Report on Harmonisation of freshwater biological methods
Report on Harmonisation of freshwater biological methods
Report on Harmonisation of freshwater biological methods
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Annex II: Summary <strong>of</strong> the informati<strong>on</strong> gathered from ECOSTATand M<strong>on</strong>itoring WG <strong>on</strong> the nati<strong>on</strong>al lake <strong>biological</strong> <strong>methods</strong>Table 1. Summary <strong>of</strong> general characteristics <strong>of</strong> the lake <strong>biological</strong> <strong>methods</strong> employed indifferent countries (The informati<strong>on</strong> in this table is not complete but gather <strong>on</strong>ly theinformati<strong>on</strong> received from the ECOSTAT WG 2A during the first half <strong>of</strong> 2004 andinformati<strong>on</strong> reported in the WFD CIS M<strong>on</strong>itoring WG fact sheets).BiologicalelementPhytoplankt<strong>on</strong>Aquatic plantsBenthicMacroinvertebratesFishMacro-inv.aquaticplantsPressure Country Sampling Metric AssessmentEutrophicati<strong>on</strong>Eutrophicati<strong>on</strong>Eutrophicati<strong>on</strong>,,acidificati<strong>on</strong>Eutrophicati<strong>on</strong>Eutrophicati<strong>on</strong>,acidificati<strong>on</strong>Eutrophicati<strong>on</strong>,acidificati<strong>on</strong>AT, EE,FIN, IE, IT,LV, LT,NO, PT,SE, SL, SP,UKEE, DE, IE,FIN, LV,LT, SE,SL, UKIE, SE, NOUK,CY, LV,SEInterests differ Lakeareas, frequencies,qualitative orquantitative samples.Using nati<strong>on</strong>al Std orpublished <strong>methods</strong>Different strategies,influence <strong>on</strong> plants intransect from shore todeep waterDifferent samplingaccording to lakearea <strong>of</strong> interestInternati<strong>on</strong>al orNati<strong>on</strong>al StdHand net or beaker,Ekman grabNati<strong>on</strong>al Std (LT,SE)Chl as biomass,tax<strong>on</strong>omiccompositi<strong>on</strong>,abundance andbiovolumeID to species,abundance as %coverageSpeciesabundance,presence orabsence <strong>of</strong>sensitive speciesFamily, genus,speciesSE, SP, UK 5 different <strong>methods</strong> Applicable todifferent lakes.Most ID to speciesand abundanceUKNati<strong>on</strong>al Std for bothbiol.elementsMultimetric indexPSYMRef. C<strong>on</strong>d notc<strong>on</strong>sidered or <strong>on</strong>lyfor limited No <strong>of</strong>lakes. N<strong>on</strong>e WFDcompatibleOne c<strong>on</strong>siders refc<strong>on</strong>d. but forlimited No <strong>of</strong>lakes, mostly usedto m<strong>on</strong>itorchanges. NotWFD compatibleSpeciesApplicable todifferent areas(littoral orpr<strong>of</strong>undal)ref. c<strong>on</strong>d. or needto develop typespecific ref. c<strong>on</strong>d.,5 quality classes.2 WFDcompatibleApplicable topr<strong>of</strong>undalType specific ref.c<strong>on</strong>d., 5 qualityclasses, WFDCompatibleOne with typespecies ref. c<strong>on</strong>d.Good basis fordeveloping WFDcompatible<strong>methods</strong>Ref. C<strong>on</strong>d. forrange <strong>of</strong> env.c<strong>on</strong>d. and geology.Good applicabilityto WFD. Smallstanding water<strong>on</strong>lyAT= Austria, CY= Cyprus, DE= Germany, EE= Est<strong>on</strong>ia, FIN= Finland, IE= Ireland, IT= Italy, LV=Latvia, LT= Lithuania, NO= Norway, PT= Portugal, SE= Sweden, SL= Slovenia, SP= Spain, UK=United Kingdom41