04.12.2012 Views

The origins of the telescope - DWC - KNAW

The origins of the telescope - DWC - KNAW

The origins of the telescope - DWC - KNAW

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

unproblematic. In 1975 Van Helden summarized <strong>the</strong> remaining problems in<br />

his paper ‘<strong>The</strong> Historical Problem <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Invention <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Telescope.’ Although<br />

<strong>the</strong> archival and printed evidence relating to <strong>the</strong> invention <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>telescope</strong> was<br />

fairly extensive, it remained inadequate in several crucial areas. Moreover, Van<br />

Helden wrote that ‘it varies from <strong>the</strong> unimpeachable to <strong>the</strong> patently false. <strong>The</strong><br />

problem has something for <strong>the</strong> positivist as well as for <strong>the</strong> weaver <strong>of</strong> plausible<br />

<strong>the</strong>ories.’ 5 He concluded – against De Waard – that <strong>the</strong> available evidence<br />

‘does not necessarily commit us to believing that <strong>the</strong> <strong>telescope</strong> was invented<br />

in Italy around 1590.’ 6 But we do not know who invented <strong>the</strong> <strong>telescope</strong>, and<br />

when, because, ‘<strong>the</strong> instrument was <strong>the</strong>re before <strong>the</strong> world knew it.’ 7<br />

In 1977 Van Helden repeated De Waard’s efforts by collecting all <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>n<br />

known sources about early telescopic devices, and he published a translation <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong>se documents, for <strong>the</strong> first time into English. <strong>The</strong> Invention <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Telescope<br />

also contained Van Helden’s own account <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> happenings <strong>of</strong> 1608. He concluded<br />

that <strong>the</strong> Lipperhey letter <strong>of</strong> 25 September 1608 indeed was <strong>the</strong> earliest<br />

traceable ‘undeniable mention <strong>of</strong> a <strong>telescope</strong>,’ but his analysis also demonstrated<br />

<strong>the</strong> extreme complexity <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> process that had led to <strong>the</strong> invention <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

instrument. Van Helden concluded that ‘to award <strong>the</strong> honor <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> invention<br />

to Lipperhey solely on that basis is an exercise in historical positivism.’ 8 Many<br />

o<strong>the</strong>rs had paved <strong>the</strong> path, or had developed <strong>the</strong> instrument fur<strong>the</strong>r, and by<br />

doing so <strong>the</strong>se artisans and scholars eventually had made an optical toy into a<br />

useful instrument for obtaining new knowledge. With Van Helden’s intervention<br />

<strong>the</strong> question shifted from ‘who was <strong>the</strong> first and true inventor <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>telescope</strong>’<br />

to how <strong>the</strong> instrument was developed. <strong>The</strong> reconstruction <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> long<br />

and complex process <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> invention <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>telescope</strong>, and <strong>the</strong> identification<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> multiple technical, ma<strong>the</strong>matical, and social <strong>origins</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>telescope</strong> is<br />

also <strong>the</strong> aim <strong>of</strong> this book.<br />

<strong>The</strong> editors <strong>of</strong> this volume felt that such a collection was much needed,<br />

because <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> shifts in <strong>the</strong> historiography <strong>of</strong> science and technology in <strong>the</strong><br />

past decades since Van Helden’s seminal <strong>The</strong> Invention <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Telescope, and because<br />

<strong>of</strong> new findings and revisionist accounts on <strong>the</strong> history <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>telescope</strong>,<br />

especially in <strong>the</strong> past two decades (after a long silence following <strong>the</strong> publication<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>The</strong> Invention <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Telescope). Most authors responsible for <strong>the</strong> new<br />

perspectives brought to <strong>the</strong> invention <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>telescope</strong> have contributed to this<br />

5 Van Helden, ‘<strong>The</strong> Historical Problem <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Invention <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Telescope’ (1975), 251.<br />

6 Ibidem, 259.<br />

7 Ibidem, 255.<br />

8 Van Helden, ‘<strong>The</strong> Invention’ (1977), 25.<br />

4<br />

introduction

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!