BEECHER - NAWC

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Water ComparedAppendix CTable C-2 (continued)State Year Inflation Adjust- Revenue Service Length of Length Infraplanin Index ment profit Quality freeze on of plan structureeffect (%) sharing Penalty basic InvestservicesmentTexas 1995 CPI Set by No No 4 years No limit Yes-PUCdigitalupgradesby 2000UtahVermontNoneNoneVirginia 1995 GDPPI .5 of No No 6 years No limit NoGDPPIWashingtonNoneWest Virginia 1995 CPI None No No 3 years 3 years 350Mover 5yearsWisconsin 1994 GDPPI 3 No No 3 years 5 years 700Mover 5yearsWyoming 1996 None None No Yes No No limit NoCapsSource: Survey by Dr. Nancy Zearfoss, National Regulatory Research Institute, October 1997.NAWC 148 September 1998
Water ComparedData SourcesData SourcesPage I Title2 Table 1-1. Investor-OwnedIndustry Profiles (1996)10 Capital Intensity:Ratio of Utility Plant to Revenues(1995 and 1996)10 Average Service Life ofWaterAssets (Florida AdministrativeCode)11 Recent Trend in Ratio ofElectric Plant to Revenue ( 1991to 1996)II Recent Trend in Ratio ofWater Plant to Revenue (1991 to1996)12 Ratio ofNet Utility Plant toConnections (NA WC 1986 and1996)12 Scale Economies in WaterTreatment13 Economies of Scale in WaterSupply: Total Assets (NAWC1996) •13 Economies of Scale in WaterSupply: Operations andMaintenance Expense (NA WC1996)15 Electric Utility Plant in Service(1996)15 Water Utility Plant in Service:American Water WorksCompany, Inc. (1997)16 Recent Trends in Electric UtilityPlant Additions (1991 to 1996)16 Natural Gas Industry: Miles ofPipeline and Main ( 1970 to 1996)16 Natural Gas IndustryConstruction Expenditures ( 1996)SourceTelephone. Federal Communications Commission, Statistics ofCommunications Common Carriers, 1996/1997 Edition (1997).Electric. Energy Information Administration, Financial Statistics ofMajor U.S. Investor-Owned Electric Utilities 1996 (1997). NaturalGas. American Gas Association, Gas Facts 1995 (balance sheet)and 1996 (income statement) (1996 and 1997). Water. NationalAssociation of Water Companies, 1996 Financial Summary forInvestor-Owned Water Utilities (1997).Same as above (industry profiles) plus U.S. EnvironmentalProtection Agency, Community Water System Survey (1997).Florida Administrative Code, Chapter 25-30, Supplement No. 179.Energy Information Administration, Financial Statistics of MajorU.S. Investor-Owned Electric Utilities 1996 (Washington, DC:EIA, 1997).National Association of Water Companies, Financial Summary forInvestor-Owned Water Companies (various years).National Association of Water Companies, Financial and OperatingData for Investor-Owned Water Utilities (1986 and 1996).U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Affordability of the 1986SDWA Amendments to Community Water Systems (1993).National Association of Water Companies, Financial and OperatingData for Investor-Owned Water Utilities (various years).National Association of Water Companies, Financial and OperatingData for Investor-Owned Water Utilities (various years).Energy Information Administration, Financial Statistics of MajorU.S. Investor-Owned Electric Utilities 1996 (1997). Does notinclude CWIP, $20 billion in nuclear fuel, and other adjustments.American Water Works Service Company, Inc., 1997 AnnualReport. Excludes wastewater plant, CWIP, and accumulateddepreciation.Energy Information Administration, Financial Statistics of MajorU.S. Investor-Owned Electric Utilities 1996 (1997).American Gas Association, Gas Facts 1996 (1997), Chart 5- I.American Gas Association, Gas Facts 1996 (Arlington, VA: AGA,1997).NAWC149 September 1998!I)
Page 1 and 2:
8NAWCNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF WATER
Page 3:
MNAWCNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF WATER
Page 6 and 7:
----Water ComparedExecutive Summary
