110G. Arimura et al. / Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 1734 (2005) 91–111[231] P.W. Price, C.E. Bouton, P. Gross, B.A. McPheron, J.N. Thompson,A.E. Weis, Interactions among 3 trophic levels — influence of <strong>plant</strong>son interactions between insect herbivores and natural enemies, Ann.Rev. Ecolog. Syst. 11 (1980) 41–65.[232] E. Haukioja, T. Hakala, <strong>Herbivore</strong> cycles and periodic outbreaks:formulation of a general hypothesis, Rep. Kevo Subarct. 12 (1975)1–9.[233] D.J. O’Dowd, Foliar nectar production and ant activity ona neotropical tree, Ochroma pyramidale, Oecologia 43 (1979)233–248.[234] S.L. Gulmon, H.A. Mooney, Costs of defense and their effects on<strong>plant</strong> productivity, in: T.J. Givnish (Ed.), On the Economy of PlantForm and Function, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1986.[235] J. Gershenzon, Metabolic costs of terpenoid accumulation in higher<strong>plant</strong>s,J. Chem. Ecol. 20 (1994) 1281–1328.[236] J. Gershenzon, The cost of <strong>plant</strong> chemical defense againstherbivores: a biochemical perspective, in: E.A. Bernays (Ed.),Insect–Plant Interactions, vol. 5, CRC Press, Boca Raton, 1994,pp. 105–173.[237] M. Dicke, M.W. Sabelis, Does it pay <strong>plant</strong>s to advertize forbodyguards? Towards a cost–benefit analysis of <strong>induced</strong> synomoneproduction, in: T.L. Pons (Ed.), Variation in Growth Rate andProductivity of Higher Plants, SPB Academic Publishing, TheHague, 1989, pp. 341–358.[238] M.W. Sabelis, M.C.M. de Jong, Should all <strong>plant</strong>s recruit bodyguards?Conditions for a polymorphic ESS of synomone productionin <strong>plant</strong>s, Oikos 53 (1988) 247–252.[239] H.C.J. Godfray, Communication between the first and third trophiclevels: an analysis using biological signalling theory, Oikos 72(1995) 367–374.[240] M. Heil, T. Delsinne, A. Hilpert, S. Schurkens, C. Andary, K.E.Linsenmair, M.S. Sousa, D. McKey, Reduced chemical defence inant–<strong>plant</strong>s? A critical re-evaluation of a widely accepted hypothesis,Oikos 99 (2002) 457–468.[241] J.A. Rudgers, S.Y. Strauss, J.E. Wendel, Trade-offs among antiherbivoreresistance traits: insights from Gossypieae (Malvaceae),Am. J. Bot. 91 (2004) 871–880.[242] M. Heil, C. Staehelin, D. McKey, Low chitinase activity in Acaciamyrmecophytes: a potential trade-off between biotic and chemical<strong>defences</strong>? Naturwissenschaften 87 (2000) 555–558.[243] M. Heil, B. Fiala, T. Boller, K.E. Linsenmair, Reduced chitinaseactivities in ant <strong>plant</strong>s of the genus Macaranga, Naturwissenschaften86 (1999) 146–149.[244] S. Koptur, Alternative defenses against herbivores in Inga(Fabaceae, Mimosoideae) over an elevational gradient, Ecology69 (1985) 278–283.[245] M. Heil, A. Hilpert, R. Krqger, K.E. Linsenmair, Competition amongvisitors to extrafloral nectaries as a source of ecological costs of an<strong>indirect</strong> defence, J. Trop. Ecol. 20 (2004) 201–208.[246] S. Koptur, J.H. Lawton, Interactions among vetches bearingextrafloral nectaries, their biotic protective agents, and herbivores,Ecology 69 (1988) 278–283.[247] P.J. Devries, I. Baker, Butterfly exploitation of an ant-<strong>plant</strong>mutualism adding insult to herbivory, J. N. Y. Entomol. Soc. 97(1989) 332–340.