Why would more than 2.3 millionpeople work in the insurance industry?According to The Insurance Inform<strong>at</strong>ionInstitute (iii) 2.3 million peoplewere employed in the insurance industryin 2008. Of those, 1.4 million worked forinsurance companies, including life, health,and medical insurers (804,200 workers),property and casualty insurers (569,200workers) and reinsurers (28,400 workers).The remaining 907,000 worked for insuranceagencies, brokers, and other insurancerel<strong>at</strong>ed enterpr<strong>is</strong>es. [1] Michael E. Porter ofHarvard Business School developed theFive Forces Model as a industry analys<strong>is</strong>and business str<strong>at</strong>egy tool to analyzethe factors with the potential to affect anindustry’s profitability and therefore the <strong>at</strong>tractivenessof an industry or market.Understanding the industry environmentand its competitors are critical to the futureprofitability and success of an industry orfirm. Porter’s Five Forces of CompetitionModel include: the thre<strong>at</strong> of new entrants,rivalry among competing firms, thre<strong>at</strong> ofsubstitute products, bargaining power ofsuppliers, and bargaining power of buyers.Through proper analys<strong>is</strong> of these forces,one may be able to utilize and buffer theforces to your benefit in order to increasethe likelihood of above-average returns andthe ability for future success.The thre<strong>at</strong> of new entrants <strong>is</strong> obvious inthe growing number of agencies throughoutthe U.S. Between 1998 and 2006, thenumber of insurance agencies and brokeragesgrew by more than 9,000 from113,112 to 122,138 firms respectively. [2]The increasing number of competitorsthre<strong>at</strong>ens the market share of ex<strong>is</strong>ting firmsand may result in lower revenue and overallreturns if str<strong>at</strong>egies are not changed. Notonly are the number of competitors increasing,the type of competitors are alsochanging. We now not only see the impactof Internet sales affecting ex<strong>is</strong>tinginsurance agents, but the type of competingfirms <strong>is</strong> also increasing. These includebanks, mortgage and real est<strong>at</strong>e companies,fe<strong>at</strong>ureWhy Insurance?associ<strong>at</strong>ions (AARP, NRA), and non-insurancerel<strong>at</strong>ed markets such as Sam’s Cluband Home Depot who are utilizing theirmarket presence as a means to enter the insurancemarketplace. In order to counteractthese opposing forces and maintain growthand profitability, ex<strong>is</strong>ting firms must evalu<strong>at</strong>etheir marketing str<strong>at</strong>egies and focus ontheir core competencies to become moreeffective and efficient.The intense rivalry among competitorshas the potential to reduce profitabilitythroughout the industry as well. Withthe high number of firms competing forthe same client base, successful agenciesmust be able to differenti<strong>at</strong>e themselves,not only on price but with services provided.Th<strong>is</strong> might include ramping upefforts to deliver first-r<strong>at</strong>e service toagency clients by imparting the knowledgenecessary for them to make w<strong>is</strong>eand proper coverage choices.In addition, providing clients with allof their insurance needs gre<strong>at</strong>ly increaseslong-term retention. Successful agencieshave h<strong>is</strong>torically provided more than asimple commodity to their clients – theyalso provide value, which increases loyaltyand retention. These value-added servicesincrease the “switching costs” associ<strong>at</strong>edwith moving to another agent or company,making it more difficult to move.Insurance agencies must be able to differenti<strong>at</strong>ethe products and services they sellfrom those provided by their competitorsto cre<strong>at</strong>e value. Doing so instills confidencein the minds of their clients whichhelps cement lasting rel<strong>at</strong>ionships.The ex<strong>is</strong>tence of substitute productsthre<strong>at</strong>ens an agency’s ex<strong>is</strong>ting client baseby increasing the likelihood a client mayswitch. In 2008 there were 2,741 propertyand casualty companies and 