13.07.2015 Views

Report on Harmonisation of freshwater biological methods

Report on Harmonisation of freshwater biological methods

Report on Harmonisation of freshwater biological methods

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Annex II: Summary <strong>of</strong> the informati<strong>on</strong> gathered from ECOSTATand M<strong>on</strong>itoring WG <strong>on</strong> the nati<strong>on</strong>al lake <strong>biological</strong> <strong>methods</strong>Table 1. Summary <strong>of</strong> general characteristics <strong>of</strong> the lake <strong>biological</strong> <strong>methods</strong> employed indifferent countries (The informati<strong>on</strong> in this table is not complete but gather <strong>on</strong>ly theinformati<strong>on</strong> received from the ECOSTAT WG 2A during the first half <strong>of</strong> 2004 andinformati<strong>on</strong> reported in the WFD CIS M<strong>on</strong>itoring WG fact sheets).BiologicalelementPhytoplankt<strong>on</strong>Aquatic plantsBenthicMacroinvertebratesFishMacro-inv.aquaticplantsPressure Country Sampling Metric AssessmentEutrophicati<strong>on</strong>Eutrophicati<strong>on</strong>Eutrophicati<strong>on</strong>,,acidificati<strong>on</strong>Eutrophicati<strong>on</strong>Eutrophicati<strong>on</strong>,acidificati<strong>on</strong>Eutrophicati<strong>on</strong>,acidificati<strong>on</strong>AT, EE,FIN, IE, IT,LV, LT,NO, PT,SE, SL, SP,UKEE, DE, IE,FIN, LV,LT, SE,SL, UKIE, SE, NOUK,CY, LV,SEInterests differ Lakeareas, frequencies,qualitative orquantitative samples.Using nati<strong>on</strong>al Std orpublished <strong>methods</strong>Different strategies,influence <strong>on</strong> plants intransect from shore todeep waterDifferent samplingaccording to lakearea <strong>of</strong> interestInternati<strong>on</strong>al orNati<strong>on</strong>al StdHand net or beaker,Ekman grabNati<strong>on</strong>al Std (LT,SE)Chl as biomass,tax<strong>on</strong>omiccompositi<strong>on</strong>,abundance andbiovolumeID to species,abundance as %coverageSpeciesabundance,presence orabsence <strong>of</strong>sensitive speciesFamily, genus,speciesSE, SP, UK 5 different <strong>methods</strong> Applicable todifferent lakes.Most ID to speciesand abundanceUKNati<strong>on</strong>al Std for bothbiol.elementsMultimetric indexPSYMRef. C<strong>on</strong>d notc<strong>on</strong>sidered or <strong>on</strong>lyfor limited No <strong>of</strong>lakes. N<strong>on</strong>e WFDcompatibleOne c<strong>on</strong>siders refc<strong>on</strong>d. but forlimited No <strong>of</strong>lakes, mostly usedto m<strong>on</strong>itorchanges. NotWFD compatibleSpeciesApplicable todifferent areas(littoral orpr<strong>of</strong>undal)ref. c<strong>on</strong>d. or needto develop typespecific ref. c<strong>on</strong>d.,5 quality classes.2 WFDcompatibleApplicable topr<strong>of</strong>undalType specific ref.c<strong>on</strong>d., 5 qualityclasses, WFDCompatibleOne with typespecies ref. c<strong>on</strong>d.Good basis fordeveloping WFDcompatible<strong>methods</strong>Ref. C<strong>on</strong>d. forrange <strong>of</strong> env.c<strong>on</strong>d. and geology.Good applicabilityto WFD. Smallstanding water<strong>on</strong>lyAT= Austria, CY= Cyprus, DE= Germany, EE= Est<strong>on</strong>ia, FIN= Finland, IE= Ireland, IT= Italy, LV=Latvia, LT= Lithuania, NO= Norway, PT= Portugal, SE= Sweden, SL= Slovenia, SP= Spain, UK=United Kingdom41

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!