Florida Study - Bipartisan Policy Center

Recommendations

Info

C.10 Federal Renewable Energy Portfolio Standard Impacts on North CarolinaTable C.7. Total Industry Output From Year-to-Year Operations Under the Two Federal Policy Scenarios, 2015, 2020, 2025, ContinuedThe 25% RESThe 20% RESBEA Region/State 2015 2020 2025 2015 2020 2025Direct Fire WoodGainesville $229,240,055 $229,240,055 $229,240,055 $229,240,055 $229,240,055 $229,240,055Jacksonville $96,128,874 $96,128,874 $96,128,874 $96,128,874 $96,128,874 $96,128,874Miami-Fort Lauderdale-Miami Beach $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Orlando-The Villages $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Panama City-Lynn Haven $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Pensacola-Ferry Pass-Brent $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Sarasota-Bradenton-Venice $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Tallahassee $167,521,744 $167,521,744 $167,521,744 $167,521,744 $167,521,744 $167,521,744Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Florida $597,930,817 $597,930,817 $597,930,817 $597,930,817 $597,930,817 $597,930,817Direct Fire Dedicated Energy CropGainesville $83,766,830 $385,327,416 $619,874,539 $83,766,830 $385,327,416 $619,874,539Jacksonville $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Miami-Fort Lauderdale-Miami Beach $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Orlando-The Villages $51,043,764 $234,801,313 $377,723,851 $51,043,764 $234,801,313 $377,723,851Panama City-Lynn Haven $73,213,371 $336,781,508 $541,778,947 $73,213,371 $336,781,508 $541,778,947Pensacola-Ferry Pass-Brent $60,110,683 $276,509,142 $444,819,054 $60,110,683 $276,509,142 $444,819,054Sarasota-Bradenton-Venice $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Tallahassee $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Florida $292,450,256 $1,345,271,177 $2,164,131,893 $292,450,256 $1,345,271,177 $2,164,131,893Direct Fire Poultry Litter (Broilers)Gainesville $60,756,622 $60,756,622 $60,756,622 $61,237,502 $61,237,502 $61,237,502Jacksonville $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Miami-Fort Lauderdale-Miami Beach $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Orlando-The Villages $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Panama City-Lynn Haven $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Pensacola-Ferry Pass-Brent $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Sarasota-Bradenton-Venice $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Tallahassee $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Florida $69,342,016 $69,342,016 $69,342,016 $69,890,849 $69,890,849 $69,890,849
Federal Renewable Energy Portfolio Standard Impacts on North Carolina________________________ C.11Table C.7. Total Industry Output From Year-to-Year Operations Under the Two Federal Policy Scenarios, 2015, 2020, 2025, ContinuedThe 25% RESThe 20% RESBEA Region/State 2015 2020 2025 2015 2020 2025Animal Methane Poultry (Layers)Gainesville $252,912 $252,912 $252,912 $252,410 $252,410 $252,410Jacksonville $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Miami-Fort Lauderdale-Miami Beach $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Orlando-The Villages $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Panama City-Lynn Haven $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Pensacola-Ferry Pass-Brent $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Sarasota-Bradenton-Venice $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Tallahassee $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Florida $309,675 $309,675 $309,675 $309,061 $309,061 $309,061Animal Methane DairyGainesville $1,794,109 $1,794,109 $1,794,109 $1,794,229 $1,794,229 $1,794,229Jacksonville $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Miami-Fort