13.07.2015 Views

Total Economic Value of Maasai Mau, Trans Mara and Eastern Mau ...

Total Economic Value of Maasai Mau, Trans Mara and Eastern Mau ...

Total Economic Value of Maasai Mau, Trans Mara and Eastern Mau ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The results in adjusted equal annual equivalent (EAE) per hectare based on a 10-yearcycle are shown in Table 9. Tea is the most pr<strong>of</strong>itable l<strong>and</strong> use followed by transmissionpoles, maize <strong>and</strong> firewood in that order. Thus farmers, ceteris paribus, if the objective isfinancial gain are likely to select tea farming as a priority farming enterprise given anyextra l<strong>and</strong> to utilize.The opportunity cost <strong>of</strong> the conservation <strong>of</strong> the three forest blocks, instead <strong>of</strong> placingthem under the selected competing enterprises, is shown in Table 9. The comparativeanalysis indicate that tea farming generated higher incomes as compared to the otherpotential farm enterprises that were are likely to compete for forestl<strong>and</strong>.Table 9: Potential net incomes for the three forest blocks <strong>of</strong> <strong>Mara</strong> River Basin forselected enterprisesAlternative investments EAE in KES <strong>Value</strong> (US $) Benefit/Cost forchangeMedium maize 22,325 41,967,547 3:17Eucalyptus firewood 42,952 25,979,462 6:55Eucalyptus poles 13,820 80,743,117 20:59Tea farming 63,322 119,035,566 1:2Note: The costs are interpreted to mean the value <strong>of</strong> forest that has to be lost when the l<strong>and</strong> currentlyunder forest is used for the alternatives uses.Introduction <strong>of</strong> alternative enterprises provides opportunities <strong>and</strong> costs in foregonerevenue. Tea farming strongly competes with the forest as it results in the reduction <strong>of</strong>total economic value by half. In any case, the forest remains viable compared to otheralternative l<strong>and</strong> uses.5.1 The Forest Block Capacity to generate benefits to cover management costsTo assess the ability <strong>of</strong> the three forests block to be sustainably managed from revenuegenerated by use <strong>of</strong> its resources was not possible. However, current revenuegeneration from the forest blocks <strong>and</strong> direct expenditure by KFS on the administration<strong>of</strong> the three forest blocks were used as a proxy to evaluate their ability to sustainably tomeet their management costs. The staff breakdown for two zonal <strong>of</strong>fices that directlymanage the <strong>Eastern</strong> <strong>Mau</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Trans</strong> <strong>Mara</strong> forests was undertaken. The staff salaries <strong>and</strong>annual operational costs were estimated. The results indicate Nakuru had a total 29451

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!