Major changes to SWCS 969kb - Wiltshire Council

ProposedChangeReferenceCS REFERENCE CHANGE SOURCEland. A retail-led mixed-use development is also planned.The city of Salisbury is identified as a Strategically Significant City or Town ("SSCT") underDevelopment Policy A of the RSS. Salisbury is the primary service, economic and culturalcentre for south Wiltshire and, in line with RSS, will remain the focal point for the majority ofnew development in south Wiltshire.Wilton Community AreaPlanned growth:Wilton Local Service Centre: 620 homes, 3 ha of employment landRest of Wilton Community Area: 950 homesWilton is the Local Service Centre for its Community Area and relates to Development PolicyB in the RSS. The proximity of Salisbury to the east means that Wilton has a functionalrelationship with its larger neighbour but retains an identity of its own. The UK Land ForcesHQ in Wilton is a strategically important regeneration site, which will deliver employment andhousing. The Community Area has two three secondary villages (equivalent to RSSDevelopment Policy C), which are Broad Chalke, and Dinton and Great Wishford, wherelimited growth will be appropriate.Amesbury Community AreaPlanned growth:Amesbury Service Centre: 1960 homesRest of Amesbury Community Area: 690 homes, 17 ha of employment landAmesbury, with support from Durrington and Bulford, is the Service Centre for the area.Although these settlements are distinct from one another, their close geographical andfunctional relationships between Amesbury, Durrington and Bulford mean that they constitutea unique group of settlements within south Wiltshire that neither conforms to the SSCTcategory nor is directly comparable with the Local Service Centres or any of the Villagecategories. Amesbury Community Area contains the majority of allocated employment land insouth Wiltshire (outside of the SSCT), including land at Solstice Park, Boscombe Down andPorton Down. Porton, Shrewton, and Tilshead are secondary villages in this community area,as well as "The Winterbournes" collectively. These settlements conform to DevelopmentPolicy C of the RSS and perform a complementary role to Amesbury, Durrington and Bulford,Minor change toSubmission Documentpreviously containedwithin SWCS 13 AMinor changes toSubmission Documentpreviously containedwithin SWCS 13 APage 2 of 70

ProposedChangeReferenceCS REFERENCE CHANGE SOURCEeach having a range a more local of services, which serve the surrounding areas.Southern Wiltshire Community AreaPlanned Growth:Downton Local Service Centre: 190 homesRest of Southern Wiltshire Community Area: 550 homesDownton is a large settlement providing a good level of services and performs the role ofLocal Service Centre for this Community Area. It provides a good source of employment withone of eight strategically important employment sites in south Wiltshire located in Downton.The secondary villages (equivalent to RSS Development Policy C) in the Southern WiltshireCommunity Area are Alderbury, Coombe Bissett, Morgan's Vale/Woodfalls, Pitton,Whiteparish and The Winterslows. These villages provide a reasonable level of local servicesand facilities where modest growth will be appropriate. The proximity of Salisbury to the northmeans that a number of settlements located in the northern part of this community area havea much stronger functional relationship with the City, which performs performing the role ofthe service centre, rather than with Downton.Minor changes toSubmission Documentpreviously containedwithin SWCS 13 AMere Community AreaPlanned Growth:Mere Local Service Centre: 270 homes, 3 ha of employment landRest of Mere Community Area: 20 homesMere is the Local Service Centre for this Community Area as it offers a range of services andfacilities and is an important centre for the outlying villages in the west of south Wiltshire. ThisCommunity Area is unique in south Wiltshire in that there are no settlements that perform asecondary village role and hence it is anticipated that the majority of growth will take place inMere over the plan period. Where exactly this growth will take place will be identified througha subsequent Site Specific Allocations DPD. The existing Local Plan employment allocation atMere of approximately 3 hectares will be implemented during the period of this Strategy.Tisbury Community AreaPlanned Growth:Tisbury Local Service Centre: 160 homes, 1.4 ha of employment landRest of Tisbury Community Area: 280Page 3 of 70

ProposedChangeReferenceCS REFERENCE CHANGE SOURCETisbury is the Local Service Centre for this Community Area and serves a wide and sparselypopulated hinterland. The existing Local Plan employment and housing allocations on HindonLane will be implemented during the period of this Strategy. Fovant, Hindon and Ludwell arethe secondary villages in this Community Area. These villages provide a reasonable level oflocal services and facilities and can accommodate reasonable levels of growth. Specific sitesthat can accommodate this growth will be identified through a subsequent Site SpecificAllocations DPD.The Council's target for housing development on previously developed land is 34% from thedate of adoption of this Core Strategy to 2026. This includes the conversion of existingbuildings.Apart from the housing numbers attached to Local Service Centres, development will befocussed on the Secondary Villages in each Community Area. In addition, infill developmentwill be permitted in the Small Villages of Barford St Martin, Bodenham, Britford, Chilmark,Figheldean/Ablington, Gomeldon, Middle Woodford, Newton Toney, Odstock, Orcheston,Stapleford, Steeple Langford, Wylye and Zeals. Exception development, based on identifiedlocal need, will also be permitted in these villages.New housing will not be permitted outside the settlements named in Core Policy 1[nb. numbers rounded]Note: All numbers have been rounded up and include a contingency allowance.Targets: Qualitative: The delivery of levels of growth in conformity with the SettlementStrategy; average of 620 housing completions per year; 34% of housing completions per yearto be on previously-developed land.Council’s suggestedwording as a result ofdiscussions at EIP.Minor change toSubmission Documentpreviously containedwithin SWCS 13 AMonitoring and Review: AMR & housing trajectory, number of dwellings built in sustainablelocations aligned with the Sustainable Settlement StrategyDelivery Responsibility: Wiltshire Council, Development Industry, Strategic Partnerships.Page 4 of 70

ProposedChangeReferenceCS REFERENCE CHANGE SOURCEMAJ/03 Page 56Para 5.31 ePolicies replaced: Policy H1(e) Highways(e) TransportationWith respect to Salisbury, the Council has constructed a transport model, which has beenused to assess the implications of the Core Strategy on the transport network. Although futuregrowth will have an impact on the highway network, with a commitment to demandmanagement interventions, this Strategy can be implemented as because there are noinsurmountable barriers to its delivery. The Council is currently producing a detailed SalisburyTransport Strategy, which will define a set of transport initiatives that will address the impactsof the additional transport demand. The strategy will be published in December 2009. Initialmodelling work, involving partnership work with the Highways Agency has concluded that thetransport network, with improvements, will be able to support the levels of growth over theplan period. Also, there are unlikely to be significant new road building requirements in orderto enable strategic site allocations to be developed. These transport initiatives willcomplement the key strategic outcomes sought in Strategic Objective 8 in Chapter 4, whichinclude:Optimisation of benefits from the five Park and Ride sitesMeasures to treat additional pressures on the ring roadImprovements to the coverage and linkages of the cycle and footpath network.Support for Network Rail's long term plans to increase the capacity of the railway betweenSalisbury and ExeterReview of the parking strategy to seek a balance between providing adequate spaces forvisitors and shoppers, while realising major regeneration schemes, which may mean a loss ofspaces at the Maltings/Central Car Park and the Market Place.The careful planning of the major growth sites around Salisbury based on the mixed-usestrategy, to provide jobs, services and shops that are locally accessible via a range of meansincluding walking, cycling and bus.The exploration of access linkages between major new strategic sites to maximiseCouncil’s suggestedwording as a result ofdiscussions at EIP.Page 5 of 70

ProposedChangeReferenceCS REFERENCE CHANGE SOURCEbenefits of community infrastructure and new job opportunitiesMAJ/04 Page 64New paragraphafter Core Policy 5As part of the work to develop the Transport Strategy, an ‘Options Assessment Report’ hasbeen prepared. This report sets out a range of deliverable and affordable options and theirconsequential outcomes.In broad terms, the report looks at the difference between two approaches; an “established”approach, which is a continuation of the existing strategy, and a “radical” approach, which ismore in line with current practice of demand management interventions. Both approachesillustrate realistic options between which the eventual strategy will sit.Further consultation on the refinement of the transport strategy will be undertaken. Ultimately,the transport strategy will need to support the proposed growth and the ‘Options AssessmentReport’ concludes that a strategy based on the radical option would best enable Salisbury tomeet the challenges of addressing future growth in travel demand in a sustainable manner.5.53(a) Protecting Retail CentresSalisbury City Centre and the smaller centres of Amesbury, Tisbury, Mere, Wilton andDownton are vulnerable to possible edge or out of centre retail and leisure development.Salisbury City Centre is the principal shopping centre within south Wiltshire. Amesbury is thesecond largest settlement and functions as a service centre for the communities on thesouthern edge of Salisbury Plain. Other centres at Wilton, Tisbury, Downton and Mere aresmall in scale and perform as local village centres offering little more than essential ‘everyday’requirements to a local catchment. Each centre has a Post Office, pharmacy and local top-upfood store. The Retail and Leisure Needs study identified that the centres are small in scale,appeared to be attractive with high quality environments, have a low vacancy rate and did notappear too vulnerable. However, this potentially masks concern in respect of all centres losingessential services and shopping provision, which has been the historic trend. Rather thanlooking for opportunities for new retailing, which is likely to be limited, the challenge is toprotect the centres that already exist.Council’s suggestedwording as a result ofdiscussions at EIP.Page 6 of 70

ProposedChangeReferenceCS REFERENCE CHANGE SOURCEMAJ/05 Page 101Core Policy 12Consequently, all applications outside or on the edge of Salisbury City, Amesbury, Wilton,Tisbury, Mere and Downton that include retail or leisure floor space of over 200 sq m shouldbe accompanied by an impact assessment.Core Policy 12 - Porton DownThe Council recognises the important contribution that the Porton Down science communitymakes to the economy, both nationally and within south Wiltshire. The council will work withpartners on the production of a Wildlife Management Plan (WMP) to be adopted asSupplementary Planning Document for the Porton Down SAC, SPA and SSSI.Once finalised, this will enable the scientific community's aspirations to be met while at thesame time providing a comprehensive framework for wildlife protection and enhancement atthe site. New development in connection with DSTL, HPA and the Porton Down Science Parkwill only be permitted where it contributes to the objectives of the WMP and accords with themeasures within the WMP to avoid and mitigate potential adverse effects on the integrity ofthe the European sites and other nature conservation interests.Until such time as the WMP is agreed, new development proposals will only be permittedwhere they can demonstrate that either alone or in combination with other plans or projects,they do not have a significant impact on the integrity of the Porton Down SPA, SAC or SSSI.The Council strongly supports the principle of the future development of the Porton DownScience Campus for research and development purposes and will work with the principal sitestakeholders to build on the work already undertaken to facilitate their business aspirations inaccordance with Strategic Objective 3 of the Core Strategy. This work will also ensure that thelong-term future of Porton Down is secured based on a coordinated approach.One specific issue in relation to which coordination is required is wildlife management. TheCouncil will thus work with all relevant interests to produce an Integrated Business andEnvironmental Strategy (IBEMS) for the Porton Down SAC, SPA and SSSI and the non-Porton Down SCGPage 7 of 70

ProposedChangeReferenceCS REFERENCE CHANGE SOURCEdesignated areas of the site that will be adopted as a Supplementary Planning Document.The IBEMS will seek to balance the existing and future economic and scientific significance ofthe site with safeguarding important nature conservation interests, together with enhancingbiodiversity across the Porton Down site. In order to facilitate future development, the IBEMSwill identify future proposed development and when this will take place, the broad impacts ofthis development and how (if possible) these impacts can be mitigated.Proposals submitted in advance of the IBEMS being adopted as SPD, and stand aloneprojects not addressed in the IBEMS will need to adequately demonstrate that either alone orin combination with other plans or projects, they do not have significant impact on the integrityof the Porton Down SPA, SAC or SSSI; or that if they do adequate mitigation will be providedto ensure no adverse effect on site integrity.Targets: % habitat at Porton Down in favourable condition. Specific species monitoring.Percentage of planning applications granted on the Porton Down site which contribute to theobjectives of the WMP IBEMS (target 100%).Monitoring and Review: AMR, Wildlife Management Plan IBEMS when approvedDelivery Responsibility: Wiltshire Council, RSPB, DSTL, HPA, PDSP PBTC, Natural England,Species specific organisations e.g. RSPB, BTO, Plantlife, Butterfly ConservationPolicies replaced: NonePage 8 of 70

