13.07.2015 Views

Suren Kandasamy Dissertation.pdf - University of Surrey

Suren Kandasamy Dissertation.pdf - University of Surrey

Suren Kandasamy Dissertation.pdf - University of Surrey

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

M.Sc <strong>Dissertation</strong>A desirable feature <strong>of</strong> any γ-ray detector is linearity <strong>of</strong> energy response. That is,direct proportionality between the quantity <strong>of</strong> energy deposited in the detector by theincident radiation event and the height <strong>of</strong> the analogue output pulse. A detector energycalibration may be obtained by plotting incident photon energy versus the centralchannel number <strong>of</strong> the corresponding full energy peak. Using each <strong>of</strong> the sourcescollect an energy spectrum and determine the central channel <strong>of</strong> the full energy peak.Plot a graph <strong>of</strong> channel number versus energy, making sure to indicate all errors [7].Energy calibration is one <strong>of</strong> the most important factors that should be consideredbefore making any analysis. The gain <strong>of</strong> the system is given by the slope <strong>of</strong> thecalibration plot. The units are energy per channel (eg. keV per channel). Changing theamplifier gain is the most immediate way <strong>of</strong> altering the calibration <strong>of</strong> the system.2.4.2 Energy ResolutionOne important property <strong>of</strong> a detector in radiation spectroscopy can be examinedby noting its response to a monoenergetic source <strong>of</strong> that radiation. Statistical factors andelectronic noise affects the shape <strong>of</strong> the spectra obtained by a radiation detector. Sharplines and sharp edges would be the ideal spectrum, but in practice the lines are boardpeaks, and the edges are rounded. The energy resolution <strong>of</strong> a detector is a measure <strong>of</strong> itsability to resolve small differences in the energy <strong>of</strong> incident γ-rays, varies with theenergy and type <strong>of</strong> detector. Scintillator detectors tend to have lower energy resolutionin comparison with the solid state detectors at room temperature.An ideal photopeak will be close to Gaussian shape, because the total number <strong>of</strong>charge carriers N is typically a large number. In this case, the Gaussian function can bewritten with analytical parameter :A C exp 2 H H22022.2Where C is the number <strong>of</strong> count, H 0 is centroid channel number and A is peak area. Thewidth parameter determines the full width at half maximum (FWHM) <strong>of</strong> anyGaussian through the relation FWHM=2.35.K. <strong>Suren</strong> 8

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!