BEECHER - NAWC

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Water ComparedAlternative ModelsHiPerformancebased·regulationLoTraditionalregulationDeregulationContract -basedregulationValidity ofassumptionsEfficacy ofmodelFigure 4-2. Evaluation of Regulatory Alternatives<strong>NAWC</strong> 92September 1998
Water ComparedAlternative Models;iThis analysis generally reflects a societal perspective; that is, the efficacy of the model isassessed in terms of achieving societal goals (such as efficient performance, appropriateinvestment, consumer protection, and environmental stewardship). Another perspective thatcan enter the mix is that of the utility company. Thus, another basis for comparing themodels is the risk/reward dimension. This is a highly subjective analysis. Each utility mustassess for itself whether one model or another offers more or less potential for risk andreward. As depicted in Figure 4-3, traditional regulation provides the lowest risk and rewardpotential; deregulation offers the highest. Deregulation is considered risky because of theuncertainty it would bring, particularly given the relatively politicized nature of water and thesubstantial amount of needed capital investment.Generalizedpotential for riskLoGeneralized potentialfor rewardHiFigure 4-3. Risks and Rewards of Regulatory Alternatives<strong>NAWC</strong> 93 September 1998
Page 1 and 2:
8NAWCNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF WATER
Page 3:
MNAWCNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF WATER
Page 6 and 7:
----Water ComparedExecutive Summary
Page 8 and 9:
Water ComparedExecutive SummaryAs u
Page 10 and 11:
Water ComparedExecutive SummaryUtil
Page 12 and 13:
Water ComparedExecutive SummaryII !
Page 15 and 16:
Water ComparedExecutive SummaryAppe
Page 17 and 18:
Water ComparedIntroduction1. Introd
Page 19 and 20:
Water ComparedIntroductionThe inves
Page 21 and 22:
Water ComparedIndustries Compared2.
Page 23 and 24:
Water ComparedIndustries Comparedo
Page 25 and 26:
Water ComparedIndustries ComparedTa
Page 27 and 28:
Water ComparedIndustries ComparedTh
Page 29 and 30:
Water ComparedIndustries ComparedEc
Page 31 and 32:
Water ComparedIndustries ComparedEl
Page 33 and 34:
Water ComparedIndustries ComparedCu
Page 35 and 36:
Water ComparedIndustries ComparedA
Page 37 and 38:
Water ComparedIndustries ComparedTh
Page 39 and 40:
Water ComparedIndustries ComparedEc
Page 41 and 42:
Water ComparedIndustries ComparedTa
Page 43 and 44:
Water ComparedIndustries ComparedLo
Page 45 and 46:
Water ComparedIndustries ComparedAs
Page 47 and 48:
Water ComparedIndustries Compared9.
Page 49 and 50:
Water ComparedIndustries ComparedWh
Page 51 and 52:
Water ComparedIndustries ComparedTr
Page 53 and 54:
Water ComparedIndustries ComparedLi
Page 55 and 56:
Water ComparedIndustries Compared
Page 57 and 58: Water ComparedIndustries ComparedTo
Page 59 and 60: Water ComparedIndustries Comparedoo
Page 61 and 62: Water ComparedIndustries ComparedTa
Page 63 and 64: -----------~~~-Water ComparedIndust
Page 65 and 66: Water ComparedIndustries ComparedTh
Page 67 and 68: Water ComparedIndustries ComparedPu
Page 69 and 70: Water ComparedStructural Change3. S
Page 71 and 72: Water ComparedStructural ChangeObse
Page 73 and 74: Water ComparedStructural ChangeIndu
Page 75 and 76: Water ComparedStructural ChangelMan
Page 77 and 78: Water ComparedStructoral ChangeDesp
Page 79 and 80: Water ComparedStructural ChangeRest
Page 81 and 82: --lWater ComparedStructural Changeg
Page 83 and 84: lWater Compared Structoral ChangeIn
Page 85 and 86: Water ComparedStructural ChangeoooA
Page 87 and 88: Water ComparedStructural ChangeTabl
Page 89 and 90: Water ComparedStructoral ChangeTabl
Page 95 and 96: Water ComparedAlternative Models4.
Page 97 and 98: Water ComparedAlternative ModelsReg
Page 99 and 100: Water ComparedAlternative ModelsFin
Page 101 and 102: Water ComparedAlternative ModelsIn
Page 103 and 104: Altematlve ModelsTable 4-5: Regulat
Page 105 and 106: Water ComparedAlternative ModelsTab
Page 107: Water ComparedAlternative ModelsTab
Page 111 and 112: Water ComparedAlternative ModelslIT
Page 113 and 114: Water ComparedStrategic Issues5. St
Page 115 and 116: Water ComparedStrategic IssuesTable
Page 117 and 118: Water ComparedStrategic IssuesTable
Page 119 and 120: Water ComparedAppendix AAppendix A:
Page 121 and 122: Water ComparedAppendix AState Telec
Page 123 and 124: Water ComparedAppendix AStateColora
Page 127 and 128: Water ComparedAppendix AStateIllino
Page 129 and 130: Water Compared AooendixAlState Tele
Page 131 and 132: Water ComparedAooendix AState Telec
Page 135 and 136: Water ComparedAppendix AStateMissis
Page 137 and 138: Water Compared Appendix Al),•Stat
Page 145 and 146: Water Compared Appendix A lState Te
Page 155 and 156: Water ComparedAppendix BAppendix BR
Page 157 and 158: Water ComparedAppendix BTable B-2Ke
Page 159 and 160:
Water ComparedAppendix CAppendix CS
Page 161 and 162:
Water ComparedAooendix CTable C-2Pe
Page 163 and 164:
Water ComparedAppendixCTable C-2 (c
Page 165 and 166:
Water ComparedData SourcesData Sour
Page 167 and 168:
Page 169 and 170:
Page 171 and 172:
-~------Water ComparedGlossaryGloss
Page 173 and 174:
Water ComparedGlossaryincluding dem
Page 175 and 176:
Water ComparedGlossarymay apply to
Page 177 and 178:
Water ComparedGlossaryReseller. In
show all

BEECHER - NAWC

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?