Suren Kandasamy Dissertation.pdf - University of Surrey
Suren Kandasamy Dissertation.pdf - University of Surrey
Suren Kandasamy Dissertation.pdf - University of Surrey
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
M.Sc <strong>Dissertation</strong>A desirable feature <strong>of</strong> any γ-ray detector is linearity <strong>of</strong> energy response. That is,direct proportionality between the quantity <strong>of</strong> energy deposited in the detector by theincident radiation event and the height <strong>of</strong> the analogue output pulse. A detector energycalibration may be obtained by plotting incident photon energy versus the centralchannel number <strong>of</strong> the corresponding full energy peak. Using each <strong>of</strong> the sourcescollect an energy spectrum and determine the central channel <strong>of</strong> the full energy peak.Plot a graph <strong>of</strong> channel number versus energy, making sure to indicate all errors [7].Energy calibration is one <strong>of</strong> the most important factors that should be consideredbefore making any analysis. The gain <strong>of</strong> the system is given by the slope <strong>of</strong> thecalibration plot. The units are energy per channel (eg. keV per channel). Changing theamplifier gain is the most immediate way <strong>of</strong> altering the calibration <strong>of</strong> the system.2.4.2 Energy ResolutionOne important property <strong>of</strong> a detector in radiation spectroscopy can be examinedby noting its response to a monoenergetic source <strong>of</strong> that radiation. Statistical factors andelectronic noise affects the shape <strong>of</strong> the spectra obtained by a radiation detector. Sharplines and sharp edges would be the ideal spectrum, but in practice the lines are boardpeaks, and the edges are rounded. The energy resolution <strong>of</strong> a detector is a measure <strong>of</strong> itsability to resolve small differences in the energy <strong>of</strong> incident γ-rays, varies with theenergy and type <strong>of</strong> detector. Scintillator detectors tend to have lower energy resolutionin comparison with the solid state detectors at room temperature.An ideal photopeak will be close to Gaussian shape, because the total number <strong>of</strong>charge carriers N is typically a large number. In this case, the Gaussian function can bewritten with analytical parameter :A C exp 2 H H22022.2Where C is the number <strong>of</strong> count, H 0 is centroid channel number and A is peak area. Thewidth parameter determines the full width at half maximum (FWHM) <strong>of</strong> anyGaussian through the relation FWHM=2.35.K. <strong>Suren</strong> 8