Total Economic Value of Maasai Mau, Trans Mara and Eastern Mau ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

egimes of the forests. In order to transfer the benefits, it may be more beneficial to giveforest adjacent communities more rights of ownership of the forests.72
9.0 ReferencesAdger, N., Brown, K., Cervigni, R and D. Moran, 1995. Total economic value of forestsin Mexico,Ambio, 24(5), 286-296.Ammour, T., Windevoxhel, N and Sencion, G. 2000. Economic valuation of mangroveecosystems and subtropical forests in Central America, in M. Dore and R.Guevara (eds), Sustainable Forest Management and Global Climate Change,Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 166-197.Anon (anonymous) 2001. Putting a price tag on conservation: cost-benefit analysis ofVenezuela's national parks, mimeo.Bann, C. 1998. Turkey: Forest Sector Review – Global Environmental Overlays Program.Final Report. Washington DC:World Bank.Brown, J and Pearce, D.W. 1994. The economic value of carbon storage in tropicalforests, in J.Weiss (ed), The Economics of Project Appraisal and theEnvironment, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 102-23.Bugenyi, W.B. and J.S. Balirwa. 2003. East African Species Introductions and WetlandManagement: Sociopolitical Dimensions. Pp. 79-103 in: Conservation, Ecology,and Management of African Fresh Waters. Crisman, T.L., L.J. Chapman andC.A. Chapman. (eds.). The UniversityPress of Florida, Gainesville, Florida.Cheboiwo, J. and D. Langat. 2008. “Profitability of Eucalyptus Growing in Central andSouth Rift Valley”. In: Proceeding of Stakeholders Workshop for Western and NorthRiftRegional held in Moi University on 17th November, 2006. Unpublished. KenyaForest Research Institute KEFRI. Londiani.Clarkson, R. 2000. Estimating the Social Cost of Carbon Emissions, London: Departmentof the Environment, Transport and the Regions.Convension on Biodiversity. 2006. Value of biodiversity. UNEP. Report No. 4Dasgupta A.K. and Pearce D.W. 1986. Cost-Benefit Analysis: Theory and Practice,Mackmillan Education Ltd, Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hamphsire and London.Emerton L. 1995. Valuing Domestic Forest Use: Communities and Conservation. OverseasDevelopment Administration, London.Emerton L. 2001. Valuing the Environment: Case Studies From Kenya. Africa WildlifeFoundation, Nairobi.Emerton L. and Muramira. 1999. Uganda Biodiversity: An economic assessment. Reportfor IUCN World Conservation Union. Biodiversity economics for Eastern Africa.Gibbs, H. K. 2006. Major World Ecosystem Complexes Ranked by Carbon in LiveVegetation: An Updated Database Using the GLC2000 Land Cover Product.NDP-017b. ORNL-CDIAC.73
Page 1 and 2:
2011THE TOTAL ECONOMIC VALUEOF MAAS
Page 3:
Executive SummaryThe Mau Forest Com
Page 9 and 10:
6.0 POLICY IMPLICATIONS OF THE CURR
Page 11 and 12:
Table 4: Roundwood production from
Page 13 and 14:
• Widespread perception on resour
Page 15 and 16:
Economic valuation of forest goods
Page 17 and 18:
2.0 METHODS FOR ESTIMATING ECONOMIC
Page 19 and 20:
2.1.3 Prices of SubstitutesThe pric
Page 21 and 22: with interest ranging from the impa
Page 23 and 24: watershed protection functions are
Page 25 and 26: Nakuru. The south-western watershed
Page 27 and 28: 3.0 THE TOTAL ECONOMIC VALUE OF THR
Page 29 and 30: Unit price 100 100 15,700 1,000 1,0
Page 31 and 32: 3.1.2 Direct Use by the Ogiek Commu
Page 33 and 34: The upper catchment of the Mara Riv
Page 35 and 36: the river. Because we did not obtai
Page 37 and 38: The role of the Mara Basin in touri
Page 39: The value of the carbon stock outli
Page 42 and 43: 4.0 ASSESSING THE DISTRIBUTION OF T
Page 44 and 45: We obtained an estimated number of
Page 46 and 47: Figure 4: The distribution of the i
Page 48 and 49: Figure 5: Distribution of benefits
Page 50 and 51: For the local communities living ne
Page 52 and 53: staff in coordination, management a
Page 54 and 55: 6.0 POLICY IMPLICATIONS OF THE CURR
Page 56 and 57: The Mau forest contains a rich dive
Page 58 and 59: domestic and industrial uses can be
Page 60 and 61: Table 11: The impacts of current st
Page 62 and 63: 8. Resettling the Ogiek community a
Page 64 and 65: economic conditions exist for local
Page 66 and 67: Innovative conservation incentives
Page 68 and 69: to restrict or forbid future develo
Page 70 and 71: practices would be best for some ke
Page 74 and 75: Hodgson, G., and J. A. Dixon. 1988.
Page 76 and 77: Services in the Mara River Basin. G
Page 78 and 79: national income and livelihood of p
Page 80 and 81: 7. Duration of AssignmentThe consul
Page 82 and 83: for 40 litres of water equivalent t
Page 84 and 85: Appendix 3: The checklist of data c
Page 86 and 87: TanzaniaConservation,SUA NationalAg
Page 88 and 89: Appendix 6: Relationship between to
Page 90 and 91: Appendix 8: Rapid result questionna
Page 92 and 93: Appendix 10: Categorization of stak
Page 94 and 95: Appendix 12: The Mara River Basin94
Page 96: Appendix 14: Valuation approaches f
show all

Total Economic Value of Maasai Mau, Trans Mara and Eastern Mau ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?