Journalist’s TradeScuttlebutt and Speculation Fill a Political WeblogA newspaper columnist’s blog becomes a must-read on the campaign trail.By Daniel WeintraubAfter 20 years writing about politicsand public policy to somelocal note but no national acclaim,I managed to become almostfamous this year—by dispensing speculationand instant analysis on theInternet and punditry on cable television.I owe it all to the California recalland to my Weblog.When I started the Weblog—knownas the California Insider—I had no ideathat the attempt to remove GovernorGray Davis from office would take rootand evolve into the biggest politicalstory of the year. Or that the Internetgenre known commonly as the blogwould come to play such a prominentrole in the coverage.For the uninitiated, a blog is anonline journal of usuallyshort, spontaneous itemsupdated frequently asevents develop. Manyblogs are personal diariesread only by the author’sfamily and close friends.Even the more prominentbloggers are usuallynonjournalists who link toprinted stories and critiquethem on their owntime. Others are createdand updated by collegeprofessors or experts intheir fields.Blogs, then, representa democratization of journalism,or at least opinionjournalism, because theyallow anybody, just aboutanywhere, to publishthemselves and gain readersin relation to their talent,their relevance and,ultimately, their accuracy,regardless of their credentials.Breaking News on My BlogI was breaking new ground by combiningfull-time journalism as a three-timesa-weekcolumnist for The SacramentoBee and a full-time blog that I updatedconstantly from anywhere I had accessto the Internet—from my desk, home,campaign bus, and other unpredictablelocations. When I wrote for theCalifornia Insider, I commented on thenews and broke some, too.It was a perfect marriage of mediumand message. The recall was a fastmovingstory from the start, first withthe signature count and then the watchto see which candidates would file torun. The final, 60-day sprint to ElectionDay was filled with unexpected twistsand turns that I could report and thenanalyze on my blog 18 hours or morebefore they would appear in the printversion of our newspaper. When I beganthe blog in early April, it was readby a few hundred people each day,mainly Capitol staff, lobbyists, politicalconsultants, and colleagues in the presscorps. By the end of the campaign, theblog was getting nearly 20,000 pageviews a day.Some readers told me they wouldcheck the site eight or 10 times a day tosee if anything was breaking on thestory. Those readers included peoplefrom all over the world and many editorsin newsrooms from Los Angeles toNew York. One day, late in the campaignwhen I was riding on the ArnoldSchwarzenegger bus tour, a reporterfor another paper approached me afterhis editor had read an item I’dposted a few minutes earlier,called him, and asked him tocheck it out.Ironically, the success of theblog was based on skills I’d longshunned as a journalist. In my 20years as a beat reporter, I hateddaily news, or at least the kindgenerated by politicians, whichso often seemed artificial andoften self-serving. Rather thanstaffing press conferences andsitting through staged committeehearings, I preferred enterprisestories and analysis. Now Ifound myself with a self-imposeddeadline every minute, and I wasfiling items based not just on myreporting but also on press releases,campaign commercials,fundraising reports, and otherroutine developments.While as a columnist I preferpolicy to politics, my blog wasfilled with political scuttlebuttand speculation, the latest pollsand observations on who was up58 <strong>Nieman</strong> Reports / Winter 2003
California Recalland who was down. Naturally, TV lovedit. I was soon in demand as a guestpundit for all three major cable televisionnetworks, and halfway throughthe campaign I signed on as an exclusiveanalyst with MSNBC. I was bemusedif not surprised that family andfriends who had rarely if ever read oneof my 850-word columns on state policywere thrilled to see me on televisionoffering my latest sound bites on therecall race.Even if I was going against my instincts,I found that the blog helpedimprove my column. The constant writingloosened up my style and made mealways ready to write whenever I satdown to craft my newspaper pieces.The increased feedback from readersalso helped, especially tips and analysisthat flowed in as people respondedto my posts. I also was able to use theWeb site as a public drafting board,posting segments that would grow intocolumns over a few days’ time.The Blog and the NewspaperI did stumble along the way. Mynewfound thirst for reporting breakingdevelopments led me to post anitem from a source close toSchwarzenegger saying the actor haddecided not to run and would be holdinga press conference to announce hisdecision. As it turned out, the pressconference was postponed and ultimatelycanceled and Schwarzenegger,of course, did enter the race. Such arethe hazards of reporting the newsminute-by-minute as it develops.I also became somewhat notoriousafter I posted a sharply worded commentarycritical of Lt. Governor CruzBustamante, the major Democrat inthe race. Protests from the newsroomled to a decision to have an editor preclearmy items. Before then, I’d posteddirectly to the Web with a simultaneouscopy sent to my line editor.When the paper’s ombudsman revealedthis change in policy, it caused an uproarin the “blogosphere” among mynew colleagues who believe thatblogging and editing are incompatiblebecause the craft is supposed to bespontaneous and unfiltered, then revisedas readers jump in for a sort ofinteractive story session. Someone evenstarted a “free Dan Weintraub” movement.By Election Day, I was liberated, butnot from my editors. Now that thecampaign has ended and the transitionment to Schwarzenegger’s internationalprominence as a movie actor.In keeping with Schwarzenegger’sstatus as a former Mr. Universe,Ironman Magazine was also present.Teagan Clive, the Ironman correspondent,granted numerous interviews toher colleagues in the room, telling thePasadena Star-News “Arnold is themodern day king” and adding, “He isstrong, and he shoots from the hip.”The news conference offered a previewof the campaign to follow: longon star power and short on substance.The candidate’s refusal to get into spetogoverning has begun, I’ve returnedto the pace I intended all along: I posta few items a day, some tidbits butmostly analysis. Readers tell me theyare having withdrawal pains. But thereis simply no way to keep up the pace ofthe campaign and also publish threeprint columns a week and still findtime to eat and sleep.The electronic media have also retreated.When, the day after the election,they packed their bags and headedfor the Kobe Bryant trial in Colorado orthe presidential campaign trail in Iowa,they also stopped calling for instantanalysis. My teenage son noted my absencefrom the tube and asked with allthe sincerity a 14-year-old can muster:“What happened, did your 15 days offame run out?”I guess so. But the blog, and thecolumn that begat it, continue. ■Daniel Weintraub opines on Californiapolitics for the editorial pages ofThe Sacramento Bee. His Weblog andcolumn archive are atwww.sacbee.com/insiderdweintraub@sacbee.comLights, Camera, RecallTelevision news coverage could not get past a candidate’s star power.By Cecilia Alvear and George LewisThe California recall was a mixtureof historical event, highdrama, and showbiz. In the beginning,it was covered as a farce, with135 candidates in the field. The firstweek of stories profiled Larry Flynt, theself-styled “smut peddler with a heart,”porn star Mary Carey, and former childactor Gary Coleman in pieces that reinforcedevery East Coast stereotype ofCalifornia as a land of whackos. ThenArnold Schwarzenegger announced hiscandidacy on the “The Tonight Showwith Jay Leno,” and from that momenton the media focus narrowed to him,embattled Governor Gray Davis, and ahandful of other so-called “serious”candidates. But it was Schwarzenegger,with his superstar aura, who dominatedthe story.His first news conference was anevent attended by 160 journalists fromaround the world, representing outletsranging from The New York Timesto Variety, from the broadcast and cablenews outlets to the celeb-news shows“Entertainment Tonight” and “AccessHollywood.” There was a huge contingentof foreign journalists from Europe,Asia and Latin America, a testa-<strong>Nieman</strong> Reports / Winter 2003 59