ProposedChangeReferenceMAJ/06 Page 128Paragraph 12.2 (b)CS REFERENCE CHANGE SOURCEThe River Avon SAC and ground water sources are particularly vulnerable from the effects ofpollution form surface water drainage, non-physical and biological disturbance.Groundwater in South Wiltshire is the source of much of the river flow within the River Avon.Pollution of groundwater therefore has the potential to impact on water quality in the river.Source Protection Zones (SPZs) mapped by the Environment Agency (EA) are used to protectabstractions used for water supply and other forms of distribution to the public. These zonesshow the areas of groundwater within which there is particular sensitivity to pollution risks, dueto the proximity of a drinking water source and the way the groundwater flows. Generally, thecloser the activity or release is to a groundwater source the greater the risk.Protecting water quality both in and outside of SPZs is necessary to comply with therequirements of the Water Framework Directive.Human activities produce sources of phosphorus (P) which can threaten the integrity offreshwater ecosystems, including rivers, through a range of inter-related biological processes(e.g. excessive algal growth and associated changes in the composition of plant and animalcommunities). To protect SAC rivers, Natural England uses a family of P targets, jointlydeveloped with the EA, for the purposes of site management and condition assessment.Currently, P concentrations exceed the appropriate targets over the majority of the HampshireAvon system, threatening the integrity of the SAC.Whilst significant improvements have recently been made to a number of Sewage TreatmentWorks (STWs), these improvements, according to EA predictive modelling, will not besufficient to reduce P concentrations to below the aforementioned targets, across the majorityof the SAC. Therefore, these STW discharges when combined with other sources of P (eg.agricultural sources, septic tanks) are still contributing to a significant threat to site integrity.Development put forward in the Core Strategy must be able to ascertain that these dischargesare no longer threatening the integrity of the SAC.A specific issues raised by the HRA of this Core Strategy (and that of the RSS) concluded that,subject to programmed investment being carried out to reduce the phosphate load from majorNatural England andEnvironment AgencySCGs and Council’ssuggested wording as aresult of discussions atEIPPage 9 of 70

ProposedChangeReferenceCS REFERENCE CHANGE SOURCEsewage treatment works in the River Avon System, there would be no adverse effect on theintegrity of the SAC from proposed development. However, there are other phosphate inputsbesides those attributable to sewage works, and initiatives area underway to better understandthis issue and implement measures that will lead to a long-term reduction in phosphateconcentration in the river.MAJ/07 Page 129Core Policy 20Development in the SAC catchment should not have a significant effect upon the SAC supportthis wider agenda to protect the river, and developers of the strategic sites identified in thisStrategy will be required to mitigate against any increase in P levels that their developmentmay create. This may be through contributions to a Mitigation Strategy which will identify andimplement measures to reduce P levels in the SAC or on or near site measures to be agreedby the LPA. Measures will be secured contribute to any overall mitigation strategy throughSection 106 agreements. This mitigation strategy will identify and implement measures toreduce the phosphate levels in the SAC.Core Policy 20 Pollution and phosphate Levels in the Water EnvironmentIn order to protect groundwater and surface water quality and to avoid and reduce the potentialenvironmental effects on water quality in the River Avon Special Area of Conservation,development will need to incorporate measures during construction and operation that avoidand prevent pollution and mitigate potential disturbance effects. This may include appropriateschemes of mitigation, including consideration of suitable buffer zones along watercourses,habitat enhancements and river access management measures. will be required to mitigatepotential disturbance effects’. All developments identified in this Core Strategy should submita Construction Management Plan should also be submitted to the Local Planning Authority toensure measures proposed during construction are satisfactory.All developments identified in this Core Strategy will be required, to demonstrate that theirproposals will include the implementation of effective mitigation measures by means offinancial contribution, to contribute to the undertaking and implementation of a managementplan, to ensure that their development will not cause detriment to watercourses through theunmitigated addition of phosphates to local watercourses. This may be by means such as anCouncil’s suggestedwording as a result ofdiscussions at EIPPage 10 of 70

ProposedChangeReferenceCS REFERENCE CHANGE SOURCEappropriate of financial contribution to a Management Plan or the implementation by thedeveloper of on or near site mitigation measures to be agreed by the Local Planning Authority.MAJ/08 Page 129Paragraph 12.2(c)Targets: No approvals against policy, maintenance of River Avon SAC in favourable conditionno significant effect on River Avon SAC.Monitoring and Review: AMRDelivery Responsibility: Wiltshire Council, Environment Agency, Natural England,Water companies: Developers.Policies Replace: NoneThe Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment (SHLAA) demonstrates that there issufficient land available in Flood Zone 1, the zone of least risk, to meet the housingdevelopment needs of the area. The strategy therefore favours housing development in FloodZone 1 over areas of higher risk as identified by the Strategic Flood Risk Assessment (SFRA).Proposals put forward in areas of higher risk (Flood Zones 2 and 3) will need to be supportedby clear evidence that no lower risk alternative sites are available. The findings of the SHLAAwill carry considerable weight when testing the suitability of proposals put forward in higherrisk areas.The Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment (SHLAA) and the Strategic Flood RiskAssessment (SFRA) currently demonstrate that there is a readily available and deliverable 5-year supply of housing land in Flood Zone 1, the zone of least risk, to meet the housingdevelopment needs of the area. Proposals put forward in areas of higher risk (Flood Zones 2and 3) will need to be supported by clear evidence that no lower risk alternative sites areavailable. This is in order to apply the Sequential Test in line with the requirements of PPS25.The findings of the SHLAA and SFRAs Level 1 and 2 will carry considerable weight whentesting the suitability of proposals put forward in higher risk areas.Environment AgencySCGPage 11 of 70

ProposedChangeReferenceCS REFERENCE CHANGE SOURCEMAJ/09 Page 129Core Policy 21All new development will include measures to reduce the rate of rainwater run-off and improverainwater infiltration to soil and ground (Sustainable Drainage) unless site or environmentalconditions make these measures unsuitable.Delete policy.Core Policy 21 - Flood RiskThe SHLAA and SFRA currently demonstrate there is a readily available and deliverable 5year supply of housing land in Flood Zone 1. Development proposed in Flood Zones 2 and 3as identified within the SFRA will need to refer to this information when providing evidence tothe local planning authority in order to apply the Sequential Test in line with the requirementsof PPS25.All new development will include measures to reduce the rate of rainwater run-off andimprove rainwater infiltration to soil and ground (Sustainable Drainage) unless site orenvironmental conditions make these measures unsuitable.Targets: No approvals against policy or against EA adviceMonitoring and Review: AMR; External reviews (for example by the EA).Delivery Responsibility: Wiltshire Council; EA; Developers.Policies replaced: G4 and G6Environment AgencySCGMAJ/10 Page 134Paragraph 12.9Paragraph 12.10Paragraph 12.11Core Policy 25 –Air QualityDelete heading, paragraphs and Core Policy.12.9 Air PollutionWithin South Wiltshire, there are problems with air pollution, particularly transport generatedemissions in Salisbury, which has a designated AQMA covering the following areas Salisbury City Centre including Wilton Road / St Pauls Roundabout and London Road/ StMarks Road around St Marks Roundabout.12.10 Furthermore, the HRA has identified that their critical loads of nitrogen deposition arelikely to be exceeded at the following sensitive sites• New Forest SAC,Council’s suggestedchanges as a result ofdiscussions at EIP.Evidence th rough theSalisbury TransportModel now shows thatdue to technologicaladvances emissionsshould decrease ratherthan increase.Page 12 of 70

ProposedChangeReferenceCS REFERENCE CHANGE SOURCE• Dorset Heaths SAC,• Fontmell and Melbury Downs SAC12.11 Concern is also raised about the potential effect of air pollution on the River Avon SACand Porton Down and Salisbury Plain SAC and SPAs. In order to ensure that the sensitivenature of these sites are protected and that the air quality in the AQMA is improved,development proposals, particularly those generating traffic uses, will need to demonstrate thatthere will be no significant increases in air pollution emissions, or that measures to secureimprovements in air quality can be achieved.12Core Policy 25 - Air QualityDevelopment proposals that are likely to cause air pollution will only be permitted where it canbe demonstrated that measures can be implemented to minimise emissions to levels thatprotect health, environmental quality and amenity. When determining planning applications,consideration will be given to the following issues• The potential impact on the designated AQMA.• The potential impact on the environmental quality of the European designated sitesAn air quality impact assessment should accompany the planning application for sitesidentified within this Core Strategy and should detail any mitigation measures needed to makethe development acceptable.Targets: No approvals against policy.Monitoring and Review: AMR; External reviews (for example by the EA).Delivery Responsibility: Wiltshire Council.Policies replaced: G2 VIIIMAJ/11 Appendix ADevelopment templates for strategic growth sitesAs well as meeting all relevant polices in this Core Strategy, national policy, the developmentplan and saved polices (see Appendix C), Core Policy 2 of this Strategy requires the masterplanning of the strategic sites that will deliver housing. The following templates set out theMinor change toSubmission Documentpreviously containedwithin SWCS 13 APage 13 of 70

ProposedChangeReferenceCS REFERENCE CHANGE SOURCEMAJ/12 Page 145 to 147Hampton ParkTemplateobjectives for the new development, constraints and the infrastructure needed for the sites tobe delivered.Amend text accompanying map as follows:Site Name:Hampton ParkSite DescriptionThis area of land to the east of the City city is limited by the A345, the built envelope of Paul'sDene, Bishopdown, and Hampton Park, the flood plain of the River Bourne, the village of Ford,and the Conservation Area at Old Sarum Airfield. It has a gradual slope down to the Bournewith some level sections in the centre and south. There is a sharp rise towards Castle ridge.Minor change toSubmission Documentpreviously containedwithin SWCS 13 AObjectives for the developmentTo develop 500 new homes through a high quality residential development which delivers anappropriate sense of place in accordance with the South Wiltshire Design Guide, 'CreatingPlaces', in a sustainable location close to Salisbury in a manner that complimentscomplements the existing community at Bishopdown Farm and makes a significant strategiccontribution to meeting the local housing needs of South Wiltshire. Specific issues to beaddressed are:Minor change toSubmission Documentpreviously containedwithin SWCS 13 A• Protection of the strategic landscape setting of the northern slopes of Salisburyincluding safeguarding views to and from Old Sarum Scheduled Ancient Monument.• Strategic gap planning to ensure Ford retains its independent character and does notbecome merged with the city.• The delivery of a significant country park that will be handed to the local community inperpetuity.• To deliver a development that is adequately served by essential infrastructureincluding transportation, water, drainage, education, healthcare and emergencyservices and green infrastructure.Page 14 of 70

ProposedChangeReferenceCS REFERENCE CHANGE SOURCE• To plan for the permanent retention and enhancement of the Castle Hill/Bishopdowngreen lung to the city as a key area of habitat retention and informal recreational openspace.• To deliver a development which conserves and in places enhances the naturalenvironment, including the quality of the Bourne tributary of which is within the RiverAvon SAC/SSSIEnvironment AgencySCGSite Constraints• The sensitive landscape at the northern slopes of Salisbury including the setting of OldSarum SAM• Strategically important green lung at Bishopdown/Castle Hill• Retention of the separate identity of Ford and avoiding potential coalescence.• The Bourne tributary to part of the River Avon SSSI/SAC• High pressure gas main to west of the site• Retention of existing byways• Existing residential amenity to the north and south• Salisbury Air Quality Management Zone• Interface with existing residential properties and rural fringeLand uses and quanta of development500 new dwellings of which a minimum of 40 % will be affordable. The breakdown will be asdetailed in Core Policy 6.Environment AgencySCGInspectors request forconsistencyEssential Infrastructure RequirementsEducation: 1 form entry primary school and contributions towards secondary educationTransportation: Any major infrastructure requirements outcomes identified by the SalisburyTransport Model or subsequent Transport Assessment and Travel Plan. A TransportAssessment setting out how the model shift promoted at national and RSS level will beGOSW SCGHighways Agency SCG(18 March 2010)Change proposed bySavills and agreed byPage 15 of 70

ProposedChangeReferenceCS REFERENCE CHANGE SOURCEachieved, including improved bus, cycle and walking routes..CouncilGreen Infrastructure: 1 in 10 dwellings to have facilities for roosting bats. New woodlandhedging and native species to connect to retained hedges to River Avon. Surveys of protectedspecies, especially botanical, in June/July. Other essential GI and BAP habitat and speciesrequirements will be determined at or prior to master planning.Change proposed bySavills and agreed byCouncilNatural England SCGHeritage/Salisbury Historic Environment Assessment: High risk to the west at Old Sarum SAM.Great potential for archaeology, field systems and Roman remains. Trial pitting undersupervision of Wiltshire Council Archaeologist required.Drainage and Water: Dedicated spine main to provide capacity. Sewers: limited capacity -requires off-site link plus extensive downstream improvements. Cumulative development withinthe upstream catchment at Old Sarum, Hampton Park and Longhedge developments willtrigger significant works with new relief sewer to ensure that risk from sewer flooding isresolved. Capacity improvements required downstream. Network modelling will be required aspart of an engineering appraisal to determine the scope and extent of these improvementsprior to the commencement of development. A contribution is required towards a managementand mitigation plan to address of phosphate levels in the River Avon SAC watercourses andtheir threat to protected species as well as its implementation.Change proposed bySavills and agreed byCouncilInspectors request forconsistencyPCT: Financial contribution towards new or improved doctors and dentist surgeries.Emergency Services: Contribution to the provision of a new community fire station orimprovements to existing facilities in order to provide a comprehensive and flexible responsesto future emergencies.Renewable energy: 10% renewable energy generated on or near the site.These infrastructure requirements will be negotiated and delivered on a site by site basis aspart of section 106 agreements until the Wiltshire wide DPD on planning obligations toWiltshire Fire andRescue SCGPage 16 of 70

