<strong>Chapter</strong> 28 <strong>of</strong> 68 9/20/2012 1:34 PMcuriosity and respect and were described with a sense <strong>of</strong> humor."Ikeda et al (1993) reported that some 500 descendants <strong>of</strong> Miwok-speaking Native <strong>American</strong>s live inMariposa County, California, and that 50 percent <strong>of</strong> the families live below the federal poverty level and areunable to afford the kind <strong>of</strong> food that ensures an adequate diet. The authors report:Some families augmented their food supply in traditional ways: 47% gathered wild berries, nuts,mushrooms and other plants; 67% said their grandparents and parents traditionally used wildplants as foods, and 81% said this knowledge had been passed on to them by their elders. . .[22%gardened, 26% fished, 14% hunted] . . . Many Miwok recalled foods their grandparents ate thatthey do not eat: insects such as pine tree worms, Monarch butterfly larvae and grasshoppers;animals like squirrel, Mono Lake shrimp, quail, deer, rabbit, bear and hedge hog; and plant foodssuch as acorn mush, pine nuts, wild vegetables and berries. Some <strong>of</strong> these foods, particularly theinsects, are not considered food by the dominant culture. This may have influenced these Native<strong>American</strong>s to abandon them as food sources.Sutton (1995) reiterates the importance <strong>of</strong> insects in prehistoric diet and technology and <strong>of</strong> theirprocurement in determining settlement/subsistence patterns. He also re-emphasizes and expands on his 1988criticisms <strong>of</strong> "Western bias" on the part <strong>of</strong> anthropologists, ethnographers and archaeologists in assessing the role<strong>of</strong> insects, especially as food. In the interpretation <strong>of</strong> study results, there is an over-emphasis on male-orientedsubsistence activities and "big ticket" economic animals, particularly mammals, while insects, which are not verymobile, are considered part <strong>of</strong> "gathering" which is done by women and children. The author discusses in detailthe reasons for the low archaeological "visibility" <strong>of</strong> insects.See also Lowie (1909b, insects as food <strong>of</strong> the Assiniboine) and Osborne (1923, insects in coprolites).Bruchidae (seed beetles)Algarobius (= Bruchus) spp., larvae, pupaeNeltumius (= Bruchus) spp., larvae, pupaeColeopteraSutton (1988: 57-60) notes that bruchid beetles constituted an "automatic inclusion <strong>of</strong> animal protein inprocessed mesquite." Three genera <strong>of</strong> bruchids common in mesquite in <strong>North</strong> America are Algarobius, Neltumiusand Mimosestes (Kingsolver et al 1977: 113, Table 6-3). There may be as many as three generations per year,and as many as 80% <strong>of</strong> the pods may be infested by the latter part <strong>of</strong> the season (Glendening and Paulsen 1955:9; vide Sutton 1988), thus it was almost axiomatic that the bruchids would be a part <strong>of</strong> mesquite harvest.Regarding the harvest <strong>of</strong> mesquite pods, Bell and Castetter (1937: 22-23); vide Sutton 1988: 59) observed:When stored in the form <strong>of</strong> whole or dry pods, partially pulverized, they soon became a livingmass, since an insect, a species <strong>of</strong> Bruchus, was present in almost every seed. To the Pima or anyother tribe <strong>of</strong> Indians, this made little difference. The insects were not removed but accepted asan agreeable ingredient <strong>of</strong> the flour, subsequently made from the beans. If reduced to a fine floursoon after gathering, the larvae still remained within the beans and became a part <strong>of</strong> the meal,forming an homogenous mass <strong>of</strong> animal and vegetable matter.Hooper (1920: 357) noted that the Desert Cahuilla ate mesquite beans that were "worm eaten in spots,but regardless <strong>of</strong> this, they are all pounded together."Bye (1972: 94) gives the history <strong>of</strong> the botanical collections made by Edward Palmer and John WesleyPowell and reviews the ethnobiology <strong>of</strong> the southern Paiutes, which lived in southern Utah, adjacent northernArizona, and southern Nevada. Relative to the mesquite, Prosopis glandulosa Torr. var. torreyana, and thescrewbean, P. pubescens Benth., the fruits <strong>of</strong> which were important as food, especially the starchy inner portionsand the seeds, <strong>of</strong>ten contained Bruchus larvae which were eaten along with the fruits. Now that bruchidcontainingpods have become unacceptable to some tribes such as the Pima and Cahuilla, infestations can becontrolled by heat-treatment as is the Seri custom in Mexico (Felger 1977: 163).Mesquite seeds in a cached ceramic olla, or storage jar, recovered from CA-RIV-519 in southeasternCalifornia (ethnographic territory <strong>of</strong> the Desert Cahuilla, and radiocarbon dated to within the past severalhundred years), showed evidence <strong>of</strong> insect activity within the bean matrix (Swenson 1984: 249). This wasprobably the result <strong>of</strong> bruchid beetles infesting the beans when they were still nutritionally viable.Cerambycidae (long-horned beetles)