[248] A. Janssen, J.J.M. Vanalphen, M.W. Sabelis, K. Bakker, Odormediatedavoidance of competition in Drosophila parasitoids: theghost of competition, Oikos 73 (1995) 356–366.[249] A. Janssen, J.J.M. Vanalphen, M.W. Sabelis, K. Bakker, Specificityof odor mediated avoidance of competition in Drosophila Parasitoids,Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 36 (1995) 229–235.[250] A. Janssen, J. Bruin, G. Jacobs, R. Schraag, M.W. Sabelis, Predatorsuse volatiles to avoid prey patches with conspecifics, J. Anim. Ecol.66 (1997) 223–232.[251] C. Höller, S.G. Micha, S. Schulz, W. Francke, J.A. Pickett,Enemy-<strong>induced</strong> dispersal in a parasitic wasp, Experientia 50 (1994)182–185.[252] M.L. Bernasconi, T.C.J. Turlings, L. Ambrosetti, P. Bassetti, S. Dorn,<strong>Herbivore</strong>-<strong>induced</strong> emissions of maize volatiles repel the cornleaf aphid, Rhopalosiphum maidis, Entomol. Exp. Appl. 87 (1998)133–142.[253] C.J. Bolter, M. Dicke, J.J.A. vanLoon, J.H. Visser, M.A. Posthumus,Attraction of Colorado potato beetle to herbivore-damaged <strong>plant</strong>sduring herbivory and after its termination, J. Chem. Ecol. 23 (1997)1003–1023.[254] Y. Inui, Y. Miyamoto, T. Ohgushi, Comparison of volatile leafcompounds and herbivorous insect communities on three willowspecies, Popul. Ecol. 45 (2003) 41–46.[255] V. Stanjek, C. Herhaus, U. Ritgen, W. Boland, E. St7dler, Changes inthe leaf surface chemistry of Apium graveolens (Apiaceae) stimulatedby jasmonic acid and perceived by a specialist insect, Helv.Chim. Acta 80 (1997) 1408–1420.[256] J. Ruther, A. Reinecke, M. Hilker, Plant volatiles in the sexualcommunication of Melolontha hippocastani: response towards timedependentbouquets and novel function of (Z)-3-hexen-1-ol as asexual kairomone, Ecol. Entomol. 27 (2002) 76–83.[257] J. Horiuchi, G. Arimura, R. Ozawa, T. Shimoda, J. Takabayashi,T. Nishioka, A comparison of the responses of Tetranychusurticae (Acari: Tetranychidae) and Phytoseiulus persimilis (Acari:Phytoseiidae) to volatiles emitted from lima bean leaves withdifferent levels of damage made by T. urticae or Spodopteraexigua (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), Appl. Entomol. Zool. 38 (2003)109–116.[258] W. Völkl, D.J. Sullivan, Foraging behaviour, host <strong>plant</strong> and hostlocation in the aphid hyperparasitoid Euneura augarus, Entomol.Exp. Appl. 97 (2000) 47–56.[259] R.M.P. van Poecke, M. Dicke, Indirect defence of <strong>plant</strong>s againstherbivores: using Arabidopsis thaliana as a model <strong>plant</strong>, Plant Biol.6 (2004) 387–401.[260] R. Karban, Fine-scale adaptation of herbivorous thrips to individualhost <strong>plant</strong>s, Nature 340 (1989) 60–61.[261] J.D. Fry, Evolutionary adaptation to host <strong>plant</strong>s in a laboratorypopulation of the phytophagous mite Tetranychus urticae Koch,Oecologia 81 (1989) 559–565.[262] A.A. Agrawal, Host-range evolution: adaptation and trade-offs infitness of mites on alternative hosts, Ecology 81 (2000) 500–508.[263] S.S. Duffey, Sequestration of <strong>plant</strong> natural-products by insects,Annu. Rev. Entomol. 25 (1980) 447–477.[264] R. Nishida, Sequestration of defensive substances from <strong>plant</strong>s byLepidoptera, Annu. Rev. Entomol. 47 (2002) 57–92.[265] D.E. Dussourd, T. Eisner, Vein-cutting behavior insect counterployto the latex defense of <strong>plant</strong>s, Science 237 (1987) 898–901.