<strong>The</strong> rejection <strong>of</strong> the above propositions may sound like total repudiation for cooperativeagriculture, like a platform for return to the traditional desperate go-it-alone peasant tillage <strong>of</strong>the past. <strong>The</strong> advocates <strong>of</strong> the "responsibility system" deny it. <strong>The</strong>y see the new system associalist in form, a system that gives individual initiative a chance to develop inside acollective framework. This framework includes public (state) ownership <strong>of</strong> the main means <strong>of</strong>production, the land, which cannot be bought, sold, rented out, or rented in. It also includes acollective support network, the peasant-owned supply and marketing cooperatives that withbacking from the state deliver all critical supplies and market most if not all the commoditiesproduced. <strong>The</strong> macrosystem, the innovators say, is collective. Within it, at a micro-level, thepeasants plan, invest, and labor individually because agricultural production demandspersonal attention to every detail. This, so the argument runs, is socialism tailored to <strong>China</strong>'sunique rural situation.Without getting into a debate over whether the system qualifies as socialist or not, one cangrant that it is working reasonably well and quite fairly in Fengyang after four years, but onecan also foresee that the dynamic individualism unleashed by family contracts may rise tochallenge and eventually overthrow the collective integument that now supports andcontains it. Many long-range questions remain unanswered.From the social point <strong>of</strong> view the main question is that <strong>of</strong> polarization. One <strong>of</strong> the primaryarguments in favor <strong>of</strong> collectivization when it was launched in the 1950s was that it wouldforestall social differentiation, block the break-up <strong>of</strong> rural society into exploiting and exploitedclasses. <strong>The</strong> peasants, so the cooperators argued, would all rise together. In practicecollectivization did forestall polarization, but in too many cases no significant rise occurred.All remained poor together, eating out <strong>of</strong> one pot that wasn't anywhere near big enough and,worst <strong>of</strong> all, wasn't growing.Reacting to this deplorable state <strong>of</strong> affairs, advocates <strong>of</strong> the "responsibility system" nowboldly advocate the idea that "some must get rich first." Such a principle obviously favorsthe young, the strong, thepage 67healthy, the smart, and the aggressive. I asked what measures could prevent a handful <strong>of</strong>ambitious peasants on the rise from taking possession <strong>of</strong> the best means <strong>of</strong> production otherthan land -- draft animals, carts, tractors, pumps, threshing machinery -- and using these toexploit their less fortunate neighbors. In the lower stage coops <strong>of</strong> the 1950s a peasant withtwo animals could live without working. Could not a peasant with several tractors do sotoday? And if the tractors were passed on to the next generation would not the familyperpetuate its privileged class position?Deputy County Chairman Wang did not see this as a serious issue. In the past, he said,there were 27,000 needy families in the county, some 30 percent <strong>of</strong> the total. (He defined"needy" as families with less than 700 catties <strong>of</strong> grain per capita per year and less than 50yuan per capita cash income.) Now, he said, there are only 1,021 such families in the whole
county and the government gives them ten different kinds <strong>of</strong> special aid designed to keepthem from sinking. <strong>The</strong> aid is as follows:(1) Each state and local cadre takes personal responsibility for one needy family; studies itssituation, and gives advice.(2) Needy families pay no taxes.(3) <strong>The</strong> county sets aside 50,000 yuan to help the needy buy fertilizer, chemicals, improvedseeds, and other necessities.(4) <strong>The</strong> county allocates 30,000 yuan for low-interest production loans to the needy, settingthe interest rate at 1 percent instead <strong>of</strong> the 4.8 percent charged by the bank.(5) Communes and brigades allocate an additional 30,000 yuan for similar production loans.(6) Schools collect no fees from needy scholars.(7) Needy families have the right to buy animal feed at reduced prices and to sell their grainto the state at any time, even when the State Grain Company, due to local oversupply, stopsbuying from the public.(8) Needy families pay no doctors' fees (they still pay for medicine).(9) <strong>The</strong> supply coop guarantees all necessary fertilizer to the needy. Others have to buyfertilizer where they can find it.