Page 1.indd - Wingspan

More documents

Recommendations

Info

12WingspanThe Wyomingegislatureassed a billo help raiseccountablitytandards andest scoresn the schoolsf Wyoming.By SusannRobbinsNews EditorThou shall notovertest buttest for theight elements at theight time.Education acountabilitylegislaionpassed by the 61 styoming Legislatureoes not necessarilyean more—but beter—testingwill takelace on Wyoming-12 students to enurethey are on tracko reach their educaionalgoals and havehe help and supporto get there.“Education acountabilitywill forces, legislators andducators, to lookn the mirror andake sure that we areoing everything wean to educate ourids right,” Sen. Billanden, R-Natrona,aid.Wyoming Senateile 57 “Educationccountability” ishase I of the effort toake school districts,chools, superintenents,principals,eachers, studentsnd parents more acountablefor the kindf education childrenn Wyoming receive.he governor signedhe bill on March 21.The basic idea forhis act originated inhe federal No Childeft Behind Act of001 (Public Law07-110, George W.ush administration)and Wyoming SenateFile 70 “EducationAccountability” of2011 (stepping stoneof this year’s bill).“Wyoming fundsits schools systembetter than any otherstate in the Union,”Landen said.Rep. Mike Madden,R-Johnson/Sheridan,added, therefore,some question whythere is such a bigdifference in performancefrom nationallyranked schools toso below substandardthat students canhardly read and writewhen they leave highschool. The EducationAccountability billof 2012 is designedto hold all 48 schooldistricts accountablefor the performanceof their students,Madden said.Beginning insummer 2011 for sixstraight months withmeetings twice amonth, the WyomingJoint EducationInterim Committee,the WyomingDepartment ofEducation and membersof the communitycrafted the bill.Everyone involvedworked on:• establishing moreframeworks forthe accountabilitysystem;• determining whento test and how totest;• deciding howsuperintendents,principals andteachers will beevaluated;• deciding how theindividual performanceof studentswill be measured.Many of thesequestions have beenanswered in detailsin this year’s bill, andothers will be answeredin bills in theyears to come.Most of the pointsin this year’s billhave been a result61stof the “WyomingEducationalAccountability: PhaseI Report” by ScottMarion, Ph.D., andChris Domaleski,Ph.D., Center forAssessment, ofJanuary 2012 (availableto view on theWyoming legislativewebsite).One big point ofthis year’s bill madeclear when to teststudents and how totest across the state ina uniformed way.Some legislatorshave concerns rightnow about someweaknesses of the bill.Madden pointed out alot of testing is takingplace every year, andthis year alone thestate will pay about$8 million for studenttesting. So, how muchtesting is too much?Also Sen. Landenasked if teacherswill have too muchpaperwork in orderto do their job efficientlyand properly.Furthermore, howgood are some of thepoints for the real-lifeclassrooms?Next year will bePhase II of EducationAccountability withthe focus on schoolsuperintendentsand principals.Rep. Madden saidthe work on nextyear’s bill will startthis summer. Afterthat legislators willmove on to expandingthe EducationAccountability Act tofocus on teachers andlater to students andparents, he added.Why a bill foraccountability onthe parents’ part?“We have a generationof parents thatspent a lot of timenot being engaged inschool,” Rep. Maddenexplained. If thatcontinues, anothergeneration of peoplewill raise a new batchof children who don’tLegislatureknow the importanceof education.Full implementationof all phases ofthe education accountabilitylegislationmay take as littleas three years and willcost an estimated $10million, Sen. HankCoe, R-Park, said.How does thispertain to communitycolleges?“You can’t solelydetermine success ina school by how manystudents achieve agiven norm level ofperformance becausethose student don’tall begin at the sameplace,” said Dr. JimRose, executive directorof the WyomingCommunity CollegeCommission (WCCC).Therefore, the billfocusing on achievementsand growth ofstudents is a step inthe right direction forthe education of theWyoming’s childrenand preparing themfor post-secondaryeducation and theworkforce.