Report on Harmonisation of freshwater biological methods

Shannon, C.E. and W. Weaver, 1949. The mathematical theory of communication. Urbana Univ.Illinois Press.Schönfelder, I., 1997. Eine Phosphor-Diatomeen-Relation für alkalische Seen und Flüsse Brandenburgsund ihre Anwendung für die paläolimnologische Analyse von Auensedimenten der unteren Havel. J.Cramer, Berlin, Stuttgart Dissertationes Botanicae 283,148 pp.Simpson, E.H., 1949. Measurement of diversity. Nature 163: 688.Skriver, J., 1999. Danish Stream Fauna Index (DSFI) as an indicator of rare and threatened benthicmacroinvertebrates. Biodiversity in benthic ecology. Proceedings from Nordic BenthologicalMeeting in Silkeborg, Denmark, 13-14 November 1997: 97-105.Skoulikidis, N.T., K.C. Gritzalis, T. Kouvarda and A. Buffagni, 2004. The development of anecological quality assessment and classification system for Greek running waters based on benthicmacroinvertebrates. Hydrobiologia 516: 149-160.Skriver, J., N. Friberg and J. Kirkegaard, 2000. Biological assessment of running waters in Denmark:Introduction of the Danish Stream fauna Index (DSFI). Verh. Internat. Verein. Limnol. 27: 1822-1830.Sládeek, V., 1973. System of water quality from the biological point of view. Archiv fürHydrobiologie Ergebnisse der Limnologie 7: 1-218.Sommerhäuser, M., S. Robert, S. Birk, O. Moog, I. Stubauer, and T. Ofenböck 2004. Final report of theactivities 1.1.2, 1.1.6 and 1.1.7 of the UNDP/GEF Danube Regional Project “Strengthening theImplementation Capacities for Nutrient Reduction and Transboundary Cooperation in the DanubeRiver Basin”. University of Duisburg-Essen and BOKU Vienna, Essen and Vienna.STN (Slovenská Technická Norma) 83 0532 – 1 to 8:1978/79 Biologický rozbor povrchovej vody.(Biological analysis of surface water quality). Úrad pro Normalizaci a Mereni, Praha.Stoch, F., 1986. La valutazione della produttività ittica delle acque correnti. Indici ambientali eproduttività teorica. – Quaderni E.T.P., Udine, 14: 175-181.Strickland, J. D. H., and T. R. Parsons, 1968. A practical handbook of seawater analysis. Fish. Res. Bd.Can. Bull. 167, 311 ppStrickland, J. D. H. and T. R. Parsons, 1972. A Practical Handbook of Seawater Analysis. Bull. 167Fisheries Res. Bd. Ottawa, Canada.Talling, J.F. and D. Driver, 1963. Some problems in the estimation of chlorophyll-a in phytoplankton.In: Proceedings, Conference of Primary Productivity Measurements, Marine and Freshwater. U.S.Atomic Com. Publ. TID –7633, 142 - 146.Ten Brink, B.J.E., S.H. Hosper and F. Colijn, 1991. A quantitative method for description andassessment of ecosystems: the AMOEBA approach. Mar. Poll. Bull. 23: 265-270.Tripkovic, D. (ed.) 2003. National water monitoring strategy. Regional Environmental Center forCentral and Eastern Europe – Country Office Serbia and Montenegro, Belgrade.Utermöhl, H., 1958. Zur Vervollkommung der quantitativen phytoplankton-methodik. Mitt. Internat.Verein. Limnol., 9, 1-38.Van den Berg, M., D.T. Van der Molen and P.C.M. Boers, 2002. Setting up reference conditions forphytoplankton, turbidity and submerged macrophytes in Dutch lakes. TemaNord 566:28-31Verdonschot, P.F.M., 2000. Integrated ecological assessment methods as a basis for sustainablecatchment management. Hydrobiologia 422/423: 389-412.Vighi, M and Chiaudani, G., 1985. A simple method to estimate lake phosphorus concentrationsresulting from natural, background, loadings. Wat. Res. 19: 987-991.Wolfe-Murphy S.A., E.W. Lawrie, S.J. Smith and C.E. Gibson, 1991. A <strong>Report</strong> by the Northern IrelandLakes Survey. Department of the Environment (Northern Ireland)Woodiwiss, F.S., 1978. Biological water assessment methods. Second Technical Seminar -Background information. Commission of the European Communities. - First Draft report.37