<strong>ARVO</strong> 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts by Scientific Section/Group - <strong>Biochemistry</strong>/<strong>Molecular</strong> <strong>Biology</strong>demonstrated that treatment with anti-vascular endothelial growthfactor (anti-VEGF) therapy was superior to observation or grid laserfor the treatment of ME due to BRVO. This study evaluates themagnitude of the impact of anti-VEGF therapy on visual impairmentfrom ME due to BRVO to estimate its potential impact in a clinicalsetting.Methods: A retrospective cohort study of patients with ME due toBRVO from 2002 to 2004 and from 2006 to 2011 was identified frompatient records of 2 retina specialists at a university-based clinic(SBB and NMB). Eligibility included ME in one or both eyes fromBRVO and treatment with grid laser from 2002 to 2004 or anti-VEGF therapy from 2006 to 2011. Those patients with less than 6months of follow-up were excluded.Results: A total of 12 eyes (12 patients) from 2002 to 2004 and 16eyes (16 patients) from 2006 to 2011 with BRVO were included.Among the 12 patients from 2002 to 2004 receiving laser for ME, 3eyes (25%) had at least mild visual impairment (worse than 20/40 inthe better-seeing eye) including 1 eye (8%) with at least moderatevisual impairment (worse than 20/80 in the better-seeing eye) atpresentation. At the 6-month follow-up for this cohort, 4 eyes (33%)had at least mild visual impairment, and all 4 eyes (33%) had at leastmoderate visual impairment, although none were legally blind(20/200 or worse in the better-seeing eye). Among the 16 patients in2006 to 2011 receiving anti-VEGF therapy for macular edema, 3(19%) had at least mild visual impairment, including 2 eyes (13%)with at least moderate visual impairment. At the 6-month follow-upfor this cohort, 3 eyes (19%) had at least mild visual impairment, andonly 1 eye (6%) had at least moderate visual impairment, and nonewere legally blind.Conclusions: Although there are several limitations to this studyinherent to its retrospective design, the conclusions provide evidencethat the prevalence of at least moderate visual impairment due to MEfrom BRVO may be declining among people in the era of anti-VEGFtherapy.Commercial Relationships: Mariana S. Lopes, None; Connie J.Chen, None; Voraporn Chaikitmongkol, None; Yulia Wolfson,None; Susan B. Bressler, Novartis (F), Bausch and Lomb (F),Genentech (F), Thrombogenics (F), Lumenis (F), Notal vision (F),GlaxoSmithKline (C), allergan (F); Neil M. Bressler, AbbottMedical Optics, inc (F), Alimera Sciences (F), Allergan (F), Bausch&Lomb, Inc (F), Bayer (F), Carl Zeiss Meditec, Inc (F), ForSightLabs, LLC (F), Genentech, Inc (F), Genzyme Corporation (F),Lumenis, Inc (F), Notal VIsion (F), Novartis Pharma AG (F), Pfizer,Inc (F), Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc (F), Roche (F),Thrombogencis (F)surgery and pars plana vitrectomy. AF (0.05-0.10cc) was obtained viaanterior chamber paracentesis. Cataract surgery was performed afterwhich ~1cc undiluted VF was obtained through the vitrector beforeinitiating infusion. All samples were stored at -80°F until batchprocessed. Proteomic analysis used 30μL of undiluted sample.Proteins were analyzed by tandem mass spectrometry and proteinlevels compared using peptide/spectral matches assigned usingX!Tandem.Results: 228 unique proteins were identified overall in AF and VFwith 110 (48%) found in both AF&VF, 16 (7%) in AF only, and 102(45%) in VF only. The percentage of proteins found in both AF&VFfor NPDR, PDR and QPDR groups was 50% (88), 48 % (80) and58% (67), respectively. VF proteins were present only in VF in 37%(64) of NPDR, 47% (79) of PDR, and 32% (37) of QPDR. Overall,52% (110) of VF detected proteins were also detectable in the AF.When proteins were present in both AF&VF, peptide counts betweenVF and AF for an individual protein were highly correlated (r=0.76-0.89) and correlations did not differ substantially between DR groups(r = 0.83-0.84). Peptide counts were higher in VF than AF in 87.3%of proteins for the combined group, 92% in NPDR, 92% in PDR and76% in QPDR. On average, peptide counts for VF predominantproteins were 5 fold higher in VF than AF for any specific protein. Apartial survey of specific proteins known to be predominantly vitrealhad VF/AF ratios >1.0 with peptide numbers changing by group asexpected for changes in disease severity (eg. carbonic anhydrase 1,C1 inhibitor).Conclusions: This study reveals that approximately 50% of theproteins found in vitreous can also be detected in aqueous. There wasalso a high correlation between proteins found in both the AF andVF, and AF findings correlated with known VF changes for at leastsome specific proteins. These data suggest that AF sampling mightallow proteomic