13.07.2015 Views

Nacro's response to Breaking the Cycle Green Paper

Nacro's response to Breaking the Cycle Green Paper

Nacro's response to Breaking the Cycle Green Paper

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Breaking</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Cycle</strong>: Nacro’s <strong>response</strong> | 17developed by investing substantially in <strong>the</strong> provision of women’s community projects. Thegovernment’s strategy for diverting women away from crime has included <strong>the</strong> creation of morethan 40 ‘one-s<strong>to</strong>p-shop’ services across England and Wales. These services have been fundedpartly through central grants from <strong>the</strong> Ministry of Justice, partly through grants from <strong>the</strong>Cors<strong>to</strong>n Coalition of Independent Funders (a group of grant giving trusts) and partly throughlocal commissioning or local grant funding arrangements. The central funding for <strong>the</strong>se servicesis due <strong>to</strong> cease at <strong>the</strong> end of March 2011, although some limited transitional funding for afur<strong>the</strong>r 12 months has been agreed. However, <strong>the</strong> expectation that local commissioning willprovide a route for sustainability and mainstreaming during 2011-12 is unlikely <strong>to</strong> be met. Someservices are already planning for reduced levels of activity or service closure.The government has said it supports <strong>the</strong> Cors<strong>to</strong>n report recommendations. Many of <strong>the</strong>seapply <strong>to</strong> government departments and agencies outside <strong>the</strong> criminal justice system. Themultiple and complex needs of women were highlighted, and services in a wide range ofareas – including health, housing, drugs, alcohol, victim support, childcare, education, trainingand employment – were seen as central <strong>to</strong> improvement. Nacro welcomes proposals for <strong>the</strong>expansion of integrated offender management at local level, so long as <strong>the</strong> gender-specificneeds of women are addressed and appropriate provision is embedded in local schemes.The need for fur<strong>the</strong>r progressThe coalition government is clearly creating a policy environment which offers <strong>the</strong> prospec<strong>to</strong>f fur<strong>the</strong>r positive change in <strong>the</strong> way that <strong>the</strong> justice system responds <strong>to</strong> women offenders.However, <strong>the</strong> problem remains that some of Cors<strong>to</strong>n’s most important recommendations werenot accepted by <strong>the</strong> government and many of <strong>the</strong>m were only partially accepted or acceptedin principle. A fur<strong>the</strong>r difficulty is <strong>the</strong> need <strong>to</strong> drive forward change on <strong>the</strong> ground and <strong>to</strong> getnationally driven policy <strong>to</strong> bring about meaningful, practical and sustainable improvements atregional and local level.Some of <strong>the</strong> key problems that inhibit progress at local level are set out below:• Police and crown prosecu<strong>to</strong>rs do not have sufficient expertise in relation <strong>to</strong> gender issuesand little knowledge about options for diverting women (where appropriate) out of <strong>the</strong>criminal justice system.• Probation staff who make proposals <strong>to</strong> court are not always trained <strong>to</strong> assess women. Manyhave no knowledge about <strong>the</strong> kind of interventions that would meet <strong>the</strong>ir needs. Currently,<strong>the</strong>re is insufficient expertise among probation staff and a lack of confidence amongsentencers about <strong>the</strong> effectiveness of community penalties.• Conditions attached <strong>to</strong> bail, community orders and end of cus<strong>to</strong>dy licences do not currentlytake account of women’s needs and <strong>the</strong>re is little in place <strong>to</strong> assist women with compliance.There is also no flexibility in breaching rules which often results in a cus<strong>to</strong>dial outcome.• Local court criminal justice liaison and diversion schemes that are intended <strong>to</strong> divert peoplewith mental health problems out of <strong>the</strong> criminal justice system are not universally availableand where <strong>the</strong>y are available, <strong>the</strong>y do not necessarily meet women’s specific needs.• Effective commissioning for women requires robust local data <strong>to</strong> ensure that commissioners

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!