17.07.2015 Views

update NewS from dNv to the tANker INduStry No 02 2011 - Hays

update NewS from dNv to the tANker INduStry No 02 2011 - Hays

update NewS from dNv to the tANker INduStry No 02 2011 - Hays

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Intertanko and <strong>the</strong> EEDIEEDI covers <strong>the</strong> industry’s most energyintensivesegments, including oil andgas tankers, bulk carriers, general cargoships, refrigerated cargo carriers andcontainer ships. However, <strong>the</strong> EEDI is notapplicable <strong>to</strong> all ship types or propulsionsystems (such as hybrid or diesel electricengines). IMO has indicated that <strong>the</strong>Marine Environment Protection Committee(MEPC) will consider ship types notcovered by <strong>the</strong> EEDI at future sessions,focusing on <strong>the</strong> most carbon-intensiveship types first.An issue of concern <strong>to</strong> INTERTANKOis <strong>the</strong> four-year waiver provision includedin <strong>the</strong> newly adopted regulations. Thisprovision allows flag states <strong>to</strong> waive <strong>the</strong>2013 implementation date until 2017. JoeAngelo, Intertanko’s Managing Direc<strong>to</strong>r,believes that any regulation must apply <strong>to</strong><strong>the</strong> whole industry equally. “In our view,<strong>the</strong>re should be a level playing field. TheEEDI requirements should apply equally <strong>to</strong>all new ships that are built between 2013and 2017,” he says. “Carving out exceptionsundermines <strong>the</strong> spirit and intent of<strong>the</strong> initiative.”Ano<strong>the</strong>r critical issue <strong>to</strong> INTERTANKOis compliance with <strong>the</strong> EEDI. Reducing <strong>the</strong>design speed on new ships is an easy way <strong>to</strong>comply with <strong>the</strong> EEDI requirements, butINTERTANKO believes that complianceshould be achieved through o<strong>the</strong>r means.“Our position is that compliance shouldfocus on improved hull design, propulsionefficiency and energy optimisation,ra<strong>the</strong>r than predominantly on reduceddesign speeds,” says Mr Angelo. “The EEDIshould not jeopardise or have an adverseeffect on <strong>the</strong> vessel’s safety.”While more work clearly needs <strong>to</strong> bedone, both Mr Westgarth and Mr Angeloagree this is a good start. “For <strong>the</strong> firsttime in our industry’s his<strong>to</strong>ry, ships willhave <strong>to</strong> meet a minimum energy efficiencystandard , and <strong>the</strong>se standards will bestreng<strong>the</strong>ned,” says Mr Westgarth. “It willtake some time before <strong>the</strong> existing globalfleet is replaced by EEDI-compliant vessels,but we are confident that this is <strong>the</strong> rightthing <strong>to</strong> do.” “Our active participation with <strong>the</strong> IMOin <strong>the</strong> development of EEDI for newships is a clear demonstration of ourshared commitment <strong>to</strong> this issue,”says Graham Westgarth, Chairman ofIntertanko.›› Graham Westgarth and Joseph Angelo, Managing Direc<strong>to</strong>r of Intertanko.Pho<strong>to</strong>: DNV/Nina E. RangøyTanker <strong>update</strong> NO. 2 <strong>2011</strong> | 11

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!