignoresthe extent to which anaesthetists <strong>and</strong>intensivists have worked for decadeswith nursing teams in Australia in areaslike pre-anaesthesia clinics, duringanaesthesia, in the recovery room<strong>and</strong> in intensive care units.A research paper published in March2008 from the Social Policy section of the<strong>Australian</strong> Department of ParliamentaryServices 5 repeats much of the informationconsidered by, but interpreted quitedifferently, in a well-researched paperpublished by Thompson, Phillips <strong>and</strong>Cousins in 2007 6 . It is of more thanpassing interest that while the role of“nurse anaesthetists” in several countrieswas explored by the Royal <strong>College</strong> ofAnaesthetists <strong>and</strong> the NHS in 2002, witha view to adoption in the UK of “nurseassistants”, this had not progressed farby 2008 7-8 .One reason given for recommendingcontinuation of training of nurse assistantsin the UK is said to be “in the context ofdecreasing trainee numbers, hours ofwork <strong>and</strong> a higher expectation oftraining quality”.While nurses are in short supply inAustralia, <strong>and</strong> likely to remain so fora long time, an ambitious program forexpansion of medical student numbers in<strong>Australian</strong> medical schools is already inplace. Commencing medical students areprojected to reach 3074 by 2010 (from 1470in 2002). This is a much higher percentagethan the increase in commencing nursingstudents in the same period (from 8042 to13,895). The flow-on effect of increasedmedical graduates to vocational trainingwill result in a large increase in medicalspecialist anaesthetists.In addition, anaesthesia in Australiais attracting increasing numbers ofInternational Medical Graduate Specialists(IMGS). A paper published by the NHWTin September, 2008 sees no definite end tothe need for IMGS 9 . Since 2002, the numberof IMGS who have been accepted into theprocess agreed by the <strong>Australian</strong> MedicalCouncil (AMC)/medical boards/councils<strong>and</strong> the medical colleges <strong>and</strong> have eitherachieved Fellowship of the <strong>Australian</strong><strong>and</strong> <strong>New</strong> Zeal<strong>and</strong> <strong>College</strong> of Anaesthetists24The <strong>ANZCA</strong> <strong>Bulletin</strong> <strong>June</strong> <strong>2009</strong>
“Commencing medical students are projectedto reach 3074 by 2010 (from 1470 in 2002). Thisis a much higher percentage than the increasein commencing nursing students in the sameperiod (from 8042 to 13,895). The flow-on effectof increased medical graduates to vocationaltraining will result in a large increase in medicalspecialist anaesthetists.”(F<strong>ANZCA</strong>) or are well on the way to doingso, has been increasing. For the pastfew years, F<strong>ANZCA</strong>s by this route haveaveraged between 22 <strong>and</strong> 25 per annum.But the rules are changing again –MTRP is re-inventing itself, <strong>and</strong> we nowhave the NHWT, the Health WorkforcePrincipal Committee (HWPC), <strong>and</strong> a recentdiscussion paper raises important issuesabout clinical placement, governance <strong>and</strong>organization for all health professionals 10 .Source material included in this paper istaken from the Clinical Training Agency in<strong>New</strong> Zeal<strong>and</strong>, <strong>and</strong> from the UK NHS NextStage Review “A High Quality Workforce”.As would be expected, the clinical trainingdiscussion paper concentrates on theincreased numbers of health professionalsabout to enter the pre-vocational trainingworkforce, <strong>and</strong> does not yet address theissue of specialist training, althoughputative models are canvassed.Returning to <strong>ANZCA</strong>, after the<strong>Australian</strong> Competition <strong>and</strong> ConsumerCommission (ACCC) completed its review ofthe Royal Australasian <strong>College</strong> of Surgeons(RACS), the ACCC <strong>and</strong> the <strong>Australian</strong> HealthWorkforce Officials Committee (AHWOC)reviewed the specialist medical <strong>College</strong>s,<strong>and</strong> published their report in 2005 11 . <strong>ANZCA</strong>has done well in