Page 8 and 9:
Water ComparedExecutive SummaryAs u
Page 10 and 11:
Water ComparedExecutive SummaryUtil
Page 12 and 13:
Water ComparedExecutive SummaryII !
Page 15 and 16:
Water ComparedExecutive SummaryAppe
Page 17 and 18:
Water ComparedIntroduction1. Introd
Page 19 and 20:
Water ComparedIntroductionThe inves
Page 21 and 22:
Water ComparedIndustries Compared2.
Page 23 and 24:
Water ComparedIndustries Comparedo
Page 25 and 26:
Water ComparedIndustries ComparedTa
Page 27 and 28:
Water ComparedIndustries ComparedTh
Page 29 and 30:
Water ComparedIndustries ComparedEc
Page 31 and 32:
Water ComparedIndustries ComparedEl
Page 33 and 34:
Water ComparedIndustries ComparedCu
Page 35 and 36:
Water ComparedIndustries ComparedA
Page 37 and 38:
Page 39 and 40:
Water ComparedIndustries ComparedEc
Page 41 and 42:
Page 43 and 44:
Water ComparedIndustries ComparedLo
Page 45 and 46:
Water ComparedIndustries ComparedAs
Page 47 and 48:
Water ComparedIndustries Compared9.
Page 49 and 50:
Water ComparedIndustries ComparedWh
Page 51 and 52:
Water ComparedIndustries ComparedTr
Page 53 and 54:
Water ComparedIndustries ComparedLi
Page 55 and 56:
Water ComparedIndustries Compared
Page 57 and 58:
Water ComparedIndustries ComparedTo
Page 59 and 60:
Water ComparedIndustries Comparedoo
Page 61 and 62:
Page 63 and 64:
-----------~~~-Water ComparedIndust
Page 65 and 66:
Page 67 and 68:
Water ComparedIndustries ComparedPu
Page 69 and 70:
Water ComparedStructural Change3. S
Page 71 and 72:
Water ComparedStructural ChangeObse
Page 73 and 74:
Water ComparedStructural ChangeIndu
Page 75 and 76:
Water ComparedStructural ChangelMan
Page 77 and 78:
Water ComparedStructoral ChangeDesp
Page 79 and 80:
Water ComparedStructural ChangeRest
Page 81 and 82:
--lWater ComparedStructural Changeg
Page 83 and 84:
lWater Compared Structoral ChangeIn
Page 85 and 86:
Water ComparedStructural ChangeoooA
Page 87 and 88:
Water ComparedStructural ChangeTabl
Page 89 and 90:
Water ComparedStructoral ChangeTabl
Page 91 and 92:
Page 93 and 94:
Page 95 and 96:
Water ComparedAlternative Models4.
Page 97 and 98:
Water ComparedAlternative ModelsReg
Page 99 and 100:
Water ComparedAlternative ModelsFin
Page 101 and 102:
Water ComparedAlternative ModelsIn
Page 103 and 104:
Altematlve ModelsTable 4-5: Regulat
Page 105 and 106:
Water ComparedAlternative ModelsTab
Page 107 and 108:
Water ComparedAlternative ModelsTab
Page 109 and 110:
Water ComparedAlternative Models;iT
Page 111 and 112:
Water ComparedAlternative ModelslIT
Page 113 and 114: Water ComparedStrategic Issues5. St
Page 115 and 116: Water ComparedStrategic IssuesTable
Page 117 and 118: Water ComparedStrategic IssuesTable
Page 119 and 120: Water ComparedAppendix AAppendix A:
Page 121 and 122: Water ComparedAppendix AState Telec
Page 123 and 124: Water ComparedAppendix AStateColora
Page 127 and 128: Water ComparedAppendix AStateIllino
Page 129 and 130: Water Compared AooendixAlState Tele
Page 131 and 132: Water ComparedAooendix AState Telec
Page 135 and 136: Water ComparedAppendix AStateMissis
Page 137 and 138: Water Compared Appendix Al),•Stat
Page 145 and 146: Water Compared Appendix A lState Te
Page 155 and 156: Water ComparedAppendix BAppendix BR
Page 157 and 158: Water ComparedAppendix BTable B-2Ke
Page 159 and 160: Water ComparedAppendix CAppendix CS
Page 161 and 162: Water ComparedAooendix CTable C-2Pe
Page 163: Water ComparedAppendixCTable C-2 (c
Page 167 and 168: Water ComparedData SourcesData Sour
Page 169 and 170: Water ComparedData SourcesData Sour
Page 171 and 172: -~------Water ComparedGlossaryGloss
Page 173 and 174: Water ComparedGlossaryincluding dem
Page 175 and 176: Water ComparedGlossarymay apply to
Page 177 and 178: Water ComparedGlossaryReseller. In
show all

BEECHER - NAWC

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?