13.07.2015 Views

Cost and Effective Analysis of the LINKAGES ... - Linkages Project

Cost and Effective Analysis of the LINKAGES ... - Linkages Project

Cost and Effective Analysis of the LINKAGES ... - Linkages Project

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

6. FindingsThe findings presented are organized to reflect each <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> study questions:• How do costs <strong>and</strong> outcomes compare across <strong>the</strong> three regions?• What are <strong>the</strong> determinants <strong>of</strong> costs <strong>and</strong> cost effectiveness?• How can <strong>LINKAGES</strong> improve its cost effectiveness?• What would it cost to replicate <strong>the</strong>se activities <strong>and</strong> is it cost effective?Selected information is shown in <strong>the</strong> sections below to address <strong>the</strong> questions <strong>of</strong> interest. Annex Bincludes detailed cost data for <strong>LINKAGES</strong> <strong>and</strong> its partners.6.1. How Do <strong>Cost</strong>s <strong>and</strong> Outcomes Compare Across <strong>the</strong> ThreeStudy Regions?Overall Finding: There appears to be no relationship between costs <strong>and</strong> LAMbehavior change outcomes. <strong>Cost</strong> per beneficiary was <strong>the</strong> lowest <strong>and</strong> LAM behaviorchange outcome <strong>the</strong> highest in <strong>the</strong> North region. The reverse pattern exists in <strong>the</strong>South with <strong>the</strong> highest cost per beneficiary <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> lowest LAM behavior changeoutcome.To answer <strong>the</strong> question <strong>of</strong> how costs <strong>and</strong> outcomes compare across regions, all costs for <strong>LINKAGES</strong>Jordan <strong>and</strong> DC-based activities <strong>and</strong> partner activities to promote LAM are included.6.1.1. <strong>LINKAGES</strong> <strong>and</strong> Partner <strong>Cost</strong>sTable 3 shows <strong>the</strong> <strong>LINKAGES</strong> incurred costs for <strong>the</strong> three regions allocated by LAM User Rate.Total <strong>LINKAGES</strong>’ costs to promote <strong>the</strong> LAM behavior change indicator were $37,078 in <strong>the</strong> Center,$28,247 in <strong>the</strong> North, <strong>and</strong> $17,302 in <strong>the</strong> South. On a per beneficiary basis (defined as <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong>antenatal <strong>and</strong> postpartum women served by MCH clinics during <strong>the</strong> study period), <strong>the</strong> cost was $1.85in <strong>the</strong> Center, $1.60 in <strong>the</strong> North, <strong>and</strong> $2.86 in <strong>the</strong> South.Table 3: <strong>LINKAGES</strong>’ <strong>Cost</strong>s Allocated by IndicatorNorth Center SouthNumber <strong>of</strong> 17,693 20,065 6,042BeneficiariesIndicator Total <strong>Cost</strong> <strong>Cost</strong> perBeneficiaryTotal <strong>Cost</strong> <strong>Cost</strong> perBeneficiaryTotal <strong>Cost</strong> <strong>Cost</strong> perBeneficiaryLAM UserRate$28,247 $1.60 $37,078 $1.85 $17,302 $2.86Table 4 shows that <strong>the</strong> total cost <strong>of</strong> <strong>LINKAGES</strong>’ infant feeding <strong>and</strong> LAM activities across <strong>the</strong> threestudy regions was $247,284. Of all activities, it is estimated that 67% <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> total cost was spent onimproving breastfeeding behavior, <strong>and</strong> 33% was spent on LAM. Based on <strong>the</strong>se percentages, <strong>the</strong>total cost <strong>of</strong> activities is $82,627 to support LAM <strong>and</strong> $164,657 to support EBF.<strong>Linkages</strong> <strong>Project</strong>/AED 6. Findings 17

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!