Challenges of Civil Military Cooperation/Coordination in Humanitarian ReliefMr Graham HeaslipNational University of Ireland, Maynooth, IrelandChallenges of Civil Military CooperationIntroductionIn 1991 the almost unthinkable happened, the Soviet Union collapsed, the Warsaw pactdissolved, taking the menace of global war with it. The end of the Cold War brought a dramaticincrease in conflicts within states and a similar increase in international peace operations, ascomplex multi-actor interventions to end civil wars and build peace have come to be known.While in 1998 the UN deployed 14,000 peacekeepers worldwide, today over 90,000 militaryand civilians are in the field in 16 UN missions. 1 New international ‘coalitions of the willing’led by regional organisations like North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (NATO) in Kosovo andEuropean Force (EUFOR) in Chad, emerged in place of UN involvement in some contexts.The trend in peace-building since Kosovo in 1999 is towards greater integration ofinternational efforts and the necessity for collaboration between relief, development andsecurity organisations. By the late 1990s, from key donor countries, to United Nations (UN)agencies, to Non Governmental Organisation (NGO) networks, a common understandingemerged that efforts for peace must become more strategic and coordinated if they are tohave the ambitious impacts they intend. This consensus has led to efforts in recent years topromote explicit communication, coordination and even formal integration among intervenersto achieve greater impact.Since the late 1990s, this push for more unified efforts has led to such innovations as UNIntegrated Missions, which combined the political, peacekeeping, and humanitarian armsof the UN system under a unified command. Indeed, many donor countries have nowsynchronized the foreign assistance arms of government in what has been variously calledthe “joined up approach,” the “whole of government approach,” or, the “3-Ds” approach,referring to defence, development and diplomacy. 2 The goal has been to use military, politicaland humanitarian/development instruments in a more synchronized and presumably moreeffective, manner to achieve security, development and peace in conflict affected countries.Civil military coordination essentially deals with two aspects of military support to civilians,i.e. the provision of security, e.g. a military escort for a humanitarian convoy, or the provisionof military assets, including skills, knowledge and manpower, e.g. equipment such as trucksor helicopters, and skills and knowledge such as medical and engineering expertise. Thearea of civil-military coordination in the field is even more difficult than other interagencyrelationships given fundamental differences between international military forces andhumanitarian and development agencies in terms of their agendas, operating styles, roles,and the principles and doctrines guiding their work. This article identifies the many factors1 CIC (Centre on International Cooperation), (2006), Annual <strong>Review</strong> of Global Peace Operations, 2006. Boulder, Colorado: Lynne Rienner Publishers.2 OECD, (2005), ‘Paris Declaration on Aid Effectiveness’ pp. 13 – 14. www.oecd.org Accessed: 12 September 2007.49
<strong>Defence</strong> <strong>Forces</strong> <strong>Review</strong> <strong>2010</strong>that render integration and collaboration problematic between diverse assistance agencies,especially between civilian and military agencies, it will conclude with proposals to improveCIMIC within humanitarian relief.New BeginingIn situations of humanitarian relief, the interlinked nature of security, aid and development isinescapable, with security necessary to enable progress on development, and immediate reliefand longer-term development gains necessary to solidify the peace by giving people a stake inthe new stability. Roles and mandates often overlap as military forces engage in aid provisionand governance support, major donor representatives work directly with provincial and localgovernments, and development actors participate in the security sector reform spectrum (ofdisarmament, demobilisation and reintegration (DDR), justice reform, police reform). Whetherinternational military forces, UN, humanitarian and relief agencies choose to explicitly worktogether or not, the outcomes of their efforts in such settings are deeply intertwined. Giventhis interdependence, improving how military, UN, humanitarian and development actorsinteract in such settings is critical to increasing the probability that their independent effortswill lead to positive outcomes, and to increasing the chances that some level of constructivecoordination may be developed.The Crowded StageA number of actors interact in humanitarian relief. 3 In their work Kovács & Spens identifiedthe various actors involved in the humanitarian aid supply network, see Figure 1. 4Aid AgenciesNGOsDonorsLogistics ServiceProvidersHumanitarian AidSupply NetworkSuppliersMilitaryGovernmentsFigure 1: The Humanitarian Aid Supply Network Source: Kovács and Spens 2008, p. 2233 Mackinlay, J., ed. (1996). A guide to peace support operations. Providence: The Thomas J. Watson Jr. Institute, Brown University. Seiple C. (1996).The US Military/NGO Relationship in humanitarian interventions. Carlisle Barracks: Peacekeeping Institute Centre for Strategic Leadership, U.S. ArmyWar College.4 Kovács, G. and Spens, K., (2007), ‘Humanitarian logistics in disaster relief operations’, International Journal of Physical Distribution and LogisticsManagement, Vol. 37, No. 2, pp. 99-114.50