Lauderdale-Miami Beach $1,480,762 $1,480,762 $1,480,762 $1,477,203 $1,477,203 $1,477,203Orlando-The Villages $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Panama City-Lynn Haven $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Pensacola-Ferry Pass-Brent $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Sarasota-Bradenton-Venice $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Tallahassee $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Florida $3,651,144 $3,651,144 $3,651,144 $3,647,681 $3,647,681 $3,647,681TotalGainesville $389,083,907 $700,043,102 $943,988,834 $389,564,405 $700,523,601 $944,469,332Jacksonville $102,411,411 $599,806,207 $638,124,219 $102,411,411 $599,806,207 $638,124,219Miami-Fort Lauderdale-Miami Beach $1,499,734,248 $2,504,208,559 $2,642,225,185 $1,499,730,689 $2,504,204,999 $2,642,221,626Orlando-The Villages $1,173,935,579 $2,066,466,291 $2,369,705,128 $1,173,935,579 $2,066,466,291 $2,369,705,128Panama City-Lynn Haven $163,344,127 $428,829,943 $635,745,063 $162,804,047 $428,829,943 $635,745,063Pensacola-Ferry Pass-Brent $89,028,634 $309,223,649 $481,330,118 $89,028,634 $309,223,649 $481,330,118Sarasota-Bradenton-Venice $289,570,927 $1,062,261,411 $1,134,401,282 $289,570,927 $1,062,261,411 $1,134,401,282Tallahassee $170,710,777 $172,968,866 $175,226,955 $170,710,777 $172,968,866 $175,226,955Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater $437,795,224 $922,795,173 $981,370,334 $437,795,224 $922,795,173 $981,370,334Florida $4,939,532,215 $9,786,817,566 $11,173,588,864 $4,940,076,970 $9,787,362,321 $11,174,133,618
Page 1 and 2:
Projected Impacts ofProposed Federa
Page 3 and 4:
Executive SummaryThe purpose of thi
Page 5 and 6:
Table ES.2. Summary of the Projecte
Page 7 and 8:
Table of ContentsPageExecutive Summ
Page 13 and 14:
Study PurposeProjected Impacts of P
Page 15 and 16:
The 20% RESThe proposed new PURPA S
Page 17 and 18:
Table 4. The 25% RES for Federal Re
Page 19 and 20:
Table 6. ContinuedUtility Name Plan
Page 21 and 22:
Potential for Energy Generation to
Page 23 and 24:
Table 9. Florida Landfill Gas Proje
Page 25 and 26:
Table 11. Projected Potential for E
Page 27 and 28:
Direct Fire With Dedicated Energy C
Page 29 and 30:
Projections to Meet the Federal Pro
Page 31 and 32:
shown in Figure 8. The Miami and Sa
Page 33 and 34:
of representative facilities invest
Page 35 and 36: projected to be purchased. The REC
Page 37 and 38: MarkeyBingaman2.4% 4.8%6.6% 2.2%2.4
Page 39 and 40: MarkeyBingaman9.0% 2.4%34.8%9.0% 2.
Page 41 and 42: Table 21. Employment Projections Fr
Page 43 and 44: Figure 19 shows the total employmen
Page 45 and 46: Although there are negative impacts
Page 47 and 48: References UsedAmerican Renewable E
Page 49 and 50: APPENDIX AENERGY SOURCE ABBREVIATIO
Page 51 and 52: APPENDIX BEXPENDITURES BY REPRESENT
Page 53 and 54: Conversion Technology: Large Reside
Page 55 and 56: Conversion Technology: Utility Scal
Page 57 and 58: Conversion Technology: Landfill Gas
Page 59 and 60: Conversion Technology: Co-fire (15%
Page 61 and 62: Conversion Technology: Wood Fired P
Page 63 and 64: Conversion Technology: Dedicated En
Page 65 and 66: Conversion Technology: Citrus Waste
Page 67 and 68: Conversion Technology: High Pressur
Page 69 and 70: Conversion Technology: Poultry Litt
Page 71 and 72: Expenditure Summary for Poultry Lit
Page 73 and 74: Conversion Technology: Methane Dige
Page 75 and 76: Conversion Technology: Methane Dige
Page 77 and 78: APPENDIX CECONOMIC IMPACTS FROM ADD
Page 79 and 80: Federal Renewable Energy Portfolio
Page 85: Federal Renewable Energy Portfolio
Page 91 and 92: APPENDIX DFLORIDA ECONOMIC ACTIVITY
Page 95 and 96: APPENDIX EAdjusted Bureau of Econom
Page 97: Table E.1. Adjusted Bureau of Econo
show all

Florida Study - Bipartisan Policy Center

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?