The origins of the telescope - DWC - KNAW
The origins of the telescope - DWC - KNAW
The origins of the telescope - DWC - KNAW
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
unproblematic. In 1975 Van Helden summarized <strong>the</strong> remaining problems in<br />
his paper ‘<strong>The</strong> Historical Problem <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Invention <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Telescope.’ Although<br />
<strong>the</strong> archival and printed evidence relating to <strong>the</strong> invention <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>telescope</strong> was<br />
fairly extensive, it remained inadequate in several crucial areas. Moreover, Van<br />
Helden wrote that ‘it varies from <strong>the</strong> unimpeachable to <strong>the</strong> patently false. <strong>The</strong><br />
problem has something for <strong>the</strong> positivist as well as for <strong>the</strong> weaver <strong>of</strong> plausible<br />
<strong>the</strong>ories.’ 5 He concluded – against De Waard – that <strong>the</strong> available evidence<br />
‘does not necessarily commit us to believing that <strong>the</strong> <strong>telescope</strong> was invented<br />
in Italy around 1590.’ 6 But we do not know who invented <strong>the</strong> <strong>telescope</strong>, and<br />
when, because, ‘<strong>the</strong> instrument was <strong>the</strong>re before <strong>the</strong> world knew it.’ 7<br />
In 1977 Van Helden repeated De Waard’s efforts by collecting all <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>n<br />
known sources about early telescopic devices, and he published a translation <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong>se documents, for <strong>the</strong> first time into English. <strong>The</strong> Invention <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Telescope<br />
also contained Van Helden’s own account <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> happenings <strong>of</strong> 1608. He concluded<br />
that <strong>the</strong> Lipperhey letter <strong>of</strong> 25 September 1608 indeed was <strong>the</strong> earliest<br />
traceable ‘undeniable mention <strong>of</strong> a <strong>telescope</strong>,’ but his analysis also demonstrated<br />
<strong>the</strong> extreme complexity <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> process that had led to <strong>the</strong> invention <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
instrument. Van Helden concluded that ‘to award <strong>the</strong> honor <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> invention<br />
to Lipperhey solely on that basis is an exercise in historical positivism.’ 8 Many<br />
o<strong>the</strong>rs had paved <strong>the</strong> path, or had developed <strong>the</strong> instrument fur<strong>the</strong>r, and by<br />
doing so <strong>the</strong>se artisans and scholars eventually had made an optical toy into a<br />
useful instrument for obtaining new knowledge. With Van Helden’s intervention<br />
<strong>the</strong> question shifted from ‘who was <strong>the</strong> first and true inventor <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>telescope</strong>’<br />
to how <strong>the</strong> instrument was developed. <strong>The</strong> reconstruction <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> long<br />
and complex process <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> invention <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>telescope</strong>, and <strong>the</strong> identification<br />
<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> multiple technical, ma<strong>the</strong>matical, and social <strong>origins</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>telescope</strong> is<br />
also <strong>the</strong> aim <strong>of</strong> this book.<br />
<strong>The</strong> editors <strong>of</strong> this volume felt that such a collection was much needed,<br />
because <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> shifts in <strong>the</strong> historiography <strong>of</strong> science and technology in <strong>the</strong><br />
past decades since Van Helden’s seminal <strong>The</strong> Invention <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Telescope, and because<br />
<strong>of</strong> new findings and revisionist accounts on <strong>the</strong> history <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>telescope</strong>,<br />
especially in <strong>the</strong> past two decades (after a long silence following <strong>the</strong> publication<br />
<strong>of</strong> <strong>The</strong> Invention <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Telescope). Most authors responsible for <strong>the</strong> new<br />
perspectives brought to <strong>the</strong> invention <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>telescope</strong> have contributed to this<br />
5 Van Helden, ‘<strong>The</strong> Historical Problem <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Invention <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Telescope’ (1975), 251.<br />
6 Ibidem, 259.<br />
7 Ibidem, 255.<br />
8 Van Helden, ‘<strong>The</strong> Invention’ (1977), 25.<br />
4<br />
introduction