complying with allrequirements, <strong>and</strong> has also participatedin the program recommended by theEnhanced Medical Education AdvisoryCommittee 12 , supporting more applicationsfor training in the private sector than wereeventually funded by the government.With the projected increase in traineenumbers in a very few years time, it seemshighly unlikely that “training in private”will provide an adequate solution, <strong>and</strong>increases in funding for trainees in publichospitals, <strong>and</strong> increases in specialistnumbers to supervise <strong>and</strong> teach them willbe required.From <strong>ANZCA</strong>’s perspective, all of theabove movements, combined with nationalregistration <strong>and</strong> national accreditationfrom 2010 will require serious planning toensure that there are enough anaesthetiststo keep providing the high quality patientcare the community will continue toexpect. It seems likely that the increasingnumber of Fellows in Australia, both bytraining <strong>and</strong> examinations, <strong>and</strong> via theIMGS pathways, <strong>and</strong> the program of theJoint Consultative Committee of <strong>ANZCA</strong>,the Royal <strong>Australian</strong> <strong>College</strong> of GeneralPractitioners <strong>and</strong> the <strong>Australian</strong> <strong>College</strong> ofRural <strong>and</strong> Remote Medicine (the latter notavailable in the UK) ably assisted by nursesin their traditional, <strong>and</strong> perhaps exp<strong>and</strong>edroles, will avoid the need for radicalrestructuring of the anaesthesiaworkforce here.It is be hoped that when reviewed inanother year or so, it will be seen thatgovernment <strong>and</strong> its new agencies havesupported the <strong>College</strong>s, which producemedical specialists of high quality, a solidplank in our health system.Emeritus Professor Garry Phillips AMFormer <strong>ANZCA</strong> PresidentReferences1. Medical Training Review Panel EleventhReport, <strong>Australian</strong> Government Canberra 2007.2. <strong>Australian</strong> Medical Workforce AdvisoryCommittee, The Specialist AnaesthesiaWorkforce in Australia. Supply <strong>and</strong>requirements, 2000 – 2011 Sydney 2001.3. Productivity Commission, Australia’s HealthWorkforce. Canberra 2005.4. KPMG, National Health Workforce Taskforce,Health Workforce in Australia <strong>and</strong> Factors forCurrent Shortages. <strong>2009</strong>.5. Jolly R, Health Workforce: a case for physicianassistants? Research Paper 24, Social PolicySection, Parliamentary Library Canberra 2008.6. Thompson WR, Phillips G, Cousins MJ,Anaesthesia underpins acute patient care inhospitals. <strong>Australian</strong> Health Review 31 (Suppl1) 116 – 121.7. Grayling M, Thomas P, Lillie HJ, WilkinsonD, Physicians’ assistants (anaesthesia) –the Exeter experience. Royal <strong>College</strong> ofAnaesthetists’ <strong>Bulletin</strong> July 2008: 2570 – 2573.8. Association of Anaesthetists of GreatBritain <strong>and</strong> Irel<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> the Royal <strong>College</strong> ofAnaesthetists, Joint Statement on physicians’assistants (Anaesthesia) – supervision <strong>and</strong>limitation of scope of practice. www.aagbi.org9. Carver P, National Health WorkforceTaskforce, self sufficiency <strong>and</strong> InternationalMedical Graduates – Australia,Melbourne 2008.10. National Health Workforce Taskforce,Health Education <strong>and</strong> Training, clinicalplacements across Australia: capturing data<strong>and</strong> underst<strong>and</strong>ing dem<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> capacity,Melbourne 2008.11. <strong>Australian</strong> Competition <strong>and</strong> ConsumerCommission <strong>and</strong> <strong>Australian</strong> HealthWorkplace Officials’ Committee, Reviewof <strong>Australian</strong> Specialist Medical <strong>College</strong>s,Canberra 2005.12. Department of Health <strong>and</strong> Ageing, Exp<strong>and</strong>edSettings for Medical Specialist Training,<strong>Australian</strong> Government Canberra 2006.The <strong>ANZCA</strong> <strong>Bulletin</strong> <strong>June</strong> <strong>2009</strong> 25