fe<strong>at</strong>ureA Voice <strong>is</strong> A TerribleThing to WasteSUBMITTED ANONYMOUSLYBy now a substantial number of Allst<strong>at</strong>eagents have heard or read aboutthe petition requesting a presidential and/or IRS inquiry into Allst<strong>at</strong>e’s tax st<strong>at</strong>usregarding its use of employees versus independentcontractors. Were it not for theefforts of NAPAA educ<strong>at</strong>ing us about thealtern<strong>at</strong>ives to the st<strong>at</strong>us quo, most agentswould suffer in silence. Because our officesare without an agent-initi<strong>at</strong>ed inform<strong>at</strong>ionnetwork, we rely on NAPAA’sweekly members-only communiqués andits quarterly magazine to provide accessto inform<strong>at</strong>ion otherw<strong>is</strong>e not readilyavailable to Allst<strong>at</strong>e agents. While themagazine <strong>is</strong> focused on supporting agentsin their daily business oper<strong>at</strong>ions, it <strong>is</strong>NAPAA’s coverage of the “employee classific<strong>at</strong>ion”<strong>is</strong>sue th<strong>at</strong> has domin<strong>at</strong>ed ourworld as of l<strong>at</strong>e. Most agents see th<strong>is</strong> <strong>is</strong>sueas out of their direct control, and as such,are tempted to rely solely on NAPAA fordirection and or on them, for action. Th<strong>is</strong>would be a m<strong>is</strong>take.The fall 2009 Exclusivefocus magazinerepresents one of the most dram<strong>at</strong>icexamples of agent involvement coupledwith the prowess of NAPAA. Emblazonedwith the title “A Call to Arms,” themagazine cover previewed probably themost striking and intense article aboutwh<strong>at</strong> has become the cornerstone <strong>is</strong>suefor every U.S. Allst<strong>at</strong>e agent — the m<strong>is</strong>classific<strong>at</strong>ionof employee st<strong>at</strong>us. No longerable to remain sidelined, many agentsfinally feel they have an avenue for directinvolvement. But, as important as it wasto mail in the petitions, the job <strong>at</strong> hand <strong>is</strong>far from fin<strong>is</strong>hed. There must be ongoingefforts to solidify the process.To particip<strong>at</strong>e ornot to particip<strong>at</strong>eIt <strong>is</strong> now several months since theAgency Rel<strong>at</strong>ionship Survey and doubtlessmany agents declined to particip<strong>at</strong>eout of fear of retribution or because theyfelt it was a futile effort. However, manydid particip<strong>at</strong>e and Allst<strong>at</strong>e corpor<strong>at</strong>e willsoon tell us th<strong>is</strong> year’s results. If you responded,then good for you. Contrary tothe notion th<strong>at</strong> taking the survey <strong>is</strong> a wasteof time, I believe each of our opinionsm<strong>at</strong>ter. I am a 20+ year agent and havetaken the survey <strong>at</strong> least ten times andhave never been singled out or otherw<strong>is</strong>eidentified in spite of my extreme critic<strong>is</strong>mof Allst<strong>at</strong>e. Cowering in a corner in fearof retribution or blowing off the surveybecause you think it doesn’t m<strong>at</strong>ter, arewasted opportunities. Not speaking outonly serves to valid<strong>at</strong>e the company’s illconceivedagenda. To be sure, had everyagent particip<strong>at</strong>ed in the 2008 survey, onecan only imagine how much different theresults would have been. We need to makea gre<strong>at</strong>er effort to get our fellow agents toparticip<strong>at</strong>e in the next survey – only thenwill the company realize how concernedwe are with the st<strong>at</strong>us quo.When NAPAA publ<strong>is</strong>hed “Deliber<strong>at</strong>elyM<strong>is</strong>classified?” and included themail away postcard to the IRS, manyagents took the time and mailed the card.As the author of th<strong>at</strong> article, I investedover a year in research and many monthsmore of personal time to construct theelements of the article and piece themtogether. I did th<strong>is</strong> with gre<strong>at</strong> sacrificeto my personal life so my fellow agentscould clearly grasp the depth and importanceof the m<strong>is</strong>classific<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>is</strong>sue. Afterthe article was publ<strong>is</strong>hed, I was emotionallytaken aback by the groundswell ofsupport th<strong>at</strong> ensued. I am confident th<strong>at</strong>thousands of postcards found their wayto John Tuzynski’s desk <strong>at</strong> the IRS. Don’tdoubt for a moment th<strong>at</strong> these small<strong>is</strong>hpieces