Visualize and interpret the geometry, heterogeneity and lateral ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Figure 3.1: This figure illustrates the photo interpretation and the associated log takenat Lyngefjellet south. (A) A log collected by Roger I. Johansen, Anne Mari Østvedt-Gahzi and Atle Mørk during the 1995 expedition to Hopen. (B) A photo of Lyngefjelletsouth. (C) Interpretation of the photo shown in B, with the aim of finding the thicknessof Hopen member.20
Figure 3.2: This photo and drawing illustrates the interpretation of Iversenfjellet. (A) Aphoto Iversenfjellet, situated at the southernmost tip of Hopen. (B) Interpretation of thephoto shown in A.21
Page 1: Visualize and interpret the geometr
Page 5 and 6: SammendragEn digital 3D-modell av H
Page 7: 4.2.3 Channel body 8 (SW of Lyngefj
Page 10 and 11: Secondly, I wish to thank my co-sup
Page 12 and 13: 1.3 Regional geological settingThe
Page 14 and 15: The Triassic of Svalbard consists o
Page 16 and 17: Geerdalen Formation is overlain by
Page 18 and 19: 1.5 Previous work at HopenThe Swedi
Page 21 and 22: 2. MethodsThe work of this thesis i
Page 23 and 24: 2.2 PhotoModeler-modelThe program P
Page 25 and 26: 2.3 Sources of errorThere are no kn
Page 27: 3. Lateral distribution of possible
Page 31 and 32: 3.2 Lateral distribution of Slottet
Page 33 and 34: Hopen member and the top of the mou
Page 35 and 36: 4. Channel bodiesIn this chapter ob
Page 37 and 38: 4.1.1 Channel body 1 (Northern chan
Page 39 and 40: Figure 4.2: Photos and illustration
Page 41 and 42: 4.1.2 Channel body 2 (Binnedalen)Ch
Page 43 and 44: Figure 4.4: This figure illustrates
Page 45 and 46: (1) DiscussionFacies occurring in t
Page 51 and 52: 4.1.4 Channel Body 4 (Johan Hjortfj
Page 53 and 54: Figure 4.10: Photos and illustratio
Page 55 and 56: The log shows that the channel body
Page 57 and 58: 4.2.1 Channel body 5 (SW of Nørste
Page 59 and 60: (1) DiscussionOne of the interestin
Page 61 and 62: Another explanation of the apparent
Page 63 and 64: Figure 4.14: This figure illustrate
Page 65 and 66: 4.2.4 Channel body 9 (Blåfjellet,
Page 67 and 68: Figure 4.16: Illustrates Channel bo
Page 69 and 70: The outcrop orientations and/or a n
Page 71 and 72: Unfortunately the stratigraphic int
Page 73 and 74: Figure 4.22: An illustration of the
Page 75 and 76: 2006). Flaser bedding is characteri
Page 77 and 78: elow the stratigraphical level of C
Page 79 and 80:
indications on the logs from the st
Page 81 and 82:
Figure 4.27: This figure illustrate
Page 83 and 84:
Figure 4.28: This Figure illustrate
Page 85 and 86:
is perhaps the best indication of a
Page 87 and 88:
4.31: This figure illustrates the w
Page 89 and 90:
Figure 4.32:Interpretation offault
Page 91 and 92:
4.3.1 Channel body 15 (NW of Braast
Page 93 and 94:
4.3.2 Channel body 16 (Blåfjellet
Page 95 and 96:
4.3.3 Channel body 17 (Djupskaret)C
Page 98 and 99:
Figure 4.36: This figureillustrates
Page 101 and 102:
5. Discussion5.1 Map relevant featu
Page 103 and 104:
Geerdalen Formation of no more than
Page 105 and 106:
ase of Hopen member. Going further
Page 107 and 108:
6. Conclusions18 channel bodies are
Page 109 and 110:
ReferencesAinsworth, R. B., Vakarel
Page 111:
Knarud, R. 1980. En sedimentologisk
Page 114 and 115:
AppendixAppendix 1: The measured se
Page 116 and 117:
108
Page 118 and 119:
Appendix 2: Legend of the measured
Page 120 and 121:
Appendix 4: Illustrations of the Ph
Page 122:
Figure 6: Illustration of the Photo
show all

Visualize and interpret the geometry, heterogeneity and lateral ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?