ProposedChangeReferenceCS REFERENCE CHANGE SOURCEincorporate the CIL, setting out a tariff approach is adopted.Place shaping requirementsIn addition to the provisions of 'Creating Places' and saved Local Plan policies, masterplanning of this site needs to specifically address:• Safeguarding zone for the high pressure gas main• A strongly defined urban/rural edge to the north of the site• The layout and utility of the Country Park• Defining the strategic gap between the development and the settlement of FordStrategic LinkagesLinkages with the existing residential development at Bishopdown Farm and Hampton Park, toensure that the new communities can integrate.Delivery MechanismThis site should be the subject of partnership between private and public sector based onfrontloading a master plan to be approved by the Local Planning Authority as part of theplanning application process. This Master Plan will guide the private sector led delivery of thesite.Key delivery milestones, monitoring and reviewThis site has been chosen not only because strategically, environmentally and consultatively itcan make a significant contribution to meeting local needs through regeneration, but alsobecause early discussions with land owners, agents and prospective developers haveencouraged the Local Planning Authority that this site can be brought forward within the firstfive years. In order to safeguard the delivery of housing within this period the followingmilestones will be adhered to:Agreed with variousPage 17 of 70

ProposedChangeReferenceCS REFERENCE CHANGE SOURCEIn order to expedite the delivery of development within this period the Council will work closelywith the developers and landowners to facilitate delivery, and will expect to see significant,tangible progress towards a planning application within 18 months of the date of adoption ofthe Core Strategy. This work should include master planning, community engagement andprogress on the necessary assessments. If the Council is concerned that significant progressis not being made on the preparation of a planning application, or that, subsequent to the grantof planning permission, as identified through regular monitoring work, there does not appear tobe a reasonable prospect of development commencing in a timely manner, a review into thedelivery of the site will be instigated. This review will comprise:Failure to meet any of the above deadlines without production of compelling justification willlead to conclusion that the site is not deliverable and the site could be de-allocated in a minipartiesas a result ofdiscussion at EIPhearings.• Immediate partnership working with LPA and stakeholders frontloading matters• A planning application accompanied by master plan and design code within 18 monthsof adoption of the Core Strategy.• A section 106 agreement will be required setting key milestones for delivery includingthat the site shall start delivering housing within 12 months of the grant of permissionand a phasing agreement setting out completions at agreed milestones movingforward.• Detailed dialogue with the landowner, developer and their agents to ascertain thecause of delay.• An update of the Strategic Housing Market Availability Assessment to identify whethermarket demand has reduced or is being met through other sources.• A further independent viability study of the site to assess its delivery.• Using the Council’s influence to try and remove any barriers identified that stand in theway of progress, such as working with statutory consultees and the community.• As a last resort, if the Council feels that the new evidence renders the siteundeliverable, a new allocation or allocations equivalent to the Strategic Allocation willbe considered through the appropriate development plan process.Page 18 of 70

ProposedChangeReferenceCS REFERENCE CHANGE SOURCEreview of the Core Strategy and the site replaced with an alternative site where more certaintyexists.MAJ/13Page 148 to150Fugglestone ReddevelopmenttemplateAn independent viability review of the site will be undertaken by Wiltshire Council within twoyears to review the standards of delivery set in view of the projected recovery from therecession of 2009. This review will not be undertaken where the developer has demonstratedcommitment through delivery in the first two years of the Strategy.Delete present map and replace with:As proposed byPegasus Planning andagreed by the council.Fugglestone RedPage 19 of 70

ProposedChangeReferenceCS REFERENCE CHANGE SOURCEAmend text to read:Site NameFugglestone RedSite Description of siteThe site is to the north west of Salisbury and is bounded by The Avenue to the north west, theA360 DevizesRoad to the north east, the extent of the built envelope of Salisbury (Fugglestone Red andBemerton Heath to the south east and the Imerys quarry site, a significant dry valley and theUK Land Forces site to the south) The site is mainly agricultural land but with significant treedfeatures. It also includes an existing secondary school(Salisbury High School) to the south east of the site. The "townscape/countryside interface" ofthe whole area is of "elevated views, little/no foreground, generally harsh, abrupt settlementedge".Inspector request forconsistency.Objectives for the developmentTo develop 1250 new homes and 8 hectares of employment land, through a high qualitydevelopment which delivers an appropriate sense of place in accordance with the SouthWiltshire Design Guide, 'Creating Places' in a sustainable location close to Wilton andSalisbury, in a manner which compliments the existing communities and makes a significantstrategic contribution to meeting the local housing needs of south Wiltshire and helps facilitatethe delivery of the proposed Sarum Academy or a replacement of Salisbury High School.Specific issues to be addressed are:• The delivery of a new local centre for the Fugglestone Red area.• Assistance with and/or cContributions towards improving the secondary school or theproposed Sarum Academy• Retention of a Strategic gap of open countryside planning to ensure Wilton retains itsindependent character and does not become merged with Salisbury.Change proposed byPegasus and agreed byCouncilChanges proposed byPegasus and agreed byCouncilPage 20 of 70

ProposedChangeReferenceCS REFERENCE CHANGE SOURCE• To deliver a development which conserves and in places enhances the naturalenvironment, including the quality of the Camp Down SSSI and the River Avon SAC• To conserve and where possible enhance views from the Wilton Estate and OldSarum SAM• Conservation of the historic Avenue.Site Constraints• Potential coalescence between Salisbury and Wilton and the need for a strategiclandscape belt to be retained.• The sensitive landscape, especially the north eastern edge and the setting of OldSarum SAM• Copses, wooded belts, and other tree planting• Overhead power cables (several running N-S and E-W)• Existing residential amenity to the east of the site.• Salisbury Air Quality Management Area on Devizes Road and Wilton Road• Setting of Wilton House and its historic park and garden.Land uses and quanta of development• 1250 new dwellings of which a minimum of 40% will be affordable. The breakdown willbe as detailed in Core Policy 6.• 8 hectares of employment land to include some start-up units• New primary school and enhanced improvements to secondary school/Academyprovision• Public open space• Space for a new cemetery• Local CentreInspectors request forconsistencyChanges proposed byPegasus and agreed byCouncilEssential Infrastructure RequirementsEducation: 2 form entry primary school and either a secondary contribution or assistanceChange proposed byPage 21 of 70

ProposedChangeReferenceCS REFERENCE CHANGE SOURCEtowards construction of a replacement new Salisbury High School/Sarum Academy.Pegasus and agreed byCouncilTransportation: Any major infrastructure requirements outcomes identified by the SalisburyTransport Model Study 2010 or subsequent Transport Assessment and Travel Plan. Newaccess including improvements to the junction between the A360 and The Avenue. A TrafficAssessment which sets out how the modal shift promoted at national and RSS level will beachieved, including improved, bus, cycle and walking routes.Green infrastructure: Formal and informal public open space to be provided on site to reducepressure onCamp Down SSSI. New woodland, hedges and standard trees to connect retained hedges andwoodland and ultimately link to the River Avon. 1 in 10 properties An agreed proportion tocontain features suitable for roosting bats. Improved linkages and contributions towardsimprovements to Wilton House historic park and garden. Extended phase 1 survey to beundertaken. Site should look to minimise recreational impacts on the New Forest Europeanprotected sites. Other essential GI and BAP habitat and species requirements will bedetermined at or prior to master planning.GOSW SCGHighways Agency SCG(18 March 2010)Changes proposed byPegasus and agreed byCouncilNatural England SCGHeritage: Archaeological investigations to be undertaken prior to finalisation of the site design,with the design responding to finds.Drainage and Water: Requires boosted supply from existing local reservoir and a dedicatedspine main to serve local distribution mains. On site sewers required to be provided bydevelopers with separate systems of drainage. Off site surface water disposal to local landdrainage systems with attenuated discharge needed to satisfy PPS25. On site foul-waterpumping station with rising main to Devizes Road. Long off site connecting sewer (>1km) toagreed point of connection, where planned capacity is available to accept future foul flows. Acontribution is required towards a management and mitigation plan to address of phosphatelevels in the River Avon SAC watercourses and their threat to protected species as well as itsimplementation.Inspectors request forconsistencyPage 22 of 70

ProposedChangeReferenceCS REFERENCE CHANGE SOURCEPCT: Financial contribution towards new or improved doctors and dentist surgeries or on-siteprovision, if appropriate.Emergency services: Contribution to the provision of a new community fire station orimprovements to existing facilities in order to provide a comprehensive and flexible responsesto future emergencies.Change proposed byPegasus and agreed byCouncilCommunity facilities and services: Need to deliver a local centre to provide the local access tobasic services this area of Salisbury currently lacks.Renewable energy: 10% renewable energy generated on or near the siteThese infrastructure requirements will be negotiated and delivered on a site by site basis aspart of section 106 agreements until the Wiltshire wide DPD on planning obligations toincorporate the CIL, setting out a tariff approach is adopted.Change proposed byPegasus and agreed byCouncilWiltshire Fire andRescue SCGPlace shaping requirementsIn addition to the provisions of 'Creating Places' and saved Local Plan policies, masterplanning of this site needs to specifically address:• Significant tree planting to protect key views from Wilton Park.• Overall building mass should be in keeping with the setting to of Wilton ConservationArea.• The Avenue not to be widened or subject to major road improvements, apart from theproposed new roundabout with Devizes Road.• The visual gateway into Salisbury from the A360 is conserved and enhanced.• A significant green buffer is retained between the built up areas of Salisbury andWilton.• Lighting does not exceed the height of the development and is designed to minimiselight pollution and sky glow.• Overhead cables to be buried.Changes proposed byPegasus and agreed byCouncilPage 23 of 70

ProposedChangeReferenceCS REFERENCE CHANGE SOURCEStrategic LinkagesImproved linkages between Wilton House historic park and garden and UKLF site.Development will also need to integrate with the existing developments at Fugglestone Redand Bemerton Heath.Minor change toSubmission Documentpreviously containedwithin SWCS 13 ADelivery MechanismThis site should be the subject of partnership between private and public sector based onfrontloading a master plan to be approved by the Local Planning Authority as part of theplanning application process. This Master Plan will guide the private sector led delivery of thesite.Key delivery milestones, monitoring and reviewThis site has been chosen not only because strategically, environmentally and consultatively itcan make a significant contribution to meeting local needs through regeneration, but alsobecause early discussions with land owners, agents and prospective developers haveencouraged the Local Planning Authority that this site can be brought forward within the firstfive years. In order to safeguard the delivery of housing within this period the followingmilestones will be adhered to:In order to expedite the delivery of development within this period the Council will work closelywith the developers and landowners to facilitate delivery, and will expect to see significant,tangible progress towards a planning application within 18 months of the date of adoption ofthe Core Strategy. This work should include master planning, community engagement andprogress on the necessary assessments. If the Council is concerned that significant progressis not being made on the preparation of a planning application, or that, subsequent to the grantof planning permission, as identified through regular monitoring work, there does not appear tobe a reasonable prospect of development commencing in a timely manner, a review into thedelivery of the site will be instigated. This review will comprise:Agreed with variousparties as a result ofdiscussion at EIPhearings.Page 24 of 70

ProposedChangeReferenceCS REFERENCE CHANGE SOURCE• Immediate partnership working with LPA and stakeholders frontloading matters• A planning application accompanied by master plan and design code within 18 monthsof adoption of the Core Strategy.• A section 106 agreement will be required setting key milestones for delivery includingthat the site shall start delivering housing within 12 months of the grant of permissionand a phasing agreement setting out completions at agreed milestones movingforward.• Detailed dialogue with the landowner, developer and their agents to ascertain thecause of delay.• An update of the Strategic Housing Market Availability Assessment to identify whethermarket demand has reduced or is being met through other sources.• A further independent viability study of the site to assess its delivery.• Using the Council’s influence to try and remove any barriers identified that stand in theway of progress, such as working with statutory consultees and the community.• As a last resort, if the Council feels that the new evidence renders the siteundeliverable, a new allocation or allocations equivalent to the Strategic Allocation willbe considered through the appropriate development plan process.Failure to meet any of the above deadlines without production of compelling justification willlead to conclusion that the site is not deliverable and the site could be de-allocated in a minireviewof the Core Strategy and the site replaced with an alternative site where more certaintyexists.An independent viability review of the site will be undertaken by Wiltshire Council within twoyears to review the standards of delivery set in view of the projected recovery from therecession of 2009. This review will not be undertaken where the developer has demonstratedcommitment through delivery in the first two years of the Strategy.MAJ/14 Page 151 to 153Land at theMaltings / CentralAmend text to read:Site NamePage 25 of 70

ProposedChangeReferenceCS REFERENCE CHANGE SOURCECar ParkdevelopmenttemplateLand at the Maltings and Central Car ParkSite DescriptionA city centre site situated to the west of the city's established secondary shopping area. Thesouthern part of the site predominantly comprises The Maltings shopping centre. To the northis the central surface level car park. To the north east is the 'Millstream' coach park. To theeast of the coach park is the Boathouse bar and brasserie. To the south of the coach park areoffices owned and occupied by the Probation Service and the Wiltshire PCT. To the immediatesouth of Avon Approach, leading to Central Car Park, is a service yard and private car parkowned by Tesco's. The Playhouse Theatre, City Hall and Summerlock House (Department ofWork and Pensions) are situated adjacent to The Maltings, to the south west of the site. PublicOpen Space runs along the eastern boundary and the city Library and Galleries are adjacent.To the extreme north of the site is an electricity substation and private car park. Severalcourses of the River Avon SAC flow through the site. To the west lies a railway embankment.Objectives for the developmentTo develop a retail led mixed use regeneration scheme through a high quality development,which delivers an appropriate sense of place in accordance with the South Wiltshire DesignGuide, 'Creating Places' in a sustainable location within Salisbury city centre, in a mannerwhich compliments complements the existing retail provision and makes a significant strategiccontribution to meeting local housing needs of south Wiltshire.The redevelopment of the Maltings / Central Car Park will remain sensitive Salisbury's skylineand respect the scale and building forms of the historic urban fabric. It will build on the city'salready strong retail offer to create a new quarter specifically designed to meet the demands ofthe modern shopper - and the modern retailer, with simple, regular shaped interior spaceswhich can be easily configured to meet a wide variety of needs and shop sizes.The Maltings / Central Car Park will not be an enclosed shopping centre or self-contained mallstyle development, but a high quality outward looking design, which integrates into the citycentre. Its retail, residential and leisure areas will be linked by open, pedestrianised streets andMinor change toSubmission Documentpreviously containedwithin SWCS 13 ACouncil’s suggestedwording as a result ofdiscussions at EIP.Page 26 of 70

