17.07.2015 Views

Final Report - Volume 1 - the South Wales Police Federation

Final Report - Volume 1 - the South Wales Police Federation

Final Report - Volume 1 - the South Wales Police Federation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

SummaryNegotiating machinery32 The development of police officer pay negotiating machinery over <strong>the</strong> last century can onlybe described as convoluted. Ra<strong>the</strong>r than being designed, <strong>the</strong> evolution of police officer paynegotiating machinery has been driven by responses to events and crises, such as <strong>the</strong> policestrikes of 1918 and 1919. As a result, <strong>the</strong> police service has ended up with negotiatingmachinery which is costly, cumbersome, bureaucratic and slow, and which has proven itselfpoor at reaching decisions.33 The <strong>Police</strong> Negotiating Board was devised in 1978, in parallel with <strong>the</strong> recommendation ofa formula for <strong>the</strong> automatic uprating of officers’ pay. During <strong>the</strong> years when <strong>the</strong> so-calledEdmund-Davies formula was in operation, <strong>the</strong> PNB worked well. However, from 2006 onwardsit has failed to produce timely negotiated settlements on <strong>the</strong> most material issues. The PNB’sreliance on <strong>the</strong> <strong>Police</strong> Arbitration Tribunal – 17 times between 2000/01 and 2010/11, not evenincluding for <strong>the</strong> recommendations of Part 1 of this review – demonstrates that <strong>the</strong> PNB hasnot achieved its principal objective of reaching agreement through negotiation, and has insteadtoo often turned difficult questions over to a group of independent individuals to decide for<strong>the</strong>m. In effect, <strong>the</strong> police service already has a pay review body, in <strong>the</strong> form of <strong>the</strong> PAT. Butthat review body is ill-equipped to carry out <strong>the</strong> full functions of such an entity.34 I have recommended that an independent pay review body be established for police officers upto <strong>the</strong> rank of chief superintendent. Chief officers’ pay and conditions should be determined by<strong>the</strong> Senior Salaries Review Body.35 For police staff, <strong>the</strong> current arrangements work well and consultees argued for <strong>the</strong>ir retention.However, <strong>the</strong> poor data available on basic management issues in <strong>the</strong> police service is striking.This is especially true for data on police staff. Accordingly, I recommend that <strong>the</strong> <strong>Police</strong> StaffCouncil be funded by its respective police forces so that <strong>the</strong> PSC can conduct much neededdata analysis in this field.36 The principal recommendations concerning <strong>the</strong> negotiating machinery include:• Recommendation 115 – The <strong>Police</strong> Negotiating Board should be abolished and replaced byan independent police officer pay review body by late 2014.• Recommendation 118 – The Senior Salaries Review Body should take responsibilityfor setting <strong>the</strong> pay of Chief Constables, Deputy Chief Constables and Assistant ChiefConstables by 2014.• Recommendation 119 – The <strong>Police</strong> Staff Council should receive approximately £50,000per annum from police forces to fund regular data surveys of <strong>the</strong> remuneration andconditions of police staff.Phasing and next steps37 If accepted, most of my recommendations will require referral by <strong>the</strong> Home Secretary to <strong>the</strong><strong>Police</strong> Negotiating Board, <strong>the</strong> <strong>Police</strong> Advisory Board of England and <strong>Wales</strong>, or <strong>the</strong> <strong>Police</strong> StaffCouncil, as well as to those forces that negotiate police staff pay and conditions outside <strong>the</strong>PSC arrangements.38 Each Chapter of this report contains a recommended phased process for introduction. <strong>Police</strong>officers and staff must be provided with <strong>the</strong> time to absorb change and allow for <strong>the</strong> principlesof reform to bed in. These changes are too important to be rushed, yet too vital to delay.Achieving <strong>the</strong> correct balance will be crucial. Appendix 2 contains a summary of my principalrecommendations and proposals for <strong>the</strong>ir phased implementation over several years.25

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!