Cost and Effective Analysis of the LINKAGES ... - Linkages Project
Cost and Effective Analysis of the LINKAGES ... - Linkages Project
Cost and Effective Analysis of the LINKAGES ... - Linkages Project
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Based on this analysis, <strong>LINKAGES</strong> may be able to improve its cost effectiveness by:• Lowering <strong>the</strong> cost <strong>of</strong> LAM interventions by mainstreaming LAM• Targeting activities in areas with low LAM baseline ratesThe cost structure <strong>of</strong> interventions is such that most <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> costs are fixed costs <strong>and</strong> activity costs arenot tied to <strong>the</strong> target population. Mainstreaming LAM into an integrated package <strong>of</strong> existing MCHactivities will allow spreading those costs across several interventions resulting in lower cost perintervention.An analysis <strong>of</strong> marginal costs shows that <strong>the</strong>re is a clear relationship between selecting areas with lowbaseline rates <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> targeted behavior <strong>and</strong> cost effectiveness. <strong>LINKAGES</strong> may improve its costeffectiveness by targeting areas with lower baseline rates.Determination <strong>of</strong> an optimal population size that <strong>the</strong> intervention activities should target appears to beano<strong>the</strong>r important factor in achieving cost effectiveness. The limited data suggest that <strong>the</strong> package <strong>of</strong>activities may need to be adjusted once <strong>the</strong> target population exceeds certain levels. When thisthreshold is reached, a fur<strong>the</strong>r increase <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> target population results in decreased cost effectivenesssince <strong>the</strong> program costs grow at a higher pace than <strong>the</strong> target population. If this threshold is notreached, however, <strong>and</strong> economies <strong>of</strong> scale may be gained, increasing <strong>the</strong> target population size mayimprove cost effectiveness.One important limitation <strong>of</strong> this study is that it does not allow for <strong>the</strong> analysis <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> costeffectiveness <strong>of</strong> individual activities or <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> optimal mix <strong>of</strong> activities. Thus, no recommendation canbe made regarding ways to improve cost effectiveness by manipulating <strong>the</strong> package <strong>of</strong> activities.26 6. Findings <strong>LINKAGES</strong> <strong>Project</strong>/AED