ProposedChangeReferenceCS REFERENCE CHANGE SOURCEpublic spaces, with an improved Cultural area around thePlayhouse and City Hall, improving legibility from the new development through the culturalarea to FishertonStreet. Relocation of the library will open up links to the Market Square. This open streetscapewill connect the prime retail units anchored by a department store, residential and leisureareas. Specific issues to be addressed are:• To provide a range of retail unit sizes including a department store format andsupermarket and a mix of major shop units and smaller store units• To ensure the continued viability and vibrancy of the whole of Salisbury city centre• To provide a range of homes including affordable suitable for a city centre location• A relocated library• To provide a range of office space• Protection of views of Salisbury Cathedral.• A development that upgrades public open space including riverside walks• A holistic approach to addressing the piecemeal nature of car parking, rear aspects ofproperties and land ownerships in a comprehensive manner.• A development that is well integrated and opens up links to Fisherton Street, MarketWalk and the surrounding City Centre• Retention and enhancement of the 'Shopmobility' scheme.• Continued provision of public toilets• Massing of new development respects the scale and building forms of the historicurban fabric• The development can protect and enhance both the built and natural conservationinterests surrounding the site• The character of the development creates a sense of place that responds to and issympathetic to locally distinctive patterns of development• Providing a high quality public realm that promotes public spaces that are attractive,safe, uncluttered and work effectively for all in society.Council’s suggestedwording as a result ofdiscussions at EIP.Site ConstraintsPage 27 of 70

ProposedChangeReferenceCS REFERENCE CHANGE SOURCE• Protection of views of Salisbury Cathedral• Protection and proximity of the River Avon SAC• Salisbury city centre Air Quality Management Area• Salisbury Conservation area and a number of listed buildings• Electricity Sub-station• Flooding• Some fFragmented land ownership.• Access, parking and servicing (including coach parking)Land uses and quanta of developmentCouncil’s suggestedwording as a result ofdiscussions at EIP.Minor change toSubmission Documentpreviously containedwithin SWCS 13 A• Potential for a total of 40,000 sq m of retail floorspace (gross external area). A single,or few large retail outlets providing the whole of the floor area will not be appropriate toachieve the aims of the development and not be permitted.• A single, or few large retail outlets providing the whole of the floor area will not beappropriate to achieve the aims of the development and not be permitted.• Comparison shopping uses, comprising a range of unit sizes including a departmentstore format and a mix of major shop units and smaller store units• Convenience floor space replacing the net loss of such floorspace• Around 200 dwellings of which a minimum of 40% will be affordable. The breakdownwill be as detailed in Core Policy 6.• Office use• Leisure uses (15% of comparison floor space), to improve the quality of leisurefacilities• A replacement library• Adequate car parking spaces using under croft and multi-storey car parking• A new park based around existing watercourses and opening linkages to the MarketSquare and Fisherton Street.• Improved cultural area around the Playhouse and City Hall, improving legibility fromthe new development through the cultural area to Fisherton StreetCouncil’s suggestedwording as a result ofdiscussions at EIP.Inspectors request forconsistencyPage 28 of 70

ProposedChangeReferenceCS REFERENCE CHANGE SOURCEEssential Infrastructure RequirementsEducation: Contributions towards primary and secondary.Transportation: Any major infrastructure requirements outcomes identified by the SalisburyTransport Model or subsequent Transport Assessment and Travel Plan. A TransportAssessment which sets out how the modal shift promoted at national and RSS level will beachieved, including improved, bus, cycle and walking routes.Green infrastructure: Formal and informal public open space to be provided on site including anew park.Adequate land to be set aside for treatment of surface runoff. Incorporation of at least bufferstrips adjacent to the river, restricting lighting near river. Construction method statementrequired with application. Other essential GI and BAP habitat and species requirements will bedetermined at or prior to master planning.GOSW SCGHighways Agency SCG(18 March 2010)Natural England SCGFlooding: Requirements of SFRA level 2 to be incorporated into design. No development inFlood Zone 3b.Development should be directed to areas of lowest risk from flooding with lower flood depthsand velocities.Old landfill sites should be avoided where possible due to the risk of potential contaminants.Culverts both at the site and upstream need to be maintained. Model shows that safeaccess/egress will be possible via bothChurchill Way West and Avon Approach during a 1 in 100 year flood event with climatechange.Heritage: Archaeological investigations should be undertaken prior to finalisation of the sitedesign with the design responding to finds.Drainage and Water: On site sewers provided by developers with separate systems ofdrainage, no spare capacity in local networks for a development of this scale. Off site surfacewater disposal to local land drainage systems with attenuated discharge to satisfy PPS25 isrequired. May require a pumped discharge and an off site link sewer to agreed point ofPage 29 of 70

ProposedChangeReferenceCS REFERENCE CHANGE SOURCEconnection, subject to engineering appraisal and network modelling to confirm the scope andextent of capacity improvements. There is a high probability of capacity improvements beingnecessary associated with downstream overflows to reduce risk of pollution and maintainwater quality. A contribution is required towards a management and mitigation plan to addressof phosphate levels in the River Avon SAC watercourses and their threat to protected speciesas well as its implementation.Inspectors request forconsistencyPCT: Financial contribution towards new or improved doctors and dentist surgeries.Emergency services: Contributions towards the Fire Service for new or improved fire stationsin order to provide a comprehensive and flexible responses to future emergencies.Renewable Energy: 10% renewable energy generated on or near the site as per RSS policyThese infrastructure requirements will be negotiated and delivered on a site by site basis aspart of section 106 agreements until the Wiltshire wide DPD on planning obligations toincorporate the CIL, setting out a tariff approach is adopted.Wiltshire Fire andRescue SCGPlace shaping requirementsAs the site sits in a sensitive location between two river courses of the River Avon SAC anyproposal will also need to meet the following requirements:• Softening the hard edges of the river to provide better marginal habitat for wildlifeincluding improved cover for fish and invertebrates.• Meet the requirements of Policies 19 (water efficiency) and 20 (phosphate levels) ofthis Core Strategy.• Be designed and provide for flood defences and mitigation measures in accordancewith the SFRA level 2 for the site.• Protection of views of Salisbury Cathedral.• A development that upgrades public open space including riverside walks.• A holistic approach to addressing the piecemeal nature of car parking, rear aspects ofCouncil’s suggestedwording as a result ofdiscussions at EIP.Page 30 of 70

ProposedChangeReferenceCS REFERENCE CHANGE SOURCEproperties and land ownerships in a comprehensive manner.• A development that is well integrated and opens up links to Fisherton Street, MarketWalk and the surrounding City Centre.• Retention and enhancement of the ‘Shopmobility’ scheme.• Continued provision of public toilets.• Massing of new development respects the scale and building forms of the historicurban fabric.• The development can protect and enhance both the built and natural conservationinterests surrounding the site.• The character of the development creates a sense of place that responds to and issympathetic to locally distinctive patterns of development.• Providing a high quality public realm that promotes public spaces that are attractive,safe, uncluttered and work effectively for all in society.Strategic LinkagesProvision of a key link in the retail circuit of Salisbury, particularly between the High Street,Fisherton Street and Market Place/Castle Street.Delivery MechanismThis site should be the subject of partnership between private and public sector based onfrontloading a master plan to be approved by the Local Planning Authority as part of theplanning application process. This Master Plan will guide the private sector led delivery of thesite.Key delivery milestones, monitoring and reviewThis site has been chosen not only because strategically, environmentally and consultatively itcan make a significant contribution to meeting local needs through regeneration, but alsobecause early discussions with land owners, agents and prospective developers haveencouraged the Local Planning Authority that this site can be brought forward within the firstAgreed with variousparties as a result ofdiscussion at EIPhearings.Page 31 of 70

ProposedChangeReferenceCS REFERENCE CHANGE SOURCEfive years.In order to expedite the delivery of development within this period the Council will work closelywith the developers and landowners to facilitate delivery, and will expect to see significant,tangible progress towards a planning application within 18 months of the date of adoption ofthe Core Strategy. This work should include master planning, community engagement andprogress on the necessary assessments. If the Council is concerned that significant progressis not being made on the preparation of a planning application, or that, subsequent to the grantof planning permission, as identified through regular monitoring work, there does not appear tobe a reasonable prospect of development commencing in a timely manner, a review into thedelivery of the site will be instigated. This review will comprise:• Detailed dialogue with the landowner, developer and their agents to ascertain thecause of delay.• An update of the Strategic Housing Market Availability Assessment to identify whethermarket demand has reduced or is being met through other sources.• A further independent viability study of the site to assess its delivery.• Using the Council’s influence to try and remove any barriers identified that stand in theway of progress, such as working with statutory consultees and the community.• As a last resort, if the Council feels that the new evidence renders the siteundeliverable, a new allocation or allocations equivalent to the Strategic Allocation willbe considered through the appropriate development plan process.MAJ/15 Page 154 to 157Churchfields andthe Engine ShedSiteAn independent viability review of the site will be undertaken by Wiltshire Council within twoyears to review the standards of delivery set in view of the projected recovery from therecession of 2009. This review will not be undertaken where the developer has demonstratedcommitment through delivery in the first two years of the Strategy.Churchfields and the Engine Shed siteSite Description of siteInspector request forconsistency.Page 32 of 70

ProposedChangeReferenceCS REFERENCE CHANGE SOURCEA major employment site serving Salisbury. The site accommodates approximately 200businesses of varying types and size on 33 hectares. It lies to the west of Salisbury city centreand to the south of the railway line, close to the railway station. The east, south and west of thesite is bounded by the River Nadder (part of the River Avon SAC), with water meadowsbeyond. To the west of the engine shed site lies Cherry Orchard Lane with residentialdevelopment beyond. To the east is Ashfield Road. Both Cherry Orchard Lane and AshfieldRoad pass under railway bridges providing northward routes to Wilton Road. The site iscurrently overgrown with dense scrub and a number of fairly large trees., is a vacant site, and itis bounded between the railway line to the north and Churchfields Road to the south andresidential development to the west.Minor changes toSubmission Documentpreviously containedwithin SWCS 13 AObjectives for the developmentTo develop a housing led mixed use redevelopment of around 1100 dwellings and retaining 5ha of employment through a high quality master plan, which delivers an appropriate sense ofplace in accordance with the South Wiltshire Design Guide, 'Creating Places' in a sustainablelocation, in a manner which compliments the existing community and makes a significantstrategic contribution to meeting local housing needs of South Wiltshire. Specific issues to beaddressed are:• Project alignment with the LDF to ensure there is adequate and appropriate landavailable to allow a successful decant for existing employers in and around Salisburyso the existing protective policy preventing change of use away from employment canbe relaxed.• Redevelopment that sympathetically capitalises on the assets of the site, such asproximity to water meadows, town path, Harnham and cathedral views• Master planning to be undertaken for both sites to ensure that the two developmentsintegrate.• Providing green links from the east and west of the River Nadder, to contributetowards the environmental and ecological aspirations of the Salisbury Vision• The incorporation of a central green to act as a focal point and encourage vitality• A mix of heights of up to 6 storeys determined by detailed context planningPage 33 of 70

ProposedChangeReferenceCS REFERENCE CHANGE SOURCE• Planning in and making features of key vista to the cathedral• To provide an element of carbon neutral homes• Maximising the site's south facing orientationSite Constraints• Poor access through narrow rail bridges and via residential areas• Potential land contamination (including former land fill site, abattoir and steam engineshed)• Protection and proximity of the River Avon SAC• Salisbury city centre Air Quality Management Area• Protection of views of Salisbury Cathedral• Interdependencies with the Waste Site Specific Allocations DPD to find a suitabledecant site for the Household Recycling Centre currently on site• Household Recycling Centre currently on site• FloodingRemoval of draftingerrorEngine sheds:• Issue over level of site, which appears to be mainly 2-3m above that of ChurchfieldsRoad: investigations need to be made as to whether this is artificial or natural.• 3m high blank retaining wall along Churchfields Road provides an unattractive 'dead'frontage.• Proximity to railway lineLand uses and quanta of development• Approximately 1100 dwellings of which a minimum of 40% will be affordable. Thebreakdown will be as detailed in Core Policy 6.• 5 ha of employment land• Public Open Space• Local neighbourhood centreInspectors request forconsistencyPage 34 of 70