“The ultimatehope of this (bill) isthat it starts to get us(secondary and postsecondaryeducation)better connected,”Rose said. “So that‘we’ know that studentsare being evaluatedon a basis that isrelevant to what theyneed and preparesthem for post-secondaryeducation and theworkforce.”EducationAccountability Act indetail:• Ultimately legislatorshave the goalof establishingWyoming schoolsas national leadersin education;having studentsready for collegeand careers;recognizing andincreasing studentgrowth; improveleader quality andmaximizing educationalefficiency inWyoming.• Evaluating schoolsfor achievement,readiness, growth,equity and inclusionand attribution.• Having singleschoollevel performancescores;exceeding expectations,meetingexpectations, partiallymeeting expectationsand notmeeting expectations;and holdingschools accountablebased on theirscores. Schoolswho disagree withtheir score can gothrough two tiersof review to have itpossibly changed.• Improving testing;PAWS (reading andmath in grades 3-8,April 2, 2012wingspan.lccc.wy.eduEducation bill leads to stricter regulationsscience in grades4 and 8, writingin grades 3, 5 and7) and EXPLORE/ACT/COMPASS (ingrades 9-12).• Making uniformbenchmark assessmentof all schoolsfor grades 3-8 twiceannually.• Establishing of anin-depth reportingsystem and technicalsupport for allschools. This willgive schools theneeded technicalsupport to improvetheir performance,and schools withgreat performancecan sharetheir best practiceswith others.Communicationbetween schoolswill be open andaid to a unified approachof elevatingWyoming schoolperformance.
April 2, 2012wingspan.lccc.wy.edu61st LegislatureWingspan 13State redefines, expands public recordsBy Katie BlaserManaging EditorAfter a committee of state senators and representativesmet to fix a technical error in Senate File 25regarding public records at the end of the 61 st WyomingLegislature, the governor signed it on March 13.Senate File 25 was approved by the Wyoming Houseof Representatives March 2 on final reading and wasthen sent back to the Senate; however, the Senate didnot approve the bill after finding a technical error.Senate File 27, concerning public meetings, was approvedby the House on March 5 and also signed by thegovernor March 13.After numerous changes, File 25, the public recordsbill, was finally approved by the Senate in late February,then sent to the House, which also approved the bill.While the public records bill was in the Senate thefirst time, the proposed changes to the bill seemed tobe reasonable. There were two changes proposed, JimAngell, executive director of the Wyoming AssociatedPress, said. The changes were, first, to clarify the olddefinition of a public record to better identify electronicdocuments as public records.Angell said electronic documents have been mentionedin the public records statute since the 1990s,but it wasn’t necessarily clear. The second proposedchange to the bill was setting a time limit on answeringrequests.Previously, the official custodian, who is responsiblefor answering record requests, had no official time limitfor responding to a request. The change a coalition hadproposed was to set a seven-day limit to say yes or no.By Mackenzie FosterContributing WriterOne House bill has passedthe Wyoming Legislature in thefast lane and was signed by thegovernor March 9 to become alaw starting July 1.Wyoming legislators passedHouse Bill 21, which will allowtrustwhat doeslook like?drivers on two-lane highwaysto exceed the posted speedlimit, if it is at or exceeds 50mph, to pass vehicles travelingunder that speed and safelyreturn to the right-hand lane.The majority of legislatorssupported the bill, agreeingwith its sponsor Rep. Del W.Angell, representing the Wyoming Press Association,had begun working with the Wyoming Association ofMunicipalities and the Wyoming County CommissionersAssociation to discuss improvements that needed to bemade in the public record statute as far back as April2011. He said they spent a good part of the year makingdecisions on what changes should be made.Angell said many people were involved in discussionsabout the statute, including the conservation districts,the school districts, the hospitals, the university, etc.The proposed changes were decided upon by manydifferent groups expressing their concerns and ultimatelyputting their heads together to come up with reasonablechanges.It was a long and involved process, Angell said, andoverall, the three major groups were able to compromiseand pull together reasonable needs. He said its “neat” tosee agreement among three groups that seem to neveragree.