05.12.2012 Views

priciples of insecticide use in rice ipm

priciples of insecticide use in rice ipm

priciples of insecticide use in rice ipm

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Resurgence <strong>of</strong> BPH under Field conditions<br />

Insecticides <strong>in</strong> Rice IPM (DRR)<br />

The amount <strong>of</strong> toxicant that comes <strong>in</strong> contact with N. lugens and its predators is <strong>in</strong>fluenced by several<br />

factors. The density <strong>of</strong> the crop canopy <strong>in</strong>creases with age <strong>of</strong> the crop, limit<strong>in</strong>g the spray material reach<strong>in</strong>g<br />

the base <strong>of</strong> the plant, where BPH feeds. Ra<strong>in</strong>fall, which washes the <strong><strong>in</strong>secticide</strong> from the plant, and degree<br />

<strong>of</strong> resistance to <strong><strong>in</strong>secticide</strong>s are additional factors <strong>in</strong>fluenc<strong>in</strong>g BPH resurgence under field conditions<br />

(He<strong>in</strong>richs et al., 1982b). The situation is further complicated beca<strong>use</strong> the <strong><strong>in</strong>secticide</strong> application rates,<br />

application methods, time <strong>of</strong> application and degree <strong>of</strong> varietal resistance could also <strong>in</strong>fluence the level<br />

<strong>of</strong> BPH resurgence (He<strong>in</strong>richs and Mochida, 1983).<br />

Effect <strong>of</strong> Rates <strong>of</strong> Insecticide Application on BPH and its Predators<br />

When foliar sprays <strong>of</strong> methyl parathion, deltamethr<strong>in</strong>, diaz<strong>in</strong>on and carbosulfan (FMC 35001) were applied<br />

at different dosages, higher concentrations <strong>of</strong> carbosulfan <strong>in</strong> general led to greater populations <strong>of</strong> BPH<br />

(He<strong>in</strong>richs et al., 1982 b). Among the three predators <strong>of</strong> BPH (spiders, Microvelia atrol<strong>in</strong>eata Bergoth<br />

and Cyrtorh<strong>in</strong>us lividipennis Reuter), deltamethr<strong>in</strong> was the most toxic to spiders even at low rates;<br />

deltamethr<strong>in</strong> and carbosulfan were toxic to M. atrol<strong>in</strong>eata, while diaz<strong>in</strong>on was less toxic to both spiders<br />

and M. atrol<strong>in</strong>eata. High rates <strong>of</strong> all the <strong><strong>in</strong>secticide</strong>s resulted <strong>in</strong> lowest populations <strong>of</strong> C. lividipennis<br />

(He<strong>in</strong>richs and Mochida, 1983). Krishnaiah and Kalode (1987) observed that <strong><strong>in</strong>secticide</strong>s such as<br />

monocrotophos, phosalone and phosphamidon at recommended concentrations (0.05%) checked BPH<br />

build-up while monocrotophos and phosphamidon at suboptimal concentrations (0.02%) resulted <strong>in</strong><br />

resurgence. Among the other <strong><strong>in</strong>secticide</strong>s deltamethr<strong>in</strong> at recommended concentration (0.01% and<br />

0.005%) recorded highest BPH population whereas methylparathion and fenvalerate exhibited a tendency<br />

towards BPH resurgence. Deltamethr<strong>in</strong> also showed high degree <strong>of</strong> adverse affect on natural enemies<br />

such as mirid bug, C. lividipennis and spiders. S<strong>in</strong>ce, resurgence is a dose dependant phenomenon,<br />

emphasis should be placed on the application <strong>of</strong> correct dosage <strong>of</strong> effective and recommended <strong><strong>in</strong>secticide</strong>s<br />

<strong>in</strong> addition to select<strong>in</strong>g the right <strong><strong>in</strong>secticide</strong> (Krishnaiah and Kalode, 1987).<br />

Number, time and Method <strong>of</strong> <strong><strong>in</strong>secticide</strong> Application and Pest Resurgence<br />

In the tropics, the most popular method <strong>of</strong> <strong><strong>in</strong>secticide</strong> application is by foliar spray<strong>in</strong>g. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to<br />

He<strong>in</strong>richs et al., (1982a} application <strong>of</strong> <strong><strong>in</strong>secticide</strong>s through foliar spray<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>duces high degree <strong>of</strong> BPH<br />

resurgence when compared to application as root zone placement, and as broadcast<strong>in</strong>g. Under field<br />

conditions, dust formulations control BPH, but foliar spray<strong>in</strong>g with <strong><strong>in</strong>secticide</strong>s results <strong>in</strong> resurgence<br />

(Raman, 1981). Application <strong>of</strong> granular gamma HCH, diaz<strong>in</strong>on, Sevidol (Chelliah and He<strong>in</strong>richs, 1979),<br />

mephospholan, and qu<strong>in</strong>alphos (Varadarajan et al., 1977) was observed to ca<strong>use</strong> BPH resurgence.<br />

Resurgence was also <strong>in</strong>fluenced by the time <strong>of</strong> application. Sprays <strong>of</strong> methyl parthion and deltamethr<strong>in</strong><br />

applied at 50 and 65 days after transplant<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>duced resurgence, while earlier applications had little<br />

effect. Further, plots receiv<strong>in</strong>g only one application had low BPH population as compared to those<br />

sprayed 2, 3 or 4 times (He<strong>in</strong>richs and Mochida, 1983).<br />

81

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!