Visualize and interpret the geometry, heterogeneity and lateral ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Figure 4.36: This figureillustrates Channel body18. (A) An overviewphoto of area whereChannel body 18 issituated.(B) Interpretation of thephoto shown in A. (C) Aclose up photo ofChannel body 18 on thesouthern side of thefault. (D) Interpretationof photo C. (E) A closeup photo of the Channelbody 18 on the northernside of the fault.(F) Interpretation of thephoto shown in E.90
(1) DiscussionAs shown in Table 4.3, it is only medium probability for this being an actual channel body.This is because there is no associated log which can establish what kind of environment thestratigraphical interval of this channel body was deposited in and one cannot see any clearpinch outs either, confirming that it is a channel body. The reasons for why this can be achannel body is that one can see that some layers stopping towards the channel body and onecan possibly see that the layer stopping against the channel body on the southern side of thefault, being visible again towards the end of the channel body on the northern side of the fault(Figure 4.36 A, C and E). Another reason for interpreting this as a channel body is its place inthe stratigraphical record. 50 meters below the Hopen member are interpreted as a delta plainenvironment on the logs collected at the island (See Chapter 5: Discussion). The most likelysituation for finding sandstone unit of this size on a delta plain is if it is a distributary channel.Because the interdistributary areas are less sandy, and commonly contain a series of relativelythin, stacked coarsening- and fining- upwards facies successions, which are usually less thanten meters thick (Bhattacharya, 2006) and not sandstone units up to 30 meters thick.91
Page 1:
Visualize and interpret the geometr
Page 5 and 6:
SammendragEn digital 3D-modell av H
Page 7:
4.2.3 Channel body 8 (SW of Lyngefj
Page 10 and 11:
Secondly, I wish to thank my co-sup
Page 12 and 13:
1.3 Regional geological settingThe
Page 14 and 15:
The Triassic of Svalbard consists o
Page 16 and 17:
Geerdalen Formation is overlain by
Page 18 and 19:
1.5 Previous work at HopenThe Swedi
Page 21 and 22:
2. MethodsThe work of this thesis i
Page 23 and 24:
2.2 PhotoModeler-modelThe program P
Page 25 and 26:
2.3 Sources of errorThere are no kn
Page 27 and 28:
3. Lateral distribution of possible
Page 29 and 30:
Figure 3.2: This photo and drawing
Page 31 and 32:
3.2 Lateral distribution of Slottet
Page 33 and 34:
Hopen member and the top of the mou
Page 35 and 36:
4. Channel bodiesIn this chapter ob
Page 37 and 38:
4.1.1 Channel body 1 (Northern chan
Page 39 and 40:
Figure 4.2: Photos and illustration
Page 41 and 42:
4.1.2 Channel body 2 (Binnedalen)Ch
Page 43 and 44:
Figure 4.4: This figure illustrates
Page 45 and 46:
(1) DiscussionFacies occurring in t
Page 47 and 48: Figure 4.6: This figure illustrates
Page 49 and 50: Figure 4.7: This figure illustrates
Page 51 and 52: 4.1.4 Channel Body 4 (Johan Hjortfj
Page 53 and 54: Figure 4.10: Photos and illustratio
Page 55 and 56: The log shows that the channel body
Page 57 and 58: 4.2.1 Channel body 5 (SW of Nørste
Page 59 and 60: (1) DiscussionOne of the interestin
Page 61 and 62: Another explanation of the apparent
Page 63 and 64: Figure 4.14: This figure illustrate
Page 65 and 66: 4.2.4 Channel body 9 (Blåfjellet,
Page 67 and 68: Figure 4.16: Illustrates Channel bo
Page 69 and 70: The outcrop orientations and/or a n
Page 71 and 72: Unfortunately the stratigraphic int
Page 73 and 74: Figure 4.22: An illustration of the
Page 75 and 76: 2006). Flaser bedding is characteri
Page 77 and 78: elow the stratigraphical level of C
Page 79 and 80: indications on the logs from the st
Page 81 and 82: Figure 4.27: This figure illustrate
Page 83 and 84: Figure 4.28: This Figure illustrate
Page 85 and 86: is perhaps the best indication of a
Page 87 and 88: 4.31: This figure illustrates the w
Page 89 and 90: Figure 4.32:Interpretation offault
Page 91 and 92: 4.3.1 Channel body 15 (NW of Braast
Page 93 and 94: 4.3.2 Channel body 16 (Blåfjellet
Page 95 and 96: 4.3.3 Channel body 17 (Djupskaret)C
Page 101 and 102: 5. Discussion5.1 Map relevant featu
Page 103 and 104: Geerdalen Formation of no more than
Page 105 and 106: ase of Hopen member. Going further
Page 107 and 108: 6. Conclusions18 channel bodies are
Page 109 and 110: ReferencesAinsworth, R. B., Vakarel
Page 111: Knarud, R. 1980. En sedimentologisk
Page 114 and 115: AppendixAppendix 1: The measured se
Page 116 and 117: 108
Page 118 and 119: Appendix 2: Legend of the measured
Page 120 and 121: Appendix 4: Illustrations of the Ph
Page 122: Figure 6: Illustration of the Photo
show all

Visualize and interpret the geometry, heterogeneity and lateral ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?