of card stock had a huge impact.When “A Call to Arms” was written,the author made a st<strong>at</strong>ement about being<strong>at</strong> a crossroads in h<strong>is</strong>/her career. No truerst<strong>at</strong>ement could ever be written abouteach and every one of us. We must facethe fact th<strong>at</strong> Allst<strong>at</strong>e has chosen a newp<strong>at</strong>h for us; exclusive of our w<strong>is</strong>hes. Wecan either remain silent or we can speakout. We can stay complacent or we canact. Th<strong>is</strong> crossroads th<strong>at</strong> each of us faces<strong>is</strong> not one of our own making, but the actionwe take next <strong>is</strong> totally up to us.D<strong>is</strong>cussing even the most serious of <strong>is</strong>suescan begin with a wh<strong>is</strong>per. And whenenough voices wh<strong>is</strong>per together, the volumecan be deafening. “A Call to Arms”requested each of us take a minute of ourtime and $.88 of our capital and mail away20 — Exclusivefocus Winter 2009/2010
the petitions to the IRS and to <strong>President</strong>Obama. With almost no effort or investment,each of us can turn up the volumeby anonymously requesting a review ofthe p<strong>at</strong>h Allst<strong>at</strong>e has consciously chosento take regarding our employment st<strong>at</strong>us.Th<strong>is</strong> <strong>is</strong>sue <strong>is</strong> so critical th<strong>at</strong> it <strong>is</strong> paramountwe not stop there. Now <strong>is</strong> the time for moredec<strong>is</strong>ive action. Th<strong>is</strong> can be monetary, likea NAPAA membership; the small annualdues should never d<strong>is</strong>courage anyone frombeing a member. The benefits of NAPAA’sconsiderable efforts, in my estim<strong>at</strong>ion, arepriceless. Each agent who knows of a nonmembershould make <strong>at</strong> least one phonecall to recruit th<strong>at</strong> agent. Another examplewould be organizing agent groups for a d<strong>is</strong>trict-typemeeting. If geography limits thepossibility for face-to-face meetings, pick upthe phone. If you have progressed into thetech-savvy wave of communic<strong>at</strong>ions, thenemail, text, or tweet.The time to sit on the sidelines <strong>is</strong> behindus. As Allst<strong>at</strong>e ramps up its newIdeal Agency model of the future, manyof us are about to be sent to the sidelinesprem<strong>at</strong>urely. With the complexity of theRFG and the imposition of new quotasfor ALI and EB, Allst<strong>at</strong>e has instituted amassive employee infrastructure th<strong>at</strong> hasbeen designed to cull the agent ranks byhalf our current size and simultaneouslyconf<strong>is</strong>c<strong>at</strong>e our books of business. Even ifthe timeline <strong>is</strong> close to the Allst<strong>at</strong>e suggested3 to 6 years, none of us will beable to market our books to prospectivebuyers between now and then. There willsimply be too many agents being termin<strong>at</strong>edand too few buyers.Note to Allst<strong>at</strong>e: Email meThe next time your manager emailsyou, take a moment and print it out andsave it in a separ<strong>at</strong>e file marked “EmployeeEmails.” Too often we open these mini<strong>at</strong>urem<strong>is</strong>sives and without so much as a glance,send it off to the recycle bin. Almost as often,these documents contain elements ofcommunic<strong>at</strong>ion th<strong>at</strong> clearly belong in the“employee” column. I especially like those“urging” us to do something, or th<strong>at</strong> st<strong>at</strong>eth<strong>at</strong> failing to make your AFS ExpectedResults <strong>is</strong> “unacceptable.”Any such email should be printed andsaved in a file folder marked “IRS/Allst<strong>at</strong>e”or saved on a CD, memory stick orstored via some other electronic storagemeans. There <strong>is</strong> a high probability th<strong>at</strong>your MDL or other manager will emailyou a document requesting your <strong>at</strong>tendance<strong>at</strong> a mand<strong>at</strong>ory meeting, or highlightingyour territory’s “sales team” EBauto or EB leaders. Some of us may beunlucky enough to receive an email decryingour year to d<strong>at</strong>e AFS and RFGperformance. These kinds of emails aregood because they imply consequencesfor failure to meet corpor<strong>at</strong>ely imposedquotas (employee controls) and bad becauseno one wants to get one. When indoubt, regardless of content, print andsafely file away all emails. No one wantsto have to sue, but it <strong>is</strong> much easier topresent a jury with scores of