ForewordAs the world gets more and more complex, as more and more jobs are automated or areundertaken <strong>in</strong> countries with lower labour costs, higher educational achievement is <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>glybecom<strong>in</strong>g a necessity rather than an optional extra. Higher achievement for all students is thekey to every country’s future prosperity, and, for <strong>in</strong>dividuals, it is becom<strong>in</strong>g essential just to makesense of the world, let alone to f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g fulfill<strong>in</strong>g work.Of course this was realised by some many years ago. In 1975, Jan T<strong>in</strong>bergen, w<strong>in</strong>ner of the 1969Nobel Memorial Prize for Economics, spoke of “a race between education and technology”and for at least 40 years, many people have been try<strong>in</strong>g to understand the factors that areassociated with successful outcomes for school<strong>in</strong>g. The first generation of school effectivenessresearch focused on the characteristics of effective schools, but of course for some schools theirsuccess is more to do with the students they recruit than the quality of the education be<strong>in</strong>gprovided. This was a key argument of the second generation of school effectiveness researchers,who po<strong>in</strong>ted out that demographic factors account for most of the variation <strong>in</strong> studentachievement <strong>in</strong> most countries. However, <strong>in</strong> recent years, there has been a grow<strong>in</strong>g consensusthat successful outcomes for school students depend, more than anyth<strong>in</strong>g else, on what happens<strong>in</strong>side classrooms. School leadership is important, but mostly because effective leaders createthe circumstances <strong>in</strong> which teachers cont<strong>in</strong>ue to learn and develop.This new third generation of school effectiveness research looks more at the “how” than the“what” of school improvement. How is it that some schools are more effective <strong>in</strong> educat<strong>in</strong>gtheir students than other schools that are similar <strong>in</strong> terms of resources, <strong>in</strong>take and so on? Thedifficulty with such research is that it is very difficult to do well. Large-scale studies can lookat <strong>in</strong>puts and outputs, and <strong>in</strong> England the quality of the data available on student achievementmeans that we can carry out these analyses for the whole national cohort. The problem is thatdata on the processes of education <strong>in</strong> schools at the national level is rather th<strong>in</strong>, and, worse,seems to expla<strong>in</strong> very little.At the other extreme, we have many high-quality, small-scale, almost “ethnographic” studies,which provide detailed <strong>in</strong>formation about a small number of classrooms, and which can suggestfactors that might be important, but of course generalis<strong>in</strong>g from these small samples is risky.i | <strong>Explor<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Effective</strong> <strong>Pedagogy</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Primary</strong> <strong>Schools</strong>
That is why the <strong>Effective</strong> Pre-School, <strong>Primary</strong> and Secondary Education (EPPSE) study is soimportant. It is a large-scale and ma<strong>in</strong>ly quantitative study, follow<strong>in</strong>g a cohort of over 3,000students from before they enrolled <strong>in</strong> school through to the end of compulsory education, us<strong>in</strong>gmeasures of student achievement to identify the schools <strong>in</strong> which students make most progress.However, the study complements the quantitative analysis with hundreds of hours of classroomobservation to characterise the most effective practices <strong>in</strong> classrooms. Moreover, becausethe study uses well-validated observation methods, we can be sure that the observations arenot subjective impressions but robust evidence of what is happen<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> successful, and not sosuccessful, classrooms. F<strong>in</strong>ally, because the research has been conducted by some of the world’sleaders <strong>in</strong> this area of research, we can trust their f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs.The result is an extraord<strong>in</strong>ary compendium of what works best <strong>in</strong> help<strong>in</strong>g children learn <strong>in</strong>classrooms, synthesised <strong>in</strong>to 11 easily understood strategies, and illum<strong>in</strong>ated by copious extractsfrom the actual fieldwork notes of those <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> the research. Everyone who wants tounderstand, and improve, primary school classrooms needs to read, and act on, this report.Dylan WiliamEmeritus Professor of Educational Assessment, Institute of Education, University of LondonEvidence from Research | ii
- Page 1 and 2: Exploring Effective Pedagogy inPrim
- Page 3 and 4: About the AuthorsProfessor Iram Sir
- Page 5: ContentsForeword - by Dylan WiliamE
- Page 9 and 10: Executive SummaryBackgroundThis pub
- Page 11 and 12: some there was incomplete data; onl
- Page 13 and 14: Personalised teaching and learningT
- Page 15 and 16: 1Pedagogy: TheInternational Perspec
- Page 17 and 18: The work of SER scholars provided p
- Page 19 and 20: The TIMSS study is very clear about
- Page 21 and 22: Given that pedagogy is fundamentall
- Page 23 and 24: The methodsThe EPPSE study is uniqu
- Page 25 and 26: The case studies of practice were c
- Page 27 and 28: The full findings of this associate
- Page 29 and 30: Group C: Poor Schools: Low academic
- Page 31 and 32: The initial analyses of the observe
- Page 33 and 34: • Routines are very efficient - h
- Page 35 and 36: 3. HomeworkThe EPPSE 3-14 study sho
- Page 37 and 38: • Supportive approach with high e
- Page 39 and 40: • Only one very minor disagreemen
- Page 41 and 42: Children in highly effective school
- Page 43 and 44: • Teacher is very aware of childr
- Page 45 and 46: Another example demonstrates clear
- Page 47 and 48: 10. Assessment for Learning (AfL)As
- Page 49 and 50: She was able to offer a little feed
- Page 51 and 52: It is highly likely that good organ
- Page 53 and 54: Also, although the large amounts of
- Page 55 and 56: All of the above could be researche
- Page 57 and 58:
Claxton, G. & Carr, M. (2004). A Fr
- Page 59 and 60:
Gorard, S. (2010b). Serious doubts
- Page 61 and 62:
OECD Organisation for Economic Co-o
- Page 63 and 64:
Sammons, P., Sylva, K., Melhuish, E
- Page 65 and 66:
Veenam, S., Denessen, E., van den A
- Page 67 and 68:
Child social behaviour - Social int
- Page 69 and 70:
Appendix 2: Complete List of School
- Page 71 and 72:
Appendix 2: Complete List of School