assessment reflecting the vitreome in the diabeticeye and help evaluate specific vitreous proteins as biomarkers of DRprogression or treatment response.Commercial Relationships: Nour Maya N. Haddad, None;Jennifer K. Sun, Boston Micromachines (F), Abbott Laboratories(C), Novartis (C), Genentech (F); Michael Molla, None; Paul G.Arrigg, None; Sabera T. Shah, None; Deborah K. Schlossman,None; Timothy J. Murtha, None; Edward P. Feener, JoslinDiabetes Center (P), KalVista Pharmaceuticals (C); Lloyd P. Aiello,Genentech (C), Genzyme (C), Thrombogenetics (C), Ophthotech (C),Kalvista (C), Pfizer (C), Proteostasis (C), Abbott (C), Vantia (C),Optos, plc (F)Support: Research to Prevent Blindness, JDRF 17-2011-359,Massachusetts Lions Eye Research FundProgram Number: 1128 Poster Board Number: D0032Presentation Time: 1:00 PM - 2:45 PMCorrelation of the Aqueous and Vitreous Proteomes in DiabeticEye DiseaseNour Maya N. Haddad 1 , Jennifer K. Sun 1, 2 , Michael Molla 4, 3 , PaulG. Arrigg 1, 2 , Sabera T. Shah 1, 2 , Deborah K. Schlossman 1, 2 , TimothyJ. Murtha 1, 2 , Edward P. Feener 4, 3 , Lloyd P. Aiello 1, 2 . 1 Beetham EyeInstitute, Joslin Diabetes Center, Boston, MA; 2 Department ofOphthalmology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; 3 HarvardMedical School, Boston, MA; 4 Research Division, Joslin DiabetesCenter, Boston, MA.Purpose: To compare proteomes between aqueous fluid (AF) andvitreous fluid (VF) obtained concurrently from the same eye ofpatients undergoing ocular surgery and to assess differences betweendiabetic retinopathy (DR) severity levels.Methods: AF and VF were obtained from 6 eyes (2 each NPDR,active PDR and quiescent PDR) undergoing combined cataractProgram Number: 1129 Poster Board Number: D0033Presentation Time: 1:00 PM - 2:45 PMRetrospective Study of Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth FactorTherapy in the Treatment of Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion andPredictive Factors for Visual OutcomePeng Lei. Ophthalmology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas,TX.Purpose: To compare the efficacy of bevacizumab and ranibizumabintravitreal injection in the treatment of branch retinal vein occlusion(BRVO). To assess the prognostic value on visual outcome of theintegrity of the inner segment-outer segment (IS-OS) junction line onoptic coherence tomography (OCT) and the integrity of the fovealcapillary ring on fluorescein angiography (FA).Methods: A retrospective study with 8 patients diagnosed withBRVO; 5 patients received bevacizumab intravitreal injections; 3patients received ranibizumab intravitreal injections. Average followup times were 8 months and 6.5 months, respectively. Primary©2013, Copyright by the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, Inc., all rights reserved. Go to iovs.org to access the version of record. For permissionto reproduce any abstract, contact the <strong>ARVO</strong> Office at arvo@arvo.org.
<strong>ARVO</strong> 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts by Scientific Section/Group - <strong>Biochemistry</strong>/<strong>Molecular</strong> <strong>Biology</strong>outcomes included difference between initial best corrected visualacuity (BCVA) and best BCVA during follow up, integrity of IS-OSjunction, and integrity of foveal capillary ring.Results: In the bevacizumab group, average improvement in BCVAwas 0.375 +/- 0.205 logMAR. Best BCVA was achieved on averageafter 2.2 +/- 1.6 months and 1.4 +/- 1.1 intravitreal injections. In theranibizumab group, average improvement in BCVA was 0.141 +/-0.151 logMAR. Best BCVA was achieved on average after 2.4 +/-2.2 months and 2.0 +/- 1.7 intravitreal injections. In the bevacizumabgroup, average improvement in CMT was 404 +/- 41 um with bestCMT occurring on average after 1.1 +/- 0.1 months and 1.0 +/- 0.0injections. In the ranibizumab group, average improvement in CMTwas 286 +/- 47 um with best CMT occurring on average after 2.7 +/-1.1 months and 2.5 +/- 0.7 injections.Conclusions: Bevacizumab may be superior to ranibizumab fortreating BRVO with greater improvement in BCVA, fewer injectionsto achieve best BCVA, fewer injections needed during follow upcourse, greater improvement in CMT, shorter time interval to bestCMT, and fewer injections needed to achieve best CMT. Theintegrity of the IS-OS junction correlated well with visual acuityresponse to anti-VEGF treatment. The integrity of the foveal capillaryring in relation to visual outcome was equivocal. Statisticalsignificance was limited by the small sample size.Commercial Relationships: Peng Lei, NoneProgram Number: 1130 Poster Board Number: D0034Presentation Time: 1:00 PM - 2:45 PMVEGF and TNF Interact to Induce Retinal Edema in an AtypicalPKC Dependent MannerCheng-mao Lin 1 , Paul M. Titchenell 2 , Arivalagan Muthusamy 1 ,David A. Antonetti 1 . 