Total Economic Value of Maasai Mau, Trans Mara and Eastern Mau ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Appendix 8: Rapid result questionnaire for households adjacent to the Mara ForestComplexDirect use of products and servicesHome consumption and saleProductUnitmeasurePoles NoFencing NopostsSawn wood M3Firewood HeadlotThatching HeadlotgrassCharcoalHoney KgForest soils TonnesMedicinalGrazing No. ofanimalsWater LitresOthersspecifyQuantity/seasonAnnualestimatesCurrentmarket pricein KESAnnualvalue in KES90
Appendix 9: Economic values of forest watershed functionsStudy Watershed function valued Results ($/ha per year)Ammour et al. (2000), Prevention of soil erosion. NegligibleGuatemala forestPrevention of nutrient loss. 12–30Nutrients in aerial biomassvalued at fertilizer prices.Kumari (1996), Malaysian Protection of irrigation water 15forestfor crops.Protection of domestic water 0supplies. Valued at treatmentcost for improved qualityYaron (2001), Mt.Flood protection valued at 0–24Camerounvalue of avoidable crop and treelosses.Pattanayak and Kramer Drought mitigation from forest 3–35 per household(2001), Eastern Indonesia protection and regrowth.Bann (1998), Turkey Soil erosion valued by46replacement cost of nutrients.Adger et al. (1995), Mexico Sedimentation effects on Negligibleinfrastructure.Hodgson and Dixon (1988),PhilippinesFisheries protection fromavoided logging.268Anon (2001), VenezuelaAvoided sedimentation ofhydro-reservoir.Urban water supply.Protection of irrigation.Source: Secretariat of the Convention on Biodiversity (2001).14–216–131–691
Page 1 and 2:
2011THE TOTAL ECONOMIC VALUEOF MAAS
Page 3:
Executive SummaryThe Mau Forest Com
Page 9 and 10:
6.0 POLICY IMPLICATIONS OF THE CURR
Page 11 and 12:
Table 4: Roundwood production from
Page 13 and 14:
• Widespread perception on resour
Page 15 and 16:
Economic valuation of forest goods
Page 17 and 18:
2.0 METHODS FOR ESTIMATING ECONOMIC
Page 19 and 20:
2.1.3 Prices of SubstitutesThe pric
Page 21 and 22:
with interest ranging from the impa
Page 23 and 24:
watershed protection functions are
Page 25 and 26:
Nakuru. The south-western watershed
Page 27 and 28:
3.0 THE TOTAL ECONOMIC VALUE OF THR
Page 29 and 30:
Unit price 100 100 15,700 1,000 1,0
Page 31 and 32:
3.1.2 Direct Use by the Ogiek Commu
Page 33 and 34:
The upper catchment of the Mara Riv
Page 35 and 36:
the river. Because we did not obtai
Page 37 and 38:
The role of the Mara Basin in touri
Page 39: The value of the carbon stock outli
Page 42 and 43: 4.0 ASSESSING THE DISTRIBUTION OF T
Page 44 and 45: We obtained an estimated number of
Page 46 and 47: Figure 4: The distribution of the i
Page 48 and 49: Figure 5: Distribution of benefits
Page 50 and 51: For the local communities living ne
Page 52 and 53: staff in coordination, management a
Page 54 and 55: 6.0 POLICY IMPLICATIONS OF THE CURR
Page 56 and 57: The Mau forest contains a rich dive
Page 58 and 59: domestic and industrial uses can be
Page 60 and 61: Table 11: The impacts of current st
Page 62 and 63: 8. Resettling the Ogiek community a
Page 64 and 65: economic conditions exist for local
Page 66 and 67: Innovative conservation incentives
Page 68 and 69: to restrict or forbid future develo
Page 70 and 71: practices would be best for some ke
Page 72 and 73: egimes of the forests. In order to
Page 74 and 75: Hodgson, G., and J. A. Dixon. 1988.
Page 76 and 77: Services in the Mara River Basin. G
Page 78 and 79: national income and livelihood of p
Page 80 and 81: 7. Duration of AssignmentThe consul
Page 82 and 83: for 40 litres of water equivalent t
Page 84 and 85: Appendix 3: The checklist of data c
Page 86 and 87: TanzaniaConservation,SUA NationalAg
Page 88 and 89: Appendix 6: Relationship between to
Page 92 and 93: Appendix 10: Categorization of stak
Page 94 and 95: Appendix 12: The Mara River Basin94
Page 96: Appendix 14: Valuation approaches f
show all

Total Economic Value of Maasai Mau, Trans Mara and Eastern Mau ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?