1,128life and health insurance companies inthe United St<strong>at</strong>es, [1] each offering similarproducts and services. Insurance agentsmust become ‘insurance adv<strong>is</strong>ors’ to educ<strong>at</strong>etheir clients and cre<strong>at</strong>e a new level ofproduct differenti<strong>at</strong>ion – in other words,be able to demonstr<strong>at</strong>e wh<strong>at</strong> makes yourproducts and service special. Indeed,there <strong>is</strong> a whole range of talking pointsagents can use to make their case. Theseinclude price, coverage quality, claimsservice and additional coverage options.And perhaps even more importantly,56 — Exclusivefocus Winter 2009/2010
agents should seek ways to instill a senseof trust and peace of mind in the mindsof their prospects and clients. By cre<strong>at</strong>inga perceived level of product differenti<strong>at</strong>ionand increasing the “switching costs,”agents can hedge against the thre<strong>at</strong>s ofsubstitute products.The “Bargaining Power of Suppliers”<strong>is</strong> the power held by the insurancecompanies. Insurance agents have littlepower over product offerings, premiumscharged, or the level of service providedduring claims. The insurance companiesdict<strong>at</strong>e the levels of comm<strong>is</strong>sions, bonusesand contingencies th<strong>at</strong> agents areable to earn. Changes within the industryover the past several years have limitedcompens<strong>at</strong>ion levels and the abilityto earn additional bonuses, most notablydue to Eliot Spitzer’s campaign for insurancereform in 2004.The insurance industry <strong>is</strong> also seeingan increase in vertical integr<strong>at</strong>ion whereininsurance companies are entering themarketplace as direct competitors, shunningthe use of agencies by utilizing Internetbased d<strong>is</strong>tribution methods. In 2008,more than 15% of all auto insurance transactionswere sold online through directmarkets. [3] With online sales and marketingnot showing any signs of decreasing,ex<strong>is</strong>ting traditional agencies must adoptsimilar plans and offer their clients comparableservices while continuing to providesuperior service, value and, most importantly,knowledge.Clients want to receive the best possibleproduct <strong>at</strong> the lowest price. While individualsmay not pose a direct “BargainingPower of Buyers,” groups and large corpor<strong>at</strong>eclients can. In order to maximizeprofitability, firms must reduce their costswhile providing higher levels of service,better quality policies and lower prices.The power of buyers <strong>is</strong> evident within theinsurance industry as evidenced by thecompetition among insurance companiesand agents b<strong>at</strong>tling for market share.According to Porter, an <strong>at</strong>tractive industryhas high entry barriers, suppliersand buyers with little power, few productsubstitutes, and moder<strong>at</strong>e competitiverivalry. Since the insurance industryhas little to none of these <strong>at</strong>tractiveforces, are 2.3 million American workersin the wrong industry? Considering theinsurance industry’s net written premiumstotaled $1.1 trillion in 2008 andaccounted for 2.4% of the U.S. gross domesticproduct in 2007 (2008 d<strong>at</strong>a notavailable), [1] the insurance industry <strong>is</strong>more than thriving. While competitionwill continue to increase among insuranceagencies and brokerages, it <strong>is</strong> stillpossible for them to increase their longtermprofitability and overall returns byrecognizing and understanding the positions,intentions, and performance oftheir competitors.Sources:1. Insurance Industry <strong>at</strong> a Glance.Insurance Inform<strong>at</strong>ion Institute (iii)..2. St<strong>at</strong><strong>is</strong>tics of U.S. Business: 2005.U.S. Census Bureau. 3. Vollman, Andrea .2009 Online AutoInsurance Report. 04-28-2009. 4. Hosk<strong>is</strong>son, Robert E., Michael A.Hitt, R. Duane Ireland, and Jeffrey S.Harr<strong>is</strong>on. Competing For Advantage.2ND ed. Ohio: South-Western, 2008Article submitted by The Woodlands FinancialGroup, The Woodlands, TX. Phone(877)-466-1115.Winter 2009/2010 Exclusivefocus — 57