Pearson-Exploring-Effective-Pedagogy-in-Primary-Schools

Recommendations

Info

Rutter, M., Maughan, B., Mortimore, P. & Ouston, J. (1979). Fifteen Thousand Hours: SecondarySchools and their Effects on Children. London: Open Books.Sammons, P. (1996). Complexities in the judgement of school effectiveness. Educational Researchand Evaluation, 2: 113-149.Sammons, P. (1999). School Effectiveness: Coming of age in the 21st Century. Lisse: Swets &Zeitlinger.Sammons, P., Siraj-Blatchford, I., Sylva, K., Melhuish, E., Taggart, B. & Elliot, K. (2005). Investigating theEffects of Pre-school Provision: Using mixed methods in the EPPE research. InternationalJournal of Social Research Methodology, 8(3): 207-224.Sammons, P., Taggart, B., Sylva, K., Melhuish, E.C., Siraj-Blatchford, I., Barreau, S. & Manni, L. (2006).The Effective Pre-School and Primary Education 3-11 Project (EPPE 3-11): Variations in Teacherand Pupil Behaviours in Year 5 Classes. London: DfES / Institute of Education, University ofLondon.Sammons, P., Sylva, K., Melhuish, E., Siraj-Blatchford, I., Taggart, B., Grabbe, Y, & Barreau, S. (2007a).The Effective Pre-School and Primary Education 3-11 Project (EPPE 3-11): Influences on Children’sAttainment and Progress in Key Stage 2: Cognitive Outcomes in Year 5. London: DfES / Institute ofEducation, University of London.Sammons, P., Sylva, K., Melhuish, E., Siraj-Blatchford, I., Taggart, B., Barreau, S. & Grabbe, Y, (2007b).The Effective Pre-School and Primary Education 3-11 Project (EPPE 3-11): Influences on Children’sDevelopment and Progress in Key Stage 2: Social/ behavioural outcomes in Year 5. London: DfES /Institute of Education, University of London.Sammons, P., Sylva, K., Melhuish, E.C., Siraj-Blatchford, I., Taggart, B., Barreau, S. & Grabbe, Y.(2007c). The Influence of School and Teaching Quality on Children’s Progress in Primary School.Nottingham: DCSF / Institute of Education, University of London.Sammons, P., Sylva, K., Melhuish, E., Siraj-Blatchford, I., Taggart, B. & Hunt, S. (2008a). The EffectivePre-School and Primary Education 3-11 Project (EPPE 3-11): Influences on Children’s Attainmentand Progress in Key Stage 2: Cognitive Outcomes in Year 6 (DCSF Ref DCSF- RR048). London:DCSF Publications Nottingham.Sammons, P., Sylva, K., Melhuish, E.C., Siraj-Blatchford, I., Taggart, B. & Jelicic, H. (2008b). TheEffective Pre-School and Primary Education 3-11 Project (EPPE 3-11): Influences on Children’sAttainment and Progress in Key Stage 2: Social/behavioural outcomes in Year 6. London: DCSF /Institute of Education, University of London.48 | Exploring Effective Pedagogy in Primary Schools
Sammons, P., Sylva, K., Melhuish, E., Siraj-Blatchford, I., Taggart, B., Toth, K., Draghici, D. & Smees, R.(2011). Effective Pre-School, Primary and Secondary Education 3-14 Project (EPPSE 3-14):Influences on Students’ Attainment and Progress in Key Stage 3: Academic Outcomes in English,Maths and Science in Year 9. London: Institute of Education/Department for Education.Sargent, C., Foot, E., Houghton, E. & O’Donnell, S. (2013). International Review of Curriculum andAssessment Frameworks Internet Archive (INCA) Comparative Tables. Slough: NationalFoundation for Educational ResearchScheerens, J. (1992). Effecting schooling: Research, theory and practice. London: Cassell.Scheerens, J. & Bosker, R. J. (1997). The foundations of educational effectiveness. Oxford: Pergamon.Shulman, L. S. (2004). The Wisdom of Practice – Essays on Teaching, Learning and Learning to Teach.San Francisco: Jossey