IntroductionThe Peculiarities <strong>of</strong> <strong>English</strong> <strong>Constitutional</strong> LanguageTranslators wrestling with the mysteries <strong>of</strong> <strong>English</strong> constitutionallanguage are unlikely to find their task much lightened by explanationson why some <strong>of</strong> the peculiarities exist, but explanations like thefollowing might at least help them better understand the rationalefor the use <strong>of</strong> such language.The Force <strong>of</strong> TraditionThere are a number <strong>of</strong> traditional approaches to drafting any legaldocuments, especially laws, which continue to affect the form <strong>of</strong>laws. Some <strong>of</strong> the most pervasive influences are the avoidance <strong>of</strong>punctuation, the use <strong>of</strong> long sentences, the use <strong>of</strong> sexist language,the use <strong>of</strong> conservative and cautious language, the use <strong>of</strong> preciselanguage, the use <strong>of</strong> archaic language and the use <strong>of</strong> Latinateterms.IA <strong>Glossary</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Constitutional</strong> <strong>Terms</strong>
Avoidance <strong>of</strong> PunctuationDrafters <strong>of</strong> legal texts <strong>of</strong>ten avoid relying on punctuation to get theirmessage across, and this practice sometimes extends to avoidingvirtually all punctuation except the full stop. One reason for this wasthat earlier, there were no specific rules <strong>of</strong> grammar, spelling andpunctuation. The other reason was that printers were unreliable, aswas their equipment in some cases. Even today, there are reasonsfor not relying too heavily on punctuation to convey meaning.First, even with rules about punctuation, modern standards <strong>of</strong>punctuation are not good and are, perhaps, getting worse, thanks toa general lack <strong>of</strong> rigour in thinking. Second, if someone has to gettheir meaning across without relying on punctuation they will haveto think, and think clearly, about what they want to say.We find this propensity for drafting without the aid <strong>of</strong> punctuationamong legal experts even today. For example, the Arizona LegislativeBill Drafting Manual, 2006 version 1 , says, 'A properly drafted billrequires little punctuation.' Nowadays, legal writers prefer, instead,the use <strong>of</strong> short sentences—not the long sentences withoutpunctuation, so <strong>of</strong>ten found in the past.The Use <strong>of</strong> Long SentencesIIAnother custom is to have only one sentence in a section, clause orsubsection. The custom <strong>of</strong> using long sentences was prevalent incountries that opted for 'common law' (the system which originatedin England and came to Nepal partly through India) but not incountries like France, which follow the 'civil law' tradition. Today,however, even in countries that follow the legislative tradition <strong>of</strong>the Common Law, this custom is breaking down.A <strong>Glossary</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Constitutional</strong> <strong>Terms</strong>