ProposedChangeReferenceCS REFERENCE CHANGE SOURCE• Primary schoolEssential Infrastructure RequirementsEducation: 2 form entry primary school. Contributions towards secondary education.Transportation: Any major infrastructure requirements outcomes identified by the SalisburyTransport Model or subsequent Transport Assessment and Travel Plan. A TransportAssessment which sets out how the modal shift promoted at national and RSS level will beachieved, including improved, bus, cycle and walking routes. The site's proximity to the citycentre and railway station provides opportunities for the implementation of strong demandmanagement techniques to be applied.Green infrastructure: Formal and informal public open space to be provided on site including acentral green and green corridors adjacent to the River Nadder. Off-site contributions may alsobe required. Incorporating a significant buffer strip adjacent to river. 1 in 10 properties tocontain features suitable for roosting bats. Woodland habitat creation to create buffer, to helpabsorb additional public pressure. Identifying suitable recreational areas within the site toreduce pressure on river corridor. Restricting lighting near river. Adequate land to be set asidefor treatment of surface runoff. Other essential GI and BAP habitat and species requirementswill be determined at or prior to master planning.Flooding: Requirements of SFRA level 2 to be incorporated into design and resilience planningmeasures. Much of the site is within Flood Zone 1. Future development should be situated inthis zone. Highly vulnerable' uses in Flood Zone 2 will have to pass the Exception Test. Ifdevelopment is necessary to the north west of the site, development should be directedtowards the areas of lowest risk. On old landfill sites, contaminated land poses additionalproblems because of the risk that polluted groundwater/leachate may be generated. Theproposed drainage system must not remobilise any contaminants and infiltration should nottherefore be used unless a full study of groundwater flow paths is undertaken. SUDStechniques that utilise infiltration should not be used here.GOSW SCGHighways Agency SCG(18 March 2010)As agreed atexamination forpurpose of consistency.Natural England SCGEnvironment AgencySCGPage 35 of 70

ProposedChangeReferenceCS REFERENCE CHANGE SOURCEDrainage and Water: Existing supply mains provide limited capacity at peak demand.Redevelopment of this site will therefore require additional capacity with off site reinforcement.On site sewers provided by developers with separate systems of drainage also required.Sewer diversions may be required to accommodate development proposals. Surface waterdisposal to local land drainage systems with attenuated discharge needed to satisfy PPS25.Improvements required to downstream overflows to reduce risk of pollution and maintain waterquality. Additional capacity improvements to foul water sewers may be needed subject toengineering appraisal. A contribution is required towards a management and mitigation plan toaddress of phosphate levels in the River Avon SAC watercourses and their threat to protectedspecies as well as its implementation.Inspectors request forconsistencyPCT: Financial contribution towards new or improved doctors and dentist surgeries.Emergency services: Contributions towards the Fire Service for new or improved fire stationsin order to provide a comprehensive and flexible responses to future emergencies.Renewable Energy: 10% renewable energy generated on or near the site as per RSS policy.These infrastructure requirements will be negotiated and delivered on a site by site basis aspart of section 106 agreements until the Wiltshire wide DPD on planning obligations toincorporate the CIL, setting out a tariff approach is adopted.Wiltshire Fire andRescue SCGPlace shaping requirementsIn addition to the provisions of 'Creating Places' and saved Local Plan policies, masterplanning of the site needs to specifically address:• Views to the cathedral as an integral part of the site layout and design• Linkages and enhancement of the water meadows and Town Path• Provision of green links from the east and west of the River Nadder to contributetowards the environmental and ecological aspirations of the Salisbury VisionPage 36 of 70

ProposedChangeReferenceCS REFERENCE CHANGE SOURCE• Incorporation of a central green to act as a focal point and encourage vitality• A mix of heights of up to 6 storeys on the Churchfields site determined by detailedcontext planning• Significant landscape buffer planting to the river• Pedestrian, public transport and cycle linkages to the city centre, including integrationwith the Railway Station Interchange.• Integration of both sites with each other and with existing residential uses• Orientation of the Engine Sheds site to maximise solar gainStrategic Linkages• Pedestrian, public transport and cycle linkages to the city centre, including integrationwith the Railway Station Interchange• Linkages and enhancement of the water meadows and Town Path• Provision of green links from the east and west of the River Nadder to contributetowards the environmental and ecological aspirations of the Salisbury Vision• Incorporation of a central green to act as a focal point and encourage vitality.Delivery MechanismThis site should be the subject of partnership between private and public sector based onfrontloading a master plan to be approved by the Local Planning Authority as part of theplanning application process. This Master Plan will guide the private sector led delivery of thesite.Key delivery milestones, monitoring and reviewThis site has been chosen not only because strategically, environmentally and consultatively itcan make a significant contribution to meeting local needs through regeneration, but alsobecause early discussions with land owners, agents and prospective developers haveencouraged the Local Planning Authority that this site can be brought forward within the firstfive years. In order to safeguard the delivery of housing within this period the followingAgreed with variousPage 37 of 70

ProposedChangeReferenceCS REFERENCE CHANGE SOURCEmilestones will be adhered to:In order to expedite the delivery of development within this period the Council will work closelywith the developers and landowners to facilitate delivery, and will expect to see significant,tangible progress towards a planning application within 18 months of the date of adoption ofthe Core Strategy. This work should include master planning, community engagement andprogress on the necessary assessments. If the Council is concerned that significant progressis not being made on the preparation of a planning application, or that, subsequent to the grantof planning permission, as identified through regular monitoring work, there does not appear tobe a reasonable prospect of development commencing in a timely manner, a review into thedelivery of the site will be instigated. This review will comprise:parties as a result ofdiscussion at EIPhearings.• Immediate partnership working with LPA and stakeholders frontloading matters• A planning application accompanied by master plan and design code within 18 monthsof adoption of the Core Strategy.• A section 106 agreement will be required setting key milestones for delivery includingthat the site shall start delivering housing within 12 months of the grant of permissionand a phasing agreement setting out completions at agreed milestones movingforward.• Detailed dialogue with the landowner, developer and their agents to ascertain thecause of delay.• An update of the Strategic Housing Market Availability Assessment to identify whethermarket demand has reduced or is being met through other sources.• A further independent viability study of the site to assess its delivery.• Using the Council’s influence to try and remove any barriers identified that stand in theway of progress, such as working with statutory consultees and the community.• As a last resort, if the Council feels that the new evidence renders the siteundeliverable, a new allocation or allocations equivalent to the Strategic Allocation willbe considered through the appropriate development plan process.Failure to meet any of the above deadlines without production of compelling justification willPage 38 of 70

ProposedChangeReferenceCS REFERENCE CHANGE SOURCElead to conclusion that the site is not deliverable and the site could be de-allocated in a minireviewof the Core Strategy and the site replaced with an alternative site where more certaintyexists.MAJ/16 Page 158 to 160UK Land ForcesHead Quarters,WiltonAn independent viability review of the site will be undertaken by Wiltshire Council within twoyears to review the standards of delivery set in view of the projected recovery from therecession of 2009. This review will not be undertaken where the developer has demonstratedcommitment through delivery in the first two years of the Strategy.Site NameUK Land forces Head Quarters, WiltonSite Description of siteThis site is situated approximately 0.7 km to the north of the centre of Wilton. It is to the east ofThe Avenue and the north of the A30 and Wilton Conservation Area. The site is divided intotwo parts to the south west and north east of a railway embankment. Beyond the A36 at thesouthern end of the site is Wilton Park (a registered historic park and garden). To the east ofthe northern part of the site falls there is agricultural land and to the south residential dwellings.The site is currently used for a mixture of military offices and accommodation.Objectives for the developmentTo develop around 450 new homes and a minimum of 3 hectares of employment land toprovide a minimum of 1200 jobs, to match those that will be lost due to the military site closing.The development should be of a high quality which delivers an appropriate sense of place inaccordance with the south Wiltshire design guide 'Creating Places' in a sustainable locationclose to Wilton, in a manner which compliments complements the existing community andmakes a significant contribution to meeting local housing needs in south Wiltshire, whilstimproving the number and range of jobs available in the local area. Specific issues to beaddressed are:Inspector request forconsistency.Minor change toSubmission Documentpreviously containedwithin SWCS 13 APage 39 of 70

ProposedChangeReferenceCS REFERENCE CHANGE SOURCE• To replace the employment opportunities lost by the MOD relocation to Andover• Replacing the contribution the MOD jobs make to keeping existing shops and servicesin Wilton town centre viable.• Strategic gap to ensure Wilton retains its independent character and does not becomemerged with Salisbury• To deliver a development that conserves and enhances views into and out of theWilton Conservation Area including Wilton Park and House• Conservation of the historic gateway to Wilton along The AvenueSite Constraints• Potential coalescence between Salisbury and Wilton: a strategic landscape belt to beretained• Setting and views to and from Wilton Park and Wilton Conservation Area• Existing residential amenity to the east of the southern part of the site• Numerous mature trees on the site• Potential impact on amenity of noise from the railway that divides the site and the A36adjoining the southern half of the site• Links between the northern and southern parts of the site and to Wilton• Proximity to River Nadder (part of River Avon SAC)Land uses and quanta of development• Around 450 new dwellings of which a minimum of 40% will be affordable. Thebreakdown will be as detailed in Core Policy 10.• A minimum of 3 hectares of employment land to provide around 1200 new jobs and toinclude some startup units• New 1 FE primary school and secondary contributions• Public Open SpaceInspectors request forconsistencyEssential Infrastructure RequirementsPage 40 of 70

ProposedChangeReferenceCS REFERENCE CHANGE SOURCEEducation: 1 form entry Primary school and either a secondary contribution or assistancetowards construction of new 'Salisbury High School'Transportation: Any major infrastructure requirements outcomes identified by the SalisburyTransport Model or subsequent Transport Assessment and Travel Plan. New access includingimprovements to the junction between the A360 and The Avenue and at the A30. A TransportAssessment which sets out how the modal shift promoted at national and RSS level will beachieved, including improved, bus, cycle and walking routes.Green infrastructure: Formal and informal public open space to be provided on site. Newwoodland, hedges and standard trees to connect retained hedges and woodland andultimately link River Avon. Improved linkages and contributions towards improvements toWilton House historic park and garden and links through to proposed Fugglestone Reddevelopment. Other essential GI and BAP habitat and species requirements will be determinedat or prior to master planning.Heritage: Site design and massing of buildings enhances views from Wilton Park and thesetting of Wilton. Design and massing is sensitive to its location on rising ground. The existingtree belt along the southern road frontage is retained and enhanced as a backdrop to WiltonPark. Lighting does not exceed the height of the development and is designed to minimise,light pollution and sky glow. The open character of the land to the east of the development siteis maintained as it also features in views from Little Park. Possible enhancements of TheAvenue.Drainage and Water: No off site reinforcement required for this redevelopment - capacityavailable to serve this level of development. Existing site served by private sewers, on sitesewers provided by developers with separate systems of drainage will be required. Off sitesurface water disposal to local land drainage systems with attenuated discharge to satisfyPPS25. Off site foul sewer to agreed point of connection to public sewer system. There is alow probability that downstream improvements will be required and will need to be confirmedby engineering appraisal to confirm the scope and extent of any capacity improvements.Existing railway at the southern boundary may restrict gravity discharge from the site. Acontribution towards management and mitigation of phosphate levels in the River Avon SACGOSW SCGHighways Agency SCG(18 March 2010)Natural England SCGMinor change toSubmission Documentpreviously containedwithin SWCS 13 AInspectors request forPage 41 of 70

ProposedChangeReferenceCS REFERENCE CHANGE SOURCEand their threat to protected species as well as its implementation.consistencyPCT: Financial contribution towards new or improved doctors and dentist surgeries.Emergency services: Contributions towards the Fire Service for new or improved fire stationsin order to provide a comprehensive and flexible responses to future emergencies.Community facilities and services: Need to deliver a local centre to provide the local access tobasic services this area currently lacks.Renewable energy: 10% renewable energy generated on or near the siteThese infrastructure requirements will be negotiated and delivered on a site by site basis aspart of section 106 agreements until the Wiltshire wide DPD on planning obligations toincorporate the CIL, setting out a tariff approach is adopted.Wiltshire Fire andRescue SCGPlace shaping requirementsIn addition to the provisions of 'Creating Places' and saved Local Plan policies, masterplanning of this site needs to specifically address:• Tree planting to protect key views from Wilton Park• The Avenue to be retained and enhanced• Massing and design of buildings sympathetic to Wilton Conservation Area• Lighting does not exceed the height of the development and is designed to minimiselight pollution and sky glow• Show how the new neighbourhood can be integrated into the existing community ofWilton, both residential and commercial and into the built and natural environment.• Employment land should not comprise development that will cause a nuisance to thenew or existing residents• The Avenue not to be widened or subject to major road improvements• A significant green buffer retained between the built up areas of Salisbury and WiltonPage 42 of 70