1 Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, KelloggEye Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; 2 Cellular and<strong>Molecular</strong> Physiology, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA.Purpose: Changes in permeability of retinal blood vessels contributeto macular edema and the pathophysiology of diabetic retinopathy.Both vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and tumor necrosisfactor (TNF) have been implicated in macular edema. We tested thehypothesis that VEGF and TNF interact to induce retinal edema invivo and require atypical PKC (aPKC) activation.Methods: Male Long-Evans rats weighing 200 to 250 g were used toevaluate retinal vascular permeability and retinal thickening inducedby VEGF and TNF treatments. Animals received a single intravitrealinjection of vehicle, aPKC inhibitor, VEGF, TNF, combined VEGFand TNF or VEGF/TNF plus aPKC inhibitor to yield finalconcentration as indicated. Blood-retinal barrier leakage wasmeasured with intravenous FITC-BSA injection. Retinal leakage wascalculated from the accumulation of fluorescent albumin in the retinaand normalized to the plasma levels. Also, 5 h after intraocularinjection of the same factors, eyes were imaged 10 min after FITC-BSA injection for retinal vascular leakage using a Micron III camera.Eyes were then enucleated, fixed and subjected to flat-mount stainingfor subsequent imaging. Tight junction proteins were examined byimmunohistochemistry. Retinal structure and layer thickness, ameasure of edema, were assessed with spectral domain opticalcoherence tomography. Baseline data were obtained before anytreatment and used for comparison with the later time points in thelongitudinal study.Results: Partial discontinuity of occludin and ZO-1 immunostainingwas observed in the VEGF-treated retinas, whereas loss of ZO-1wasobserved in the TNF-treated retinas. VEGF/TNF combinationtreatment dramatically induced tight junction disorganization andinteracted to increase retinal thickening. Increased retinal albuminleakage and retinal thickening induced by combined VEGF/TNFtreatment were effectively prevented by an aPKC inhibitor in a dosedependentmanner. In the longitudinal study, aPKC inhibitionattenuated the initial (24 h) edema response from VEGF/TNFadministration by 40%. The group treated with the aPKC inhibitorreturned to baseline more rapidly than VEGF/TNF group.Conclusions: These data demonstrate that VEGF and TNF interact topromote retinal edema in vivo and provide an effective model to testtherapeutic intervention to control edema. Co-injection of aPKCinhibitor dramatically reduces induction of edema in vivo.Commercial Relationships: Cheng-mao Lin, None; Paul M.Titchenell, None; Arivalagan Muthusamy, None; David A.Antonetti, NoneSupport: JDRFProgram Number: 1131 Poster Board Number: D0035Presentation Time: 1:00 PM - 2:45 PMThe Role of Apelin in the Retina of Diabetic RatsYanrong Jiang, Qiang Lu, Jing Feng. Peking University People'sHospital, Beijing, China.Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect ofapelin-13 on proliferative potential in diabetic retinopathy (DR), andits antagonist inhibitory effects.Methods: Localization of apelin-13, GFAP, and VEGF weredetected using immunofluorescence in the retina of diabetic rats. ThemRNA and protein of apelin-13, GFAP, and VEGF in the retina ofdiabetic rats were measured using real-time PCR and western blot.Apelin-13 antagonist F13A was used to block apelin-13, and to studyits effects in vivo.Results: Strong staining of apelin-13, co-localized with GFAP andVEGF, was observed in the retina of diabetic rats. Apelin-13, GFAP,and VEGF mRNA and protein levels were significantly increased inthe sample’s retina. Moreover, exogenous apelin-13 promoted retinalMüller cell proliferation in vivo. Simultaneously, apelin-13 inducedGFAP and VEGF expression. F13A markedly reduced the retinalgliosis caused by diabetes. Furthermore, F13A suppressed bothGFAP and VEGF expression in vivo.Conclusions: Our results strongly suggest that apelin-13 is associatedwith the development of DR, and contributes to changes in the retinaof diabetic rats. Apelin-induced promotion of cell proliferation lendssupport to the possibility that apelin-13 may play a role in theprogression of DR to a proliferative phase. This possible roledeserves further investigation, which may open new perspectives inthe early prevention and treatment of DR.©2013, Copyright by the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, Inc., all rights reserved. Go to iovs.org to access the version of record. For permissionto reproduce any abstract, contact the <strong>ARVO</strong> Office at arvo@arvo.org.