03.12.2012 Views

Peptidoglycan .Types of Bacterial Cell Walls and their Taxonomic ...

Peptidoglycan .Types of Bacterial Cell Walls and their Taxonomic ...

Peptidoglycan .Types of Bacterial Cell Walls and their Taxonomic ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

VOi. 36, 1972 PEPTIDOGLYCAN TYPES OF BACTERIAL CELL WALLS<br />

441<br />

subgenus Streptobacterium was proposed by<br />

K<strong>and</strong>ler (168, 169). It seems feasible to put it<br />

with L. inulinus in a separate subgenus<br />

Sporolactobacillus (194) which is characterized<br />

by showing some properties <strong>of</strong> the genus Bacillus,<br />

i.e., type <strong>of</strong> peptidoglycan <strong>and</strong> teichoic<br />

acid, <strong>and</strong> in some cases nitrate reduction,<br />

motility, <strong>and</strong> sporulation. This subgenus would<br />

be distinguished from the genus Bacillus by the<br />

absence <strong>of</strong> cytochromes, <strong>and</strong> these organisms<br />

are therefore not able to carry out a true<br />

oxidative metabolism.<br />

(iii) The types <strong>of</strong> peptidoglycans found in<br />

species <strong>of</strong> the subgenus Betabacterium are<br />

listed in Table 26. The predominant type is<br />

again the Lys-D-Asp type, but especially the<br />

recently described species show considerable<br />

variations in the interpeptide bridge. In the<br />

peptidoglycans <strong>of</strong> L. fermentum <strong>and</strong> L. cellobiosus,<br />

L-Lys residues are replaced by L-Orn<br />

residues (301, 302, 422). Both species possess<br />

identical GC content <strong>and</strong> electrophoretically<br />

identical lactic acid dehydrogenases (103). It<br />

seems feasible that they should be united in one<br />

species. They may be distinguished as subspecies<br />

on the basis <strong>of</strong> the fermentation pattern.<br />

Table 26 contains some other strains called L.<br />

fermentum which contain L-Lys in <strong>their</strong> pep-<br />

tidoglycan. As shown in our laboratory these<br />

strains do not belong to L. fermentum. Strain<br />

ATCC 9338 is identical with L. brevis according<br />

to the spectrum <strong>of</strong> fermented sugars <strong>and</strong><br />

the electrophoretic mobility <strong>of</strong> the lactic acid<br />

dehydrogenase. (In an earlier publication<br />

[169] it was reported that L. fermentum ATCC<br />

14931 contained a peptidoglycan <strong>of</strong> L-Lys-D-<br />

Asp type. This was due to a clerical error; the<br />

correct number <strong>of</strong> the strain studied is ATCC<br />

9338. The other five strains mentioned in the<br />

same publication were similar to ATCC 23272<br />

were isolated from manure. Unfortunately,<br />

none <strong>of</strong> the genuine L. fermentum strains investigated<br />

by Williams <strong>and</strong> Sadler [422] was<br />

included in these studies.)<br />

Strain L. fermentum ATCC 23272 (Reuter<br />

type II) differs from strain ATCC 14931 (type<br />

strain) as well as from L. brevis with respect to<br />

the GC content, sugar fermentation, <strong>and</strong> electrophoretic<br />

mobility <strong>of</strong> the lactic acid dehydrogenases.<br />

It should be considered as a separate<br />

species, not yet described.<br />

The recently described species L. viridescens<br />

(170, 174, 273) <strong>and</strong> L. coprophilus (144, 169, 304)<br />

show different peptidoglycan types. The interpeptide<br />

bridges do not consist <strong>of</strong> D-isoasparaginyl<br />

residues but <strong>of</strong> L-Ala-L-Ala-L-Ser, L-Ser-<br />

TABLE 26. Distribution <strong>of</strong> peptidoglycan types within the subgenus Betabacterium<br />

L. fermentum .............<br />

L. cellobiosus ..............<br />

L. fermentum .............<br />

L. fermentum .............<br />

L. fermentum ............<br />

L. brevis ..................<br />

L. buchneri ................<br />

L. fructovorans ............<br />

L. malefermentans .........<br />

L. pastorianus .............<br />

L. parvus<br />

L. frigidus .................<br />

L. hilgardii ................<br />

L. viridescens<br />

ssp. viridescens ..........<br />

ssp. minor ...............<br />

L. coprophilus<br />

ssp. coprophilus ..........<br />

ssp. confusus ............<br />

aSefootnote<br />

a in Table 20.<br />

I r I t<br />

No. <strong>of</strong> ATCCa<br />

Species<br />

strains no.<br />

Type Fig.<br />

Lactobacillus fermentum ... 1<br />

-i<br />

23272 L-Lys-D-Asp<br />

9<br />

F<br />

1<br />

4<br />

1<br />

1<br />

1<br />

10<br />

1<br />

1<br />

1<br />

1<br />

1<br />

1<br />

1<br />

6<br />

4<br />

3<br />

14<br />

9338<br />

11739<br />

11740<br />

14931<br />

14932<br />

14869<br />

4005<br />

8288<br />

11306<br />

8291<br />

11305<br />

11307<br />

8290<br />

12706<br />

10881<br />

L-LyS-D-Asp<br />

L-OMn-D-Asp<br />

L-OMr-D-Asp<br />

L-Orn-D-Asp<br />

L-OM-D-Asp<br />

L-Lys-D-ASp<br />

L-Lys-D-Asp<br />

L-Lys-D-Asp<br />

L-Lys-D-Asp<br />

L-Lys-D-Asp<br />

L-Lys-D-Asp<br />

L-Lys-D-Asp<br />

L-Lys-D-Asp<br />

L-Lys-L-Ala-L-Ser<br />

L-Lys-L-Ser-L-Ala2<br />

L-Lys-L-Ala,<br />

L-Lys-Ala<br />

9<br />

9, with Om<br />

instead<br />

<strong>of</strong> L-Lys<br />

9, with Om<br />

instead<br />

<strong>of</strong> L-Lys<br />

9, with Om<br />

instead<br />

<strong>of</strong> L-Lys<br />

9<br />

9<br />

9<br />

9<br />

9 9<br />

9<br />

9<br />

21a<br />

21b<br />

21c<br />

21c<br />

h 1 J L _<br />

Reference<br />

K<strong>and</strong>ler, unpublished<br />

data<br />

168, 169<br />

169, 303<br />

422<br />

422<br />

422<br />

168, 169<br />

168, 169<br />

168, 169<br />

168, 169<br />

168, 169<br />

168, 169<br />

168, 169<br />

168, 169<br />

169, 174<br />

168, 169<br />

144, 169<br />

168, 169<br />

Downloaded from<br />

http://mmbr.asm.org/<br />

on December 3, 2012 by guest

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!