48776 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 157 / Tuesday, August 14, 2012 / Rules and Regulationssro<strong>be</strong>rts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULESDEPARTMENT <strong>OF</strong> COMMERCEPatent and Trademark Office37 CFR Parts 1, 3, 5, 10, and 41[Docket No.: PTO–P–2011–0074]RIN 0651–AC68Changes <strong>To</strong> Implement the Inventor’sOath or Declaration Provisions of theLeahy-Smith America Invents ActAGENCY: United States Patent andTrademark Office, Commerce.ACTION: Final rule.SUMMARY: The United States Patent andTrademark Office (Office) is revising therules of practice to implement theinventor’s oath or declaration provisionsof the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act(AIA). The AIA permits a person towhom the inventor has assigned, or isunder an obligation to assign, theinvention, or who otherwise showssufficient proprietary interest in thematter, to make the application forpatent. The AIA also streamlines therequirements for the inventor’s oath ordeclaration, and permits a substitutestatement in lieu of an oath ordeclaration in certain circumstances.The Office is revising the rules ofpractice relating to the inventor’s oathor declaration, including reissue oathsor declarations, and substitutestatements signed by a person otherthan an inventor, and to provide forassignments containing oath ordeclaration statements. Additionally,the Office is revising the rules ofpractice relating to the inventor’s oathor declaration to allow applicants topostpone filing the inventor’s oath ordeclaration until the application isotherwise in condition for allowance.Finally, to <strong>be</strong>tter facilitate processing ofpatent applications, the Office isrevising and clarifying the rules ofpractice for power of attorney andprosecution of an application by anassignee.DATES: Effective Date: The changes inthis final rule take effect on Septem<strong>be</strong>r16, 2012.Applicability Date: The changes to 37CFR 1.9, 1.12, 1.14, 1.17(g), 1.27, 1.32,1.33, 1.36, 1.41, 1.42, 1.43, 1.45, 1.46,1.53(f) and (h), 1.55, 1.56, 1.63, 1.64,1.66, 1.67, 1.76, 1.78, 1.81, 1.105, 1.131,1.153, 1.162, 1.172, 1.175, 1.211, 1.215,1.321, 1.421, 1.422, 1.424, 1.431, 1.491,1.495(a), (c), and (h), 1.497, 3.31, 3.71,3.73, and 41.9, and the removal of 37CFR 1.47 and 1.432, apply only topatent applications filed under 35U.S.C. 111(a) or 363 on or afterSeptem<strong>be</strong>r 16, 2012.<strong>FOR</strong> FURTHER IN<strong>FOR</strong>MATION CONTACT:Hiram H. Bernstein ((571) 272–7707),Senior Legal Advisor; or Eugenia Jones((571) 272–7727), Senior Legal Advisor;or Terry J. Maciejewski ((571) 272–7730), Technical Writer-Editor, Office ofPatent Legal Administration, directly bytelephone, or by mail addressed to: MailStop Comments-Patents, Commissionerfor Patents, P.O. Box 1450, Alexandria,VA 22313–1450, marked to the attentionof the Hiram H. Bernstein.SUPPLEMENTARY IN<strong>FOR</strong>MATION:Executive Summary: Purpose: Section4 of the AIA amends the patent laws tochange the practice regarding theinventor’s oath or declaration and filingof an application by a person other thanthe inventor. Section 20 of the AIAamends the patent laws to remove the‘‘without any deceptive intention’’provisions. This final rule revises therules of practice to implement theseprovisions of sections 4 and 20 of theAIA. The changes in sections 4 and 20of the AIA take effect on Septem<strong>be</strong>r 16,2012, and apply to patent applicationsfiled, or proceedings commenced, on orafter Septem<strong>be</strong>r 16, 2012.Summary of Major Provisions: TheOffice is revising the rules of practice topermit a person to whom the inventorhas assigned or is under an obligation toassign an invention to file and prosecutean application for patent as theapplicant, and to permit a person whootherwise shows sufficient proprietaryinterest in the matter to file andprosecute an application for patent asthe applicant on <strong>be</strong>half of the inventor.Formerly, a person to whom theinventor had assigned an inventioncould file and prosecute an applicationfor patent, but the inventor wasconsidered the applicant. The Office isalso revising the rules of practice torequire that juristic entities take actionin a patent application via a registeredpractitioner.The Office is revising the rules ofpractice to eliminate a num<strong>be</strong>r of formerrequirements pertaining to theinventor’s oath or declaration andcorrection of inventorship. The Office isrevising the rules of practice to permitapplicants to postpone filing theinventor’s oath or declaration until theapplication is otherwise in