[266] D.E. Dussourd, R.F. Denno, Deactivation of <strong>plant</strong> defense —correspondence between insect behavior and secretory canalarchitecture, Ecology 72 (1991) 1383–1396.[267] I.T. Baldwin, An ecologically motivated analysis of <strong>plant</strong>–herbivore interactions in native tobacco, Plant Physiol. 127(2001) 1449–1458.[268] I.T. Baldwin, C.A. Preston, The eco-physiological complexityof <strong>plant</strong> responses to insect herbivores, Planta 208 (1999)137–145.[269] R.E. Gary, W.A. Foster, Anopheles gambiae feeding and survival onhoneydew and extra-floral nectar of peridomestic <strong>plant</strong>s, Med. Vet.Entomol. 18 (2004) 102–107.[270] D. Gnanvossou, R. Hanna, M. Dicke, S.J. Yaninek, Attraction of thepredatory mites Typhlodromalus manihoti and Typhlodromalus aripoto cassava <strong>plant</strong>s infested by cassava green mite, Entomol. Exp.Appl. 101 (2001) 291–298.[271] S. Colazza, J.S. McElfresh, J.G. Millar, Identification of volatilesynomones, <strong>induced</strong> by Nezara viridula feeding and oviposition onbean spp., that attract the egg parasitoid Trissolcus basalis, J. Chem.Ecol. 30 (2004) 945–964.[272] J. Figier, Fine structure in extrafloral nectary of Vicia faba L., Planta98 (1971) 31–49.
G. Arimura et al. / Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 1734 (2005) 91–111 111[273] J. Kuo, J.S. Pate, The extrafloral nectaries of cowpea (Vignaunguiculata (L.) Walp.): I. Morphology anatomy and fine structure,Planta 166 (1985) 15–27.[274] C.E.M. van den Boom, T.A. van Beek, M.A. Posthumus, A. deGroot, M. Dicke, Qualitative and quantitative variation amongvolatile profiles <strong>induced</strong> by Tetranychus urticae feeding on <strong>plant</strong>sfrom various families, J. Chem. Ecol. 30 (2004) 69–89.[275] T.M. Bezemer, R. Wagenaar, N.M. van Dam, W.H. van der Putten,F.L. W7ckers, Above- and below-ground terpenoid aldehydeinduction in cotton, Gossypium herbaceum, following root and leafinjury, J. Chem. Ecol. 30 (2004) 53–67.[276] J.H. Loughrin, A. Manukian, R.R. Heath, J.H. Tumlinson, Volatilesemitted by different cotton varieties damaged by feeding beetarmyworm larvae, J. Chem. Ecol. 21 (1995) 1217–1227.[277] P.J. Landolt, Effects of host <strong>plant</strong> leaf damage on cabbagelooper moth attraction and oviposition, Entomol. Exp. Appl. 67(1993) 79–85.[278] P.J. McCall, T.C.J. Turlings, J. Loughrin, A.T. Proveaux, J.H.Tumlinson, <strong>Herbivore</strong>-<strong>induced</strong> volatile emissions from cotton(Gossypium hirsutum L.) seedlings, J. Chem. Ecol. 20 (1994)3039–3050.[279] D. Tilman, Cherries, ants and tent caterpillars — timing of nectarproduction in relation to susceptibility of caterpillars to ant predation,Ecology 59 (1978) 686–692.[280] J.D. Curtis, N.R. Lersten, Morphology seasonal variation andfunction of resin glands on buds and leaves of Populus deltoidesSalicaceae, Am. J. Bot. 61 (1974) 835–845.[281] W. Trelease, The foliar nectar gland of Populus, Bot. Gaz. 6 (1881)284–290.[282] D.D. Schmidt, A. Kessler, D. Kessler, S. Schmidt, M. Lim, K. Gase,I.T. Baldwin, Solanum nigrum: a model ecological expressionsystem and its tools, Mol. Ecol. 13 (2004) 981–995.[283] K.H. Keeler, Species with extrafloral nectaries in a temperate flora(Nebraska), Prairie Nat. 11 (1979) 33–38.
Change language