<strong>Chapter</strong> 29 <strong>of</strong> 68 9/20/2012 1:34 PMErgates spiculatus Leconte, larvaMonochamus maculosus Hald., larvaMonochamus scutellatus Leconte, larvaNeoclytus conjunctus Leconte, larvaPrionus californicus Mots., larva, adultRhagium lineatum Olivier, larvaXylotrechus nauticus Mann., larvaEssig (1931) states that the fat wood-boring cerambycid grubs, some <strong>of</strong> which measure up to 60 mm inlength, were especially relished by the California Indians. Species mentioned include: Ergates spiculatusLeconte and Prionus californicus Mots. (obtained from old logs and stumps <strong>of</strong> coniferous trees, and the latteralso from various deciduous trees); Rhagium lineatum Olivier (beneath the bark <strong>of</strong> dead pine trees in the foothillsand lowlands during the winter and spring); Xylotrechus nauticus Mann., Neoclytus conjunctus Lec. and otherspecies <strong>of</strong> these genera (under the bark <strong>of</strong> various deciduous trees); Monochamus maculosus Hald., and M.scutellatus Lec. (in fire-scorched, injured and dead coniferous trees). These and "countless" other kinds <strong>of</strong>cerambycid grubs from all kinds <strong>of</strong> vegetation were dug out and eaten, usually raw.Roust (1967: 56, 82) reported adults <strong>of</strong> Prionus sp. (probably californicus) in prehistoric humancoprolites from Lovelock Cave in western Nevada. The heads <strong>of</strong> the beetles were not found, "indicating thatthey were either bitten or torn <strong>of</strong>f prior to ingestion, without chewing, <strong>of</strong> the whole beetle."See also Powers (1877a, cerambycids as a food <strong>of</strong> the Nishinam <strong>of</strong> Pacer County, California) andZigmond (1986, as a food <strong>of</strong> the Kawaiisu). It is surprising that, considering the extensive worldwide use <strong>of</strong>cerambycid grubs, and that hundreds <strong>of</strong> species occur in <strong>North</strong> America, there have been so few reports <strong>of</strong> theiruse as food here.Curculionidae (snout beetles, weevils)Rhynchophorus cruentatus (Fabr.), larvaGhesquièré (1947) indicates by the following (translation) that this species was consumed: "In hisinteresting History <strong>of</strong> Entomology, Essig (1931) devoted a chapter to edible insects in <strong>North</strong> America; however,he neglects palmicoles in it and does not cite (cf. Bowdman, 1888, and Kunze, 1916) the boring Rhynchophoruscruentatus <strong>of</strong> the saw palmetto and the date tree, whose larvae are nevertheless eaten by the natives." Thespecies occurs in Florida and nearby states in the southeastern United States, and southward through theCaribbean region.Dytiscidae (predaceous diving beetles)Cybister explanatus (author?), adultRoust (1967) reported adults <strong>of</strong> Cybister sp. (explanatus?) (pp. 56, 60, 84) in prehistoric humancoprolites from Lovelock Cave in western Nevada, and C. explanatus and unidentified insect parts in prehistorichuman coprolites from nearby Hidden Cave (p. 66). As with the cerambycid adults mentioned above, the headshad been bitten or torn <strong>of</strong>f prior to ingestion, without chewing, <strong>of</strong> the whole beetles.Also see Hrdlicka (1908, dytiscids as a food <strong>of</strong> the Tarahumare, southwestern U.S.).Scarabaeidae (scarab beetles).Cyclocephala dimidiata Burmeister, adultCyclocephala villosa Burm., adultPhyllophaga fusca Froelich, adultPolyphylla crinita Leconte, adultIndians in Madera County, California, were reported to have regularly eaten the adults <strong>of</strong> "the whitestripedJune beetle," Polyphylla crinita Leconte (Essig 1931). Sutton (1988:79) reports (via personalcommunication from Nancy Peterson Walter) that the Owens Valley and Mono Lake Paiute roasted June beetles(possibly Phyllophaga fusca) as late as 1981. These insects may have been used by other groups as well, butthere are no other specific data. Sutton notes that other June beetles occurring in the desert areas <strong>of</strong> Arizona andCalifornia include Cyclocephala villosa and C. dimidiata.Miscellaneous ColeopteraWhite grubs from the soil and weevil grubs in nuts are mentioned by Essig (1931) as food in California,