printeddocuments than it <strong>is</strong> to claim th<strong>at</strong> you“received lots of offending emails.”Letters to Congress and SS-8sMore than two years ago, I begansending multiple letters to many congressmenand sen<strong>at</strong>ors requesting aninvestig<strong>at</strong>ion into Allst<strong>at</strong>e’s m<strong>is</strong>classific<strong>at</strong>ionof its agent sales force. Onerecipient was United St<strong>at</strong>es Sen<strong>at</strong>orRichard Durbin. Sen. Durbin <strong>is</strong> Chairmanof the Subcommittee on FinancialServices and General Government. InAugust 2009, after a yearlong investig<strong>at</strong>ion,the United St<strong>at</strong>es GovernmentAccountability Office (GAO) <strong>is</strong>sued a69-page report on Employee M<strong>is</strong>classific<strong>at</strong>ion(GAO-09-717). Sen. Durbin,with others, requested th<strong>is</strong> report.Whether my letters were significant toMr. Durbin I may never know. I can sayth<strong>at</strong> the amount of <strong>at</strong>tention given toth<strong>is</strong> subject by multiple agencies <strong>is</strong> impressive.The GAO document <strong>is</strong> lengthybut I encourage every agent to read it.Whether you have faith in governmentor not, understand there are thoughtful,intelligent and concerned people whobelieve in holding accountable thosewho would flaunt the law.One noteworthy response to the GAOreport <strong>is</strong> from the Department of Treasury.Deputy Comm<strong>is</strong>sioner Linda E. Stiffwrites: “We recognize th<strong>at</strong> when employersimproperly classify workers as independentcontractors instead of employees,these workers do not receive protectionsand benefits to which they are entitled,and employers may fail to pay taxes theywould otherw<strong>is</strong>e be required to pay.”When you combine the efforts by theGAO, the IRS, individual sen<strong>at</strong>ors andcongressmen, and st<strong>at</strong>e <strong>at</strong>torneys generalyou can begin to see th<strong>at</strong> the moreour wh<strong>is</strong>pers are heard the more theybegin to sound like shouts. If you are <strong>at</strong>a loss for the proper wording or form<strong>at</strong>for your letter or email, Jim F<strong>is</strong>h fromNAPAA can provide examples for you touse. Don’t assume other agents will takeaction; instead, proceed as though yourcareer depended on it – because it does.The SS-8 filing <strong>is</strong> an important step inth<strong>is</strong> process of awareness, too. Althoughthe IRS could make an individual rulingon each filing, it <strong>is</strong> more likely th<strong>at</strong> a rulingbased on the cumul<strong>at</strong>ive effect will bethe desired outcome. Wh<strong>at</strong> the SS-8 willdo, <strong>is</strong> provide the IRS with inform<strong>at</strong>ionth<strong>at</strong> previously has been unavailable. Thedesired outcome will be a targeted auditof Allst<strong>at</strong>e and its premedit<strong>at</strong>ed noncomplianceof the Priv<strong>at</strong>e Letter Rulingit was granted in 1989 by the IRS.P<strong>at</strong>ience, Pers<strong>is</strong>tence, Repe<strong>at</strong>In our world of instant gr<strong>at</strong>ific<strong>at</strong>ion, weoften forget th<strong>at</strong> our best rewards are oftenrealized after the swe<strong>at</strong> has dried fromour brows. No one ever said success comeseasily or quickly. Th<strong>is</strong> process many of youare reading about for the first time hasbeen in the works for over two years. It <strong>is</strong>through the dedic<strong>at</strong>ed, p<strong>at</strong>ient actions ofNAPAA and a few others th<strong>at</strong> we are justnow beginning to see results. But now <strong>is</strong>not the time to relax, if anything we muststomp on the acceler<strong>at</strong>or.“A Call to Arms” <strong>is</strong> the rallying cry forthe actions we must take next. The articleand petitions are not the finale. Eachagent must contribute something. Dustoff your copies of Exclusivefocus. If thereare postcards or petitions th<strong>at</strong> haven’tbeen mailed, tear them out and sendthem in. If you are unsure wh<strong>at</strong> to do,reread th<strong>is</strong> article and those from past <strong>is</strong>suesof Exclusivefocus, such as “A Call toArms” and “Deliber<strong>at</strong>ely M<strong>is</strong>classified?”Each contains suggestions or outrightdirections for how you can proceed. Andonce you have done <strong>at</strong> least one thing,go to the next. Don’t stop and I prom<strong>is</strong>eyour voice will be heard.Winter 2009/2010 Exclusivefocus — 21