condition forallowance. The Office is revising therules of practice to provide for the filingof a substitute statement in lieu of anoath or declaration by an inventor if theinventor is deceased, under legalincapacity, or cannot <strong>be</strong> found orreached after diligent effort, or is underan obligation to assign the invention buthas refused to execute an oath ordeclaration.VerDate Mar2010 17:28 Aug 13, 2012 Jkt 226001 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\14AUR6.SGM 14AUR6The Office is also revising the rules ofpractice to remove the provisions whichset forth ‘‘without any deceptiveintention’’ requirements. The Office isfurther revising the rules pertaining toreissue practice to eliminate therequirement for a supplemental reissueoath or declaration, and to require thatthe inventor’s oath or declarationidentify a claim that the applicationseeks to broaden if the reissueapplication seeks to enlarge the scope ofthe claims of the patent.The Office is also revising the rules ofpractice to harmonize the practiceregarding foreign priority claims withthe practice regarding domestic <strong>be</strong>nefitclaims by requiring that both foreignpriority claims and domestic <strong>be</strong>nefitclaims <strong>be</strong> set forth in an applicationdata sheet.Costs and Benefits: This rulemaking isnot economically significant as thatterm is defined in Executive Order12866 (Sept. 30, 1993).Background: The AIA was enactedinto law on Septem<strong>be</strong>r 16, 2011. SeePub. L. 112–29, 125 Stat. 284 (2011).Section 4 of the AIA amends 35 U.S.C.115 and 118 to change the practiceregarding the inventor’s oath ordeclaration and filing of an applicationby a person other than the inventor. See125 Stat. at 293–94. Section 20 of theAIA amends 35 U.S.C. 116, 184, 251,and 256 (and other sections) to removethe provisions which set forth a‘‘without any deceptive intention’’requirement. See 125 Stat. at 333–34.This final rule revises the rules ofpractice to implement the provisions ofsection 4 of the AIA and to remove the‘‘without any deceptive intention’’language due to the changes to 35 U.S.C.116, 184, 251, and 256 in section 20 ofthe AIA.Section 4(a) of the AIA amends 35U.S.C. 115 to change the requirementsfor the inventor’s oath or declaration asfollows.Amended 35 U.S.C. 115(a) providesthat an application filed under 35 U.S.C.111(a) or that commences the nationalstage under 35 U.S.C. 371 must include,or <strong>be</strong> amended to include, the name ofthe inventor for any invention claimedin the application. 125 Stat. at 293. 35U.S.C. 115(a) also provides that, exceptas otherwise provided in 35 U.S.C. 115,each individual who is the inventor ora joint inventor of a claimed inventionin an application must execute an oathor declaration in connection with theapplication. 125 Stat. at 293–94.Amended 35 U.S.C. 115(b) providesthat an oath or declaration under 35U.S.C. 115(a) must contain statementsthat the application was made or wasauthorized to <strong>be</strong> made by the affiant or
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 157 / Tuesday, August 14, 2012 / Rules and Regulations48777sro<strong>be</strong>rts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULESdeclarant, and the individual <strong>be</strong>lieveshimself or herself to <strong>be</strong> the originalinventor or an original joint inventor ofa claimed invention in the application.125 Stat. at 294. There is no longer arequirement in the statute that theinventor must state his country ofcitizenship or that the inventor <strong>be</strong>lieveshimself or herself to <strong>be</strong> the ‘‘first’’inventor of the subject matter (process,machine, manufacture, or compositionof matter) sought to <strong>be</strong> patented.Amended 35 U.S.C. 115(c) providesthat the Director may specify additionalinformation relating to the inventor andto the invention that is required to <strong>be</strong>included in an oath or declaration under35 U.S.C. 115(a). Id.Amended 35 U.S.C. 115(d)(1)provides that, in lieu of execution of anoath or declaration by an inventor under35 U.S.C. 115(a), the applicant forpatent may provide a substitutestatement under the circumstancesdescri<strong>be</strong>d in 35 U.S.C. 115(d)(2), andsuch additional circumstances as theDirector specifies by regulation. Id. 35U.S.C. 115(d)(2) provides that anapplicant may provide a substitutestatement where an inventor is unableto file the oath or declaration under 35U.S.C. 115(a) <strong>be</strong>cause the individual isdeceased, under legal incapacity, orcannot <strong>be</strong> found or reached afterdiligent effort, or an individual is