Bass.Simon, B. (1999). Why no pedagogy in England? In Leach, J. & Moon, B. (Eds.), Learners andPedagogy. London: Chapman.Siraj-Blatchford, I., Sylva, K., Muttock, S., Gilden, R. & Bell, D. (2002). Researching Effective Pedagogyin the Early Years (REPEY). London: DfES / Institute of Education.Siraj-Blatchford, I., Sylva, K., Taggart, B., Sammons, P., Melhuish, E.C. & Elliot, K. (2003). The EffectiveProvision of Pre-School Education (EPPE) Project: Technical Paper 10 - Intensive Case Studies ofPractice across the Foundation Stage. London: DfES / Institute of Education.Siraj-Blatchford, I., Sammons, P., Taggart, B., Sylva, K. & Melhuish, E. (2006). Educational Researchand Evidence-Based Policy: The Mixed-method Approach of the EPPE Project. Evaluation ofResearch in Education, 19(2): 63-82.Siraj-Blatchford, I., Taggart, B., Sylva, K. Sammons, P. & Melhuish, E. (2008). Towards thetransformation of practice in early childhood education: The Effective Provision of Pre-schoolEducation (EPPE) Project. Cambridge Journal of Education, 38(1): 23-36.Siraj-Blatchford, I., Shepherd, D.-L., Melhuish, E., Taggart, B., Sammons, P. & Sylva, K. (2011).Effective Primary Pedagogical Strategies in English and Mathematics in Key Stage 2: A study ofYear 5 classroom practice from the EPPSE longitudinal study (RR 129). London: Department forEducation.Stipek, D. (1999). Instructional Environment Observation Scale. University of California: MacArthurPathways through Middle Childhood Network.Stoll, L. & Fink, D. (1996). Changing our Schools: Linking School Effectiveness and SchoolImprovement. Buckingham: Open University.Evidence from Research | 49
Page 1 and 2:
Exploring Effective Pedagogy inPrim
Page 3 and 4:
About the AuthorsProfessor Iram Sir
Page 5 and 6:
ContentsForeword - by Dylan WiliamE
Page 7 and 8:
That is why the Effective Pre-Schoo
Page 9 and 10:
Executive SummaryBackgroundThis pub
Page 11 and 12: some there was incomplete data; onl
Page 13 and 14: Personalised teaching and learningT
Page 15 and 16: 1Pedagogy: TheInternational Perspec
Page 17 and 18: The work of SER scholars provided p
Page 19 and 20: The TIMSS study is very clear about
Page 21 and 22: Given that pedagogy is fundamentall
Page 23 and 24: The methodsThe EPPSE study is uniqu
Page 25 and 26: The case studies of practice were c
Page 27 and 28: The full findings of this associate
Page 29 and 30: Group C: Poor Schools: Low academic
Page 31 and 32: The initial analyses of the observe
Page 33 and 34: • Routines are very efficient - h
Page 35 and 36: 3. HomeworkThe EPPSE 3-14 study sho
Page 37 and 38: • Supportive approach with high e
Page 39 and 40: • Only one very minor disagreemen
Page 41 and 42: Children in highly effective school
Page 43 and 44: • Teacher is very aware of childr
Page 45 and 46: Another example demonstrates clear
Page 47 and 48: 10. Assessment for Learning (AfL)As
Page 49 and 50: She was able to offer a little feed
Page 51 and 52: It is highly likely that good organ
Page 53 and 54: Also, although the large amounts of
Page 55 and 56: All of the above could be researche
Page 57 and 58: Claxton, G. & Carr, M. (2004). A Fr
Page 59 and 60: Gorard, S. (2010b). Serious doubts
Page 61: OECD Organisation for Economic Co-o
Page 65 and 66: Veenam, S., Denessen, E., van den A
Page 67 and 68: Child social behaviour - Social int
Page 69 and 70: Appendix 2: Complete List of School
Page 71 and 72: Appendix 2: Complete List of School
show all

Pearson-Exploring-Effective-Pedagogy-in-Primary-Schools

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?