ProposedChangeReferenceCS REFERENCE CHANGE SOURCEStrategic LinkagesImproved linkages with the built up areas of Wilton, Wilton House historic park and garden andthe site atFugglestone RedDelivery MechanismThis site should be the subject of partnership between private and public sector based onfrontloading a master plan to be approved by the Local Planning Authority as part of theplanning application process. This Master Plan will guide the private sector led delivery of thesite.Key delivery milestones, monitoring and reviewThis site has been chosen not only because strategically, environmentally and consultatively itcan make a significant contribution to meeting local needs through regeneration, but alsobecause early discussions with land owners, agents and prospective developers haveencouraged the Local Planning Authority that this site can be brought forward within the firstfive years. In order to safeguard the delivery of housing within this period the followingmilestones will be adhered to:In order to expedite the delivery of development within this period the Council will work closelywith the developers and landowners to facilitate delivery, and will expect to see significant,tangible progress towards a planning application within 18 months of the date of adoption ofthe Core Strategy. This work should include master planning, community engagement andprogress on the necessary assessments. If the Council is concerned that significant progressis not being made on the preparation of a planning application, or that, subsequent to the grantof planning permission, as identified through regular monitoring work, there does not appear tobe a reasonable prospect of development commencing in a timely manner, a review into thedelivery of the site will be instigated. This review will comprise:Agreed with variousparties as a result ofdiscussion at EIPhearings.Page 43 of 70

ProposedChangeReferenceCS REFERENCE CHANGE SOURCE• Immediate partnership working with LPA and stakeholders frontloading matters• A planning application accompanied by master plan and design code within 18 monthsof adoption of the Core Strategy.• A section 106 agreement will be required setting key milestones for delivery includingthat the site shall start delivering housing within 12 months of the grant of permissionand a phasing agreement setting out completions at agreed milestones movingforward.MAJ/17Page 161 to page163Land south ofNetherhampton• Detailed dialogue with the landowner, developer and their agents to ascertain thecause of delay.• An update of the Strategic Housing Market Availability Assessment to identify whethermarket demand has reduced or is being met through other sources.• A further independent viability study of the site to assess its delivery.• Using the Council’s influence to try and remove any barriers identified that stand in theway of progress, such as working with statutory consultees and the community.• As a last resort, if the Council feels that the new evidence renders the siteundeliverable, a new allocation or allocations equivalent to the Strategic Allocation willbe considered through the appropriate development plan process.Failure to meet any of the above deadlines without production of compelling justification willlead to conclusion that the site is not deliverable and the site could be de-allocated in a minireviewof the Core Strategy and the site replaced with an alternative site where more certaintyexists.An independent viability review of the site will be undertaken by Wiltshire Council within twoyears to review the standards of delivery set in view of the projected recovery from therecession of 2009. This review will not be undertaken where the developer has demonstratedcommitment through delivery in the first two years of the Strategy.Site Name:Land south of Netherhampon RoadChange map as follows:Page 44 of 70

ProposedChangeReferenceCS REFERENCE CHANGE SOURCERoad developmenttemplateCouncil’s suggestedchange to map asagreed with MrLipscomb and Pre-Vision Planning duringEIPSite Description of siteThe Netherhampton Road site is located to the south and west of Salisbury, south of theInspector request forconsistency.Page 45 of 70

ProposedChangeReferenceCS REFERENCE CHANGE SOURCEA3094 Netherhampton Road, between existing employment use to the east and the livestockmarket to the west. The site is located at the edge of Salisbury city, within Netherhamptonparish. It falls partly within the Netherhampton Chalk Downland LCA. It is low-lying andpredominantly flat, with a slope to the east of the site, facing north and north east. A gradualincline extends southwards to the drove track with the Cranborne Chase and West WiltshireDowns Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty Boundary boundary a short distance away.Another distinctive ridgeline runs east west through Harnham Hill and its western bluff intrudesinto the north east corner of the site. To the north of the site sits arable land forming part ofHarnham Water Meadows. The site consists of large arable fields with an open feel and fairlyminimal hedges and trees.Objectives for the developmentMinor change toSubmission Documentpreviously containedwithin SWCS 13 ACouncil’s suggestedchange to map asagreed with MrLipscomb and Pre-Vision Planning duringEIPTo develop 400 new homes and 10 hectares of employment land. The development will be ofa high quality, which delivers an appropriate sense of place in accordance with the southWiltshire Design Guide 'Creating Places', in a manner which compliments complements theexisting community at Harnham and makes a significant strategic contribution to meeting thelocal housing needs of south Wiltshire. Specific issues to be addressed are:Minor change toSubmission Documentpreviously containedwithin SWCS 13 A• Delivery of a local centre and community facilities for the Harnham Area• Delivery of a development that conserves and in places enhances the naturalenvironment, including the River Avon SAC.• Protection of views into and out of the Cranborne Chase and West Wiltshire DownsAONB.• Potential to incorporate the medieval drove road into the site layoutSite Constraints• Significant level views of the cathedral across the water meadows. The southern partof the site is particularly visible in views to and from the cathedral.• An urban gateway into Salisbury on the A3094: site would form a first impression ofSalisbury on approach from the westPage 46 of 70

ProposedChangeReferenceCS REFERENCE CHANGE SOURCE• Much potential for unknown archaeology in the form of prehistoric barrows, fieldsystems and enclosures across the site• Water meadows are a key feature of the surrounding landscape, with important viewsacross them to the cathedral• The higher, southern portion, of the site, together with the ridgeline and northern scarpslope of Harnham Hill, is visible across the valley and from the centre of the city,making it more sensitive to development.• Maintaining separation of Salisbury from Ebble Valley villages• Residential amenity adjacent to existing employment uses and livestock marketCouncil’s suggestedchange to map asagreed with MrLipscomb and Pro-Vision Planning duringEIPLand uses and quanta of development• 400 new dwellings of which a minimum of 40% will be affordable. The breakdown willbe as detailed in Core Policy 6.• Minimum of 10 hectares of employment land• New primary school• Public Open Space• Local CentreInspectors request forconsistencyEssential Infrastructure RequirementsEducation: 1 form entry Primary school (or contributions) and contributions towards secondaryTransportation: Any major infrastructure requirements outcomes identified by the SalisburyTransport Model or subsequent Transport Assessment and Travel Plan. A TransportAssessment which sets out how the modal shift promoted at national and RSS level will beachieved, including improved, bus, cycle and walking routes.Green infrastructure: Formal and informal public open space to be provided on site. Newwoodland, hedges and standard trees to connect retained hedges and woodland andultimately link to River Avon SAC. Improved linkages and contributions towards improvementsto Wilton House historic park and garden. Other essential GI and BAP habitat and speciesGOSW SCGHighways Agency SCG(18 March 2010)Drafting error as aresult of previous HRAconsiderations.Page 47 of 70

ProposedChangeReferenceCS REFERENCE CHANGE SOURCErequirements will be determined at or prior to master planning.Natural England SCGHeritage: Archaeological investigations are undertaken prior to the site master planning ascurrently undiscovered archaeology could be of sufficient importance to affect developmentson parts of the site. Development on the higher, southern part of the site may need to berestricted in height due to cathedral views. There is potential to incorporate the medievaldrovers road into the site layout. Landscaping should be used to link to the water meadowsand enhance the setting of Salisbury and frame views of the cathedral, lighting should be lowlevel, not intrude above the height of buildings and designed to minimise sky glow.Drainage and Water: Upstream network has limited capacity with reduced pressure. Significantnetwork improvements will be required to provide additional capacity to serve developmentproposals. Engineering appraisal will be required to determine the scope and extent of thesecapacity improvements. On site sewers to be provided by developers with separate systems ofdrainage. There is no spare capacity in local networks for any significant development. Surfacewater disposal to local land drainage systems with attenuated discharge is required to satisfyPPS25. Capacity improvements to foul water system may be needed subject to engineeringappraisal when development proposals are identified in more detail. Cumulative developmentwithin the catchment will require downstream improvements. A contribution towardsmanagement and mitigation of phosphate levels in the River Avon SAC and their threat toprotected species as well as its implementation.Natural England SCGPCT: Financial contribution towards new or improved doctors and dentist surgeries.Emergency services: Contributions towards the Fire Service for new or improved fire stationsin order to provide a comprehensive and flexible responses to future emergencies.Community facilities and services: Need to deliver a local centre to provide the local access tobasic services this area of Salisbury currently lacks.Renewable energy: 10% renewable energy generated on or near the siteThese infrastructure requirements will be negotiated and delivered on a site by site basis asWiltshire Fire andRescue SCGPage 48 of 70

ProposedChangeReferenceCS REFERENCE CHANGE SOURCEpart of section 106 agreements until the Wiltshire wide DPD on planning obligations toincorporate the CIL, setting out a tariff approach is adopted.Place shaping requirementsIn addition to the provisions of 'Creating Places' and saved Local Plan policies, masterplanning of this site needs to specifically address:• Lighting does not exceed the height of the development and is designed to minimiselight pollution and sky glow.• Employment land should not comprise development that will cause a nuisance to thenew or existing residents.• Care will have to be taken to ensure the built form integrates well with existing naturalfeatures.• Building design and massing respect the edge of settlement location• Views to the cathedral as an integral part of the site layout and design• Show how the new neighbourhood can be integrated into the existing community, bothresidential and commercial and into the built and natural environment.Strategic LinkagesThe site will need to improve links to Harnham, and the Town Path that links the site by foot toSalisbury.Delivery MechanismThis site should be the subject of partnership between private and public sector based onfrontloading a master plan to be approved by the Local Planning Authority as part of theplanning application process. This Master Plan will guide the private sector led delivery of thesite.Key delivery milestones, monitoring and reviewPage 49 of 70

ProposedChangeReferenceCS REFERENCE CHANGE SOURCEThis site has been chosen not only because strategically, environmentally and consultatively itcan make a significant contribution to meeting local needs through regeneration, but alsobecause early discussions with land owners, agents and prospective developers haveencouraged the Local Planning Authority that this site can be brought forward within the firstfive years. In order to safeguard the delivery of housing within this period the followingmilestones will be adhered to:In order to expedite the delivery of development within this period the Council will work closelywith the developers and landowners to facilitate delivery, and will expect to see significant,tangible progress towards a planning application within 18 months of the date of adoption ofthe Core Strategy. This work should include master planning, community engagement andprogress on the necessary assessments. If the Council is concerned that significant progressis not being made on the preparation of a planning application, or that, subsequent to the grantof planning permission, as identified through regular monitoring work, there does not appear tobe a reasonable prospect of development commencing in a timely manner, a review into thedelivery of the site will be instigated. This review will comprise:Agreed with variousparties as a result ofdiscussion at EIPhearings.• Immediate partnership working with LPA and stakeholders frontloading matters• A planning application accompanied by master plan and design code within 18 monthsof adoption of the Core Strategy.• A section 106 agreement will be required setting key milestones for delivery includingthat the site shall start delivering housing within 12 months of the grant of permissionand a phasing agreement setting out completions at agreed milestones movingforward.• Detailed dialogue with the landowner, developer and their agents to ascertain thecause of delay.• An update of the Strategic Housing Market Availability Assessment to identify whethermarket demand has reduced or is being met through other sources.• A further independent viability study of the site to assess its delivery.• Using the Council’s influence to try and remove any barriers identified that stand in thePage 50 of 70

ProposedChangeReferenceCS REFERENCE CHANGE SOURCEway of progress, such as working with statutory consultees and the community.• As a last resort, if the Council feels that the new evidence renders the siteundeliverable, a new allocation or allocations equivalent to the Strategic Allocation willbe considered through the appropriate development plan process.Failure to meet any of the above deadlines without production of compelling justification willlead to conclusion that the site is not deliverable and the site could be de-allocated in a minireviewof the Core Strategy and the site replaced with an alternative site where more certaintyexists.An independent viability review of the site will be undertaken by Wiltshire Council within twoyears to review the standards of delivery set in view of the projected recovery from therecession of 2009. This review will not be undertaken where the developer has demonstratedcommitment through delivery in the first two years of the Strategy.MAJ/18Page 164 to Page166Longhedge, OldSarum, Salisburydevelopmenttemplate.Site NameLonghedge, Old Sarum, SalisburyMap[Annotation at left hand side]: Existing Planning Consent (620 630 dwellings and 6ha).Minor change toSubmission Documentpreviously containedwithin SWCS 13 ASite Description of siteInspector request forconsistency.The site is located to the north of Salisbury city, to the north east of Old Sarum and the A345.To the south of the site is the Beehive Park and Ride site, largely screened by trees, and asmall area of employment land. To the east is an employment site and Old Sarum Airfield,which is a Conservation Area. To the immediate east is an existing Local Plan allocation site,where detailed planning permission has been granted for 600 dwellings and building hascommenced. This site lies to either side of the Salisbury City Football Club stadium.Page 51 of 70

ProposedChangeReferenceCS REFERENCE CHANGE SOURCEObjectives for the developmentTo develop a housing led mixed use development of 800 dwellings and 8 ha of employment,through a high quality master plan which delivers an appropriate sense of place in accordancewith the South Wiltshire Design Guide, 'Creating Places' in a sustainable location, in a mannerwhich compliments complements the existing community and makes a significant strategiccontribution to meeting local housing needs of South Wiltshire. Specific issue to be addressedare:• The introduction of additional dwellings to the Old Sarum area will add a critical massto secure the delivery and viability of planned and new local facilities to create a moreself-contained community based around a neighbourhood centre.• The provision of employment opportunities for both new investment and decant fromChurchfields.Minor changes toSubmission Documentpreviously containedwithin SWCS 13 ASite Constraints• Football stadium and airfield noise will need to be mitigated• Highways impact on Castle Road and wider area, and associated impact on air quality• Impact on setting of Old Sarum SAM and Old Sarum Airfield Conservation Area• High potential for unknown archaeology on the site• Street lighting designed to minimise light pollution and sky glow.Land uses and quanta of developmentThe site comprises approximately 51ha and will accommodate a mix of employment andhousing. The site will deliver approximately 800 dwellings of which a minimum of 40% will beaffordable. The breakdown will be as detailed in Core Policy 6.Inspectors request forconsistencyCommunity infrastructure and approximately 8ha of employment land which will includegeneral industrial, office, research and development, storage and distribution, but excluderetail.Page 52 of 70