underan obligation to assign the invention buthas refused to make the oath ordeclaration required under 35 U.S.C.115(a). Id. Therefore, while an assignee,a person under an obligation to assignthe invention (an ‘‘obligated assignee’’),or a person who otherwise showssufficient proprietary interest in thematter may make an application forpatent as provided for in 35 U.S.C. 118,an oath or declaration (or an assignmentcontaining the required statements) byeach inventor is still required, except inthe circumstances set forth in 35 U.S.C.115(d)(2) and in any additionalcircumstances specified by the Directorin the regulations. The contents of asubstitute statement are set forth in 35U.S.C. 115(d)(3). Specifically, 35 U.S.C.115(d)(3) provides that the substitutestatement must identify the individualwith respect to whom the statementapplies, set forth the circumstances forthe permitted basis for filing thesubstitute statement in lieu of the oathor declaration under 35 U.S.C. 115(a),and contain any additional information,including any showing, required by theDirector. Id.Amended 35 U.S.C. 115(e) providesfor making the statements requiredunder 35 U.S.C. 115(b) and (c) in anassignment of record and specificallypermits an individual who is under anobligation of assignment of anapplication to include the requiredstatements in the assignment executedby the individual, in lieu of filing thestatements separately. Id.Amended 35 U.S.C. 115(f) providesthat a notice of allowance under 35U.S.C. 151 may <strong>be</strong> provided to anapplicant only if the applicant has filedeach required oath or declaration under35 U.S.C. 115(a), substitute statementunder 35 U.S.C. 115(d), or recordedassignment meeting the requirements of35 U.S.C. 115(e). Id.The changes to 35 U.S.C. 115 in theAIA do not affect 35 U.S.C. 111(a)(2),which continues to require that anapplication filed under 35 U.S.C. 111(a)include an oath or declaration asprescri<strong>be</strong>d by 35 U.S.C. 115, and 35U.S.C. 111(a)(3), which continues topermit the oath or declaration to <strong>be</strong>submitted after the filing date of theapplication, but within such period andunder the conditions prescri<strong>be</strong>d by theDirector, including payment of thecurrently charged surcharge. See 35U.S.C. 111(a)(2)(C) and (a)(3), and 37CFR 1.16(f). Likewise, 35 U.S.C. 371(c)continues to require an oath ordeclaration complying with therequirements of 35 U.S.C. 115 for aninternational application to enter thenational stage, and 35 U.S.C. 371(d)continues to require the oath ordeclaration to <strong>be</strong> submitted within theperiod prescri<strong>be</strong>d by the Director, andwith the payment of any surchargerequired by the Director, if notsubmitted by the date of thecommencement of the national stage.See 35 U.S.C. 371(c)(4) and (d).Amended 35 U.S.C. 115(g)(1) providesthat the requirements under 35 U.S.C.115 shall not apply to an individualnamed as the inventor or a jointinventor in an application that claims<strong>be</strong>nefit under 35 U.S.C. 120, 121, or365(c) of an earlier-filed application, if:(1) An oath or declaration meeting therequirements of 35 U.S.C. 115(a) wasexecuted by the individual and wasfiled in connection with the earlier-filedapplication; (2) a substitute statementmeeting the requirements of 35 U.S.C.115(d) was filed in connection with theearlier-filed application with respect tothe individual; or (3) an assignmentmeeting the requirements of 35 U.S.C.115(e) was executed with respect to theearlier-filed application by theindividual and was recorded inconnection with the earlier-filedapplication. 125 Stat. at 294–95. 35U.S.C. 115(g)(2) provides that theDirector may still require a copy of theexecuted oath or declaration, thesubstitute statement, or the assignmentfiled in connection with the earlier-filedVerDate Mar2010 17:28 Aug 13, 2012 Jkt 226001 PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\14AUR6.SGM 14AUR6application to <strong>be</strong> filed in the later-filedapplication. Id.Amended 35 U.S.C. 115(h)(1)provides that any person making astatement under 35 U.S.C. 115 maywithdraw, replace, or otherwise correctthe statement at any time. 35 U.S.C.115(h)(1) also provides that the Directorshall establish regulations under whichadditional statements may <strong>be</strong> filed whena change is made in the naming of theinventor requiring the filing of one ormore additional statements under 35U.S.C. 115. Id. 35 U.S.C. 115(h)(2)provides that if an individual hasexecuted an oath or declaration meetingthe requirements of 35 U.S.C. 115(a) oran assignment meeting the requirementsof 35 U.S.C. 115(e), then the Directormay