13.07.2015 Views

The Constitutional History of England

The Constitutional History of England

The Constitutional History of England

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

42 Constitutio 9 za Z <strong>History</strong> PERIODFor the Conquest had not destroyed the shire moot. Itbecame the county court. <strong>The</strong> Norman kings seem to haveseen its value as a counterpoise to feudalism. To a certainextent the feudal principle that all public rights and dutiesare connected with land holding had, even before the Conquest,modified the constitution <strong>of</strong> the ancient assembly, ithad become an assembly <strong>of</strong> free land-owners. After theConquest the qualification became more definite; the freeholderwas entitled and was bound to be present. But acourt formed by all the freeholders <strong>of</strong> a shire is not, you willsee, a court formed upon feudal lines. In such an assemblythe tenants in chief <strong>of</strong> the crown have to meet their ownvassals on a footing <strong>of</strong> legal equality ; a tenant may findhimself sitting as the peer <strong>of</strong> his own lord. This retention<strong>of</strong> the old courts is <strong>of</strong> vast importance in the history <strong>of</strong>parliament. In Henry 1's day the county court was held,as in the days <strong>of</strong> the Confessor, twice a year. More frequentassemblies seem to have become necessary. By the charter<strong>of</strong> 1217, it is ordered that the county court shall not meetmore <strong>of</strong>ten than once a month; monthly sessions seem tohave been common.For a long time after the Conquest the county court remainedwhat it was before the conquest, the great ordinarycourt <strong>of</strong> litigation for all the men <strong>of</strong> the shire. <strong>The</strong> growth<strong>of</strong> the feudal courts (<strong>of</strong> which hereafter) had to some extentdiverted business from it; on the other hand, the king usedit as a check on the feudal courts. At the petition <strong>of</strong> a suitorsuggesting that he could not get justice from the lord's court,the king would direct the sheriff to intervene and remove thecase into the county court. Gradually, however, the countycourt began to lose its importance as a judicial tribunal. Thiswas due, however, not to the rivalry <strong>of</strong> the feual courts, butto the ever growing vigour <strong>of</strong> the king's own court, whichbegan to throw open its doors to all suitors. Of this concentration<strong>of</strong> justice something has been said already andmore must be said hereafter. But by the end <strong>of</strong> Edward I'sreign, the king's own courts had already practically becomecourts <strong>of</strong> first instance for all matters <strong>of</strong> much importance.<strong>The</strong> county court had jurisdiction in personal actions (i.e.I<strong>The</strong> County Courtactions in which land or rights connected with land were notclaimed) up to 40 shillings, and jurisdiction in actions for landwhen default <strong>of</strong> justice was made in a feudal court, but inone way or another litigants could generally take their casesto the king's courts.Rut while the county court was thus losing its high placeas a judicial tribunal, it had been becoming the very foundation<strong>of</strong> the political constitution. When in the middle <strong>of</strong> thethirteenth century we find elected representatives called t<strong>of</strong>orm part <strong>of</strong> the national assembly, <strong>of</strong> a common council<strong>of</strong> the realm, or parliament, they are the representatives<strong>of</strong> the county courts. <strong>The</strong>y are not the representatives <strong>of</strong>unorganized collections <strong>of</strong> men, they are the representatives,we might almost say, <strong>of</strong> corporations. <strong>The</strong> whole countyis in theory represented by its court. So much is this thecase that the language <strong>of</strong> the time draws no distinctionbetween the two-the same word comitatus serves to describeboth the county, the geographical district, and the assembly.<strong>The</strong> king in his financial necessities has treated with thecounties, long before the counties were ordered to sendrepresentative knights to parliament. But the corporatenature <strong>of</strong> the county, the identity <strong>of</strong> the county and thecounty court is best brought out by entries on the judicialrolls, entries which enable us to see the county in the days<strong>of</strong> Richard and <strong>of</strong> John. <strong>The</strong> king's itinerant justices fromtime to time visit the counties; the whole county (totuscomitatus), i.e. the body <strong>of</strong> freeholders, stands before them ;it declares what the county has been doing since the lastvisitation; the county can give judgment; the county cangive testimony; the county can be punished by fines andamercements when the county has done wrong ; if the countyhas given false judgment, the county can be summoned toWestminster; four knights must be sent to represent it; hewho has suffered by its false judgment may challenge thecounty to fight; and the county fights by the body <strong>of</strong> thecounty champion. Even the principle <strong>of</strong> election has beenlong growing before the day when the county is called on toelect members <strong>of</strong> parliament. In I 194, for example, coronersare first instituted ; three knights and one clerk are to be

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!