ProposedChangeReferenceCS REFERENCE CHANGE SOURCEEssential Infrastructure RequirementsEducation: 2 form entry primary school and financial contributions for secondary.Transportation: Any major infrastructure requirements outcomes identified by the SalisburyTransport Model or subsequent Transport Assessment and Travel Plan. A TransportAssessment which sets out how the modal shift promoted at national and RSS level will beachieved, including improved, bus, cycle and walking routes and possible junctionimprovements at Beehive roundabout, opportunities for links cycle and footpath to theSalisbury city centre, Beehive Park and Ride and other strategic sites. Implementing measuresto prevent overloading of Castle Road and potential contribution to Beehive Park and Ride.Contribution to addressing the objectives set out in the Salisbury AQMA.Green infrastructure: Formal and informal public open space to be provided on site. Strategiclandscape plan required to ensure opportunities to improve views from Old Sarum, through thescreening of existing functional buildings. The strengthening of existing tree belts at the site.Other essential GI and BAP habitat and species requirements will be determined at or prior tomaster planning.GOSW SCGHighways Agency SCG(18 March 2010)Minor changes toSubmission Documentpreviously containedwithin SWCS 13 ANatural England SCGFlooding: A flood risk assessment will be required and satisfy the requirements of PPS 25,reference should be made to the Level 1 SFRADrainage and Water: This should pay particular attention to drainage and the control of surfacewater by the use of SUDS. Engineering assessment of water and foul sewer drainage at thesite and potential capacity improvements at Petersfinger sewerage works and potable watercapacity. Cumulative development within the upstream catchment at Old Sarum, HamptonPark and Longhedge developments will trigger significant works with new relief sewer toensure that risk from sewer flooding is resolved. A contribution towards a management andmitigation of phosphate levels in the River Avon SAC and their threat to protected species aswell as its implementation.Inspectors request forconsistencyPCT: Financial contribution towards new or improved doctors and dentist surgeries.Page 53 of 70

ProposedChangeReferenceCS REFERENCE CHANGE SOURCEEmergency services: Contributions towards the Fire Service for new or improved fire stationsin order to provide a comprehensive and flexible responses to future emergencies.Community facilities and services: Additional community facilities and services to complementand reinforce the viability of the already planned district centre.Renewable Energy: 10% renewable energy generated on or near the site as per RSS policy.These infrastructure requirements will be negotiated and delivered on a site by site basis aspart of section 106 agreements until the Wiltshire wide DPD on planning obligations toincorporate the CIL, setting out a tariff approach is adopted.Wiltshire Fire andRescue SCGPlace shaping requirementsIn addition to the provisions of 'Creating Places' and saved Local Plan policies, masterplanning of this site needs to specifically address:• There are opportunities to secure the long term future of Old Sarum Aerodromethrough some sensitive new development, acting as a catalyst for a new ManagementPlan related to heritage and a legal agreement which controls the level of flyingactivity, which has been a longstanding issue locally.• Key views to and from Old Sarum and impact on the SAM.• Show how the new neighbourhood can be integrated into the existing community, bothresidential and commercial and into the built and natural environment.• Employment land should not comprise development that will cause a nuisance to thenew or existing residents.• Density and building height of development will vary in response to the visualsensitivity of different parts of the site allowing a balance between built and ‘greenareas’ with a higher density of development in the southern part of the site through topredominantly ‘green / planted areas’. This ‘topographical progression’ ofdevelopment would be matched by a ‘structural landscape / green infrastructureEnglish Heritage SCGPage 54 of 70

ProposedChangeReferenceCS REFERENCE CHANGE SOURCEprogression’ in order to minimise visual impact and help to maintain an appropriatelandscape setting for Old Sarum.• Retaining and strengthening the landscape elements of the site to inform the layout ofdevelopment and allowing it to relate, respond and assimilate with the surroundings.• Embedding the majority of the new development within a newly established network ofgreen corridors and strategic landscaping.• Ensuring the design responds to a detailed analysis of the historic environment;safeguards key views to and from Old Sarum and; integrates the sites importantarchaeology.• Overall building mass is in keeping with the rural setting.• Lighting does not exceed the height of the development and is designed to minimiselight pollution and skyglow. Lighting should not impinge on the views from Old Sarum.• There are no alterations, (unless essential in the interests of road safety and gainingsafe access to the site – issue to be agreed at masterplanning stage), to the line of theRoman road and long views of Old Sarum are preserved as vehicles travel southwardsalong the A345 (old Roman road) by containing development within the site bystructural roadside planting.Strategic LinkagesLinkages with the existing allocated site at Old Sarum to ensure that the new communities canintegrate and function as one.Delivery MechanismThis site should be the subject of partnership between private and public sector based onfrontloading a master plan to be approved by the Local Planning Authority as part of theplanning application process. This Master Plan will guide the private sector led delivery of thesite.Key delivery milestones, monitoring and reviewPage 55 of 70

ProposedChangeReferenceCS REFERENCE CHANGE SOURCEThis site has been chosen not only because strategically, environmentally and consultatively itcan make a significant contribution to meeting local needs through regeneration, but alsobecause early discussions with land owners, agents and prospective developers haveencouraged the Local Planning Authority that this site can be brought forward within the firstfive years. In order to safeguard the delivery of housing within this period the followingmilestones will be adhered to:Agreed with variousparties as a result ofdiscussion at EIPhearings.In order to expedite the delivery of development within this period the Council will work closelywith the developers and landowners to facilitate delivery, and will expect to see significant,tangible progress towards a planning application within 18 months of the date of adoption ofthe Core Strategy. This work should include master planning, community engagement andprogress on the necessary assessments. If the Council is concerned that significant progressis not being made on the preparation of a planning application, or that, subsequent to the grantof planning permission, as identified through regular monitoring work, there does not appear tobe a reasonable prospect of development commencing in a timely manner, a review into thedelivery of the site will be instigated. This review will comprise:• Immediate partnership working with LPA and stakeholders frontloading matters• A planning application accompanied by master plan and design code within 18 monthsof adoption of the Core Strategy.• A section 106 agreement will be required setting key milestones for delivery includingthat the site shall start delivering housing within 12 months of the grant of permissionand a phasing agreement setting out completions at agreed milestones movingforward.• Detailed dialogue with the landowner, developer and their agents to ascertain thecause of delay.• An update of the Strategic Housing Market Availability Assessment to identify whethermarket demand has reduced or is being met through other sources.• A further independent viability study of the site to assess its delivery.• Using the Council’s influence to try and remove any barriers identified that stand in theway of progress, such as working with statutory consultees and the community.Page 56 of 70

ProposedChangeReferenceCS REFERENCE CHANGE SOURCE• As a last resort, if the Council feels that the new evidence renders the siteundeliverable, a new allocation or allocations equivalent to the Strategic Allocation willbe considered through the appropriate development plan process.Failure to meet any of the above deadlines without production of compelling justification willlead to conclusion that the site is not deliverable and the site could be de-allocated in a minireviewof the Core Strategy and the site replaced with an alternative site where more certaintyexists.MAJ/19 Page 167 to 169King’ Gate,AmesburydevelopmenttemplateAn independent viability review of the site will be undertaken by Wiltshire Council within twoyears to review the standards of delivery set in view of the projected recovery from therecession of 2009. This review will not be undertaken where the developer has demonstratedcommitment through delivery in the first two years of the Strategy.Site Name:King’s Gate, AmesburyChange map as follows:Page 57 of 70

ProposedChangeReferenceCS REFERENCE CHANGE SOURCEKings GateResidentialdevelopment of1300 dwellingsA303SolsticeParkAmesburyTown CentreChanged map asagreed under EnglishHeritage SCGLand Conserved asOpen SpaceExistingHousingAllocationA3BoscombeDownMilitaryGarrisonPage 58 of 70

ProposedChangeReferenceCS REFERENCE CHANGE SOURCESite DescriptionThe To site is located to the south of Amesbury and is mainly comprises former agriculturalland. The site is bounded by residential development. Agricultural land surrounds the site onthe western and southern and eastern boundaries, which is in turn bounded by the A345 to thewest and Stockport Road to the south and east. There is further open agricultural land beyondStockport Road and beyond the A345. Former military housing and MOD outdoor sportsfacilities are located to the east of the site, beyond which lies the Boscombe Down MilitaryGarrison.Change proposed byTerence O’Rourke andagreed by CouncilObjectives for the developmentTo develop 1300 houses through a high quality development, which delivers an appropriatesense of place in accordance with the South Wiltshire design guide "Creating Places" in amanner which complements the existing development at Archer's Gate and makes a significantstrategic contribution to meeting local housing needs of south Wiltshire. Specific issues to beaddressed are: The site masterplan should:Changes proposed byTerence O’Rourke andagreed by Council• Make provision for a new wing of the existing Amesbury Archer primary school to bebuilt plus an additional 1 form entry primary school.• Allocate land for an additional 1 form entry primary school.• Ensuringe any new development respects the scale, setting and form of the existingsettlement and appropriate design and mitigation measures are put in place toaccommodate new development without significant adverse effects on key views toand from upper chalk downland slopes.• Explore the potential to soften visually harsh and abrupt settlements edges in this areathrough a strong structure of tree and shrub planting.• Take account of the Special Landscape Area which abuts the western edge of the siteand so care will have to be taken to make sure ensure that the built form integrateswell with existing natural features. Development would need to ensure a sensitiveinterface between the natural and man-made setting.• Make provision for the introduction of local facilities to create a more self-containedPage 59 of 70

ProposedChangeReferenceCS REFERENCE CHANGE SOURCEcommunity based around a the existing Archers Gate neighbourhood centre• Integrate the development with earlier phases of the development at Archers Gate• Delivery of infrastructure is underway as part of an earlier phase of development onthe site; it will be important that the new development integrates with earlier phases ofdevelopment at Archers Gate.• Potential to soften visually harsh and abrupt settlement edges through a strongstructure of tree and shrub planting.• The safeguarding and enhancement of natural habitats.Changes proposed byTerence O’Rourke andagreed by CouncilSite Constraints• Potential Impact on the River Avon SAC• Possible protected species including badgers, birds, reptiles• Existing tree belt• Area of Special Archaeological Significance. The strip lynchets to the north west ofthe site are a Scheduled Ancient Monument.• Proximity to Boscombe Down military airfield and noise implications• Special Landscape Area abutting the western edge of the siteLand uses and quanta of development• 1300 houses of which a minimum of 40% will be affordable. The breakdown will be asdetailed in Core Policy 11.• New 1 form entry primary school• Public Open SpaceInspectors request forconsistencyChange proposed byTerence O’Rourke andagreed by CouncilEssential Infrastructure RequirementsEducation: New wing of existing primary school to be built plus an additional 1 form entryprimary school.Secondary contribution to expand Stonehenge Secondary School.Change proposed byTerence O’Rourke andagreed by CouncilPage 60 of 70

ProposedChangeReferenceCS REFERENCE CHANGE SOURCETransportation: Any infrastructure requirement outcomes to be identified by the TransportAssessment which will cover the following:• An updated SATURN Transport Model based on updated traffic counts and trafficgeneration impact assessments on the local network including the links to the site andthe town centre.• Updated traffic counts and traffic generation impact assessments on the local networkincluding the links to the site and the town centre.• An assessment of the effectiveness of the double-mini roundabout on the junction ofUnderwood Drive and Boscombe Road• An assessment of committed development, including the development at SolsticePark.• The potential development at Boscombe Down.• A pedestrian and cyclist audit of the link between Byway 20 and the town centre.Green Infrastructure: Formal and informal public open space to be provided on site. Siteshould look to minimise impact on River Avon SAC. Incorporate linear strip into new nativewoodland planting to connect to River Avon SAC. New chalk grassland habitat in severalconnected blocks each of minimum 1 ha, located to connect with grassland habitat to southand east. New hedgerow planting especially within new chalk grasslands to encouragefarmland birds and butterflies. New grassland and wood habitat to link this habitat into thelandscape, depending on possible future use of this area. Other essential GI and BAP habitatand species requirements will be determined at or prior to master planning. 1 in 10 propertiesto contain Drainage and Water: A contribution is required towards a management andmitigation plan to address phosphate levels in the River Avon SAC catchment and the threat toprotected species as well as its implementation.Drainage and Water: A contribution is required towards a management and mitigation plan toaddress phosphate levels in the River Avon SAC catchment and the threat to protectedspecies as well as its implementation.PCT: Possible provision of land or financial contribution towards new or improved doctors anddentist surgeries.Changes proposed byTerence O’Rourke andagreed by CouncilChange proposed byTerence O’Rourke andagreed by CouncilNatural England SCGChanges proposed byTerence O’Rourke andagreed by CouncilChange proposed byTerence O’Rourke andagreed by CouncilPage 61 of 70

