Total Economic Value of Maasai Mau, Trans Mara and Eastern Mau ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Hodgson, G., and J. A. Dixon. 1988. Logging versus fisheries and tourism: Economicdimensions. Occasional Paper. Honolulu: East-West Center, Environment andPolicy Institute.Hoffman, C. M. 2007. Geospatial mapping and analysis of water availability-demandusewithin the Mara River Basin. MSc Thesis. Florida International University,Miami, Florida, USA.Hufschmidt M, JamesDE, Bower BT& Dixon JA. 1983. Environment, Natural Systems andDevelopment: An Economic Valuation Guide. John Hopskins University Press,Baltimore.Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). 2006. IPCC Guidelines forNational Greenhouse Gas Inventories. Volume 4: Agriculture, Forestry andOther Land Use.Interim Coordinating Secretariat (ICS), 2009. Office of the Prime Minister.http://www.kws.org/export/sites/kws/info/maurestoration/maupublications/Frequently_Asked_Questions_about_Mau_Forest_Complex.pdfIUCN 2002. Economic evaluation of the Sango bay forest resource. A community levelapproach. Report for the United Nations Development Program and Globaldevelopment facility. East African cross boundary biodiversity project.KIFCON, 1993, National Workshop for Improved Management and Conservation of theKenyan Mangroves. Diani, South Coast, Kenya. Forestry Department. Nairobi,Kenya.Krhoda, G.O. 2010. Establishing Mara River Basin Policy, Legal and InstitutionalCooperative Framework, East African Community, Lake Victoria BasinCommision, (TWB-MRB), Projects, Redplan Consultants, University Way,Nairobi, KenyaKriström, B and Riera, P. 1996. Is the income elasticity of environmental improvementsless than one?Environmental and Resource Economics, 7, 45-55Kumari, K. 1996. Sustainable forest management: myth or reality? Exploring theprospects for Malaysia, Ambio, 25, 7, 459-467.Langat D & Cheboiwo J. 2010. To conserve or not to conserve: a case study of forestvaluation in Kenya. Journal of Tropical Forest Science, 22(1): 5-12.Mahadev Bhat, Doris Ombara, Michael McClain, George Atisa, andMau Task Force (MTF) 2008. Office of Prime Minister. Nairobi. Kenya.74
Mogaka, H. 2005. Economic instruments for sustainable community forest conservation: Thecases of Taita Hills, Ol Donyo Orok and Minziro forests. The World ConservationUnion (IUCN) report.Mutunga, C., and Mwangi, S., 2006. Inventory for Ecosystem Service Payment in Kenya.Forest Trends: Washington DC.Obiri J, C Fehr and E Ndunda. 2009. A total economic valuation for the Mt. ElgonEcosystem of Kenya and Uganda. IUCN MERECP, Kampala, Uganda.Ottichilo, W.K., de Leeuw, J., Skidmore, A.K., Prins, H.H.T., and Said, M.Y., 2001Population trends large non-migratory wild herbivores and livestock in theMasai Mara ecosystem, Kenya, between 1977 and 1997. African Journal ofEcology, 38, 202-216.Pattanayak, S and Kramer, R. 2001.Worth of watersheds: a producer surplus approachfor valuing drought mitigation in Eastern Indonesia, Environment andDevelopment Economics, 6, 1, 123-146.Pearce D.W., Adger N., Brown K., Cervigu R. and Moran D. 1993. Mexico Forestry andConservation Sector Review Substudy of Economic Valuation of Forests.Reid, R.S., Ogutu, J., Rainy, M., Kruska, R.L., Nyabenge, M., McCartney, M., Worden,J.,Wilson, C.J., Kshatriya, M., Kimani, K., and N’gan’ga, L. 2003. Mara Count2002: People Wildlife and Livestock in the Mara Ecosystem. Report, Mara Count2002, International Livestock Research Institute, Nairobi, Kenya.Republic of