not require that individual tosubsequently make any additional oath,declaration, or other equivalentstatement in connection with theapplication or any patent issuingthereon. Id. 35 U.S.C. 115(h)(3) providesthat a patent shall not <strong>be</strong> invalid orunenforceable based upon the failure tocomply with a requirement under thissection if the failure is remedied asprovided under 35 U.S.C. 115(h)(1). Id.Amended 35 U.S.C. 115(i) providesthat any declaration or statement filedpursuant to 35 U.S.C. 115 must containan acknowledgement that any willfulfalse statement made in the declarationor statement is punishable under 18U.S.C. 1001 by fine or imprisonment ofnot more than 5 years, or both. Id. Thisis similar to the requirements in preexisting35 U.S.C. 25 for the use of adeclaration in lieu of an oath in anOffice proceeding. See 35 U.S.C. 25(b)(‘‘Whenever such written declaration isused, the document must warn thedeclarant that willful false statementsand the like are punishable by fine orimprisonment, or both (18 U.S.C.1001).’’).Section 4(a)(2) of the AIA amends 35U.S.C. 121 to eliminate the sentence thatprovided for the Director to dispensewith signing and execution by theinventor in a divisional applicationwhen the divisional application isdirected solely to subject matterdescri<strong>be</strong>d and claimed in the originalapplication as filed. Id. This amendmentto 35 U.S.C. 121 is consistent with 35U.S.C. 115(g)(1) <strong>be</strong>cause the inventornamed in a divisional applicationwould not need to execute an oath ordeclaration or equivalent statement forthe divisional application regardless ofwhether the divisional application isdirected solely to subject matterdescri<strong>be</strong>d and claimed in the originalapplication.
- Page 1: UNIFORM CERTIFICATE OF ATTENDANCE F
- Page 4 and 5: SPTO explains the America Invents A
- Page 6 and 7: PTO/SB/01A (01-09)Approved for use
- Page 8 and 9: PTO/SB/ (06-12)Approved for use thr
- Page 10 and 11: PTO/ (06-12)Approved for use throug
- Page 12 and 13: PTO/(06-1Approved for use through 0
- Page 14 and 15: What will change about the oath ord
- Page 16 and 17: Action item●●●If you have not
- Page 18 and 19: But 37 CFR § 1.63 says:A person ma
- Page 20 and 21: ●●●Combined assignment anddec
- Page 22 and 23: ●●●●●●Consequences of i
- Page 24 and 25: How to file the ADSs●●If you pr
- Page 26 and 27: Supplemental ADSAny ADS filed after
- Page 28 and 29: Provisionals●●●Rules are a bi
- Page 30 and 31: Are all assignees applicants?●●
- Page 32 and 33: Substitute Statement●●●This f
- Page 34 and 35: ●●●Docket consequences of the
- Page 36 and 37: New Rule-46 practice67●●●Rule
- Page 38 and 39: Consequences of AIA for PCT filers
- Page 40 and 41: If you are entrusted the US nationa
- Page 42 and 43: ●●●Choosing between a “bypa
- Page 44 and 45: ●●●Getting your name and addr
- Page 46 and 47: Exercises relating to September 16,
- Page 48 and 49: Important AIA webinar September 6
- Page 50 and 51: Exercises relating to September 16,
- Page 54 and 55: sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RUL
- Page 56 and 57: sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RUL
- Page 58 and 59: sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RUL
- Page 60 and 61: sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RUL
- Page 62 and 63: sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RUL
- Page 64 and 65: sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RUL
- Page 66 and 67: sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RUL
- Page 68 and 69: sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RUL
- Page 70 and 71: sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RUL
- Page 72 and 73: sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RUL
- Page 74 and 75: 48798 Federal Register / Vol. 77, N
- Page 76 and 77: 48800 Federal Register / Vol. 77, N
- Page 78 and 79: 48802 Federal Register / Vol. 77, N
- Page 80 and 81: 48804 Federal Register / Vol. 77, N
- Page 82 and 83: 48806 Federal Register / Vol. 77, N
- Page 84 and 85: 48808 Federal Register / Vol. 77, N
- Page 86 and 87: 48810 Federal Register / Vol. 77, N
- Page 88 and 89: 48812 Federal Register / Vol. 77, N
- Page 90 and 91: 48814 Federal Register / Vol. 77, N
- Page 92 and 93: 48816 Federal Register / Vol. 77, N
- Page 94 and 95: sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RUL
- Page 96 and 97: sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RUL
- Page 98 and 99: 48822 Federal Register / Vol. 77, N
- Page 100 and 101: sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RUL
- Page 102:
48826 Federal Register / Vol. 77, N