Ghana - Amnesty International

96GHANA: END IMPUNITY THROUGH UNIVERSAL JURISDICTIONNo Safe Haven Series No. 10addition, it does not indicate whether the conduct would have to be criminal in Ghana at the time ofthe crime’s commission, at the time of the extradition request, or when extradition is to take place.(For a more detailed discussion of the concept of double criminality under international law, seeSection 6.4 above.)7.1.1.4. Political offenceThe Extradition Act provides that no one will be extradited for an offence that is “of a politicalcharacter.” 308 Similarly, the Act prohibits Ghanaian courts and law enforcement agencies fromendorsing and executing a foreign arrest warrant if the offence for which the warrant was issued is“of a political character” or if it appears to the designated Minister or a court of competentjurisdiction that the request was in fact made to punish the person sought for an offence ofa political character. 309 Under Ghanaian case law, one may demonstrate that an offence is of apolitical character by showing (1) some political disturbance or upheaval or some physical strugglebetween two opposing political parties for the mastery of the government of the country, which theoffence at issue was committed to further; (2) that the offence was committed in association with apolitical object or with a view to avoiding political persecution or prosecution for political defaults; or(3) other similar activities. 310 There is no exception in Ghanaian legislation or jurisprudence from theconcept of an offence that is “of a political character” for crimes under international law.Political offence exceptions to extradition are also found in the non-binding London Scheme and theECOWAS Extradition Convention, both of which apply to Ghana. 311 Including a political offenceexception to extradition is not in itself a problem. The problem arises when states fail to definepolitical offences – or, in the case of Ghana, “offences of a political character” – in a manner thatexpressly excludes crimes under international law.requesting or requested country and the law of the requested country does not enable it to assert jurisdiction oversuch an offence committed outside its territory in comparable circumstances. London Scheme, para. 14 (b).308Extradition Act, sect. 2 (2).309Extradition Act, sect. 23.310State v. Director of Prisons (Ex Parte Schumann), GLR 703, 709-12, 719-26 (1966) (holding that murdersof the mentally ill and sterilizations of Jews committed under the order of the ruling Nazi regime do notconstitute offences of a political character as it has not been shown that the victims and appellant were part of apolitical struggle nor did the appellant proffer that he committed the crimes to avoid political persecution orprosecution). See also Republic v. Director of Prisons (Ex Parte Yeboah), 1 GLR 91, 95-96 (1984-86) (holdingthat the appellant failed to demonstrate extradition for offences of a political character when he was sought forfinancial crimes committed abroad wholly unrelated to intelligence gathering activities he claims he carried outin Ghana in the past); Government of Sierra Leone v. Jumu, GLR 1058 (1968) (upholding denial of extradition ofrespondent, a former Sierra Leone military official who demonstrated that his extradition for the minor crime offalse imprisonment during a period of political unrest was pretext for a treason charge).311The ECOWAS Extradition Convention provides that extradition will not to be granted to another West Africannation for a political offence or for “an offence connected with a political offence.” ECOWAS ExtraditionConvention, art. 4. In addition, the London Scheme states that extradition will be precluded within theCommonwealth if the competent authority “is satisfied that the offence is of a political character.” LondonScheme, para. 12 (a).Amnesty International November 2012 Index: AFR 28/004/2012