ProposedChangeReferenceCS REFERENCE CHANGE SOURCEEmergency Services: Contribution to the provision of a new community fire station orimprovements to existing facilities in order to provide a comprehensive and flexible responsesto future emergencies.Community facilities: Additional facilities and services to complement and reinforce the viabilityof the already planned district centre.Renewable Energy: 10% renewable energy generated on or near the site as per RSS policy.These infrastructure requirements will be negotiated and delivered on a site by site basis aspart of section 106 agreements until the Wiltshire wide DPD on planning obligations toincorporate the CIL, setting out a tariff approach is adopted.Wiltshire Fire andRescue SCGPlace shaping requirementsIn addition to the provisions of 'Creating Places' and saved Local Plan policies, masterplanning of this site needs to specifically address the master plan should:• Care will have to be taken to ensure the built form integrates well with existing naturalfeatures• Ensure that building design and massing respect the edge of settlement location• Show how the new development will integrate with earlier phases of development atArchers Gate.• Development to take account of the adopted design code• Development to be set back from the northern boundary and limited in height to twostoreys to protect views from the designed parkland at Amesbury Abbey and watermeadows and limiting any adverse impact to the setting of the Stonehenge WorldHeritage Site.• Strategic landscape buffer to the north of the site to minimise the landscape impact ofdevelopment.Changes proposed byTerence O’Rourke andagreed by CouncilEnglish Heritage SCGPage 62 of 70

ProposedChangeReferenceCS REFERENCE CHANGE SOURCE• Retain, strengthen and extend existing tree screens to the north of the site.• Lighting not to exceed the height of the development and designed to minimise lightpollution and skyglow.• Appropriate design and mitigation response to the important archaeology identified bya programme of evaluation.Strategic LinkagesLinkages with the existing allocated site at Archers Gate to ensure that the new communitiescan integrate and function as one.Delivery MechanismThis site should be the subject of partnership between private and public sector based onfrontloading a master plan to be approved by the Local Planning Authority as part of theplanning application process. This Master Plan will guide the private sector led delivery of thesite.Key delivery milestones, monitoring and reviewThis site has been chosen not only because strategically, environmentally and consultatively itcan make a significant contribution to meeting local needs through regeneration, but alsobecause early discussions with land owners, agents and prospective developers haveencouraged the Local Planning Authority that this site can be brought forward within the firstfive years. In order to safeguard the delivery of housing within this period the followingmilestones will be adhered to:Agreed with variousparties as a result ofdiscussion at EIPhearings.In order to expedite the delivery of development within this period the Council will work closelywith the developers and landowners to facilitate delivery, and will expect to see significant,tangible progress towards a planning application within 18 months of the date of adoption ofthe Core Strategy. This work should include master planning, community engagement andprogress on the necessary assessments. If the Council is concerned that significant progressPage 63 of 70

ProposedChangeReferenceCS REFERENCE CHANGE SOURCEis not being made on the preparation of a planning application, or that, subsequent to the grantof planning permission, as identified through regular monitoring work, there does not appear tobe a reasonable prospect of development commencing in a timely manner, a review into thedelivery of the site will be instigated. This review will comprise:• Immediate partnership working with LPA and stakeholders frontloading matters• A planning application accompanied by master plan and design code within 18 monthsof adoption of the Core Strategy.• A section 106 agreement will be required setting key milestones for delivery includingthat the site shall start delivering housing within 12 months of the grant of permissionand a phasing agreement setting out completions at agreed milestones movingforward.• Detailed dialogue with the landowner, developer and their agents to ascertain thecause of delay.• An update of the Strategic Housing Market Availability Assessment to identify whethermarket demand has reduced or is being met through other sources.• A further independent viability study of the site to assess its delivery.• Using the Council’s influence to try and remove any barriers identified that stand in theway of progress, such as working with statutory consultees and the community.• As a last resort, if the Council feels that the new evidence renders the siteundeliverable, a new allocation or allocations equivalent to the Strategic Allocation willbe considered through the appropriate development plan process.Failure to meet any of the above deadlines without production of compelling justification willlead to conclusion that the site is not deliverable and the site could be de-allocated in a minireviewof the Core Strategy and the site replaced with an alternative site where more certaintyexists.An independent viability review of the site will be undertaken by Wiltshire Council within twoyears to review the standards of delivery set in view of the projected recovery from therecession of 2009. This review will not be undertaken where the developer has demonstratedPage 64 of 70

ProposedChangeReferenceCS REFERENCE CHANGE SOURCEMAJ/20 Page 170 to 172Former ImerysQuarrydevelopmenttemplatecommitment through delivery in the first two years of the Strategy.Site Name:Former Imerys Quarry, SalisburySite DescriptionThe Imerys site is located between Wilton and Salisbury, immediately north of the A36 and therailway line. To the north of the site is an existing secondary school (Salisbury High School)and to the east is recreation space. It falls partly within the Larkhill and Winterbourne ChalkDownland Landscape Character Area and is in a slightly elevated position with the naturalground level sloping in a south westerly direction.Objectives for the developmentTo develop 4 ha of employment land through a high quality development which delivers asense of place in accordance with the South Wiltshire Design Guide, 'Creating Places' in asustainable location close to Salisbury whilst making the efficient use of previously developedland. Specific issues to be addressed are:• Restoration of the site• To deliver a development which conserves and in places enhances the naturalenvironmentSite Constraints• Impact on River Avon SAC• Possible protected species• Cliff face between the Quarry and Secondary School• Areas of chalk pit and settling pools are undevelopable• Access currently gained from A36 over the railway, however railway bridge is narrowand possibly inappropriate for more intensive traffic use.Page 65 of 70

ProposedChangeReferenceCS REFERENCE CHANGE SOURCE• Potential coalescence between Salisbury and Wilton• Retention of Railway sidings• Salisbury Air Quality Area on Wilton Road• No water supply mains close to this development - Development at this site will requireoff site connecting supply main from agreed point on the existing network• There is no recorded public surface water sewer system in this area. No surface waterdischarges will be permitted to foul sewer.Land uses and quanta of development4 ha of employment landEssential Infrastructure RequirementsTransportation: Any major infrastructure requirements outcomes identified by the SalisburyTransport Model. A Transport Assessment which sets out how the modal shift promoted atnational and RSS level will be achieved, including improved bus, cycle and walkingroutes.Development will be permitted if it can be demonstrated that the operation and highwaysafety of the A36 is not compromised, non-motorised users can safely access and egress thesite, and that suitable sustainable transport options exist for users OR through the completionof a Transport Assessment and Travel Plan a package of suitable mitigation measures isidentified, agreed with the Highways Agency and implemented prior to operation of the site.Highways Agency SCG(18 March 2010)Natural England SCGGreen Infrastructure: Site should look to minimise impact on River Avon SAC. Potential forundevelopable areas to create additional habitat. Other essential GI and BAP habitat andspecies requirements will be determined at or prior to master planning.Drainage and Water: Development at this site will require off site connecting supply main fromagreed point on the existing network. On site sewers provided by developers with separatesystems of drainage, limited spare capacity available in local foul network. Off site link sewer toagreed point of connection subject to engineering appraisal. Network modelling to confirm thescope and extent of capacity improvements to downstream network. A contribution is requiredInspectors request forconsistencyPage 66 of 70

ProposedChangeReferenceCS REFERENCE CHANGE SOURCEtowards a management and mitigation plan to address of phosphate levels in the River AvonSAC watercourses and their threat to protected species as well as its implementation.Removal ofunnecessary textPCT: NoneEmergency Services: Contribution to the provision of a new community fire station orimprovements to existing facilities in order to provide a comprehensive and flexible responsesto future emergencies.Community facilities: NoneRenewable Energy: 10% renewable energy generated on or near the site as per RSS policy.These infrastructure requirements will be negotiated and delivered on a site by site basis aspart of section 106 agreements until the Wiltshire wide DPD on planning obligations toincorporate the CIL, setting out a tariff approach is adopted.Removal ofunnecessary textWiltshire Fire andRescue SCGPlace shaping requirementsIn addition to the provisions of 'Creating Places' and saved Local Plan policies, masterplanning of this site needs to specifically address:• Care will have to be taken to ensure the built form integrates well with existing naturalfeatures, as well as the proposed development to the north and the existingdevelopment to the east.• Archaeological investigations are undertaken prior to finalisation of the site design withthe design responding to finds, as required by English Heritage• The tree screen is retained between the development and the road, helping screenviews from Wilton Park and providing a green break between the built up areas ofWilton and Salisbury• Visibility splays at the entrance do not require major tree loss• Development is shelved within the chalk pit and does not exceed the height of thePage 67 of 70

ProposedChangeReferenceCS REFERENCE CHANGE SOURCEcurrent development on site (which is not visible in views from Wilton Park)• Lighting is low level and does not intrude above the height of the tree screen and isdesigned to minimise skyglowStrategic LinkagesLinkages with the allocated site Fugglestone Red and existing development to the east of thesite so that the new employment community can integrate with the existing.Delivery MechanismThis site should be the subject of partnership between private and public sector based onfrontloading a master plan to be approved by the Local Planning Authority as part of theplanning application process. This Master Plan will guide the private sector led delivery of thesite.Key delivery milestones, monitoring and reviewThis site has been chosen not only because strategically, environmentally and consultatively itcan make a significant contribution to meeting local needs through regeneration, but alsobecause early discussions with land owners, agents and prospective developers haveencouraged the Local Planning Authority that this site can be brought forward within the firstfive years. In order to safeguard the delivery of housing within this period the followingmilestones will be adhered to:In order to expedite the delivery of development within this period the Council will work closelywith the developers and landowners to facilitate delivery, and will expect to see significant,tangible progress towards a planning application within 18 months of the date of adoption ofthe Core Strategy. This work should include master planning, community engagement andprogress on the necessary assessments. If the Council is concerned that significant progressis not being made on the preparation of a planning application, or that, subsequent to the grantof planning permission, as identified through regular monitoring work, there does not appear toAgreed with variousparties as a result ofdiscussion at EIPhearings.Page 68 of 70

ProposedChangeReferenceCS REFERENCE CHANGE SOURCEbe a reasonable prospect of development commencing in a timely manner, a review into thedelivery of the site will be instigated. This review will comprise:• Immediate partnership working with LPA and stakeholders frontloading matters• A planning application accompanied by master plan and design code within 18 monthsof adoption of the Core Strategy.• A section 106 agreement will be required setting key milestones for delivery includingthat the site shall start delivering housing within 12 months of the grant of permissionand a phasing agreement setting out completions at agreed milestones movingforward.• Detailed dialogue with the landowner, developer and their agents to ascertain thecause of delay.• An update of the Strategic Housing Market Availability Assessment to identify whethermarket demand has reduced or is being met through other sources.• A further independent viability study of the site to assess its delivery.• Using the Council’s influence to try and remove any barriers identified that stand in theway of progress, such as working with statutory consultees and the community.• As a last resort, if the Council feels that the new evidence renders the siteundeliverable, a new allocation or allocations equivalent to the Strategic Allocation willbe considered through the appropriate development plan process.Failure to meet any of the above deadlines without production of compelling justification willlead to conclusion that the site is not deliverable and the site could be de-allocated in a minireviewof the Core Strategy and the site replaced with an alternative site where more certaintyexists.An independent viability review of the site will be undertaken by Wiltshire Council within twoyears to review the standards of delivery set in view of the projected recovery from therecession of 2009. This review will not be undertaken where the developer has demonstratedcommitment through delivery in the first two years of the Strategy.MAJ/21 Page 173 Remove Policy H19 (Housing Restraint Areas). Council’s suggestedPage 69 of 70

ProposedChangeReferenceReplaced LocalPlan PoliciesMAJ/22 Page 177Saved Local PlanPoliciesMAJ/23 Page 177Saved Local PlanPoliciesMAJ/24 Page 213Changed LocalPlan MapsCS REFERENCE CHANGE SOURCERemove Policy G8 (Groundwater Source Protection Areas)Add Policy H19 (Housing Restraint Areas).Retain the following inset maps on the Proposals Map:Allington; Ansty; Barkers Hill; Berwick St John; Berwick St James; Bishopstone; Bowerchalke;Bowerchalke (Misselfore); Boscombe; Burcombe; Charlton; Charlton All Saints; Chicklade;Chicksgrove; Cholderton; Compton Chamberlayne; Deptford; Donhead St Andrew; DonheadSt Mary; East Grimstead; East Knoyle; Ebbesbourne Wake; Farley; Firsdown; Fisherton DeLa Mere; Fonthill Bishop; Fonthill Gifford; Ford; Great Durnford; Hanging Langford; HugglersHole; Homington; Idmiston; Kilmington; Kilmington (The Street); Kilmington (Common); Lake;Lopcombe Corner; Lower Woodford; Maiden Bradley; Milston; Netherhampton; Newton;Netton; Newtown; Nunton; Petersfinger; Quidhampton; Semley; Semley Station; SouthNewton; Stourton; Stoford; Sutton Row; Swallowcliffe; Teffont; Tollard Royal; UpperWoodford; West Amesbury; West Dean; West Grimstead; Wilsford; White Cross;Winterbourne Stoke.The above inset maps to have Flood Zones and European Nature Designations added whereappropriate.changes as a result ofdiscussions at EIP.Environment AgencySCGCouncil’s suggestedchanges as a result ofdiscussions at EIP.Council’s suggestedchanges as a result ofdiscussions at EIP.Page 70 of 70