“Nobody got everything they wanted, which is thenature of a compromise,” Angell said. But they were ableto agree on the points they needed to.In the early stages of the Senate, Sen. Bruce Burns,R-Sheridan, proposed two amendments to the bill thatwould “lock out” the public from important conversationsand allow restriction to public access.One amendment brought by Burns would haveexempted some documents related to public businessfrom being public and the second would have madesecret many documents that officials use in making predecisionsin the policy-making process.Angell said the public would lose much more withBurns’ language than it would gain with the compromise.McOmie, R-Fremont, but oneHouse representative andtwo senators voted againstit. Republican Rep. David L.Zwonitzer of Laramie Countyand Wyoming Peace OfficersAssociation lobbyist SamPowell found issues with itsenforceability.Despite efforts from many senators opposing theamendments, like Sen. Dan Dockstader, R-Lincoln/Sublette/Teton, who proposed two amendments thatwould return the bill to its original form, his amendmentswere rejected by the Senate Feb. 21 meeting.But, on Feb. 22, the bill left the Senate in its originalform after the Senate decided to kill the amendmentsmade by Burns.The bill was then handed over to the House, whoapproved the bill in final reading. The bill was then sentback to the Senate where it hit its one last road block: agrammatical error.Although Angell was less than thrilled with theamendments brought by Burns, he said he just had to“hold your breath and wait for the final note.”Senate File 27 changed the public meeting law toexpand the definition of a public meeting to includecommunication by email. The law says public officialscannot conduct meetings by electronic methods unlessthe public has access, too.Rep. Tom Lubnau, R-Campbell, said the amendmentdoesn’t change the law in any way; it just makes it easierto understand.It also specifies eight–hour notice for a special meetingand changes the section for violating the law from“willful” to “intentional” to tighten the penalty provisionand changes the penalty from a misdemeanor to a civilfine up to $750.The law also required public bodies to cite the part ofstate statute that allows them to go into closed executivesessions.Law accelerates legal passing speed on highwaysTwo-lane highway pileupsinspired McOmie to create thebill, he said. When one vehicleis traveling under the postedspeed limit, then multiple vehiclesbecome trapped behindthe slow one, he said. Manyof the vehicles’ drivers areconcerned if they speed to passsafely, then they will could beticketed. Eventually, one driverwill come along and speed pastthe lineup, which is not onlyagainst the law but also verydangerous, McOmie said.Safety is the main issue inMcOmie’s mind. Coming fromFremont County, McOmiedeals with a lot of gravel trucks,semitrailers and farm equipmentthat lead to traffic buildupsand safety concerns, hesaid. McOmie said more thanone representative shared anexperience of broken windshieldsfrom being trappedbehind gravel trucks.McOmie decided allowingdrivers to speed up to a maximumof 10 miles above thespeed limit would keep the flowof traffic moving safely.‣ ¾See SPEED, Page 14Trust doesn’t tell you it’s going to do something and then hand it offto someone else. You know exactly where Trust is when you need it.visit your local branch or firstinterstate.com
Page 1 and 2: W ingspanLaramie County Community C
Page 3 and 4: Windsmiths Club Garage SaleApril 14
Page 5 and 6: April 2, 2012wingspan.lccc.wy.eduBy
Page 7 and 8: April 2, 2012wingspan.lccc.wy.eduWi
Page 9 and 10: April 2, 2012wingspan.lccc.wy.eduop
Page 11: April 2, 2012wingspan.lccc.wy.edu61
Page 15 and 16: April 2, 2012aePage 15wingspan.lccc
Page 17 and 18: 18Wingspancampus newsApril 2, 2012w
Page 19 and 20: 20Wingspana&eApril 2, 2012wingspan.
Page 21 and 22: 22Wingspana&eApril 2, 2012wingspan.
Page 23 and 24: 24WingspanfeaturesApril 2, 2012wing
Page 31 and 32: 32WingspansportsApril 2, 2012wingsp
Page 33 and 34: 2 WingspanRodeoApril 2, 2012wingspa
Page 35 and 36: April 2, 2012wingspan.lccc.wy.eduRo
Page 37 and 38: April 2, 2012wingspan.lccc.wy.eduRo

Page 1.indd - Wingspan

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?