13.07.2015 Views

View the pdf - Australian Army

View the pdf - Australian Army

View the pdf - Australian Army

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

30paper if it is multinational and controlled by <strong>the</strong> United Nations, or consists of nationalforces which are no longer directly controlled by <strong>the</strong> contributing nations.In 2004, <strong>the</strong> ICRC announced that it would expand its contacts with <strong>the</strong> PMCindustry, recognising its role in conflict zones. The Red Cross also reaffirmed its stancethat contractors, including armed guards, are civilians entitled to <strong>the</strong> protection ofinternational humanitarian law. 102 In September 2008, <strong>the</strong> ICRC finalised <strong>the</strong> MontreuxDocument on Private Military and Security Companies, also referred to as <strong>the</strong> ‘SwissInitiative’. This initiative was intended to promote respect for international humanitarianlaw, and <strong>the</strong> signatories acknowledged <strong>the</strong>ir duty to control PMC. Australia, <strong>the</strong> UnitedStates and United Kingdom were among <strong>the</strong> original seventeen national signatories. Afur<strong>the</strong>r twenty-four countries have since signed. 103Whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> UN’s legal definition can be strictly applied to today’s PMC in <strong>the</strong>GWOT is debatable—but <strong>the</strong>se PMC have already achieved de facto legal status.PMC generally assert that <strong>the</strong>y perform ei<strong>the</strong>r supporting roles or security functions,meaning that <strong>the</strong>y have no intention of ‘fighting in an armed conflict’. Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore,<strong>the</strong> operations in which <strong>the</strong>y participate carry <strong>the</strong> official sanction of <strong>the</strong> UnitedNations and are <strong>the</strong>refore not ‘a concerted act of violence aimed at overthrowinga government’. Thus, PMC logically assert that <strong>the</strong>y do not fit <strong>the</strong> UN’s definitionof mercenaries. The governments participating in Coalition operations in Iraq andAfghanistan apparently agree with this interpretation as <strong>the</strong>y ei<strong>the</strong>r have contractswith PMC to support <strong>the</strong>ir operations or have allowed <strong>the</strong>ir citizens to be employedby PMC. Indeed, <strong>the</strong> United Nations and its agencies also utilise <strong>the</strong> services of PMC. 104None<strong>the</strong>less, all armed PMC personnel run <strong>the</strong> risk of being regarded as mercenariesif captured—and thus forfeiting <strong>the</strong> legal rights of recognised combatants or noncombatants.102 ‘The ICRC to expand contacts with private military and security companies’, 4 August 2004, accessed 5 January 2010.103 ICRC, Montreux Document on Private Military and Security Companies (also referred to as <strong>the</strong>‘Swiss Initiative’), Bern, 17 September 2008, accessed 5 January 2010.104 The author observed this first hand while serving as a UN observer in East Timor in 2000.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!