(10) Livestock specialists give needy families free help and waive fees for breedingservices, the sterilization <strong>of</strong> young pigs, etc.Wang said senior citizens without descendants also received special help:page 68"We give each one 700 catties <strong>of</strong> per capita grain, 6 catties <strong>of</strong> vegetable oil, a ton <strong>of</strong> grass,straw, and stalks for fuel, 30 yuan for clothes, 30 yuan for medical care, and 40 yuan forspending money. This amounts to 300 yuan <strong>of</strong> aid each year and with this aid the seniorcitizens can take care <strong>of</strong> themselves.""One <strong>of</strong> the motives behind such aid," he added, "is to strengthen the birth controlcampaign. When young people see that old folks without descendants can survive they feelless pressure to have children and especially the sons who will support them in their oldage."To illustrate local policy toward needy families Wang took us to see Chen Defang, a widowwith four children who was farming 17 mou (almost 3 acres) <strong>of</strong> land. She owned five sections<strong>of</strong> new housing, complete with some good furniture, shared a water buffalo with a neighbor,
- Page 1 and 2: THE GREATREVERSALThe Privatization
- Page 3 and 4: This essence was known to many in C
- Page 5 and 6: Introduction:China'sRuralReformsThe
- Page 7 and 8: concern was, of course, the country
- Page 9 and 10: I looked down in growing disbelief
- Page 11 and 12: edefining what the word meant. Cert
- Page 13 and 14: themselves, communists had, perforc
- Page 16 and 17: It is against the background of Chi
- Page 18 and 19: eformers. Throughout the whole cour
- Page 20 and 21: in China. It emphasizes above all t
- Page 22 and 23: Is Red," that solemn hymn to Mao Ze
- Page 24 and 25: Hard work to transform the land was
- Page 26 and 27: If meeting nonrelated young people
- Page 28 and 29: and three times elevated to top pos
- Page 30: can supply the raw material for lin
- Page 34 and 35: Construction Bureau who wanted to n
- Page 36 and 37: had already found wives and several
- Page 38 and 39: the peasants first gave support to
- Page 40 and 41: Zhanglaozhuang brigade, Ershihying
- Page 42 and 43: see Gaojen commune. There 7,300 abl
- Page 44 and 45: in 1978), (3) they planted large ar
- Page 46 and 47: can do so will others not denounce
- Page 48 and 49: destroyed all economies of scale an
- Page 52 and 53: and was raising two pigs that she e
- Page 54 and 55: page 71in some of the new industrie
- Page 56 and 57: page 74Reformin Stride:Rural Change
- Page 58 and 59: authorities is that it automaticall
- Page 60 and 61: most promising things in the collec
- Page 62 and 63: than it contributes itself, it is a
- Page 64 and 65: mechanization plan could have done
- Page 66 and 67: page 86units, taking a mature sheep
- Page 68 and 69: measures are necessary.Since these
- Page 70 and 71: tremely hard to carry out. Most mea
- Page 72 and 73: 60,000 mou. This would make seasona
- Page 74 and 75: lock the gates at Qinghua and other
- Page 76 and 77: programs that discourage production
- Page 78 and 79: 19781979198019811982198319841985467
- Page 80 and 81: Peasants who opt for transport on t
- Page 82 and 83: policy. Yet they are much touted by
- Page 84 and 85: millions of mu of badly eroded slop
- Page 86 and 87: page 111culture must also be modern
- Page 88 and 89: The Problem of UnemploymentThe most
- Page 90 and 91: mechanization of the more advanced
- Page 92 and 93: tractor and/or implement tire that
- Page 94 and 95: difficult form of cooperation. Betw
- Page 96 and 97: In order to mechanize agriculture s
- Page 98 and 99: Today's reports credit reform at Da
- Page 100 and 101:
were deducted from net income befor
- Page 102 and 103:
trees that appear to be, if not aba
- Page 104 and 105:
denounced by the central government
- Page 106 and 107:
spirit of Dazhai's citizens and to
- Page 108 and 109:
Ironic Lessons, Past and PresentIn
- Page 110 and 111:
Mao'sRuralPoliciesRevisitedA questi
- Page 112 and 113:
point frequently raised by the refo
- Page 114 and 115:
page 145Furthermore, the state help
- Page 116 and 117:
mechanisms rather than government d
- Page 118 and 119:
tractors who leased collective ente
- Page 120 and 121:
All this alarmed certain forces in
- Page 122 and 123:
terthrusts over the years. All of t
- Page 124 and 125:
exercises." Just as happened during
- Page 126 and 127:
every region.In the fourth place, b
- Page 128 and 129:
preserve a strong collective core.
- Page 130 and 131:
Finally, China's independent nation
- Page 132 and 133:
The World Bank strategy of opening
- Page 134 and 135:
people. They want to transform the
- Page 136 and 137:
The reformers hoped and planned tha
- Page 138 and 139:
TiananmenMassacre:June 1989It's imp
- Page 140 and 141:
left, and then there would be a new
- Page 142 and 143:
the beginning of it. Once the army
- Page 144 and 145:
and I asked him why on earth he wen
- Page 146 and 147:
have been doing this work for many
- Page 148 and 149:
going to sweep everybody out, so th
- Page 150 and 151:
affront, as turmoil, as chaos, and