Kenya, 1999. The Environmental Management and Coordination Act, 1999.Published by the Attorney General.Republic of Kenya, 2002. The Water Act 2002. The Government Printer, NairobiRepublic of Kenya, 2005. Forest Act 2005. Published by the Attorney General.Republic of Kenya, 2010. The Proposed Constitution of Kenya. Published by the AttorneyGeneralSecretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity (2001). The Value of ForestEcosystems. Montreal, SCBD, 67p. (CBD Technical Series no. 4).Tol, R., Fankhauser, S., Richels, R and Smith, J. 2000.How much damage will climatechange do? Recent estimates, World Economics, 1, 4, 179-206.Tourism Statistical Bulletin (TSB) 2000. Tourism Division, Dar-Es-Salaam, TanzaniaUnited Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), 2008. CDM/JI Pipeline Analysis andDatabase, January 8th 2008.United Republic of Tanzania (URT). 2001. Tourism report. Dar es SalaamWater for Sustainability Program, Florida International University, 41p.Bhat M.,Ombara D. McClain, Atisa G. and Kasanga W. 2006. Payment for Watershed75
Page 1 and 2:
2011THE TOTAL ECONOMIC VALUEOF MAAS
Page 3:
Executive SummaryThe Mau Forest Com
Page 9 and 10:
6.0 POLICY IMPLICATIONS OF THE CURR
Page 11 and 12:
Table 4: Roundwood production from
Page 13 and 14:
• Widespread perception on resour
Page 15 and 16:
Economic valuation of forest goods
Page 17 and 18:
2.0 METHODS FOR ESTIMATING ECONOMIC
Page 19 and 20:
2.1.3 Prices of SubstitutesThe pric
Page 21 and 22:
with interest ranging from the impa
Page 23 and 24: watershed protection functions are
Page 25 and 26: Nakuru. The south-western watershed
Page 27 and 28: 3.0 THE TOTAL ECONOMIC VALUE OF THR
Page 29 and 30: Unit price 100 100 15,700 1,000 1,0
Page 31 and 32: 3.1.2 Direct Use by the Ogiek Commu
Page 33 and 34: The upper catchment of the Mara Riv
Page 35 and 36: the river. Because we did not obtai
Page 37 and 38: The role of the Mara Basin in touri
Page 39: The value of the carbon stock outli
Page 42 and 43: 4.0 ASSESSING THE DISTRIBUTION OF T
Page 44 and 45: We obtained an estimated number of
Page 46 and 47: Figure 4: The distribution of the i
Page 48 and 49: Figure 5: Distribution of benefits
Page 50 and 51: For the local communities living ne
Page 52 and 53: staff in coordination, management a
Page 54 and 55: 6.0 POLICY IMPLICATIONS OF THE CURR
Page 56 and 57: The Mau forest contains a rich dive
Page 58 and 59: domestic and industrial uses can be
Page 60 and 61: Table 11: The impacts of current st
Page 62 and 63: 8. Resettling the Ogiek community a
Page 64 and 65: economic conditions exist for local
Page 66 and 67: Innovative conservation incentives
Page 68 and 69: to restrict or forbid future develo
Page 70 and 71: practices would be best for some ke
Page 72 and 73: egimes of the forests. In order to
Page 76 and 77: Services in the Mara River Basin. G
Page 78 and 79: national income and livelihood of p
Page 80 and 81: 7. Duration of AssignmentThe consul
Page 82 and 83: for 40 litres of water equivalent t
Page 84 and 85: Appendix 3: The checklist of data c
Page 86 and 87: TanzaniaConservation,SUA NationalAg
Page 88 and 89: Appendix 6: Relationship between to
Page 90 and 91: Appendix 8: Rapid result questionna
Page 92 and 93: Appendix 10: Categorization of stak
Page 94 and 95: Appendix 12: The Mara River Basin94
Page 96: Appendix 14: Valuation approaches f
show all

Total Economic Value of Maasai Mau, Trans Mara and Eastern Mau ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?